Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Social Media

Linda Yaccarino, the Ex of X

She did her best to manage Elon Musk, protect free speech on X, and appease advertisers.

Robby Soave | 7.10.2025 12:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Linda Yaccarino |  Vincent Isore/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
Linda Yaccarino ( Vincent Isore/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

X CEO Linda Yaccarino has become an ex-X CEO. She is stepping down after two years at the helm of Elon Musk's social media site, formerly known as Twitter, which he purchased in October 2022. Musk hired Yaccarino in June 2023 to run Twitter and rebranded it as X the following month.

You are reading Free Media from Robby Soave and Reason. Get more of Robby's on-the-media, disinformation, and free speech coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In her departure announcement, Yaccarino thanked Musk for the opportunity and touted her accomplishments.

"X is truly a digital town square for all voices and the world's most powerful culture signal," wrote Yaccarino. "We couldn't have achieved that without the support of our users, business partners, and the most innovative team in the world."

Musk penned a short reply, thanking her for her contributions. Yaccarino also received affirmation from many conservative, libertarian, and independent commentators, including Megyn Kelly, Michael Shellenberger, and Charlie Kirk, who credit her with guiding X through a tumultuous time and luring advertisers back to the site while living up to Musk's free speech commitments.

Less kind parting words—indeed, he sounded vaguely threatening—came from Steve Bannon, an archenemy of Elon Musk. In a characteristically wild rant on his own news show, Bannon said of Yaccarino: "You can run, baby, but you can't hide." He vowed to pursue her with lawsuits and other measures, though he also implied that she was a stabilizing force for the platform and that Musk's erratic behavior would be uncontrollable without her.

Some background here: Musk and Bannon have been vying for influence over President Donald Trump from the outset of his second term. They represent two very different contingents of the MAGA base: Bannon's faction is stridently anti-immigration and inclined toward tariffs and economic populism, whereas Musk is somewhat more pro-immigration and in favor of free markets and economic libertarianism.

Unfortunately, Musk and Trump have fallen out hard over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Musk rightly considers to be a monstrosity that adds trillions to the deficit. Musk is so furious with Trump that he now plans to create a new third party, the America Party. Bannon, on the other hand, is still a loyal Trump disciple, though neither faction is thrilled with the president's recent military attack on Iran—one thing that mostly unites right populism and tech libertarianism is a preference for restraint over intervention.

Then there's the Jeffrey Epstein client list debacle, which has been deflating for MAGA enthusiasts of all stripes. The most rightwing media-savvy Trump administration officials promised the base that they would release bombshell revelations about the notorious sexual predator and other famous figures in his orbit—but when push came to shove, Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino all whiffed. The administration's new position is that there's nothing more to say about Epstein's clients, and Trump himself was vexed that he continues to receive questions about it.

BREAKING: AG Pam Bondi responds to why a minute was missing in the Jeffrey Epstein prison video, Trump says talking about Epstein is a waste of time.

Reporter: Could you say why there was a minute missing from the jailhouse tape on the night of his death?

Trump: Are you still… pic.twitter.com/uUGH16TW0m

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 8, 2025

Musk has suggested that Trump, and also Bannon, are actually in the Epstein files, though what exactly he means by that is anyone's guess. It's already widely known that Trump had dealings with Epstein; those associations supposedly ended after Epstein's initial misconduct came to light in 2006.

Musk eventually deleted his post on X accusing Trump of being in the Epstein files. He's still going hard after Bannon, however.

"The fat, drunken slob called Bannon will go back to prison and this time for a long time," wrote Musk on X. "He has a lifetime of crime to pay for."

Grokkk?

All of this is just to say that Yaccarino might have finally decided she needed to take a mental healthy day, and that day needs to last forever. Musk is a brilliant innovator who has built some wildly successful companies, but he also seems difficult to manage. He assigned Yaccarino an incredibly difficult task: Bring X's moderation more in line with a First Amendment understanding of what speech would be allowed on the platform without spooking advertisers who don't want their products appearing alongside hate speech, racism, and outright pro-Nazi advocacy.

What's going on with Grok, X's artificial intelligence chatbot, certainly wasn't going to make Yaccarino's job any easier, though her departure was already in the works prior to this latest development. Musk apparently prompted coders to redesign Grok to be more inflammatory and politically incorrect; as a result, it suddenly became trivially easier for X users to induce the chatbot to engage in vile, anti-Semitic, explicitly pro-Hitler shitposting. This feature requires swift correction by Musk's team; censorship-inclined European regulators are already treating Grok's descent into madness as something that necessitates government intervention.

Linda stood up and fought for free speech during arguably its most acute crisis moment in world history when we were almost on the brink of losing it. She stepped up for all of us in the face of what seemed like insurmountable pressure from governments, advertisers, boycotters,… https://t.co/uHQcCj6957

— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) July 9, 2025

I fully understand why Yaccarino might not want to be the person in charge of managing all these different expectations, personalities, and pressures, though she seemed like the right woman for the job.


This Week on Free Media

I'm joined by Amber Duke to discuss Musk's America Party, the Transportation Security Agency ending the shoe rule, whether the Department of Government Efficiency cuts had something to do with the Texas flooding deaths, and more.


Worth Watching

I was on vacation in Sicily last week. (I even got engaged!) Consequently, I watched a few movies on the long plane ride. First up was Beetlejuice Beetlejuice. I expected it to be just another typical, pointless sequel—and that's exactly what it was. I'm a fan of the original movie, but I wouldn't recommend this one unless you, like me, were stuck on a plane and had already drained the battery on your Nintendo Switch.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The 8th Circuit Court Was Right To Kill the FTC's 'Click-to-Cancel' Rule

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Social MediaFree SpeechElon MuskFirst AmendmentTwitter
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Onto step: Move on. Epstein coverup nearly complete. Score another for the Deep State!

