Kids Don't Want Screens—They Want Freedom
A new poll finds that children crave real-world play with friends, not more screen time. But we’ve made that nearly impossible.

Kids love being on their phones and would rather do that than anything else. Right?
New research finds that this is a myth. Children reported that what they really want to do is hang out with friends in real life—with no adults hovering and no screens. Kids go online because that's generally the only place they can meet up and have fun without constant adult supervision. Being glued to screens is their default, not their desire.
In an August 4 Atlantic piece I cowrote with Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation (and my Let Grow cofounder), and Zach Rausch, director of the Tech and Society Research Lab at New York University, we discuss the survey we conducted with The Harris Poll. We asked 500 kids aged 8 to 12 to pick their favorite way to spend time with friends. The choices were: unstructured play, like pick-up basketball or exploring the neighborhood; adult-led activities, like ballet or soccer; and socializing online.
The results surprised many people.

It wasn't even close: kids want to meet up in person. No tutus, no trophies, no internet—and no adults! Basically, our kids want an old-fashioned, free-range childhood.
But the survey also told us that this is almost an impossible dream, because kids are rarely allowed any free, unsupervised time. We found that:
- Most kids are not allowed to be without an adult in public spaces (streets, parks, playgrounds, stores).
- Most kids have rarely or never walked around without an adult.
- Fewer than half of the 8- and 9-year-olds have been to another aisle at the grocery store on their own.
- More than a quarter of the 8- and 9-year-olds—and 1 in 5 of the older kids—aren't even allowed to play in their own front yard alone.
Our kids are growing up on lockdown. Their childhoods are strangely adult when it comes to tech, and infantilized when it comes to real life. The poll found that more 8- and 9-year-olds have talked to an artificial intelligence chatbot than have ever used a sharp knife.
Perhaps unexpectedly, we don't blame parents for this. We blame the fears, social norms, and laws that have made micromanagement seem like a wise way to raise kids. But is it? Kids are more depressed than ever, according to the surgeon general. The same is true for parents. Today's childhood isn't working well for anyone.
The saving grace for kids—and the thing driving adults crazy—is that one escape hatch beckons: the screen. Kids who have never been to a store on their own can conquer entire kingdoms online and connect with school friends and people in other countries alike.
We nag at children to get off their devices, but why would they? We give them so few real-life alternatives. But if we would step back and let them step up and out, kids would be engaged with the world outside their door. Nearly three-quarters of the kids in the Harris survey agreed they "would spend less time online if there were more friends in my neighborhood to play with in person."
Obviously, technology is attractive. But kids have a strong, almost evolutionary desire to play and roam—the way most of us adults did.
Let Grow, the nonprofit I helm, is dedicated to making that kind of childhood easy, normal, and legal again. Our free programs for schools and parents encourage real-world independence and free play. And the Reasonable Childhood Independence laws we've helped pass in 11 states affirm the right of kids to play outside, walk to school, etc., without their parents being investigated for neglect.
It's not fair to blame kids for being online when we don't let them go almost anywhere else. As we said in The Atlantic piece, "If parents want their kids to put down their phones, they need to start opening the front door."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Move out of boomer doomer gloomer zoomerville and let your kids be kids.
I'm going to treat the author with kid gloves, because coming to the right conclusion was child's play.
Most kids are not allowed to be without an adult in public spaces (streets, parks, playgrounds, stores).
I was.
Most kids have rarely or never walked around without an adult.
I rarely walked around WITH an adult.
Fewer than half of the 8- and 9-year-olds have been to another aisle at the grocery store on their own.
I did that all the time at that age.
More than a quarter of the 8- and 9-year-olds—and 1 in 5 of the older kids—aren't even allowed to play in their own front yard alone.
I played alone over an area of many square miles and my parents never knew where I was.
And look how I turned out.
"Children reported that what they really want to do is hang out with friends in real life—with no adults hovering and no screens."
That would be nice if it were true, but I have not seen the evidence for it.
Rural kids.
Not all of them of course, but I frequently see boys on bicycles with fishing poles, kids on dirt bikes and ATVs, kids swimming in the lakes, rivers, and quarries, etc. I see little kids waiting for the school bus in the dark on school days. These are the children of Millennials.
I see all of that (except the quarries) and I live in what passes for a city in Maine. Get off your high horse. Your contempt is nauseating.
I'm also a Mainer and my neighborhood has unsupervised kids everywhere. Maybe it's a Maine thing and the rest of the country has prison wardens for parents.
I think that counts as at least semi-rural. I see the same where I live. There's some hope. But most people do live in or near actual cities (not what we call cities in northern New England). I think there probably is a pretty big difference between rural (or rural-ish) and urban.
I see it a lot where I live in the Bronx, and the parents actually often give the kids that freedom -- if the parents are immigrants.
Love your contributions here Lenore. Keep up the good work.
That kids still say they want to be left alone to explore is the most hopeful thing I've heard on the subject in a long, long time. At least there is still a native spark living in them!
Yes there is hope.
Oh it's not just kids.
Gov - 'Guns' are F'En everywhere curbing production even as adults.
But we’ve made that nearly impossible.
Indeed we have. Or, I should say, the left has. You constantly fail to point this indisputable fact out, Lenore.
You can have free-range kids; or you can have LGBT Pedo groomer predators, drug-addicted crazies, illegal alienage (especially from third-world societies that are 100% incongruous with American society), tent cities, and a society that is being openly told/taught to hate white people - all of which used to at least be contained into the urban hellscapes, but the Left has made a concentrated effort to spread into surburbia and even rural communities.
You cannot have both. They are diametrically opposed. You can either have a society that is conducive to child-rearing, or you can have left-wing Progressivism.
Pick one.
I'll make it even easier for you, Lenore. Pick JUST one. Pick ONE of those things to be vehemently against: the pedo faggots, the druggies, the illegals, the vagrants, the racists. Pick JUST ONE to denounce right here and right now, and I'll take you seriously on free-range childhood. Call any one of them a social evil and a blight on America, and I'll take you seriously.
But you can't or won't do that, will you. Because you don't actually believe ANYTHING you say.
As many are pointing out above, you can, in fact, still have it in a lot of more rural areas. THough you do have a point about the nastiness being pushed more into rural areas (deliberately). I've seen the effects in northern CA (obvious even to a visitor like me) and it is awful.
But doesn't infantilization and isolation prepare kids for adult life in today's world? How is a free-range adult supposed to function in our dystopia?
Many major cities have folks who are starting up Adulting classes that include stress-reducing activities like coloring books and legos.