Child Protective Services Investigated Her 4 Times Because She Let Her Kids Play Outside
A mom who trusted her kids to play outside ended up under repeated investigation.

Parenting expectations are often unreasonably high—and so is the number of people who believe that kids can't handle anything on their own.
Passersby too often see an unsupervised child and assume they are unsafe. So they call the authorities, who also often share those super-sized fears. Then parents get investigated simply for trusting their kids with some age-appropriate, location-appropriate independence.
Because of this frustrating cycle, I frequently get letters like the one below. When people ask why I spend so much time trying to pass Reasonable Childhood Independence laws, it's for people like Emily Fields and her children. Fields is a mom in small-town Virginia who responded to my nonprofit Let Grow's call for parents willing to speak to child protective services about why such laws are necessary. (Virginia unanimously passed its Reasonable Childhood Independence law in 2023.)
This letter is presented as a stark example of how little trust our country has in its parents and children anymore—and how misanthropic neighbors can weaponize the state at will.
***
Myself, my husband, and our three children (currently aged 12, 11, and 9) moved to southwest Virginia in 2017 when the kids were 4, 3, and 7 months. When my youngest began walking, I would let the three of them play in the backyard in our small, rural community while I would garden or read outdoors. There are no forested areas, and four unfenced yards all meet together with ours. Our new neighbors said the kids were welcome to play in their yards as well.
In spring 2018 (our kids then aged 5, 4, and 18 months), we received our first visit from child protective services (CPS). A neighbor called to report that my children were unsupervised and that I was allowing a baby to climb the front porch steps by himself. I laughed and gestured at my toddler and said, "Yes, he is allowed to walk up the steps, I admit it!" That one did not result in a formal investigation being opened, but they did investigate our home for food, bugs, toys, etc.
In late 2019 (the kids now 6, 5, and 3), we had our second visit from CPS, again alleging that the children were inadequately supervised because they were allowed to play in our yard and in the yards of our neighbors. This one did result in a formal investigation, and I was told people would be driving by our house periodically to make sure I was supervising the kids as they played.
During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old. Social Services said specifically that I had to be in each room with them at all times until they were 13. That investigation ended without incident.
Our third CPS visit happened in May 2021 (ages 8, 6, and 4). This one was the result of a specific (adult-supervised!) incident, with a bitter neighbor trying to make our lives hard by using the government as a weapon. She again alleged inadequate supervision, claimed the children were allowed to wander all over the neighborhood, and said they tried to enter strangers' homes. She included an accusation that we permit the children to abuse animals.
During this visit, the social services worker acknowledged that our home was clean, that the children were happy, well-fed, polite, and well-spoken, but said the children had to be supervised 100 percent of the time when outdoors. When I asked what constitutes supervision, she said that I had to be visible to my neighbors when the kids were outside, regardless of whether or not I could see the children. I asked where that was found in the Virginia law. She replied that it isn't in the Virginia law, but that Social Services has its own set of rules.
They came up with a written action plan and required all adults in the house to sign it (which included my sister at the time), saying that the children would be supervised. My husband and sister were very frightened that the situation would escalate due to small-town politics (the person who reported us had previously been a law enforcement officer and was well known in the community), so we all signed. This investigation was again closed.
That last visit was when I knew I had to get involved with Let Grow to change the laws in Virginia. I was already familiar with their work, which is partly why we had these run-ins with CPS. I was practicing "masterly inactivity"—watching from a distance and letting my kids make decisions and learn how the world works, intervening only when necessary to keep them safe. I believe my children have a right to independence. They have never been seriously hurt and have never hurt anyone (or anything) in their practice of independence. But their right to practice it was challenged over and over again.
One afternoon shortly after getting in touch with Let Grow, my children were playing outdoors on our neighbors' hill, a place they are allowed to play. Another neighbor (who does not own the hill) stopped in the street and called them over to her. She told them they couldn't play there and that they had to go home. The children told her they did not have to go home and that they had their parents' and the property owner's express permission to play there.
She was immediately upset that they were talking back to her and asked if she was going to have to "call the police and get your parents in trouble." This obviously scared the children, and they began to walk home, in tears. Meanwhile, I was standing at the kitchen window watching the kids talk to a neighbor, not understanding what was happening until I saw one child visibly upset. I immediately walked out of the house, and the neighbor (who, coincidentally, is a social worker) drove off without speaking to me about her concerns.
