Hostile Takeover: Trump Federalizes Law Enforcement and Deploys National Guard in D.C.
Despite an apparent drop in the city’s violent crime, President Donald Trump announced a “public safety emergency” in D.C., deploying 800 of the city’s National Guard and over 450 federal law enforcement officers.

President Donald Trump declared "Liberation Day in D.C." on Monday, announcing a "public safety emergency." The president will place the city's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under federal control and deploy 800 D.C. National Guardsmen to "establish law order and safety" in the city. The announcement came in response to last week's assault and robbery of Edward "Big Balls" Coristine, a former engineer for the Department of Government Efficiency.
Blaming the city's "abject failures of the city's leadership," the president specifically called "no cash bail" policies a disaster and vowed to challenge such policies nationwide, beginning with Chicago. Referring to "slums" and "caravans of mass youth" as he advocated more forceful police tactics, Trump appeared to contradict himself, painting the city's 3,500 officers as insufficient while calling a request for more officers "ridiculous."
The White House also announced that the president signed two executive orders. One authorizes the National Guard in D.C. due to a "crime emergency," including his notification to Congress and Washington, D.C., Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser. The other allows Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to deploy the National Guard in D.C. and coordinate with state governors for additional guardsmen.
As part of the emergency declaration, Attorney General Pam Bondi will take command of the MPD and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) chief Terri Cole will serve as the interim federal commissioner of the MPD. Trump claimed there would be "full seamless integrated cooperation at all levels of law enforcement," with an "overwhelming presence" of officers and FBI agents visible across the district.
Hegseth confirmed that the Trump administration may bring more military forces in, including "other national guard units" and "other special units." Trump also floated the possibility of "servicemembers directly joining the guardsmen."
Trump previously deployed the National Guard to D.C. in 2020, during the George Floyd protests. The detachment included more than 4,500 National Guard members, some of whom came from other states, including Florida, Missouri, Mississippi, and Utah. In June, Trump dispatched the California National Guard to Los Angeles in response to riots and protests against the ongoing immigration raids in the city.
More than 450 federal law enforcement officers from various agencies have already been deployed to "high-traffic D.C. areas and other hotspots" during the weekend, according to USA Today. DEA agents have also been seen patrolling the National Mall.
Under the Home Rule Act of 1973, residents of D.C. elect their mayor and city councilmembers. But Congress still reviews all legislation before it becomes law and controls the city's budget.
The D.C. National Guard, unlike its counterparts in the states, is directly under the control of the president, and Section 740 of the Home Rule Act gives the president the power under "special conditions of an emergency nature" to take control of the MPD. These services cannot extend beyond 48 hours unless the president notifies the chairman and the ranking minority members of the congressional committees that oversee the city. He must make this notification in writing, stating the reason for the extension and the anticipated duration.
While an MPD commander is currently under investigation for allegedly manipulating crime statistics, the data we have from the MPD back up recent reports of crime decreasing nationwide. Data released Monday also indicate a 26 percent decrease in violent crime year over year.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What? With violent crime down? Totally not from cooking books.
https://gellerreport.com/2025/08/d-c-police-commander-suspended-for-deliberately-falsifying-crime-data-to-falsely-show-a-26-drop.html/
But I'm confused. D.C. is federal jurisdiction correct? So how is it a hostile takeover?
It's a white guy taking over. That makes it hostile.
How does it compare to, say, 2019?
DC is, currently, the most violent capital city on Earth. No other one is really close.
Moscow is not close anymore?
No.
Moscow was moved to Idaho some time ago.
Come for the whitewater. Stay for the militias.
Moscow has 12.9 murders per 100,000 people. I've seen other numbers but this was the highest I found anywhere.
DC has 27.4 in 2024. Which was, allegedly, LOWER than 2023.
So we're winning?
Um, Caracas, to name just one in the Western hemisphere with a far higher violent crime rate than D.C.
Because Reason is hostile to Trump.
I am sure crime is really down and the DC police commissioner is just cooking the books for fun. I bet it's a fun hobby. Because there is no way he would be falsifying numbers to make himself look better. That is just crazy talk.
Put aside cooking of the books. You can drop 300lb but still be a fat lard a** if started from 700lb. That's the thing going on here that Reason glossed over with the Orwellian "apparent drop" bit. Or to totally clear the BS ask one question: Is or is not DC crime 3rd World? (Spoiler alert: DC is 3rd World. Reason is allergic to clarity on immigration and crime.
Even darker than that. One of the reports out is that d.c. police were requiring officers to write down felonies to misdemeanors when reporting. They would even refuse to send out supervisors required for felony reporting.
DC has home rule where the non-federal land is ruled by an elected council and mayor.
They are a federal district. That pesky constitution thing you hate dumdum. I mean you even support murder by d.c. police. And if that's not hostile how is arresting criminals?
...unless Congress decides otherwise and ends the pathetic charade.
TFW how Reason suddenly believes the cops when they might contradict Bad Orange Man.
Trump pegged the takeover on DC presenting an overall murder risk higher than Bogota or Mexico City
But while 90% of tourism and the business of government is concentrated within a mile of the Capitol, just 7 people were murdered in central DC last year, versus 170 on the Swamp's periphery-
So there was violence in D.C.
