Leaked Memo: ICE To Block Bond Hearings for Millions of Undocumented Immigrants. Detentions To Skyrocket.
Immigrants who arrive illegally in the U.S. may be detained for months or years as they await a resolution to their immigration cases.

An internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) memo sent on July 8 "declared that immigrants who arrived in the United States illegally are no longer eligible for a bond hearing as they fight deportation proceedings in court," The Washington Post reported on Monday. The new policy means millions of undocumented immigrants may be detained by ICE, potentially for years, as they await a resolution to their immigration case.
In the memo reviewed by the Post, Todd M. Lyons, acting director of ICE, directed officers to detain immigrants who entered illegally "for the duration of their removal proceedings." The policy change will significantly impact immigrants currently living in the United States who have been historically allowed to request a bond hearing before an immigration judge if detained by ICE. "Lyons wrote that the Trump administration's departments of Homeland Security and Justice had 'revisited its legal position on detention and release authorities' and determined that such immigrants 'may not be released from ICE custody,'" according to the Post. Only in rare exceptions may immigrants be released on parole, a determination that will be left "up to an immigration officer, not a judge."
"This is their way of putting in place nationwide a method of detaining even more people…without any real review of their individual circumstances," Greg Chen, senior director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told the Post. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has not been shy about wanting to increase immigrant detention numbers. The administration has experimented with controversial methods of detaining immigrants in both state-run detention facilities, like Florida's Alligator Alcatraz, and other countries, like El Salvador, to meet Trump's deportation goals.
"Detention is absolutely the best way to approach [immigration], if you can do it. It costs a lot of money, obviously," Mark Krikorian, executive director for the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for fewer immigrants, told the Post. The cost of detention is not lost on Trump, who recently signed legislation appropriating $45 billion to nearly double the country's detention capacity to 100,000 beds. "You're pretty much guaranteed to be able to remove the person, if there's a negative finding, if he's in detention," Krikorian added.
Until recently, ICE detained immigrants only "when necessary" and in FY 2024 had over 7.6 million noncitizens on its nondetained docket. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, ICE must detain immigrants without bond if they are convicted of certain crimes, including certain drug crimes, aggravated felonies, and terrorist activity. The Laken Riley Act, passed by Congress earlier this year, added charges for theft-related crimes to the list. According to ICE's detention policies, anyone deemed "a public safety or flight risk during the custody determination process" could also be held in detention and not released.
But under the direction of Lyons, millions more undocumented immigrants who pose no threat to public safety will be held in custody awaiting immigration proceedings—a process that can take months or even years due to court backlogs. The new policy is expected, even by Lyons himself, to face legal challenges over immigrants' rights.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Get out while the getting is good.
Immigrants who arrive illegally in the U.S. may be detained for months or years as they await a resolution to their immigration cases.
Or they can leave immediately on their own accord. The fact we have to force them to leave makes them criminals.
""as they await a resolution to their immigration case. ""
Biden's open door policy has led to a huge backlog. So it's going to take some time. Can't blame Trump on that one.
One of the detention centers even has an alligator petting zoo. How cool is that?
Dude, that’s cold blooded.
Someone said that was a croc, but I think it is true.
Snappy retort.
You and you alligator tears.
What?
No ferris wheel, U2 rock show or maid service?
Does Amnesty International know about this?
https://youtu.be/UJXqnYCWW7Y?si=Ragw2j6gBsDZKVd_
No Margaritas with the local congressman? That will be a big deterrent once the word gets out.
Hey Autumn. You do know the actual law doesn't allow for bonds right? The law actually calls for detention. The law has just been ignored for decades.
The policy actually largely started under Obama including work permits, not allowed under the law. Obama ramped up bond/permit allocations leading to the illegal surge over the last decade.
Autumn should spring into action and research this more to prevent a fall from journalism standards?
Summer better than others on this issue.
If she improves, she could be top billings regarding that.
Funny how those who claim that illegals getting assistance is bankrupting the country have no problem with keeping those same illegals in prison indefinitely, which costs a lot more.
Actually less.
From the same data dump as the memo it turns out most given no bond also choose to self deport. Guess their asylum claims werent actually that important.
80B vs... how much?
No imprisonment indefinitely; temporary detainment. They are getting deported.
Pro tip: stop drinking
Drinking and having a subscription to TNR and Mother Jones is a bad combo. Simply being drunk is less toxic.
You simp for illegals, so you simp for Laken Riley's killer who wanted to rape her pussy!
They don't have to be detained at all if they voluntarily return to their country of origin. Spare us the leftist propaganda.
They should probably not come here illegally then.
Of course, if Biden had not opened the flood gates then the numbers that needed processing would not be so large as to require so much time to get through.
https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=concentration+camp
"A camp where persons are confined, usually without hearings and typically under harsh conditions, often as a result of their membership in a group the government has identified as dangerous or undesirable"
Can we call it a concentration camp yet?
Can we call it a concentration camp yet?
If Democrats were doing it then hell yeah. But they're not. Since definitions depend upon who is doing it, not what is being done, no. Not concentration camps. Now if Trump loses the 2028 election, I mean if the 2028 election is stolen again, and Democrats continue to keep the place open, then it will become a concentration camp. But not while there's a Republican in the White House.
Cough. Australia. Cough. Concentration outrage.
https://reason.com/2021/11/24/ahmaud-arbery-alleged-murderers-almost-escaped-charges-prosecutorial-misconduct-jackie-johnson-george-barnhill/?comments=true#comment-9228119
There is always a post of sarc being a hypocrite based on the who and not the what.
Harsh conditions? No- less harsh than prison. Membership in a group? No- they have committed crimes or entered the country illegally. Without hearings? Doubtful, but if they didn’t the law didn’t entitle them one.
The private contractors that run the detention centers must be loving this.
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
Another part of the Constitution that MAGAs ignore.
I'm sure they'll say that it doesn't apply because persons have papers and illegals don't.
Or that is what the law actually is.
What was yours and brandys response to J6 people and no bail again?
Sarc says the law is just a rant.
Fair.
He also thinks the fine of 1.5B for Alex Jones was fair.
Invest in Off! since the US government needs to end the cruel and unusual punishment that mosquitos bring to illegals detained before being deported, you could make a few extra bucks.
Don't you read volokh? Check his post from a few days ago. Check the judicial history of the INA.
Or keep being a leftist retard.
So what? Is your answer to just release them to ignore the law generally and the deportation order specifically or do you also demand billions be spent to aid them in their illegal occupation?
My answer to the illegal immigrant problem is to fucking enforce the law on employers that hire them. Unless the reason to not punish employers is because the laws that they are violating are completely toothless. Then, the solution is to pass real fucking laws against hiring illegals.
But hey, the owners of businesses are the heroes of capitalism. The desperate illegal workers that they underpay to make more profit are the villains.
With your ilk your false cries always requiring a separate process to avoid the current process. Your actual goal isnt to ever fix things but deflect and keep the things you lie about being against.
Ironically you said this right after they just charged an arizona taco shop owner. So what's your next excuse?