Since that time, even with the legislation we helped to pass, my kids are hesitant to exercise their independence. Few people know that parents have the right to decide what their children are capable of handling. I have equipped my kids with a "license" that they keep on them when they roam our small, rural neighborhood. It says across the top in big, bold letters "MY PARENTS KNOW I'M HERE" and includes information about SB1367 (Virginia's Reasonable Childhood Independence law) as well as my name and phone number. My children have been stopped by neighbors, produced their license, and thankfully were then left unbothered.
As they age, their confidence and understanding grow, and they venture further and further out with the assurance that they have the right to walk and bike the streets of our neighborhood just as much as the adults they see exercising every day. My children and their friends benefit greatly from being allowed independence and from organizations that fight to protect that right.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Passersby too often see an unsupervised child and assume they are unsafe.
You can call them what they are: AWFL Karens.
Again, Lenore - you are not practicing what you preach. Until you are ready to condemn, full-throat, Progressivism itself - then you cannot be taken seriously on this subject to which you've dedicated your career.
It's a noble subject, 100%. But until you start calling out the liberals and the progressives for their intentional ruin of children; for their "it takes a village" mindset; the litany of poxes they cause upon society; the sheer evil that they actually are - then how do you expect anyone to take you seriously?
If you truly value free range parenting and childhood independence, then it's time to turn your back on the progressives. The gays, the druggies, the illegals, the vagrants, the race pimps, the critical theorists - these are actual legitimate and proven clear and present dangers to children. You CANNOT free range a lamb in a forest full of wolves. Period. And progressivism in ALL its incarnations is the wolf. If you cannot acknowledge them as an enemy to your overall goal, then your goal has ZERO chance of success.
Conservatism is calling, Lenore. Answer the phone.
Shit is good to see that AT the AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian (for now) swill SNOT indulge His Sacred Urges to PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH the free-range parents, or their children, on matters of physical play. Sad to say, when innocent intellectual or political play comes about? Well, THERE, AT is, well, an AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian!!! Who INSISTS that we MUST PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH the illegal sub-humans, trannies, accused “groomers”, abortionists, gays, heathens, infidels, unbelievers, vaxxers, mask-wearers, atheists, dirty hippies, commies, Jews, witches, or, the very WORST of them all, being one of those accused of STEALING THE ERECTIONS OF OUR DEAR LEADER, right, right-wing wrong-nuts? ANY methods are OK, so long as they are used against the CORRECT enemas, am I right, or am I right-wing?
AT the AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian, I hope that Ye do SNOT PervFectly have much contact with children, or even pets, for that matter... And Government Almighty forbid, PLEASE do SNOT attempt to personally raise children, until (I am dreaming, butt there is always hope) such time that PervFected You PROFOUNDLY REFORM, and give UP you Eternal Dreams of ORGIES of PUNISHMENT!
Punish-punish-punish! Personally, I think that punishment should be strictly reserved for only those who cannot otherwise be corrected, and then, “the punishment should fit the crime”. What is needed, and then no more, as far as the severity of the punishment goes. Even criticism is punishment, and it, too, should be carefully rationed.
What have very varied thinkers through the years said about this?
"Beware of all those in whom the urge to punish is strong." - Friedrich Nietzsche
“Mistrust all those in whom the desire to punish is imperative.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
"Let he who is without sin, throw the first stone." - Jesus
“How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ while there is still a beam in your own eye? You hypocrite! First take the beam out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” - Jesus
AT lusts after punishing (and KILLING?) Jesus, Gandhi, and MLK Jr, because AT can CLEARLY see that these 3 were SOOOOO WRONG for SNOT buying (for resisting) "my Tribe's violence GOOD; your tribe's violence BAD!"
I truly wish my (admittedly limited) experience with autistic children in real life translated into how to handle it online.
PUNISH them all, right, right-wing wrong-nut? PUNISHMENT fixes EVERYTHING!!!