Why so many words to confirm it?
I'm sure you could find a random bathroom with zero crime events to rationalize even more.
I mean their brains are so broken. You can write a perfectly good article about the potential dangers of what Trump is doing without all the misleading stuff.
Why so many writers here have to use hyperbole, non sequiturs and rage about speculation is beyond me.
The new journalistic credo.
Who? What if? When, in the future it could manifest? Where? and How, is Trump to blame? Why, we should be afraid?
This is being done in every liberal run city. In Chitown, they can't get away with it because of:
CWB Chicago - Chicago public safety and crime news
https://cwbchicago.com/
cwbchicago.com
Chicago Crime, Murder & Mayhem | Criminal Infographics | HeyJackass! | Illustrating Chicago Values
https://heyjackass.com/
heyjackass.com
Cooking the books is why the drop on violent crime is “apparent” and not a fact. Violent felonies were routinely reclassified as “felony assault,” a category NOT reported via FBI crime reporting guidelines. Crime stats are smoke and mirrors. Just ask the victims if crime is down.
The violent crime rate in Washington (D)C is abhorrent. The hostile takeover was by the criminals.
Heck, one of Reason’s editors was kidnapped from his wife by a foreign national and is now ostensibly performing sex acts for that man.
Robby is into BDSM?
Can you imagine the cocktail parties.
Are we still doing phrasing?
A double entendre would have the audacity to rear its ugly head?
President Donald Trump declared "Liberation Day in D.C."
Why do all of Trump's liberations look like authoritarian takeovers?
In this case he’s liberating DC from democrat malignant idiocy and violent crime. As a Democrat, you probably can’t see that.
As an authoritarian, you probably can't see why a federal takeover dictated by one man is an issue to a libertarian.
One of the points of the Marxist strategy is to let criminals run free in order to demoralize the people. This is your people's doing.
You're the strong government takeover with a planned economy apologist here. Your accusation of "MarXisT!" is like a gay homophobe's judgey overcompensation.
Yes all leftists in the US are Marxist. They all say they believe in Marxism. I simply listen to them.
I am a leftist, I am not a Marxist, and I've known no Marxists since Alexander Cockburn died. Katha Pollitt called her ex "the last Marxist," and perhaps he is. FYI, we are social democrats, and we do not support public ownership of the means of production, which is the textbook definition of socialism and which failed for the Bolsheviks.
A) DSA has literally called for seizing the means of production.
B) you're a fascist then? Government control to regulate industry? Not much better.
I'm sure you'll get it right this time. You're obviously smarter than Stalin, Castro, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Mao and, well I could go on. But the new generation of communists is like super smart and as long as you don't take over the means of production it's all good. You won't leave millions of dead in your wake and even if you do you're not a Marxist so it's cool. The Soviets had an apt description for people like you. Useful idiots. Every generation thinks it can reinvent the wheel but history is not on your side and it never will be .
Norway. Denmark. Finland. Germany. New Zealand. Recent Ireland. What have these models in common with any of your mentioned grotesque dictatorships? Nothing, so you run straw train down a side track.
Norway, Denmark and Finland keep telling you assholes that they're not socialist. But you don't listen. They achieve your supposed goals without your oppression. Through capitalism.
We've all seen the results of German socialism, is that the example you want to be citing?
And there is unrest in both New Zealand and Ireland.
Can your idiocy even be called 'useful'?
"Norway. Denmark. Finland. Germany. New Zealand. Recent Ireland."
These are MARKET economies with large welfare systems. Even the PM of Denmark shot back recently at the socialist-mongers to insist "Denmark is not socialist, it is a market economy".
Libertarianism isn't anarchy. People actually should have the freedom to walk down the street in their nation's capital without fear of being beaten, robbed or murdered.
Youre forgetting that for libertines the most important freedoms are:
A) from responsibility
B) drugs
C) responsibility for crimes
D) Food trucks operated by rapefugees
Pretty sure butt sex is in the top five but I'm reluctant to designate it's s place on the list.
You went for lettering, but it's #2, a solid #2.
So we can be certain the city will be safer after this?
Part of the Marxist strategy is to label all criminals, no matter how violent as "VICTIMS"!
Those who were victimized are the oppressors and had it coming.
IS it any wonder this narrative is being rejected by the majority of Americans.
How about the J6 rioter yelling "kill the cops," had been convicted and awaiting sentencing when Trump took office, and was not only pardoned, but hired by Bondi for the DOJ. The Madrid triple axe-murderer, tried, tried, convicted, and imprisoned in Venezuela, but sprung by Trump in a bogus "prisoner swap" to put a spin on his illegal roundup and confinement of noncriminal migrants, now free in Orlando. Excusing violent crime indeed. Proud Boys? Oath Keepers? All now at large once more. And deemed "victims" not by "Marxists," but by MAGATs.
Pinocchio, of your nose gets any longer, you'll burn it on the sun.
Uninformative and unresponsive.
How so?
Libertarianism is not consistent with a strong ruler sopping up authority especially against the will of those ruled over.
As a libertarian, this is a major reason I support President Trump and Congress going in and cleaning up Washington, DC.
