Bitcoin in Retirement Accounts Could Be a Good Idea
Trump’s executive order directs the Labor Department to loosen rules on retirement accounts, potentially shifting trillions in savings toward higher-return, but riskier assets like bitcoin.

Americans' 401(k)s add up to around $10 trillion total—equivalent to about 10 percent of all publicly listed stocks and bonds in the U.S., and almost twice what the federal government spends in a year. It's no surprise, then, that every industry or special interest wants a piece of that juicy retirement money.
With aging populations and a heavier emphasis on saving for retirement in the U.S., getting access to largely passive pension money is the wet dream of every asset manager, financial adviser, or industry mergers and acquisitions consultant.
On August 7, President Donald Trump issued an executive order to allow "private equity, real estate, cryptocurrency and other alternative assets in 401(k)s," reported Bloomberg, making it easier for some 80 million Americans to hold nonstandard assets in their tax-deferred retirement plans.
A 401(k) diverts a portion of an employee's wages, often matched by the employer, into a specific account where the employee can choose which assets are held and in what allocation—often mutual funds, broad stock market exchange-traded funds (ETFs), or high-yield bond portfolios. The tax-deferred account is efficient for everyone involved: The employee can save for retirement using pretax money, and the employer has a tax incentive to match the contribution.
According to Tephra Digital, an investment firm that focuses on digital assets, only a few U.S. asset managers allow unrestricted access to bitcoin ETFs. Trump's executive order tasks the Department of Labor with updating guidance and minimum standards for appropriate investment access in retirement accounts "subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974," reported Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Allison McNeely for Bloomberg.
Bitcoin, real estate—including real estate investment trusts—and private equity are all asset classes that have outperformed the S&P 500.
Since Fidelity experimented with allowing bitcoin in 401(k)s over three years ago, and the idea first made noise in the personal finance world, bitcoin has returned 215 percent—compared to about 54 percent for the S&P 500. Even the Magnificent Seven stocks, which constitute the bulk of positive returns in the S&P 500, are only up about 150 percent since then.
Private equity has usually posted a couple of percentage points of excess returns compared to public markets, so it's no surprise that pension fund managers are keen to have this asset class in their portfolios, or those of their clients.
Over almost any time period, bitcoin is the best-performing asset in the world—the longer the comparison period, the more favorably it ranks. Thus, holding it in the longest-term pools of capital is efficient and beneficial. Universities, including Brown University, Emory University, Harvard University, and the University of Austin, figured this out years ago, adding bitcoin to their endowment portfolios. Others, including the University of Pennsylvania and the University of California, Berkeley, have also received large bitcoin donations.
It is reasonable to be skeptical of Trump and cryptocurrency, especially in light of his self-enriching schemes. The $Trump and $Melania memecoins, conveniently launched days before his inauguration, and the Trump family's involvement in World Liberty Financial both raise valid concerns about conflicts of interest while allowing him (and his family) to profit from his presidential influence with minimal regulatory oversight. But the executive order is still a clever proposal. Many Americans face uncertain retirement prospects, as public programs are unlikely to be there for them in old age. Their meager savings, inside and outside retirement accounts, are often too small to support their accustomed lifestyles. Holding assets with higher returns is one way out of this conundrum.
To critics, the idea smells like yet more insider dealing, coupled with suspicious off-loading of risks to ordinary Americans who are just trying to save for retirement. But like it or not, retirement money is passively finding its way into bitcoin anyway.
Tesla, which has held bitcoin since 2021, has been part of the S&P 500 index for years. Coinbase, the cryptocurrency exchange, recently committed to building a larger bitcoin stack and joined the S&P 500 in May. Block, the payment processing company behind Square and Cash App, is the 12th-largest corporate holder of bitcoin and joined the S&P 500 last month.
The bitcoin behemoth Strategy, led by Michael Saylor, is by far the largest corporate holder of bitcoin and will quite likely join the S&P 500 in the near future. Since the firm's explicit business model these days is to hoover up funds from the traditional financial market to buy more bitcoin, any passive flow from retirement funds will end up in bitcoin, via the wrapper of the company's shares.