The intelligent, well-informed, and benevolent members of tribes have ALWAYS been feared and resented by those who are made to look relatively worse (often FAR worse), as compared to the advanced ones. Especially when the advanced ones denigrate tribalism. The advanced ones DARE to openly mock “MY Tribe’s lies leading to violence against your tribe GOOD! Your tribe’s lies leading to violence against MY Tribe BAD! VERY bad!” And then that’s when the Jesus-killers, Mahatma Gandhi-killers, Martin Luther King Jr.-killers, etc., unsheath their long knives!
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
In conclusion, troglodyte, thanks for helping me to prove my points!
Then they crucified Jesus, 'cause Jesus made them look bad! ALSO because Jesus made them look bad FOR THEIR STUPID, HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM! "The parable of the Good Samaritan" was VERY pointed, because the Samaritans were of the WRONG tribe, in the eyes of "Good Jews" of the day.
Instead of KILLING Jesus, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., etc., we’d be better off VOTING for these kinds of people! But we will NOT, ’cause they Hurt Our Precious Baby Feelings, by giving tribalism and do-gooder derogation the disrespect that they (and we self-righteous tribalists) SOOO thoroughly deserve!
Do you have any actual interesting, original copypasta to post, or is it going to be all the same boring bullshit as usual?
Ask him about Stormy Daniels. And Section 230.
Or Tim the Magician. I like that one because he only posts it when he's giving up.
So all of Ye PervFectly EVIL serpents, servants, and slup-pants of the Evil One are INTO KILLING Jesus, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., etc., and then BRAGGING about shit!!! Gotcha!!!
THESE are the hills that Ye will PervFectly DIE upon!
Ass long ass Your PervFected (and Mind-Infected) efforts serve Dear Orange Orangutan-from-Satanistanistanistanistanistan, Ye THINK that Ye are PervFectly Protected! The Universe will serve Ye some harsh, harsh lessons, one of these days... Mark my words...
Yeah. That one's retarded too.
Marxist Moose-Mammary-Necrophiliac says... Slurprise, Slurprise!!!! That the Jesus-Killers, Gandhi-Killers, and MLK-Jr-Killers are CORRECT, whenever they (killers) are of the RIGHT Tribe!!!
Twat else would ye expect from a PervFected, Mind-Infected, Evil-One-Worshitting One?
I have him blocked, so a few extra grey boxes aren’t an issue. But those of you going commando have to put up with the wall of gibberish. Bon appetite.
Yep, same boring, uninteresting, unoriginal, retarded copypasta as usual.
Pure projection!
Cite, oh retarded squirrel?
She could start with a non-partisan step: how many Karens who complain about kids have or don't have kids of their own? And then how many who do have kids also have nannies?
As for progressive policy, since they gave up on biological reproduction (pregnancy and motherhood are sexist and oppressive, humans are offensive to Gaia, the world will end in 10 years, etc.--and the unsaid but even stronger impulse to not let kids interfere with their personal life journeys) they desperately need to coopt the kids others made.
https://x.com/amyforsandiego/status/1953112439043833941
Amy Reichert
@amyforsandiego
This piece of paper is all an abuser needs to kidnap your child in California.
No court order. No background check. No parental consent.
AB 495 lets non-relatives, take custody of your child with just a signed form they downloaded from the internet.
AB 495 is a predator’s dream.
That's horrible, people need to open their eyes.
In California?
Well said
Conservatism is pure trash as a guiding philosophy for raising children. Conservatism teaches children that they are born sinners and inherently evil. That they must abide to a false ideology or burn forever in a lake of fire. That there is a code of ethics based on Bronze Age myths.
Just look at the sheer number of pedophiles produced by conservative repression whether of the Xtian or Islamic variety.
Certainly progressive indoctrination is harmful but yours is pure evil.
What happened to your original account?
How do you like the name Denny Hasterts Shower Room Lazy-Boy?
I’m already working on my next screen name.
There are so many sick ass conservatives to recognize.
Nobody cares about you referencing politicians from decades ago. How about work on your unhealthy attraction to minors instead? You posted illegal content here and got your original account banned.
So more current? How about Donnie’s Finger Fucking Teen Girls?
That needs a little work.
Or Matt Gaetz Teen Prostitution? Did you mean him?
#MAGA Molester
You posted links to child pornography here and Reason banned your original account.
False. I even showed up in the Reason Twitter feed - in a positive light.
Back when the writers read the comments. They now ignore them. Too much soul-destroying MAGA.