Pretty much the entirety of Washington, DC, and a lot of the suburbs in Maryland and Virginia, are "strong rulers sopping up authority especially against the will of those ruled over."
Baltimore being a great example of how liberals, especially black politicians can manage a city so well and create such a safe place for everyone./s
It's not called "Bodymore" for nothing. Or was it Baltimorgue?
Bloodymore, Murderland
Then those people should move to a state where they can have representation.
Well they had that where they are until Trump took it away.
Constitutionally, that "representation" was a polite fiction, as President Trump demonstrated, by taking it away.
True....until Trump took it away
And guess why he "took it away"? Because they failed miserably. If someone is doing a shitty job at work, their boss is going to take it away from them and give it to somebody who can fucking handle it.
In this case, the job is enforcing the laws on the books and creating a safe environment where all citizens can enjoy a safe, clean environment to work and play. In our nation's capital.
Let me say that again: in our nation's capital.
I’m not authoritarian. I just want to slaughter the Marxists and undo all their evil works
Your kind has no right to exist.
Anyone who wants to "slaughter" those he doesn't like is an authoritarian. In a constitutional democracy, your unfavored people would need to be investigated, there would need to be probable cause to pursue charges, the defendants would be admitted to bail, granted time to confer with counsel of their choice, and pursue discovery; charges would need to be proven beyond reasonable doubt, and sentence would need to be in accordance with the range of punishment specified by law, which does NOT include "slaughter." No, "slaughter" is the authoritarian response. You can't deny in one breath what you admit in the next.
DC has consistently not protected its citizens' property rights nor right to life.
This is a liberation.
You're right on the 1st sentence, wrong on the second.
Your argument boils down to "they can't have the government they elected for their own good.
The President was elected and he has the authority over DC MPD and the National Guard?
You have no grounds for a complaint?
Why are you complaining about making the streets safe for the public?
I suppose you prefer anarchy?
He is a Democrat. Ant tgreat to his party's power or desire is bad.
Your argument assumes the federal takeover will reduce crime without any sacrifice of quality of life, freedom, etc.
The president was elected by the entire nation. I'd be upset if my township supervisors were chosen by federal election.
Why are you complaining about making the streets safe for the public?
How can you assume the streets will be made safe? Why do you assume there will be no trade-offs; no reduction in quality of life? Crackdowns often lead to increased violence as the new order is established. Maybe the DC citizens chose their leadership/policies accordingly. Maybe we should default to local rule as was the mantra here until Trump.
There's also accountability. It's hard enough to hold law enforcement accountable for unlawful actions and violations of rights when they're local. If they're federal then there will be zero accountability. Qualified immunity for local law enforcement is bad enough. Feds have absolute immunity. They can't be sued in civil court. Period. Trump talked about giving all police absolute immunity. Problem is that that's state by state. Solution? Make all policing federal. He's just testing the waters here.
You’d rather law enforcement just shoot trespassers in the face.
That's a little extreme, but I would like to see Trump personally horse-whipping 14-year-old carjackers on TV.
It's not extreme for jeff or sarc who defended shooting an unarmed woman in the face for the crime of trespassing.
Trespassers should be given the chance to leave the property immediately and, if they do not, THEN shoot them in the face.
Impale their heads next to the no trespassing signs.
Is your township a federal district set aside as the capital of the United States?
There's always a loophole. Federal district, declared emergency, they're not citizens just keep loopholing until Trump has absolute authority.
It's not a loophole, it's part of the U.S. Constitution itself.
How, exactly, is Congress legally able to cede their authority over D.C. that is spelled out in the Constitution itself without an amendment, one wonders.
Yes. One does wonder.
DC being a federal district is not a loophole, it’s the most pertinent factor to the discussion. You just don’t like Trump so you create whatever bullshit arguments you can think of to justify your priors.
How about that emergency requirement? LOOPHOLE!
"The president was elected by the entire nation. I'd be upset if my township supervisors were chosen by federal election."
The rest of the nation doesn't give a shit about who runs your township, but they sure as shit care about having law and order in their national capital.
Yeah, they care about a lot of things, but limited government and local rule is not among those cares.
You're supposed to care about what happens in your township, not the people in the next township over. That's the essence of local rule.
As for limited government, since when have Democrats EVER been interested in THAT?
You keep having the cede ground on thisargument, argument Quixy. Quit wasting the time of productive people.
Just take the ‘L’ and walk away.
Brix is an anarchist. Only an anarchist would defend lawlessness and an actual attempt to combat it.
Leftist. Part of the bullshit he and other dumbasses believe about reformation justice. Criminals above citizens.
He will carry the HO2 for team D.
You both reveal your need to rationalize your authoritarianism by assuming anyone that is nati trump is a democrat. It's such a tire and weal trope.
Team D opposes this. Joining the opposition to what DJT plans is carrying the HO2 for them.
Cite where I stated that you are a Democrat.
Carrying water implies unthinking, uncritical support...like you with Trump.
Cite missing.
I trashed DJT on the stimulus checks article.
You get a participation trophy.
You're right. I overlooked your profound intellectual libertarian treatise on the foibles of Trump on stimulus checks: "stimulus checks are gay". Are you planning to publish a book?
I also trashed Trump on the microchip article.
And your cite is still missing.
