Child Protective Services Investigated Her 4 Times Because She Let Her Kids Play Outside
A mom who trusted her kids to play outside ended up under repeated investigation.

Parenting expectations are often unreasonably high—and so is the number of people who believe that kids can't handle anything on their own.
Passersby too often see an unsupervised child and assume they are unsafe. So they call the authorities, who also often share those super-sized fears. Then parents get investigated simply for trusting their kids with some age-appropriate, location-appropriate independence.
Because of this frustrating cycle, I frequently get letters like the one below. When people ask why I spend so much time trying to pass Reasonable Childhood Independence laws, it's for people like Emily Fields and her children. Fields is a mom in small-town Virginia who responded to my nonprofit Let Grow's call for parents willing to speak to child protective services about why such laws are necessary. (Virginia unanimously passed its Reasonable Childhood Independence law in 2023.)
This letter is presented as a stark example of how little trust our country has in its parents and children anymore—and how misanthropic neighbors can weaponize the state at will.
***
Myself, my husband, and our three children (currently aged 12, 11, and 9) moved to southwest Virginia in 2017 when the kids were 4, 3, and 7 months. When my youngest began walking, I would let the three of them play in the backyard in our small, rural community while I would garden or read outdoors. There are no forested areas, and four unfenced yards all meet together with ours. Our new neighbors said the kids were welcome to play in their yards as well.
In spring 2018 (our kids then aged 5, 4, and 18 months), we received our first visit from child protective services (CPS). A neighbor called to report that my children were unsupervised and that I was allowing a baby to climb the front porch steps by himself. I laughed and gestured at my toddler and said, "Yes, he is allowed to walk up the steps, I admit it!" That one did not result in a formal investigation being opened, but they did investigate our home for food, bugs, toys, etc.
In late 2019 (the kids now 6, 5, and 3), we had our second visit from CPS, again alleging that the children were inadequately supervised because they were allowed to play in our yard and in the yards of our neighbors. This one did result in a formal investigation, and I was told people would be driving by our house periodically to make sure I was supervising the kids as they played.
During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old. Social Services said specifically that I had to be in each room with them at all times until they were 13. That investigation ended without incident.
Our third CPS visit happened in May 2021 (ages 8, 6, and 4). This one was the result of a specific (adult-supervised!) incident, with a bitter neighbor trying to make our lives hard by using the government as a weapon. She again alleged inadequate supervision, claimed the children were allowed to wander all over the neighborhood, and said they tried to enter strangers' homes. She included an accusation that we permit the children to abuse animals.
During this visit, the social services worker acknowledged that our home was clean, that the children were happy, well-fed, polite, and well-spoken, but said the children had to be supervised 100 percent of the time when outdoors. When I asked what constitutes supervision, she said that I had to be visible to my neighbors when the kids were outside, regardless of whether or not I could see the children. I asked where that was found in the Virginia law. She replied that it isn't in the Virginia law, but that Social Services has its own set of rules.
They came up with a written action plan and required all adults in the house to sign it (which included my sister at the time), saying that the children would be supervised. My husband and sister were very frightened that the situation would escalate due to small-town politics (the person who reported us had previously been a law enforcement officer and was well known in the community), so we all signed. This investigation was again closed.
That last visit was when I knew I had to get involved with Let Grow to change the laws in Virginia. I was already familiar with their work, which is partly why we had these run-ins with CPS. I was practicing "masterly inactivity"—watching from a distance and letting my kids make decisions and learn how the world works, intervening only when necessary to keep them safe. I believe my children have a right to independence. They have never been seriously hurt and have never hurt anyone (or anything) in their practice of independence. But their right to practice it was challenged over and over again.
One afternoon shortly after getting in touch with Let Grow, my children were playing outdoors on our neighbors' hill, a place they are allowed to play. Another neighbor (who does not own the hill) stopped in the street and called them over to her. She told them they couldn't play there and that they had to go home. The children told her they did not have to go home and that they had their parents' and the property owner's express permission to play there.
She was immediately upset that they were talking back to her and asked if she was going to have to "call the police and get your parents in trouble." This obviously scared the children, and they began to walk home, in tears. Meanwhile, I was standing at the kitchen window watching the kids talk to a neighbor, not understanding what was happening until I saw one child visibly upset. I immediately walked out of the house, and the neighbor (who, coincidentally, is a social worker) drove off without speaking to me about her concerns.
Since that time, even with the legislation we helped to pass, my kids are hesitant to exercise their independence. Few people know that parents have the right to decide what their children are capable of handling. I have equipped my kids with a "license" that they keep on them when they roam our small, rural neighborhood. It says across the top in big, bold letters "MY PARENTS KNOW I'M HERE" and includes information about SB1367 (Virginia's Reasonable Childhood Independence law) as well as my name and phone number. My children have been stopped by neighbors, produced their license, and thankfully were then left unbothered.