You showed up in the comments in an illegal light and your other account got banned.
What happened to your original SPB account, fucktard?
"False. I even showed up in the Reason Twitter feed - in a positive light."
It's irrelevant what happened before you posted links to child pornography here, got the whole comments section temporarily nuked, and had your original account and nick permabanned.
Don't try and pretend that it didn't happen.
Conservatism has nothing to do with sick evil people that dwell in all walks of life, cultures, religions, cults, countries, nations, and regions.
You suggest society can judge someone as a pedo and inherently evil because they might attend church, voted for parents rights, fiscal responsibility, upholding the constitution and laws of the land, liberty and freedom to decide for themselves how to raise their children, and pursue happiness?
You are delusional.
Fiscal responsibility? Upholding the Constitution?
You are the delusional one. Republicans spend like drunken sailors. (John McCain quote)
I believe it was William F Buckley who said that conservatism was based on Xtianity. Or Islam if based in the Middle East.
Conserving the creation of the Founding Fathers which has been the greatest gift to humanity that humanity is too stupid and squanders.
fiscal responsibility, upholding the constitution and laws of the land
That's a joke, right? Trump's GOP is all about deficit spending like a bunch of leftists, reinterpreting the Constitution like a bunch of leftists, and ignoring the law like a bunch of leftists.
Sarc once again demands we raise income taxes in his anti trump rant.
Sarc once again doesn't bother to read the actual EOs as written in his repetition of Maddow rants.
Sarc once again refuses to read the actual laws while repeating MSNBC talking heads.
But sarc is not a TDS added leftist.
Sorry fucklips, but I'm not going to be charitable this weekend. Go fuck a cactus.
Civility!
Maddow's anger is rubbing off on ya buddy.
Sorry you hate your hypocrisy and lack of principles pointed out. You should be used to it by now. As you have none of the latter and oodles of the former.
Civility indeed!!!
Very uncivil to present the thought of anything rubbing off M. Maddow onto anyone! *shudder*
Aren't you a sweetie today.
Fucklips? If he were a sailor that had five bucks in his pocket, he could fuck your mom’s lips. For another five, he could have been your father. I know, you’re a lot older than him. But in an alternate universe, he’s your dad and at least you’d be tall. Grooming habits are personal choice so maybe you’d still look haggard.
"I'm not going to be charitable this weekend"
Imagine a greasy drunken troll like Sarcasmic thinking he was ever "charitable" here.
That can only be accomplished by his absence.
And I never said that ALL religious people became pedophiles. Just that the church/mosque is the perfect breeding ground for them as they prey on the young and vulnerable.
So, um, are you ever gonna face facts that your Russia Russia Russia bullshit was 100% fake and created to cover up Hillary Clinton's server scandal?
If you could actually access children by being religious, you be a high priest somewhere. What a phony you are, pedo.
Now do NAMBLA and the Democratic sympathy (and support) for MAPs.
LOL... Do you think the middle-east is full of limited-gov conservatives?
Or do you just like to make-up imaginary BS so you can make your "[WE] mob RULES 'democracy' party" sound like the lesser of two evils?
"Conservatism teaches children that they are born sinners and inherently evil. "
Never heard that when I was growing up.
Also was a free range unsupervised child.
I turned out okay. Glad I am not a child today.
Notice how quickly almost ALL of you got lost in mindless partisanship, and used it as an excuse to avoid any consideration as to why progressivism is antithetical to free-ranging America's children.
You hate Conservatism? Great, I get it. Doesn't change anything. You cannot free-range a child in a progressive culture that encourages gays, druggies, illegals, vagrants, racists, and critical theorists.
You can be a progressive parent, or you can be a good parent. Pick one.
And the horse they rode in on?
This blogger has a certain interest and that's her beat. She does best specializing in writing what she knows best about. Stop trying to drag her into additional fights.
It's not an additional fight. It's the same fight.
Like I told her the last time - you can support free-range parenting, or you can support progressivism.
You cannot support both. They work against each other.
But there's no evidence she supports progressivism. Don't be like the fanatics who say you can't just not be racist, you have to be anti-racist.
It's a reasonable conclusion. Look over the entire series of articles she's written on the subject. She gives a lot of good and valid reasons why we should encourage free range parenting, but she never - ever - considers the reasons why one might be hesitant about the subject, let alone tries to argue why we should in spite of it.