You’re 0 for 2 on this.
This looks a bit like a carbon tax.
Scathing rebuke!
And your cite is still missing
Scroll up 7 comments.
Two instances the same day disagreeing with Trump and you still have no cite. Carbon taxes are gay like stimulus checks.
Again, you are zero for two.
You reveal your TDS by opposing a safe, clean, lawful Washington DC.
Funny, you’re the one who supports authoritarians and defend them here daily. We just want the problems you created fixed.
Trump is doing that. Cleaning up another Democrat mess.
What a profound deduction! What else do you see when you look in your charlatan hat?
"Why do all of Trump's liberations look like authoritarian takeovers?"
Because you are delusional and can't handle the truth?
Am I delusional that both liberations were declared and implemented by the decree of one man and were to be governed by that same one man?
"Am I delusional that both liberations were declared and implemented by the decree of one man and were to be governed by that same one man?"
You're delusional, and a liar.
Yes, because that one man making the decrees was elected specifically to make those decrees, and the area governed was explicitly stated in the Constitution to be under Federal control, to make the region independent of States.
For all practical purposes, the Constitution makes the President Mayor of DC, and Congress its City Council.
And if you don't like that, we could always just dissolve Washington, DC, except for a few buildings, and return it to the States that donated the land in the first place.
Yes, because that one man making the decrees was elected specifically to make those decrees
So I guess you supported Obamacare, forgiving student loans, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, pardoning Hunter, NSA spying, and torturing in Gitmo...all done by men specifically elected to enact said decrees.
I do not have to agree with and support things I accept are legal -- nor do have to accept decrees that are illegal.
This takeover by President Trump and hopefully Congress is both legal, and something I agree with -- more than any other location in the US, Washington DC has proven incapable of self rule -- the very self-rule that Congress has permitted them to have, despite having direct jurisdiction of the region -- so it makes sense that the people in charge of the region can and should take back the reins to control it.
So you agree this is an emergency? No stretching of definitions of legal terms needed. Why wasn't this an emergency for Trump 1.0 when crime was worse in DC?
I'm not sure if I personally care one way or the other whether or not this is an emergency -- however, with the recent discovery of the DC Chief of Police deliberately cooking the books, it is clear than neither you nor I could claim that today's DC crime rate is better now than what it was in Trump 1.0's term.
And considering that DC was set on fire twice while Trump 1.0 was in power -- set on fire twice by Democrats who were angry that Trump was in office -- this is yet another reminder of how naive President Trump 1.0 was at the time, sincerely believing he could work with the system to enact lukewarm reform that wouldn't have had a lasting difference. Instead, we got horrific Orwellian nightmare weaponization-against-Democracy fascism committed behind the scenes, because the Deep State didn't like who the voters voted into the Presidential Office, kicked off by President Obama just before he left office.
(I am really sick and tired of everyone crying "fascism" whenever President Trump so much as scratch his nose, when far worse fascism has happened under the Democrat regime.)
+++
All those things were not within the presidents constitutional powers.. they were democrat overreach as usual.
Again, Trump is working within the constraints of his constitutional authority to clean up your fucking mess. As usual.
Didn't Napoleon "liberate" the German states from the Holy Roman Empire?
In both this case and Naploeon's case, "liberate" does not mean "set free". It means "being told to follow the 'correct' course of action, the one that the liberators choose for them."
Oh gee, who wants to tell him.
Not it.
Why bother?
I have to return some videocassettes.
Oh yeah. You asked me to help you rewind them.
https://tenor.com/view/bateman-patrick-bateman-gif-6740986972519784437
Yes, Washington DC is to POTUS what Germany is to Napoleon. That’s a totally apt and not completely dishonest comparison Lying Jeffy.
No surprise the sloppy chemist makes a sloppy analogy.
He Jeff, what if people are smuggling bears into DC via car trunks?
They should come to a shared collective reasoning that bad analogies is in the middle of the sloppy chemist’s lane.
Probably because of a hostile press, by and large. Recall that Trump was spun as an authoritarian for attempting to cut federal spending too.
D.C. has done a garbage job at, well, their jobs. Everything from public transit to police is terrible, and ultimately it's the Federal city state and answers, like it or not, to the FedGov.
The fact is D.C. does need cleaning up compared to most of the country instead of the rest of the country being shit and D.C. being immaculate. If there is such a thing as a reverse Potemkin village, D.C. is it.
Maybe declaring emergencies for situations that have existed for decades to assume unprecedented powers to the office has something to do with it too.
One assumes that you mean it's without precedent since the 1970's, which also means there is precedent. Interestingly, the creation of the capitol police back in the 1800's was without precedence, although I suppose that's only half true since they only protected the capitol itself back then. The notion of 'police' is a pretty new thing, after all.
The creation of DC was unprecedented.
uNprEsIdeNTeD!!!
Nice try
It’s a pointless leftist talking point used to get midwits riled up.
We must always do things the way they have always been done.
Trump "attempted to cut federal spending" ONLY for public health, education, and welfare. He vastly INCREASED spending for all the police state functions such as ICE, for everything brutal and punitive, and therefore vastly INCREASED spending overall. Which he proposes paying for by tariff revenues -- that is, by a consumption tax on the same citizens whose health, education, and welfare that his minions in Congress have stripped away by a single vote.
