Eric Adams Has Turned His Back on the Charter School Movement He Once Embraced
Once a champion of school choice, New York’s mayor has caved to union pressure—leaving tens of thousands of students stuck on waitlists.

During his 2021 campaign, New York's Democratic Mayor Eric Adams presented himself as a champion of education choice and charter schools. He earned support from pro-charter groups and major donors, including allies of Success Academy, New York City's largest and most successful charter network. However, his stance on education has shifted, raising concerns as he runs for reelection (now as an independent) against democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani and former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
As Brooklyn Borough President, Adams supported the expansion of Gifted & Talented programs and advocated for early admissions testing in underserved neighborhoods. He unequivocally stated his support for lifting the cap on how many charter schools could open in NYC, as a way of "scaling up excellence," a reference to high-performing charter models that have consistently delivered better outcomes for students across the city.
Shortly after taking office, Adams began retreating from these positions. Despite the clear performance advantage of charter schools, his administration shifted away from expanding their presence and instead sought politically convenient alliances. He distanced himself from education reformers and aligned more closely with entrenched interests opposed to school choice.
Charter schools, especially those serving low-income and minority communities, consistently outperform traditional district schools. The 2024 New York State Exam results showed that 96 percent of Success students passed the state math exam, compared to 53 percent of New York public school students, and 83 percent passed the English language arts exam, compared to 49 percent of public school students.
Nevertheless, in 2023, Adams opposed Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul's proposal to lift the state-imposed cap on charter schools. The mayor framed the issue as a looming fiscal crisis, warning that adding more charters would cost the city over $1 billion.
The $1 billion estimate is misleading, since charter approvals are typically gradual—five to ten per year—and any substantial fiscal impact would take a decade or more to materialize.
Further undermining the argument is a simple cost comparison. In the 2022–2023 academic year, the average cost per charter school student in New York City was approximately $20,000. In contrast, the city's public schools spent over $37,000 per student.
The clearest indicator of Adams' reversal came when the Department of Education blocked the co-location of three new Success Academy schools, citing space constraints, although suitable buildings were available.
The switch, by all appearances, was politically motivated—an effort to appease charter opponents such as the United Federation of Teachers (UFT). For many families and education advocates, this move was a betrayal of the promises Adams made on the campaign trail.
Throughout his term as mayor, Adams has caved to pressure from the UFT, which has long opposed charter growth. He also aligned himself with charter-skeptical legislators such as Assemblyman Michael Benedetto (D–Bronx), the chair of the state Assembly Education Committee. Benedetto has repeatedly pushed for legislation that would restrict charter growth, despite overwhelming parental demand for more options.
New York City's charter schools are currently at their cap of 275 schools. Without action to lift the cap or reauthorize "zombie" licenses from previously closed charters, no new schools can open. Hochul's 2024 budget proposal sought to address this by allowing 85 new charters and reviving 21 expired licenses. Adams' opposition derailed these reforms, denying thousands of families access to higher-quality educational environments.
Today, almost 50,000 students remain on charter school waitlists across the city—many of them from the same underserved communities Adams once promised to uplift.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Local politician flip flops under pressure during an election cycle.
Film at 11.
No no no! Politician responds to community input.
The real problem is that politicians have the power to change things that are none of the government's business. Reason seldom addresses that these days.
Education isn't the government's business?
Thr union didn't endorse Adams.
UFT Delegate Assembly endorses Mamdani for NYC mayor https://share.google/r8ylszGWZV80BVtJg
End all taxpayer funding of education. Then everyone has near infinite school choice. The Education Industrial Complex is about getting their funding. Break the cycle.
One hurdle for that is that most state constitutions mandate public education.
Great! Create a poor uneducated underclass who are permanently unemployable. They will camp out on your property and steal everything from you. And you will deserve that treatment.
Public schools have been in America since the 1630s.
In this episode, Lucy will be played by the Democrats and Charlie Brown will be played by Reason...
I'm sorry you are having to deal with this. It sucks and you do not deserve what has happened and is happening.
That being said, Mamdani absolutely turning NYC into a shithole will be fun to watch from afar.
It won't be fun for those of us here in NYC.
GREGORY LYAKHOV is a columnist and a high school student in New York
Urah!
Every single big city mayor is completely captured by the teachers' union. this isn't a mystery
Gee, a NYC politician lied to its constituency.
Who would've seen that coming?
Diane Ravitch points out that charter schools do NOT outperform public schools and are a drain on taxpayer money.
Selling Out Our Public Schools | Diane Ravitch | The New York Review of Books https://share.google/zMHQ2u6ctCrHujqHR
Opinion | Charter schools damage public education - The Washington Post https://share.google/68R7yg2HOFYA7O7Al
The Myth of Charter Schools | Brookings https://share.google/lAbJs73ovGnYXwaJb
A charter school four blocks from me closed a while back in scandal. The teachers had assigned no homework and the public funds had disappeared.
Diane Ravitch has been ready to argue either side of the school-reform debate, sometimes wittily, but not always convincingly. Until 2006 she was well known among "reform" advocates, but then suddenly switched sides to support the teachers' unions. For several years an anonymous wag annoyed her by maintaining a Twitter feed "NOTdianeravitch" featuring many of her best pre-2006 pro-"reform" quotes.
(2) As for her current advocacy for teachers unions, it is hampered by their dismal record during the Covid period, extending destructive lockdowns long after safe vaccines became available, and west European countries, many quite progressive, got their kids back in school.
(2b) Some local teachers' unions are even worse, eg in Massachusetts where they orchestrated a referendum to end MCAS, a test that flagged students in poorer districts who needed extra help.
(3) That said, however, many charter schools no longer meet their earlier promise. Eva Moskowitz's Success Academies still keep the faith, but many others have fallen prey to the Woke virus. Katherine Birbalsingh, Britain's answer to Eva Moskowitz, noted in a recent interview that she used to have lively correspondence with dynamic American charter schools, but that has faded away in recent years. No more rejection of excuses and victimhood, no more rigorous and demanding curriculum, no more expectations of businesslike conduct. In ghettos, many failing charter schools are indistinguishable from failing public schools.
(3b) Intelligently designed standardized tests are needed to keep charter schools honest.