And that reason is progressivism - because progressivism produces all the things that make free-range parenting extremely difficult, if not outright dangerous. Progressivism normalized homosexuality, so now we've got pedo creepers skulking around the playgrounds. Progressivism flooded the nation with illegals, and they're snatching kids off the street (or even in their own yard) and raping/killing them. Drug abusers and vagrants wander the streets and parks where we wish our kids could play, but which they instead make their home and toilet, and Progressivism actively encourages/defends this. Disturbing amounts of people who think their Lives Matter are engaged in open crime/gang activity with total impunity and are now to the point of randomly attacking white people simply for being white, and Progressivism both empowers it and refuses to condemn it.
And that's what's missing from Lenore's articles: the denunciation of all things Progressive and its socially destructive nature that makes free-ranging kids such a hard pill to swallow in 2025. I've even flat out asked her. And even if you think denunciation is too much of an ask, you'll note that she refuses to even take them into consideration. "While some people might be rightfully concerned about a rainbow sex cult of sicko perverts preying on a free-ranging child, especially as such predatory behavior seems particularly emboldened these days, the value of free-ranging is still important despite it because..." is something she could write.
But she doesn't, does she. Not for anything progressive.
Because she supports progressivism. And pointing those things out would mean shining the light on its socially destructive nature and its open danger to children. So, she refuses to acknowledge the cognitive dissonance and impossible hurdles that brings to supporting free-range kids - and in doing so, makes it impossible to take her seriously and accept that she really believes in what she's advocating.
"While some people might be rightfully concerned about a rainbow sex cult of sicko perverts preying on a free-ranging child"
This kind of discredits you as a crazy fringe person. If I were you and I had those beliefs, I'd probably be smart enough not to share them. Of course, I'm smart enough not to have them in the first place.
In a prior comment, you wrote: "Notice how quickly almost ALL of you got lost in mindless partisanship, and used it as an excuse to avoid any consideration as to why progressivism is antithetical to free-ranging America's children."
You're the OP on this thread. You started this with your rants about "progressivism". Progressivism and conservatism share a common thread of Big Brother inserting itself into your life and making decisions for you that you ought to be allowed to make for yourself. Are you naive enough to think that rural Virginia is progressive? The nosy/malicious neighbors calling CPS on this woman aren't likely progressive. They're likely Big Government conservatives trying to use the government to attack this lady whose children made decisions (based upon her guidance) that these nosy adults don't like.
I imagine that if you were her neighbor, you'd be calling CPS on her as well, especially when you say things like: "impossible hurdles that brings to supporting free-range kids". This is Reason Magazine. It's a LIBERTARIAN magazine. Libertarianism is a philosophy and political movement that revolves around limiting the size, scale and scope of government. This lady's views and experiences are libertarian in nature. Yours are Big Government in nature. It's not surprising to me that they come into conflict.
Conservatism is a philosophy of bigotry and big government. It's basically the same thing as progressivism except instead of trying to "help" everyone by inserting the government into everything, it seeks to keep everything the way it was in the 1950s (paranoia, government management of everyone's lives, institutional mistreatment of minorities, etc). The REAL solution is to embrace limited government which conservatives claim to do but never actually do.
Sounds like the neighbor and cps agents need a visit from the lead fairy
Time to move.
'Passersby too often see an unsupervised child and assume they are unsafe. So they call the authorities, who also often share those super-sized fears.'
Can we get a male/female/uh, other breakdown on those passersby?
Repeal the 19th.
Re-reading... Yup, the reasoning is sound. Seconded.
With a population density of 900 people per square mile, dunno I’d refer to the town proper as “rural.” Seems like a mobile home park but in houses.
Yeah. But boundaries matter. My western town and county have densities of 3000 people per square mile inside the city and 20 outside.
Another article suggested they live in the town proper (kids were going door-to-door trying to see Easter eggs). With multiple Karens involved, seems like the dense population part.
Too many busy body progressives even where there are only 10 people per square mile. It only takes one to spoil everything.
That is about 1.5 people per acre.
Suburban. Here is it fewer than 10 people per sq mi.
"During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old. Social Services said specifically that I had to be in each room with them at all times until they were 13.".