"Trump "attempted to cut federal spending" ONLY for public health, education, and welfare. He vastly INCREASED spending for all the police state functions such as ICE, for everything brutal and punitive, and therefore vastly INCREASED spending overall."
TDS-addled slimy lying piles of shit ignore that the increased police functions are a result of Soros-backed DAs releasing felons back to the streets and Biden simply opening the borders to any and all, TDS-addled slimy lying pile of shit.
You are blaming the plumber for draining the water rather than the demented pieces of shit for running into the wall and breaking the pipe.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
He’s cleaning up your messes. Best you just shut up and learn to obey. You’re lucky we allow you Marxists to live at all.
Data released Monday also indicate a 26 percent decrease in violent crime year over year.
The foxes assure us that the henhouse is secure.
Glad there are no updates to this statistic loke posted above. Reason would look terrible if it was found out the D.C. police were cooking the books.
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-police-commander-suspended-crime-statistics/3959566/
Despite an apparent drop in the city’s violent crime,
We went from the chance of being carjacked going from "A Near Certainty" to "Very Likely".
Whenever the data contradicts Trump, then the data is leftist. I don't know why we have statistic gathering organizations anyway. Should scrap those organizations and have Trump dictate the data. While we're at it get rid of Congress and courts. Let Trump dictate the law and make legal decisions by decree. If you disagree then you're a leftist.
Agreed, When the swamp creatures control and manipulate the statistics there's actually no reason to keep the people or the statistics since they are fake.
Removing those folks who've been shown to fail for many years and revising the system to be more accurate is the sensible solution.
Of course you have no sensibility so you further your complaint to suggest that the US government should just completely collapse and America become anarchist instead of Trump who is POTUS, duly elected by the majority with the GOP, doing what they can to fix it?
Is that your final answer?
Agreed, When the swamp creatures control and manipulate the statistics there's actually no reason to keep the people or the statistics since they are fake.
Yes. We know they're fake when they contradict Trump. When the statistics confirm Trump then they're not to be questioned. Veracity is determined by Trump, not by the data itself. I'm glad you agree that he should just dictate what the data is and imprison anyone who contradicts him. Next get rid of Congress, since their stupid laws are an impediment to his power. And courts too, since they tell him they can't do stuff. Just let him do whatever he wants.
How much straw did you stuff into that comment anyhow?
We know they’re fake because they got caught faking them drunky.
Sarc is like trashcan man “the stand”. An idiot savant. Just without the savant part.
Sarc has drunkenly pledged his life to the Democrats.
The defense of false data by government by sarc is a hell of a take. Until you realize he is just a fucking democrat and sees government control of information as a good thing.
"Defense" of false data? I guess Prime Meansters don't know the real thing when they see it.
Hey another retard who cant even read two lonk names in this very thread and demands we blindly trust government and democrat narratives.
Good work buddy.
You know... not even ABC News is as dishonest as you retard leftist fuckers lol.
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1954989437823148213
But keep demanding your fellow citizens live in crime and danger so you can push a political talking point. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You do realize that the DC Chief of Police was caught fudging the crime data, don't you? The data you're pushing as the "real thing" we can't recognize when we see it?
He’s OK with it only so long as it’s Democrat control.
Let me guess, you believe the statistics that came out of the Soviet Union and that Kim Jong-il shot 38 under par.
Whenever the data contradicts reality, then the data is leftist.
FTFY
This is one of the most fascist moves Trump had done yet. Everyone should be scared.
Lol.
Not his defenders. They want a fascist dictator who will smite their enemies. Start with immigrant criminals. Then all immigrants. Homeless people and druggies. You know, got to clean up the streets. Antisemites got to go, as well as Muslims but I repeat myself. Then dissenters in general. Members of the opposition party. Intellectuals. And his defenders will cheer him on every step of the way.
They do? You got a cite for that, or are you just pulling straw out of your ass?
He probably saw it on a bumper sticker. Or Maddow.
So presumably there's SOME Trumpian takeover of local affairs that you WOULDN'T endorse? Do tell: where is that line in the sand? What must Trump do to convince you he's an authoritarian dictator on the mob-boss model, unconstrained by personal rights or state and local powers?
Dunno, but lying piles of TDS-addled shit like you have convinced us that lying piles of TDS-addled shit are willing to promote ANY lie, since you are mentally deranged.
Fuck off and die, shitstain.
Uninformative, unresponsive, uncouth, unworthy of publication. A bot programmed solely to tell random strangers to "fuck off and die."
Nobody’s interested in your fantasies.
That’s a joke, right?
There is no line that Trump could cross. As he himself said, he could kill someone on 5th Ave in broad daylight, and hid defenders would cry “Lawfare” if he was charged with murder. They want a strongman dictator without limits.
Meanwhile you and your other leftost shitbags cheered and medaled a cop for shooting an unarmed woman. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You demand illegal criminals not be deported. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You defend the use of state powers against your political enemies. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You know, things that actually happened.