  2. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

    The Epstein about face sure is funny. Suddenly it's a big nothing burger, after all these years of rumors and promises. But it makes the Trumpistas look even more like the craven apologists they are, so it's not all downside.

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Most of reactions I’m seeing is criticism, outside of people like Ben Shapiro.

      1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

        I'm talking about the Trump fanbois here, in Reason comments.

        1. tracerv   2 months ago

          Who around here is apologizing for it? I personally think it's unexcusible.

          1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

            The stupid faggot is making things up, as usual. He can’t help it.

    2. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      Who exactly is calling the Epstein about face a good thing or defending that betrayal of justice in the slightest?

    3. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

      The closest I've seen to "apologist" behavior is people putting forth the argument that maybe, knowing whatever they know now, that they've determined that releasing the information would do more harm than good. That is, the information is currently being used by law enforcement to recover victims of trafficking, and releasing the files would endanger some current victims.

      IF that is true, it is understandable why they would go this route, even though it makes them seem like they're covering up something/Trump/whatever, and irritates the people who voted for Trump.

      What are the odds that it is true? I think on the slim-to-none side, but I don't think it's impossible. That said, release the Kraken files!

  3. damikesc   2 months ago

    Congrats on the engagement Soave. Can be an amazing experience and improve life immensely.

    I will say Yaccarino was far better as CEO than I thought she'd be. I assumed X might revert back to its old way and it did not do so.

    1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

      When she was hired, I figured Twitter was toast. She proved me wrong.

  4. A Thinking Mind   2 months ago

    If you ask an AI chatbot to be Anti-Semitic, and it does so, is that a problem that needs to be fixed and regulated?

    1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

      I would much rather an AI chatbot that acted as its queries wanted rather than had artificial partisan limits on what it would do. The worst thing Google did to their searches was try to tailor them to my past searches. I don't trust anything Google does now. They've infested everything they do with invisible partisanship.

      1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

        The worst thing Google did to their searches was try to tailor them to my past searches.

        This^ It is supposed to be a tool for knowledge. To proceed scientifically, you would begin every new line of inquiry without prejudice. AI that makes assumptions is just a bad model based on biased data. Hypotheses generated from the world's biggest focus group.

        1. Ersatz   2 months ago

          It is supposed to be a tool for knowledge. To proceed scientifically, you would begin every new line of inquiry without prejudice. AI that makes assumptions is just a bad model based on biased data.

          You dont think they thought of this already? Remember - searches are not just for factual stuff but general information or just whatever strikes your curiosity. they are trying to build a time wasting machine to constantly feed your time wasting impulses based on what successfully tweeks that curiosity. If they start blank every time they will waste many potential search hits on stuff you dont care about. That way they can shove more ads in front of your eyes.

          Disclaimer - I don't care for Google values and believe the load (infect) their political, social and economic search results with leftist progressive propaganda first and foremost. but an approach to general search without a goal of indoctrination but with a goal of enticing engagement based on a psych profile does make business sense.

  5. mad.casual   2 months ago

    Linda Yaccarino has become an ex-X CEO

    I don't always talk about Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, or Elon Musk, but when I do, I use Linda Yaccarino's resignation as an excuse.

    Worst. Dos. Equis. Commercial. Ever.

  6. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>In a characteristically wild rant on his own news show, Bannon said of Yaccarino: "You can run, baby, but you can't hide."

    in preparation for this piece did you seek comment from Bannon on his fraud plea earlier this year?

  7. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    This feature requires swift correction by Musk's team...

    Does Grok internalize the hate spurred by Nazi prompts, or is all of that contained within the session started by said prompts? Is the "vile, anti-Semitic, explicitly pro-Hitler shitposting" more or less problematic than china-man George Washingtons or black Luftwaffe officers? Because there apparently is no in-between.

    1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

      How about claiming an 91 year-old author is a Jewish white supremacist? Any AI that is scraping Reddit should be exposed a giant electromagnet and run through a car shredder.

  8. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    The Defense Department will become the largest shareholder in rare earth miner MP Materials after agreeing to buy $400 million of its preferred stock, the company said Thursday.

    More not-communism, but hey at least they are paying instead of just taking these shares, so that's an improvement. But far from Draining the Swamp.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      Remember when Microsoft had to pull its "Tay" chatbot about 10 years ago when it started promoting TOTAL JEW DEATH within about two days of release? Probably a similar thing here.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        Sorry, this was supposed to go under Fist's comment.

  9. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    “Did her best”

    Participation award!

  10. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

    It is ironic that her job can be performed by Grok - now. Same goes for the entirety of middle management. If your job consists of:

    1. Yes
    2. No
    3. Maybe, more data needed
    4. Meetings?

    You are done for.

  11. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

    Congrats Robbie! Who’s the lucky guy? (I kid, I kid.)

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Only his hairdresser knows for sure.

  12. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

    OK, who drew the Joker lips on that photo?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Raw Milk Debates Are Turning Sour in Florida

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 8.30.2025 7:00 AM

Federal Appeals Court Says Trump's Tariffs Are Unlawful, Allows Them To Remain in Place

Eric Boehm | 8.29.2025 7:10 PM

Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Are Why Your Amazon Packages Are So Expensive and Will Take Forever

Jack Nicastro | 8.29.2025 6:20 PM

Neither Cranks Nor Hacks Should Head HHS

Matt Welch | 8.29.2025 3:16 PM

Trump's $4.9 Billion 'Pocket Rescission' Violates Federal Law and Usurps Congressional Authority

Eric Boehm | 8.29.2025 1:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300