So how does that work? Do the kids all have to be in the same room? Or is the sister now required to move in as a slave to the state so there is one adult per child?
You now have to sleep and shower with the children?
Joe Biden's America , folks
Joe Biden is retired now, this has becum Dear Orange Orangutan-from-Satanistanistanistanistanistan's America now, folks!
Clearly it's not meant to work. This isn't about kids, it's about this lady. Something personal they're not talking about. If she adopted out all the kids, she'd still be harassed for the unwritten matter. For all we know, she may have started it, and these are the only crude tools for getting back at her.
And it's a recipe for fucking up your kids. Imagine the miserable existence it would be to be constantly supervised when you are 12.
I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old.
Oh, FFS! Perhaps these CPS weenies would kindly stream *their* family activities 24/7 so we can see how this mandate is actually implemented?
Their "families" are combinations of various gender-fluid adult children. Actual kids not present. See my post above.
During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old.
How could you not laugh in the face of the idiot who makes that assertion? What do you do when one of the kids has to use the bathroom? Pile the whole family in while little Johnny tinkles in the toilet because none of them can be unsupervised for even a moment?
Turns out the guy who shot up the CDC was an anti-vaxxer nutcase from Kennesaw Ga. No surprise there.
Turns out he was vaxxed and believed that led to his injury.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/enraged-over-purported-covid-vax-injury-gunman-attacks-cdc-kills-cop
Sorry that I pissed all over your narrative there, Shrike.
It's his own fault for never reading his own articles.
Why aren't CPS agents being beaten to death?
Do the Cunts still arrive with police backup?
Generally, they show up solo on the first visit, then come back with the cops if they're met with resistance.
Because they are basically holding the kids hostage.
Well I think Lenore is doing God's work here. Statutory protections for parents may be the only practical option in the face of progressive cultural insanity. Prosecuting a parent for violence or criminal neglect has always been a power of the state. Kidnapping their kids because the kid walks to the corner store and prosecuting it as a civil matter is pretty distant from common law. The parents are not defendants and are not entitled to a jury of their peers and do not have the right to the services of a public defender. These are police state tactics with a quasi police force of social workers and Karen informants. The vast majority of the public have no idea how evil these people are because there are only a handful of people like Lenore even bothering to report it. And the MSM has no interest whatsoever. Thank you Lenore and godspeed to you.
"During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old. Social Services said specifically that I had to be in each room with them at all times until they were 13.".
Did you ever inquire on this rules' existence within the CPS framework? What State?
https://www.today.com/parents/family/when-can-kids-stay-home-alone-rcna172938
Another 7B cut from spending on green energy. Democrats, like sarc, scream illegal, but part of the BBB.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/dems-say-epa-cancelling-7b-community-solar-grants-illegal-ignore-law
New study in Europe shows mRNA covid vaccines get stuck in heart cells.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/covid-mrna-vaccines-create-numerous-target-products-get-stuck-heart
What they actually showed was that the spike protein accumulates in any cell in a dish spiked with the mrna vaccine.
The "heart cells" were a immortalized AC16 cardiomyocyte cell line. The spike protien also aggregated in an immortalized cancer cell line (HELA and a kidney cell line (HEK 293) indicating nothing special about the "heart cells."
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1635478/abstract
That's a long winded way of saying "yes they do" Mike. Quite a bit of rationalizing and saying look over there after you and jeff claimed the rise in myocarditis was fake.
Good for you. Keep up the hope you didnt push a false cure for years. Makes you look totally sane and intelligent.
Now ask yourself why accumulation in heart cells is more of an issue than say... a regenerative muscle or tissue.
Work it out slowly. You claim to have a science degree.
That's a long winded way of saying "yes they do"
It's a cell type that is in no one's body in a completely artificial condition where the mRNA vaccine has the same affect on all tested cell types when placed directly on the cells. No pharmacokinetics distribution, no blood circulation, no liver metabolism. Yes, in those conditions it gets in a cell derived from cardiac cells. It has no meaningful implication for vaccinated humans.
saying look over there after you and jeff claimed the rise in myocarditis was fake.
Look over there? I posted a link to the article you referenced, genius. And I never said the myocarditis is fake, I said it was rare. It's a real side affect that deserves rigorous study, but this study is not that because it is completely artificial.
