NFL Players Union Head Lloyd Howell Resigns After $2,426 in Strip Club Receipts Scrutinized
Plus: WNBA players want a raise, and Trump wants Redskins?

Hello and welcome to another edition of Free Agent! Hold onto your pool noodles, it's hot out there.
We're covering three huge stories this week, and I don't want to shortchange any of them: Two NFL players union officials resigned in disgrace, WNBA players want more money, and President Donald Trump wants to bring the Redskins back. Let's get to it.
Locker Room Links
- No, the MLB All-Star Game did not generate $100 million for Georgia, and no one even knows where that number came from.
- TV ratings for the All-Star Game were good, but were blown out of the water by the NHL's 4 Nations Face-Off.
- Something to watch out for: Yahoo Sports got a draft of a presidential executive order on college sports.
- Elsewhere in Reason: "Hunter Biden Walks Free While This Iowa Man Serves 4 Years for the Same 'Crime'"
- Sorry not sorry that I'm a huge Scottie Scheffler fan.
Winning golf tournaments: cool
Being a dad: cooler
— Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) July 20, 2025
Stripped of a Job
Lloyd Howell Jr. is going to have to find a new employer to expense his strip club visits.
The now-former executive director (i.e. head) of the NFL Players Association resigned last week after getting embroiled in more and more negative news cycles. There was the weird conclusion to the collusion arbitration case (that we covered here). Then there was an ESPN report that Howell was working as a "paid, part-time consultant" for a private equity firm that may seek ownership in NFL teams, a clear conflict of interest for the players union head. But ESPN asking questions about strip club receipts is apparently the straw that broke the camel's back.
Don't miss sports coverage from Jason Russell and Reason.
During the union's summit in February, Howell, two union employees, and some players went to the Magic City strip club in Atlanta and racked up $2,426 in expenses, including use of two "VIP rooms." The expense report calls the trip a "Player Engagement Event to support & grow our Union." In another instance, Howell expensed a car service to take him to an all-night visit to the world's largest strip club, conveniently located just 6.5 miles away from his luxury Miami condo.
Folks, even at Reason this is not allowed—I asked. (It might be allowed for a valid journalistic purpose.)
The bawdy details are laughable, but Howell may be in some legal trouble because of it. Federal labor laws don't look kindly on union leaders using dues money improperly. The union had already hired a lawyer to investigate Howell, and is still investigating after his resignation.
As labor lawyer Bob Stropp told ESPN about the strip club expense reports, "It's hard to believe that anyone would be that stupid."
And yet, it happened—because Howell didn't learn his lesson from when his private sector job wasn't pleased with him expensing thousands of dollars at a strip club in 2015.
Naturally, Howell's sketchy right-hand man, J.C. Tretter, was the favorite to succeed Howell until Tretter wisely resigned from the union too. The union is going to need some help—former linebacker Will Compton said, "We've gotta be the dumbest Union in all of sports."
Payday for the W
WNBA players are about to get a raise when their collective bargaining agreement expires after the season, but how much is still up in the air. Complicating the situation is that no one knows how much the league makes independently of the NBA. "We don't know what the WNBA earns on its own because TV rights deals and corporate sponsorships are bundled with the NBA," as Substack writer Ethan Strauss posted. "The league is just in an unusual situation."
A league earning so much of the spotlight despite having a maximum salary of $250,000 is indeed unusual. While I'm sure players will be asking for the moon, the league's owners have to be careful: They face an uncommon (for sports) amount of competition for the players.
When NFL players negotiate with owners, they don't have a lot of leverage. There's only one league with the power and wealth to pay the players what they want (although college football might be nipping at the NFL's heels on the younger and lower-paid end of the spectrum). The same goes for hockey and baseball—there are some foreign leagues, sure, but they aren't a real long-term option for players on strike.
WNBA players actually have a lot of leverage, though. In the offseason, many of them already go abroad to play and supplement their income, or have deals with the Unrivaled 3-on-3 league. Some of the players have bigger brands than the teams—do you go to see Caitlin Clark play, or to see the Indiana Fever play? They'll still have plenty of commercial opportunities if the players get locked out.
Fans are more connected with the players than the teams. If the players walk, fans will go with them. Clark could start her own Globetrotters-esque team, tour the country in packed arenas, and still make bank.
If there's a lockout, WNBA players have a lot of short-term and long-term options. League owners shouldn't forget that in salary negotiations.
Redskin in Chief
You'd think the president would be more worried about the economy, Jeffrey Epstein, international relations, or nuclear missiles than sports, but alas. "The current news cycle is another compelling reason for the president to stay out of college sports," Sports Illustrated's Pat Forde wrote. "He's got other issues that should be *drawing* his attention." And that was before Trump demanded the Washington Commanders rebrand back to the Redskins, or else their stadium deal may be in jeopardy.
