Americans Celebrate Independence Day Less Proud of Their Country Than Ever
Too many people elevate their political tribe and its power over all other concerns.

If you suspect that many Americans prize their partisan affiliations above their common status as U.S. citizens, the evidence keeps rolling in to support your position. Pride in being an American has reached an all-time low even as we prepare to celebrate Independence Day. More telling is that Americans' pride—or lack thereof—in the one big thing they have in common seems increasingly linked to whether their preferred politicians are in power. The partisan nature of Americans' regard for their nationality affects many people across the political spectrum but is especially pronounced among Democrats.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Big Decline in National Pride
"A record-low 58% of U.S. adults say they are 'extremely' (41%) or 'very' (17%) proud to be an American, down nine percentage points from last year and five points below the prior low from 2020," Gallup's Jeffrey M. Jones reported this week.
By contrast, in 2013, 57 percent of respondents were "extremely" proud and 28 percent were "very" proud. The high point since the turn of the century was between 2002 and 2004 when at least 90 percent of respondents reported a combination of the two. In these over-politicized times, it's not surprising that the most dramatic decline was among those whose political tribe is out of power.
"Democrats are mostly responsible for the drop in U.S. pride this year, with 36% saying they are extremely or very proud, down from 62% a year ago," Jones wrote, in a continuation of a general erosion that has partially tracked that party's political fortunes. At 53 percent, political independents have dropped seven points since last year: "Independents' pride has been declining since the early 2000s, dropping below 80% for the first time in 2005, then below 70% in 2019 and below 60% this year."
Republicans aren't immune to partisanship affecting feelings for the U.S., with their pride in country dipping in 2016 when it appeared Hillary Clinton would win the presidency, and from 2020–2024. But "Republicans' level of national pride has been much steadier, typically registering above 90%, including 92% this year, up from 85% in 2024." Republicans have more consistently expressed pride in country.
Why should national pride be so linked for many Americans to whether one party or another dominated in the last round of popularity contests? Unfortunately, for many people, their sense of identity is tied to their political affiliations at the expense of almost any other connection they may have to others.
Political Identity Overwhelms All Other Considerations
In February of this year, Political Psychology published a study of American political polarization by Julie M. Norman, a professor in the Department of Political Science at University College in London, and Beniamino Green, a Ph.D Candidate in the Department of Statistics and Data Science at Yale University. They found that "political identity outweighs all other social identities in informing citizens' attitudes and projected behaviors towards others." More than class, race, gender, religion or other identities—shared citizenship included—Americans are linked by partisan affiliation.
A YouGov survey found similar results last November. Polled on what they had in common, Americans identified age and political party ahead of gender, religion, geography, money, or race:
Democrats and Republicans both are most likely to say the group they share the most common interests and concerns with is people who identify with the same political party (32% and 31%).… The majority of Americans who are Democrats or Republicans say they share a lot of common interests and concerns with other people in their party — 55% say this. 53% of Democrats and 57% of Republicans feel this way.
YouGov has conducted the same survey several times since 2017, and political party has steadily risen as the basis for common interests over that time.
Speaking of 2017, that's the year political scientists concluded that "the strongest attachment…is Americans' connection to their political party. And the strength of that partisan bond – stronger than race, religion or ethnicity – has amplified the level of political polarization in the U.S."
That's not to say that other characteristics—like religion or race—don't matter at all. But partisan identity is more important to more people to the extent that it shapes the country we live in and our interactions with it and the people around us.
Hate for Enemies Matters More Than Affection for Allies
As for why national pride might take such a hit when political opponents take office, well, as Norman and Green put it, "out-group animosity is stronger than in-group sentiment." The Stanford study similarly found that "Americans' animosity toward players from opposing political viewpoints was stronger than favoritism shown toward politically like-minded players," as Milenko Martinovich of Stanford Report wrote.
If most of your sense of self is tied to your political identity and how much you hate people with different politics, your esteem for the country might well be dinged when those hated others get voted into power. Basically, for many Americans—yes, especially Democrats—party affiliation has taken the place of citizenship, and so they're proud only when their party is bossing everybody around.
In a January 2024 Gallup survey, a record low 28 percent of Americans reported being satisfied with the way democracy is working in the country. Of course: Having freighted government and the political system that guides its direction with far too much importance, most people don't like the results.