Whether you like bitcoin or not, and even though Trump's dealings seem self-serving and catering to special interests, bitcoin is part of America's financial present and future. Making it easier to hold in retirement accounts just strips out the middleman.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nah. Just need to revamp Social Security and the collectivists using government Top Men will take care of everything.
Bitcoin has been very good to me and I expect that to continue. Government, institutional and retail investors have made it a hedge against overpriced equities and fiat bonds. The ability for people to trade it inside their tax advantaged accounts will only enhance it's value. And probably more importantly bitcoin is a bona fide alternate currency which we have not seen in the US since the stranglehold of the central bank and the confiscation of gold. It's likely that in the next couple decades people will actually be able to choose their preferred medium of exchange.
I think it will create a massive bubble in crypto. Not excited for when it pops.
Well if you're worried about bubbles you might want to take a hard look at the USD.
You're not wrong. I just see more risk involved when the wolf of wall street tosses granny's retirement at bitcoin. It's a little different when mostly individuals are directly trading it.
Bitcoin is a speculative asset, and as such it has been very lucrative for me. However, I would argue that this speculative attraction makes it less desirable as a currency. People want currency that has stable value. Inflato bucks suck hard, but depreciating currency also has its downsides. The fact that we have little experience with the latter doesn't mean they are good.
Just ask yourself- is Bitcoin in its current existence a currency you could see supporting a solar-system-wide economy 100 years from now? The answer is a hard no. Everything including the block chain and consensus algorithm are GREAT but there is no way we can run a future society on a hard cap of 21 Million coins that gets smaller and smaller every year as people lose their keys and other disasters remove coins from the market.
The alternative in 100 years? Dollars? Rubbles? Yuans? Loonies? HAHAHA! They'll be trading in Martian coin which will be minted from rare earth metals. Seriously, prior to the FED, deflation was the norm. The money actually became more valuable to the holder. That's kind of the point of hard money. People already trade in fractions of every currency in the world and always have. As with all things, rarity makes Bitcoin more valuable.
On the contrary, we have millennia of experience with deflating currencies. For most of human history, that's what currencies did. Inflation only became "normal" in the past century or so.
Note: some currencies did depreciate back in historical times but that was usually the result of currency adulteration by the issuing government, not depreciation of the actual asset.
That said, you raise some interesting questions about the new problems of a currency that can be lost and never replenished. The smallest theoretical bitcoin transaction is 1 satoshi or 1*10^-8 bitcoin. At current value, 1 satoshi is about 1/10th of 1 cent - too small to be worrisome. But that number will likely continue to rise - and assuming it continues to outpace inflation, will eventually get to the point where fractional trades into reasonable amounts are not possible.
Fair enough. I won't be around to see that but valid point.
Enjoy your retirement accounts while you can. A wealth tax is inevitable. The only question is which party gets it passed. And as we have all seen, the GOP likes taxes just as much as the left. So if Trump says a wealth tax is a great idea, his followers will defend it just like they defend import taxes. Because their dearth of principles requires that they judge everything based upon who, what.
Gotta love someone so obsessed with trump that they can turn a Wealth tax into something to criticize Orange Man for. That takes a real special level of obsession.
If Democrats propose a wealth tax you will oppose it. If Trump proposes a wealth tax you will defend it. Because you, like all Trump defenders, judge everything based upon who not what. Principles shminciples. Trump is the head of your church and Babbitt is the martyr you pray to every night. Only difference between you and a browncoats is that they wore red armbands and you wear a red hat.
Poor, pour sarc.
I could see that happening. Republicans and Democrats share a love of spending other people's money and the billionaire tax has supporters on both sides of the aisle.
Could be a good idea, could be a bad idea.
That depends on it going up, or down.
But since it does not really exist, has no tangible backing, and is only as valuable as the buyer says it is, maybe it is more like dollars than an actual investment.
>Bitcoin in Retirement Accounts Could Be a Good Idea
A highly volatile 'asset', inherently deflationary, crazy long transaction times, huge transaction fees, and you can't do anything with it except for stunt purchases of expensive goods - with Silk Road shut down you can't even buy drugs with it.
Sure, Jan.
People should not only be free to put whatever assets they want in their 401k, but should be allowed to withdraw without penalty before they are too old to enjoy it. Not all of us are going to live that long.