The Washington "Whatever's" should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive…
— Trump Truth Social Posts On X (@TrumpTruthOnX) July 20, 2025
My statement on the Washington Redskins has totally blown up, but only in a very positive way. I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original "Washington Redskins," and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, "Washington Commanders," I won't…
— Trump Truth Social Posts On X (@TrumpTruthOnX) July 20, 2025
As my colleague Joe Lancaster writes, "If he did scuttle the stadium deal, Trump would be doing the right thing, but in perhaps the most corrupt way possible."
How Trump would actually wield power over the deal is unclear, because ownership of the stadium site transferred from the federal government to the Washington, D.C., government before Trump took office. The federal government does wield power over the district's government, though: Congress could pass a law forbidding the stadium deal, or tucking a provision into some must-pass budget legislation is more likely.
This could be open to litigation on First Amendment grounds, though. Government officials cannot compel speech from private individuals, like forcing them to call their football team a certain name. Nor can they compel speech as a condition for a financial package or benefit (my first Reason piece was about requiring the national anthem be played before games if your team wants state subsidies).
Whatever you think about the name, quarterback Jayden Daniels is still a smart draft pick in your fantasy football league—and Trump can't force me to say that.
Replay of the Week
Nobody saw this coming.
RONALD ACUÑA JR. WITH THE THROW OF THE YEAR pic.twitter.com/ddTetbUsZc
— Talkin' Baseball (@TalkinBaseball_) July 19, 2025
That's all for this week. Enjoy watching the real competition of the week, the regional competitions for a chance to play in the Little League Softball World Series (all week long on ESPN+). Who can resist Omaha, Nebraska, vs. Floyds Knobs, Indiana?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Your a retard.
The NBA players have a joint partnership where they recieve part of the profit. The same should be true for the wnba. So all of the retards in the wnba owe the corporation money, seeing as they loose money every year.
Yeah, it's a bit of a pussified take. The reporting that the league is shit compared to players and treading water among its peer leagues isn't wrong. It's been obvious for quite a while that several Women's NCAA teams and even other sports are self-sustaining* while the WNBA isn't, but the whiff on "We don't know what the WNBA earns on its own because TV rights deals and corporate sponsorships are bundled with the NBA," is obvious buck-passing.
SSDD with saying nobody knows how much the gold-digging, stay-at-home trophy wife who doesn't have a job pulls in, while the DINKs on either side of them don't seem to have a problem getting their collective/respective shit together. It's "unusual" the same way it's "unusual" to use union dues to pay for visits to the strip club.
* Or "relatively self-sustaining" which should belie the "We don't know how much money the WNBA is pulling in." horseshit. Frickin' Universities are able to parse Men's revenue from Women's revenue from academic and donor influx, the idea that the NBA can't sort their shit out is disingenuous.
He was looking for the next star tight end.
At least he wasn’t flagged for illegal touching.
Yeah, but how does his Akita feel about it?
Depends on how many ruffing the passer penalties he has accrued.
Some of the players have bigger brands than the teams—do you go to see Caitlin Clark play, or to see the Indiana Fever play?
No, one player--Clark--has a bigger brand than the team. In fact, she has a bigger brand than the league itself. It's why the people running it (and her own teammates, to be blunt) are a bunch of dumb dykes for letting her get mauled by the opposing team night after night. The only teammate to actually do anything about that so far has been Sophie Cunningham, once, and people responded by selling out her jersey.
Clark goes away, the league slides back into being on par attendance-wise with indoor lacrosse. Look at the ratings and numbers for her games versus the ones she's had to sit out with injury or her team isn't playing. No one outside the simp sports media gives a shit about Angel Reese, Paige Bueckers, A'ja Wilson, or Kelsey Plum. The only other player with some kind of brand recognition is due to her spending time in a Russian prison and laughably claiming she could beat Demarcus Cousins in a pickup game.
The retards running that league are completely deluded as to why their money pool has increased in the last two years. They legitimately believe people are showing up to watch a bunch of burly dykes make me-bounds and miss easy mid-range shots after 20 years of shit ratings and attendance for the same product.
If the people running the WNBA had any brains, they not only would be treating Clark like Tiffany crystal, they'd start marketing to men by playing up the few attractive heterosexual women that actually play in the league. Cunningham, Lexi Hull, Cameron Brink, Hailey Van Lith, are all straight and cute. Start putting out ads of them in hot clothes and treat it like a Maxim shoot, and you might start getting some thirsty guys in the seats.
Thats a great idea! I wonder why they never thought of this before.
Hetero is racist.
As I indicated above, there are Women's NCAA DI teams that are self-sustaining. I'd guess 65% of the people I know personally who know Caitlyn Clark's name, knew it before she graduated.