An unarmed woman breaking into the inner office of the House Speaker, with all of Congress cowering in hiding from violent takeover of the national Capitol during official constitutional business, which BY LAW JUSTIFIES THE USE OF LETHAL FORCE. Just drop the context when you find it convenient. What would you say if Trump had lost 2024 and "leftists" pulled a J6 in the same way? But you know we don't believe in violence, and Harris would never incite such a thing anyhow, so that one's moot.
Clearly you've forgotten when leftists stormed the white house and burned a nearby church as well as huge swathes of Dc forcing the secret service to make Trump and his wife and kid go to the bunker?
Or when leftists took over the senate office building?
Or when they stormed the Supreme court?
Or when they attacked and burned and bombed federal buildings all across the country?
How about when they opened fire at a congressional baseball game?
Of course you don't 'believe' in violence. You don't have to-- you ARE violence.
WTF? Shit that never happened is indeed quickly forgotten. What "leftist" organized, incited, or committed any such things? When? Where? We certainly know who invited, incited, cheered, praised, then pardoned the J6 traitors. Or do you mean BLM protests of the POLICE MURDER of YET ANOTHER black man on suspicion of passing a counterfeit $20? Did Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi order those?
"Federal Buildings all across the country?" Such as where and by whom and with what police casualties? Were 535 members of Congress and the Vice President inside at the time?
Did you have anything of note that wasn't a non sequitur?
Did you get mad at the Maddow reference like the other retard leftists here?
Do you think he secretly blames his drinking on you?
EveryoneCriminals and gangbangers should be scared."If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear!"
Not equal.
That’s the justification used for spying, not holding criminals accountable.
But you know that, you just said it anyway, because you’re a psychopathic liar.
The criminals might have felt sorry about their actions.
Tell me, doc, how hard did you have to work on your PhD in being a total retard?
Whatever. It's still not as fascist as organizing a giant Reichstag Fire style event to entrap a literal thousand or so of the opposing Party's supporters, pretty much suspending their Constitutional rights (and convicting them in very hostile courts, allowed by very hostile judges) because they were "threats to Democracy".
Oh, it's ok when your side engages in fascism? Because when your side is in charge, it's "Democracy", so any and all tyrannical actions are perfectly legitimate?
“Democrats did it first. That makes whatever Trump does ok.”
No, you misunderstand my position: Democrats did it far worse, and the Democrats now expect me to squeal in fear and hide under the bed when President Trump did something that he may very well have a Constitutional ability to do -- using his allegedly Constitutional power to attempt to restore order to a city that Democrats have deliberately allowed to become a criminal cesspool -- as they have done with all cities under their control -- so Democrats could push the narrative "The world is a dangerous place, so you had better give us power, and let us use that power however we see fit!"
I stand corrected.
“Democrats did it
firstworse. That makes whatever Trump does ok.”YES.
Democrats did it first, and when called on it, made it legal.
So yes, it's okay when anybody does it now.
The constitutionally required J6 Congressional electoral vote count is "organizing a giant Reichstag Fire style event to entrap" Trump goosesteppers? What am I missing here? Where is the "constitutional right" to enter the national capitol by force with the stated intention of disrupting the electoral vote count, beheading the Speaker of the House, and hanging the Vice President? Just wondering. Were the juries of their peers hostile too? Are they at fault for lawbreakers choosing their own venue to be tried in? Were the guilty pleas and the expressions of remorse involuntary? In nearly a thousand cases? Are you a lawyer or just a vacuous conspiracist?
It's not any more of an emergency than it was the last time Trump was in office. He's just swinging his tiny dick around. If it reduces crime in DC that's fine.
The only problem is that he's removing resources from investigating and prosecuting other crimes (like white collar) for this 'same as usual' emergency.
Well, the FBI had enough spare time to pursue political investigations into Trump for something like 6 years so it would seem they don't have enough real crimes to investigate after all.
Giving them D.C. to investigate should keep them busy for perhaps the next century or so.
Because Trump committed an ACTUAL CRIME WITNESSED BY THE ENTIRE WORLD ON LIVE TELEVISION AND RADIO. Had Garland not dragged his feet, wishing to avoid the appearance of vengeance, Trump would never have had time to get elected. That was "real crime" of the highest order, including the killing and disabling of Capitol police. "Law and order" my ass.
The obsession with Trump’s penis by leftists will be studied by historians.
Of course it's an emergency in DC. His guy was attacked! This is mafia-type thinking. When one of the gangsters is attacked, then the entire neighborhood must be made to know who is really in charge here, and that's Godfather Trump. You don't attack a member of the Mob without a 10-fold retribution in response.
Who, not what.
His guy = an American citizen who was doxxed by the loony left for his DOGE association and assaulted in a city that’s the capital of car jacking.
DC is a not a state. Trump has jurisdiction. He’s hinted at doing something like this and this ws the last true.
Do you feel more rage about Trump doing this, or the corrupt democrats of DC allowing teen girls to murder uber drivers by slapped them in the wrist?
The answer says a lot about you.
Prepare for another sloppy analogy in a chaff & redirect response that could include gish galloping as well as strawmen. Could even begin with, “OH HERE WE GO…”
What about the guy who was the victim of crime in DC before "Big Balls"? Why did that crime not constitute an "emergency" requiring "liberation"? And the guy before that? And the guy before that? Hmm?