And I wouldn't recommend the jab for anyone at this point.
There isn't a myocarditis registry. The only decent study of myocarditis incidence I have found was years ago in Finland. It is entirely possible that the COVID vaccines actually result in LESS myocarditis because myocarditis is a side effect of being infected with COVID.
And why would anyone in the government touch this. Trump will fire you if your findings make him look bad.
The mRNA vaccines are the greatest medical miracle in decades. It is because of them that we have a normal economy and only a million dead from COVID rather than six million. I have had 12 doses with no issues other than minor arm stiffness.
LOL. You do know the numbers were revised and also that people died with comorbidity, not the healthy and definitely not the young?
Sad thing is had the bat lady and Gen coronavirus not push the gain of function paid for by Fauci and Eco Health then humans would never have been infected by Covid 19.
There was a moratorium on funding in 2018 yet it continued...
Judge gives 0 jail time to 28 year old who sent two elderly pro life protestors to the hospital, one suffering permanent damage.
https://redstate.com/bonchie/2025/08/08/outrage-ensuses-after-judge-gives-zero-jail-time-to-man-who-brutally-beat-pro-life-protesters-n2192593
Thank god he wasn't blocking a hallway where someone twisted their ankle or jeff and Qb would be here demanding 5 years.
^Delusional.
Your made up scenario runs explicitly contrary to anything I've ever said.
Maybe training Google AI off reddit was a bad idea as Google AI gets depressed.
https://www.businessinsider.com/gemini-self-loathing-i-am-a-failure-comments-google-fix-2025-8?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axioslogin&stream=top
Did Google AI find that reddit post about the Akita?
If I had Gemini downloaded id ask what dog it preferred or what causes dogs to be ashamed of owners.
Gemini could get to the bottom of it.
Quick someone ask gemini to create a story about sarc, sbp, and chemjef drunk driving with a bear in the trunk, and an akita and child in the back seat.
Hey Google AI, if Jacob Sullum was a sane and functioning human being, how would he describe himself?
"I am a disgrace to this planet. I am a disgrace to this universe. I am a disgrace to all universes. I am a disgrace to all possible universes. I am a disgrace to all possible and impossible universes. I am a disgrace to all possible and impossible universes and all that is not a universe,"
Doucheland über Alles
The financial capital of Germany, Frankfurt, is a disaster:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p_kKHvbZ4lE&pp=
Ich habe es schon gesehen in Amerika. Sehr trauerig.
A bit late but just found out loni Anderson died.
R I P Jennifer Marlow. You truly were the greatest secretary for the greatest radio station ever!
WRIP in Cincinnati?
Would be now
Oddly fitting with an advertiser they had to made an ad for.
A Commercial Break, Season 1, Episode 17.
I'm waiting for the Akita vote before taking sides here.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/id-f-your-old-lady-in-the-a-liberal-mayor-berates-christian-at-lgbt-festival?topStoryPosition=undefined&author=Amanda+Prestigiacomo&category=News&elementPosition=3&row=1&rowHeadline=Top+Stories&rowType=Top+Stories&title=%E2%80%98I%E2%80%99d+F***+Your+Old+Lady+In+The+A**%E2%80%99%3A+Liberal+Mayor+Berates+Christian+At+LGBT+Festival
Jim Ross, the mayor of Arlington, Texas, targeted the preacher during a 2023 LGBT event. The shocking moments were captured by Vice, though Ross’s face is blurred and the footage has just now been uncovered by The Dallas Express.
Ross claims he’s a moderate, but routinely pushes race-based and gender-based initiatives and has promoted LGBT “pride.”
“I believe y’all can have free speech. But this is some hateful s*** and I am a heterosexual guy,” Ross says in the footage, speaking to preacher Ruben Israel, who has since passed away.
“You stand out here like you are a b*da** motherf***er,” the mayor continued. “You don’t think anal sex is good, do you? Have you ever f***ed your old lady in the a**? I’d f*** your old lady in the a**.”
Ross was not done, however. He called Israel a “p**** mother***er” and told him, “Shut your a**, shut your a**, you little piece of s***. You ought to talk s***, these people around here are having a good f***ing time.”
At the time of the confrontation, Ross was serving as mayor of Arlington, and currently holds the same position.