The problem with the league is agreed; it's pure woke, captured, activist retard crap. 100% managed by people who give 0 shits about women or basketball and the NBA can't fix that.
However, I don't think they have to go full thirst trap or that it's even a good idea (unless you put them all in their underwear all the time their "fans" will leave with whichever star because they're fans of ass, not basketball), but they do need to understand why men and women watch women play basketball, and it's not to watch 6'1" bull dykes poorly imitate Lebron James. That's not to say that a calendar shoot or whatever would be a problem, but that Lebron can travel and flop because he (or someone like him) can leap 23-feet to dunk the basketball. Angel Reese travelling and flopping from the paint because she has a large Instagram following isn't ever going to cut it and shouldn't have in the first place. TikTok thots would be more attractive but still aren't going to pull in serious basketball fans or build any sort of durable basketball culture.
Before Clark, I'd see more people at a Colorado Mammoth indoor lacrosse game than the average WNBA game. Clark is a legitimately great player, but she also was lucky enough to hit this weird spot in the zeitgeist where she became the focal point of the whole sport. She arguably has as much brand recognition right now as Steph Curry or LeBron.
https://www.sportico.com/leagues/college-sports/2023/iowa-women-basketball-attendance-record-outdoor-game-1234742107/
She is certainly atop a rising tide, but that shouldn't overshadow how abjectly, if not criminally, awful the WNBA is managed.
They could have 60k enthusiastic, paying fans in stadiums. They don't want that.
The WNBA doesn't have their own David Stern, who was a fucking genius at manipulating mass media to promote the product. He was smart enough to realize that the Lakers and Celtics had superteams that were going to butt heads for a decade, and got the tv contracts needed to push that rivalry into becoming the focal point of 80s NBA.
Clark going to a flyover city like Indianapolis is actually perfect because you can get more red state people interested in the product that way. The only reason the league can even talk about expansion and the players think they have leverage in the new CBA is SPECIFICALLY because Clark is a ratings and merch magnet. But these dumb bitches don't have enough self-awareness to realize that.
I have two sisters who have traveled a bit of distance to watch Caitlin Clark. No idea why. They also used to go to all her college games as the live 10 minutes from Carver Hawkeye arena.
Brittany Hicks is also bigger then the league she never played in.
The players for the top men's leagues do not have much leverage because those leagues have the wherewithal from revenue to outspend most foreign competition, which means the players get ridiculous salaries. The WNBA players have leverage but a league that is arguably running at a loss.
Which is better for the player? Having little leverage over the disposition of a large revenue pie or having much leverage over a possibly nonexistent revenue pie? Who ends up getting paid more in the end?
Let’s not massage the truth, former Baltimore Ravens all-pro Justin Tucker reportedly got his kicks through other means.
Washington should have kept the name but changed their mascot to a potato.
Lol. Nice. ^
So what kind of leverage does a player strike in the WBNA afford? Do you think the team owners are anxious to increase their already substantial annual losses or the NBA anxious to pony up even more to cover those losses? Paying WNBA players more isn’t gonna put any more fans in the seats.
WNBA players
Hahaha, who?
Look, if you can find 10,000,000 Americans who can NAME just three WNBA players - Caitlyn Clark doesn't count - then fine, give them a raise.
The WNBA is a goat rodeo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkZ21j3jSDk#t=131s
Government officials cannot compel speech from private individuals, like forcing them to call their football team a certain name.
And only idiots are pretending that's what's going on here.
Trump is simply echoing the sentiments of the people. If he "ordered" Bud Light to publicly disparage Dylan Mulvaney - we all know it's something he couldn't actually force on anyone. It wouldn't be because it's trying to dictate to Bud Light. It'd be because he's... wait for it... representing his constituents in their ardent desire for wokeness to be shoved back up the ass it came from.
This is no different. He doesn't give a flip about the stadium. He simply wants to give the Wokesters the finger. And large swaths of America loves him for it, because America is 100% done with Wokeness.
He simply wants to give the Wokesters the finger. And large swaths of America loves him for it, because America is 100% done with Wokeness.
I don't know about 100%. Definitely 80%.
Nobody's listening to the other 20%, and actively/openly hates their guts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkZ21j3jSDk#t=131s
The funniest part about the joke is the WNBA doesn't have good fundamentals. There are HS girls teams with smaller egos and better fundamentals.
$2,426 in Strip Club Charges? Those are rookie numbers! Up your game, man!
"...A league earning so much of the spotlight despite having a maximum salary of $250,000 is indeed unusual..."
No, it's not "earning" so much of the spotlight, it's the legacy media woke 'sports-writers' virtue-signaling by covering a sport no one watches.
My preferred term is "titty bar". Because chicks hate that term.