Because Trump thinks like a mafioso. Those other people are meaningless to him, regardless if they are citizens or not. It only matters when it's his guy who is victimized.
+++
Leftist retard detected.
DC is a not a state. Trump has jurisdiction.
The Federal government as a whole has jurisdiction. That includes Congress. Also, the governor in your state had "jurisdiction" to declare COVID lockdowns and mandates during the pandemic. I don't recall you standing up to defend the propriety of those actions.
"What about the guy who was the victim of crime in DC before "Big Balls"?"
What guy? Is there some guy who was a more appropriate case for the straw breaking the back of the camel? If Trump ordered this in response to the two girls murdering a Muslim DC driver, that would have been ok?
Jurisdiction is relevant here as to settle whether this is a "hostile takeover." It's plainly not. Trump couldn't close down schools during the pandemic, only the states could do that. The feds have jurisdiction over DC, and Trump is the head of the federal government and can order the national guard to protect states.
The feds sent the national guard to southern states to enforce integration on segregated schools. OMG that's JUST LIKE state pandemic lockdowns! They both used their jurisdictional powers! Do you actually read the things who write? You LOVE to play equivalency game, but half the time you're comparing apples to rockets.
Again - "Trump's guy" is young American citizen in his 20's duly appointed to serve in government. First at DOGE, now at the social security. He fought carjackers in front of his girlfriend. Did you see the photos of the injury? Where did you come up with the mafioso connection, aside from your diseased mind desperate to confirm Trump as Hilter incarnate?
https://abcnews.go.com/US/19-year-former-doge-worker-assaulted-dc-carjacking/story?id=124406722
If Hunter Biden was beaten up this bad and Joe Biden ordered a "takeover of DC", sure, we'll have some laugh at their history of nepotism. But we're not gonna go out of our way to stop the national guard from descending upon that cesspool.
You wanna lecture us about "dehumanizing" people again, chem?
Here’s Lying Jeffy comparing the guy that worked for Doge getting beaten for trying to stop a woman getting carjacked to a gangster.
Fucking psychopath.
As DC is federal property, I see no problem with this.
They could always cede to VA or MD at any time, but they won't, so too bad.
We don’t want DC, no thanks! Although they have pretty much taken over NoVa. MD doesn’t want them either. Could always combine the NoVa counties, Montgomery and PG county MD with DC into a new state. That could solve a lot of problems
Or, we could raze the residential areas of DC Gaza-style and only leave the government buildings in the district.
I wouldn't care if it was Trump, Obama or Ron Paul; federalizing national troops in a non-emergency situation doesn't sit right with me.
I've been to DC quite a few times-- most recently a week after the election-- and I don't think the crime rate is bad enough to warrant this decision. I'm naturally skeptical of the Federal government, as I'd think most Libertarians should be (is-ought problem here), and this comes off more of Trump dick swinging to see what he can and cannot "get away with".
D.C. is more than just the tourist part of town.
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Katie Pavlich
@KatiePavlich
White House sends out these stats/examples on DC crime:
-In 2024, Washington, DC had the fourth-highest homicide rate in the US, with a homicide rate nearly SIX TIMES HIGHER than New York City.
-Just last month, a D.C. police commander was suspended for manipulating crime data to make it seem lower than it actually is. The D.C. police union says this practice is widespread.
-Washington D.C.’s homicide rate also topped Atlanta, Chicago and Compton.
-Washington, D.C. has one of the highest robbery and murder rates among large U.S. cities nationwide with numerous assaults and robberies on Congressional staffers and Members of Congress. In May, two embassy staffers were murdered.
-In June, a Congressional intern was fatally shot just a short distance from the White House.
-Just days ago, a Trump Administration staffer was mercilessly beaten by a violent mob.
JesseBot repeats government propaganda. Quelle surprise.
What did he say that was incorrect Lying Jeffy?
Heh, funny complaint from Pretendent Biden's Grand Propagandist Puppet!
"...this comes off more of Trump dick swinging to see what he can and cannot "get away with"."
This comes off as a rant by a TDS-addled shit.
Only to you.
If you were not a TDS-addled lying pile of slimy lefty shit, you might understand that also, so there's no chance.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Ho-hum.
"Despite an apparent drop in the city’s violent crime"
Despite? Once again REASON showing how Trump Derangement Syndrome makes them Unreasonable. At least 1 Metro DC higher up has been put on leave after it was found that he was having officers rig the crime numbers to make it "appear" that crime was down.
Trump has broken REASON's ability to think
Ten bucks says DC victims disagree with this report.
"Despite an apparent drop in the city’s violent crime"
Hey. I had an apparent drop of 200lb! I am slim! But please don't mention that I started at 600lb.
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-police-commander-suspended-crime-statistics/3959566/
You think the Reason intern is interested in any facts that contradicts the narrative? He’s trying to get a job in journalism.
What's your source for this? Caracas has a far higher violent crime rate than D.C.
Yeah, that's setting the bar high.
Like when jeff said illegal immogrants had lower crime rates than south Chicago gangs so we should ignore it.
But I hear it is declining.
One of your socialist hellholes is worse than DC?
Okay.
And?
Not my hellhole, socialist or otherwise. Just reminder that, contrary to false representation, D.C. does NOT lead world capitals in violent crime.