As they age, their confidence and understanding grow, and they venture further and further out with the assurance that they have the right to walk and bike the streets of our neighborhood just as much as the adults they see exercising every day. My children and their friends benefit greatly from being allowed independence and from organizations that fight to protect that right.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Passersby too often see an unsupervised child and assume they are unsafe.
You can call them what they are: AWFL Karens.
Again, Lenore - you are not practicing what you preach. Until you are ready to condemn, full-throat, Progressivism itself - then you cannot be taken seriously on this subject to which you've dedicated your career.
It's a noble subject, 100%. But until you start calling out the liberals and the progressives for their intentional ruin of children; for their "it takes a village" mindset; the litany of poxes they cause upon society; the sheer evil that they actually are - then how do you expect anyone to take you seriously?
If you truly value free range parenting and childhood independence, then it's time to turn your back on the progressives. The gays, the druggies, the illegals, the vagrants, the race pimps, the critical theorists - these are actual legitimate and proven clear and present dangers to children. You CANNOT free range a lamb in a forest full of wolves. Period. And progressivism in ALL its incarnations is the wolf. If you cannot acknowledge them as an enemy to your overall goal, then your goal has ZERO chance of success.
Conservatism is calling, Lenore. Answer the phone.
Shit is good to see that AT the AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian (for now) swill SNOT indulge His Sacred Urges to PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH the free-range parents, or their children, on matters of physical play. Sad to say, when innocent intellectual or political play comes about? Well, THERE, AT is, well, an AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian!!! Who INSISTS that we MUST PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH the illegal sub-humans, trannies, accused “groomers”, abortionists, gays, heathens, infidels, unbelievers, vaxxers, mask-wearers, atheists, dirty hippies, commies, Jews, witches, or, the very WORST of them all, being one of those accused of STEALING THE ERECTIONS OF OUR DEAR LEADER, right, right-wing wrong-nuts? ANY methods are OK, so long as they are used against the CORRECT enemas, am I right, or am I right-wing?
AT the AuthorShitarian TotalShitarian, I hope that Ye do SNOT PervFectly have much contact with children, or even pets, for that matter... And Government Almighty forbid, PLEASE do SNOT attempt to personally raise children, until (I am dreaming, butt there is always hope) such time that PervFected You PROFOUNDLY REFORM, and give UP you Eternal Dreams of ORGIES of PUNISHMENT!
Punish-punish-punish! Personally, I think that punishment should be strictly reserved for only those who cannot otherwise be corrected, and then, “the punishment should fit the crime”. What is needed, and then no more, as far as the severity of the punishment goes. Even criticism is punishment, and it, too, should be carefully rationed.
What have very varied thinkers through the years said about this?
"Beware of all those in whom the urge to punish is strong." - Friedrich Nietzsche
“Mistrust all those in whom the desire to punish is imperative.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
"Let he who is without sin, throw the first stone." - Jesus
“How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ while there is still a beam in your own eye? You hypocrite! First take the beam out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” - Jesus
AT lusts after punishing (and KILLING?) Jesus, Gandhi, and MLK Jr, because AT can CLEARLY see that these 3 were SOOOOO WRONG for SNOT buying (for resisting) "my Tribe's violence GOOD; your tribe's violence BAD!"
I truly wish my (admittedly limited) experience with autistic children in real life translated into how to handle it online.
PUNISH them all, right, right-wing wrong-nut? PUNISHMENT fixes EVERYTHING!!!
The intelligent, well-informed, and benevolent members of tribes have ALWAYS been feared and resented by those who are made to look relatively worse (often FAR worse), as compared to the advanced ones. Especially when the advanced ones denigrate tribalism. The advanced ones DARE to openly mock “MY Tribe’s lies leading to violence against your tribe GOOD! Your tribe’s lies leading to violence against MY Tribe BAD! VERY bad!” And then that’s when the Jesus-killers, Mahatma Gandhi-killers, Martin Luther King Jr.-killers, etc., unsheath their long knives!
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
In conclusion, troglodyte, thanks for helping me to prove my points!
Then they crucified Jesus, 'cause Jesus made them look bad! ALSO because Jesus made them look bad FOR THEIR STUPID, HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM! "The parable of the Good Samaritan" was VERY pointed, because the Samaritans were of the WRONG tribe, in the eyes of "Good Jews" of the day.
Instead of KILLING Jesus, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., etc., we’d be better off VOTING for these kinds of people! But we will NOT, ’cause they Hurt Our Precious Baby Feelings, by giving tribalism and do-gooder derogation the disrespect that they (and we self-righteous tribalists) SOOO thoroughly deserve!
She could start with a non-partisan step: how many Karens who complain about kids have or don't have kids of their own? And then how many who do have kids also have nannies?
As for progressive policy, since they gave up on biological reproduction (pregnancy and motherhood are sexist and oppressive, humans are offensive to Gaia, the world will end in 10 years, etc.--and the unsaid but even stronger impulse to not let kids interfere with their personal life journeys) they desperately need to coopt the kids others made.
https://x.com/amyforsandiego/status/1953112439043833941
Amy Reichert
@amyforsandiego
This piece of paper is all an abuser needs to kidnap your child in California.