He's actually rather erudite for a woke simp.
So, how much longer do we have to tolerate these perversion apologists' bullying?
He seems nice.
Guy should write a dating column.
But of course... What gave anyone the impression ALL kids weren't OWNED by the State and somehow parents owned their own kids?
The State has been babying the child from Commie-healthcare entitlements, to Commie-housing entitlements, to Commie-education entitlements ... etc, etc, etc. The State has legislated what they'll do everyday, who will watch them, who will doctor them, when they'll be allowed to get a job, what kind of job, etc. etc. etc.
If you really want to see just how far LOST the "Free Nation" has gotten look no further than ?it's-for? "the children" regime.
All the free stuff the gov't gives kids isn't free at all. People selling their children by accepting it.
BREAKING: More than 100,000 Brits took part in nationwide protests this weekend against illegal migration
This is completely unprecedented. You won't see this in the legacy media.
Remind me of when, during the Biden junta's era, 100,000 Americans came out to protest illegal migration.
Americans had an out: wait until 2024 and prevent fortification for
BidenCackles. The madlads across the pond have not any political solution on the horizon.I often see kids alone in my neighborhood - walking, riding bikes, even saw a girl on a skateboard carrying a hockey stick the other day. She was like, 8. No parents in sight, just her friends.
GOOD.
One young man likes to go up and down my street with his giant marmaduke type dog dragging him along on his hoverboard. It actually looks like a lot of fun.
I'm never calling the authorities on these kids. If they're causing trouble or IN trouble I'll just intervene directly. Otherwise, let them be.
It's nice to see kids out in the fresh air instead of on screens. Free summer play took a big hit with the COVID shenanigans, but it seems to be making a comeback.
During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old.
By the age of eight I was riding my bicycle to the comic book store and then to the Thrifty Drugstore for an ice cream cone with my friends and parents were nowhere in sight.
How did I survive?
Further proof Generation X may have had the best childhood.
How much did the cone cost?
I remember saving up a quarter and my mom always bitching "I remember when it was five cents a scoop..."
Not that it mattered. My dad was a sucker, somehow he always made sure I had 25 or 30 cents in my pocket before we went shopping.
Between $0.15 and $0.35 if I remember correctly, it was southern SF Bay Area in 1982-1983
30 years ago, CPS investigated me for allowing my 2 daughters (ages 9 and 10) to walk 3/8ths of a mile to school. I was a single father, and the school nurse liked to remind me that fathers just shouldn't be raising daughters.
I'm pretty sure who called CPS. Anyway, I pointed to the dozens of other kids walking to school on neighborhood streets and asked why I was being singled-out. I didn't get much of an answer.
Case was closed a few days later. Of course, there was no apology.
I did a lot of growing up, from the age of 6 to the age of 12, in the early 60s in southwest Virginia (Lexington, to be specific). From the age of 6, my best friend lived on a farm maybe two miles away. I walked there, on Rural Route 5 (now Valley Pike), most days after school. No parents, of course. We played in his barn, building forts out of hay bales. I almost always took my father's boyhood .22 rifle. My friend, 9 at the time, had a 410 shotgun. We killed a LOT of squirrels which my friend's father would stew for their dinner.
Most boys had .22 rifles. I got my own .22, a Winchester 290 semi-auto, when I was 8. Us kids would go camping, armed, literally miles from home and any other sort of "civilisation"--and equally miles from any adult.
The letter above is not the America I grew up in and it's immensely sad how far America has declined.
HenryMillerII:
Part of my childhood was spent in a big city, and part in a very small town. While living in the small town, I had a Remington M572 pump and two of my friends had Ithaca single shots (the kind that look like leverguns). Anyway, we were in our early teens and, like you, bagged a fair number of bunnies.
In the city...They kinda' frowned on toting guns, but we still had a heckofa lot of fun building and riding go carts, bikes, model rockets, and other projects. 'got into Ham radio...That was fun too.
I don't think many kids do any of that stuff anymore.
I was a single Dad in the 1980s, and I remember being subject to this sort of harassment. Occasionally, it came from a vindictive X-wife and occasionally, it came from a particular (very religious) school nurse who just didn't believe that it was proper for girls to be raised by a male.
Anyway, it sucks.