Do you not understand how the first phrase makes the rest of this concluding paragraph utterly unreliable?
It amounts to, "sure, someone's fudging numbers, but the data shows..." Well, the fucking data is fudged numbers. This is some serious climate change level sophistry here!
Indeed, the writers at Reason have forgotten... or never learned... how to reason.
Here's some fun-facts.
94% of D.C. is registered Democrats.
70% of the prison population is registered Democrats.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/1390328/jail-survey-7-in-10-felons-register-as-democrats/
Course what would one expect from the party of STEAL from those 'icky' people because I'm too lazy to EARN my living?
Color me; not surprised that D.C. is a criminal emergency.
The entire Democrat party is full of nothing but criminal minded scam artists.
Do the Drake meme/
"Illegal aliens appointed as police officers patrolling our streets with guns"
Yes
"President sends national guard to territory under federal jurisdiction besieged by crime"
No
Reason's attitude more recently. Meh.
I'm not renewing my subscription.
DC is not a township or county or any other political subdivision of any state. It is wholly owned by the federal government and by extension the people of the several states. Everyone living there knew or should have been aware of this basic fact. If the district has distinguished itself in any way it is by it's blind obeisance to the Democrat party which has made it a jurisdiction wherein no Republican, libertarian or conservative will ever find a jury of their peers. And the DC district and circuit court have easily violated the civil rights of more people than George Wallace ever dreamed of. Fuck DC. All it does is grow and nurture parasites.
Not one single liberal run city is worth setting up and running a business nor are they safe to visit.
Every single one has degenerated into crime infested hell holes.
Get out much? I walk safely through Brooklyn, downtown SF and Chi with bustling businesses everywhere. What business did you plan to open, a Killer Ammo Discount Warehouse?
Is crime out of hand in DC, or isn't it? It's a very simple question.
Apparently Akintola considers a stove to be cold because its not as hot as the sun?
Just because the crime rate dropped doesn't mean its a) a trend or b) that its low. Crime rates fluctuate over time and DC has a crazy high violent crime rate to start with so even a significant drop in crime leaves you with a lot of crime left over.
If there are three muggers waiting in the alley, that you get rid of two of them doesn't mean the alley is safe.
Yeah, but that doesn't make it an "emergency" just because Trump needs more diversions from Epstein. Violent crime has been epidemic in DC for nearly a century, yet no other Prez thought it an "emergency."
It hasn't been quite as openly brazen as it is now, with such an intentionally hamstringed police response.
Not only has the D govt of DC failed to adequately address the violent crime there, but former presidents also failed to act on the failure of the DC govt.
The Catholic rapey priests had been going on for some time. Should it have been allowed to continue because it had been going on for some time?
That it has been allowed to go on as long as it has doesn't make it *not* an emergency either.
Seriously - your argument is 'the proles have survived it this long so it's *normal* now'?
So you don't find the timing just a wee bit too convenient? What about that LA "emergency." How did that one pan out for your favorite authoritarian-in-chief? Now he claims more emergencies in Baltimore and other NON-FEDERAL cities with Black mayors. See a pattern here? Not if you don't want to, I suppose.
It's known by now that liberal run cities have fallen into such a state of violence and crime that no one wants to visit for any reason. Witness the mass migration out of San Francisco and even the loss of convention business has cost that city to gain the title as the worst run city in America but....the retarded liberals don't care.
Washington, D.C. should be the nation's diamond but unfortunately the 13%ers won't allow it.
You can't take humanoids with ancient ghost DNA from a hundred thousand years ago and plant them in a civilized situation and expect them to act accordingly.
This does not look good for America. To have your nation's capitol rife with crime and unsafe streets. It's bad enough the crimes being committed in congress let alone out on the streets where not even a politician is not safe. Oh, dear me......
^THIS.. "It's bad enough the crimes being committed in congress let alone out on the streets"
It's a 'following their leaders example' consequence.
Everyone should've expected individual crime from party-member with leaders that pass/propose mass-crime (THEFT distribution).
They'll sugar-coat the living tar out of it; but at the end of the day, the lefts biggest agenda, is to TAKE/STEAL what they haven't EARNED. The "conquer (w/gov-guns) and consume" criminal mentality.
Washington DC is a federal district and should remain a federal district. It should never become a state. It also should not have anyone living within the federal district permanently. Originally the district was a square from land donated by Maryland and Virginia.
Land was returned to Virginia and now the federal district is no longer a square. Land should also be returned to Maryland. The federal district should only be comprised of federal offices and some limited housing more akin to hotels for visiting people, delegations, etc., but not permanent residents.
Additionally, the federal government offices should be distributed instead of being centralized to include all 50 states. Smaller offices with federal employees that live in the actual country instead of the artificial fantasy land called Washington DC. We would get better government that reflects the citizens of the entire country instead of just the heavily east coast centric insider mentality. This would not be remote work as there would be actual offices that employees would be required to work from.
The federal district would be federal as it was always intended with federal control and no state having control of where the three branches are located. To be completely fair the federal district should probably be located somewhere in the central or mountain time zones, in the geographical center of the country. This would be cost prohibitive so not practical consider the national debt.