No court order. No background check. No parental consent.
AB 495 lets non-relatives, take custody of your child with just a signed form they downloaded from the internet.
AB 495 is a predator’s dream.
That's horrible, people need to open their eyes.
Well said
Conservatism is pure trash as a guiding philosophy for raising children. Conservatism teaches children that they are born sinners and inherently evil. That they must abide to a false ideology or burn forever in a lake of fire. That there is a code of ethics based on Bronze Age myths.
Just look at the sheer number of pedophiles produced by conservative repression whether of the Xtian or Islamic variety.
Certainly progressive indoctrination is harmful but yours is pure evil.
What happened to your original account?
How do you like the name Denny Hasterts Shower Room Lazy-Boy?
I’m already working on my next screen name.
There are so many sick ass conservatives to recognize.
Nobody cares about you referencing politicians from decades ago. How about work on your unhealthy attraction to minors instead? You posted illegal content here and got your original account banned.
So more current? How about Donnie’s Finger Fucking Teen Girls?
That needs a little work.
Or Matt Gaetz Teen Prostitution? Did you mean him?
#MAGA Molester
You posted links to child pornography here and Reason banned your original account.
False. I even showed up in the Reason Twitter feed - in a positive light.
Back when the writers read the comments. They now ignore them. Too much soul-destroying MAGA.
Conservatism has nothing to do with sick evil people that dwell in all walks of life, cultures, religions, cults, countries, nations, and regions.
You suggest society can judge someone as a pedo and inherently evil because they might attend church, voted for parents rights, fiscal responsibility, upholding the constitution and laws of the land, liberty and freedom to decide for themselves how to raise their children, and pursue happiness?
You are delusional.
Fiscal responsibility? Upholding the Constitution?
You are the delusional one. Republicans spend like drunken sailors. (John McCain quote)
I believe it was William F Buckley who said that conservatism was based on Xtianity. Or Islam if based in the Middle East.
fiscal responsibility, upholding the constitution and laws of the land
That's a joke, right? Trump's GOP is all about deficit spending like a bunch of leftists, reinterpreting the Constitution like a bunch of leftists, and ignoring the law like a bunch of leftists.
And I never said that ALL religious people became pedophiles. Just that the church/mosque is the perfect breeding ground for them as they prey on the young and vulnerable.
Sounds like the neighbor and cps agents need a visit from the lead fairy
Time to move.
'Passersby too often see an unsupervised child and assume they are unsafe. So they call the authorities, who also often share those super-sized fears.'
Can we get a male/female/uh, other breakdown on those passersby?
Repeal the 19th.
Re-reading... Yup, the reasoning is sound. Seconded.
With a population density of 900 people per square mile, dunno I’d refer to the town proper as “rural.” Seems like a mobile home park but in houses.
Yeah. But boundaries matter. My western town and county have densities of 3000 people per square mile inside the city and 20 outside.
Another article suggested they live in the town proper (kids were going door-to-door trying to see Easter eggs). With multiple Karens involved, seems like the dense population part.
Too many busy body progressives even where there are only 10 people per square mile. It only takes one to spoil everything.
"During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old. Social Services said specifically that I had to be in each room with them at all times until they were 13.".
So how does that work? Do the kids all have to be in the same room? Or is the sister now required to move in as a slave to the state so there is one adult per child?
You now have to sleep and shower with the children?
Joe Biden's America , folks
Joe Biden is retired now, this has becum Dear Orange Orangutan-from-Satanistanistanistanistanistan's America now, folks!
I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old.
Oh, FFS! Perhaps these CPS weenies would kindly stream *their* family activities 24/7 so we can see how this mandate is actually implemented?
Their "families" are combinations of various gender-fluid adult children. Actual kids not present. See my post above.
During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old.
How could you not laugh in the face of the idiot who makes that assertion? What do you do when one of the kids has to use the bathroom? Pile the whole family in while little Johnny tinkles in the toilet because none of them can be unsupervised for even a moment?
Turns out the guy who shot up the CDC was an anti-vaxxer nutcase from Kennesaw Ga. No surprise there.
Why aren't CPS agents being beaten to death?
Well I think Lenore is doing God's work here. Statutory protections for parents may be the only practical option in the face of progressive cultural insanity. Prosecuting a parent for violence or criminal neglect has always been a power of the state. Kidnapping their kids because the kid walks to the corner store and prosecuting it as a civil matter is pretty distant from common law. The parents are not defendants and are not entitled to a jury of their peers and do not have the right to the services of a public defender. These are police state tactics with a quasi police force of social workers and Karen informants. The vast majority of the public have no idea how evil these people are because there are only a handful of people like Lenore even bothering to report it. And the MSM has no interest whatsoever. Thank you Lenore and godspeed to you.
"During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old. Social Services said specifically that I had to be in each room with them at all times until they were 13.".
Did you ever inquire on this rules' existence within the CPS framework? What State?
https://www.today.com/parents/family/when-can-kids-stay-home-alone-rcna172938