The Founders Would Be Pissed
While the question doesn't seem to have been repeated since, Gallup asked Americans in 2013 how they think the signers of the Declaration of Independence would react to the country as it is today. "Seventy-one percent of Americans say the signers would be disappointed, while 27% say they would be pleased." That was down from 54 percent who thought the signers would approve in 2001.
The original Independence Day was largely about getting rid of an overbearing government that played too big and intrusive a role in people's lives. The Americans of that time wanted government to matter less relative to their personal preferences. They certainly had their differences with each other, but their intent—very imperfectly enacted—was a limited government that would leave people free to make their own decisions without exaggerating disagreements.
So, I agree that the signers of the Declaration of Independence would be disappointed by what America has become—but also by what Americans have chosen to make of themselves. As we mark Independence Day, it's worth celebrating the day's original intent and hoping for an opportunity to restore its values.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Americans Celebrate Independence Day Less Proud of Their Country Than Ever
Not I and I hate our government (could be worse though). But our country isn't our government, government only makes up a small percentage of what America is.
40% of GDP, but who's counting?
At what point is it no longer worthy of being proud of? When even the most reform minded president in a long time can't (or won't) shift the needle on the insane size and scope of the government, where are we really going? I'm trying to be optimistic, and I don't think we've lost all of what makes this country special quite yet, but it's hard sometimes. I guess it helps that pretty much all the other countries (with perhaps a few exceptions) are even more fucked.
I suppose I take pride in our traditions of freedom and independence. But it gets hard to maintain after seeing how readily so many of my compatriots crumbled to public health authoritarianism and other nonsense over the past 5 and a bit years.
I still have faith in my fellow man by and large despite their stupidity and cowardice on your point. Might just be where I live, a high trust, smaller rural community.
Maybe 20-30 million more immigrants who have no understanding of individual liberty will help?
No. But seems like we could use some who do understand and value individual liberty as that characteristic is getting harder to find among natives.
LOLOLOL LOLOLOL.
OK jd, you are half way there. What group bases their pride in the country on weather or not they are in power?
He even does the "Democrats are more prone. But Republicans aren't immune... to be sure." thing.
This place makes a dumpster fire look neat, clean, and well-maintained.
A poem by Howard Nemerov
Because I am drunk, this Independence Night,
I watch the fireworks from far away,
from a high hill, across the moony green
Of lakes and other hills to the town harbor,
Where stately illuminations are flung aloft,
One light shattering in a hundred lights
Minute by minute. The reason I am crying,
Aside from only being country drunk,
That is, may be that I have just remembered
The sparklers, rockets, roman candles and
so on, we used to be allowed to buy
When I was a boy, and set off by ourselves
At some peril to life and property.
Our freedom to abuse our freedom thus
Has since, I understand, been remedied
By legislation. Now the authorities
Arrange a perfectly safe public display
To be watched at a distance; and now also
The contribution of all the taxpayers
Together makes a more spectacular
Result than any could achieve alone
(A few pale pinwheels, or a firecracker
Fused at the dog's tail). It is, indeed, splendid:
Showers of roses in the sky, fountains
Of emeralds, and those profusely scattered zircons
Falling and falling, flowering as they fall
And followed distantly by a noise of thunder.
My eyes are half-afloat in happy tears.
God bless our Nation on a night like this,
And bless the careful and secure officials
Who celebrate our independence now.
The headline is like reading an STG post on economics.
Naw, if it were, you wouldn't respond. You're only brave when it comes to making fun of sarc.
If you suspect that many Americans prize their partisan affiliations above their common status as U.S. citizens, the evidence keeps rolling in to support your position.
I guess two weeks ago when Reason's biggest concerns were about NASHUNALIZM!, POPYOULIZM!, and, worst of all, KRISCHUN NASHUNALIZM! have been memory holed.
Remember when you retards reluctantly and strategically voted for the 'unifying' leader who said things like "You'd need nuclear weapons to take on the government." and "Poor kids are just as bright as white kids." and "Horse-faced pony soldier!" out loud over a 'divisive' leader who said "Good people on both sides."? Remember when you downplayed 'mostly peaceful protests'? Remember when you repeatedly portrayed victims as criminals and defenders of peaceable assembly as oppressors of those who specifically sought to disturb it violently for their own political ends?
If America is more divided now than ever and that's a bad thing, it's because of you. Fuck you.
Tucille voted for Trump, didn't he? I don't think all reason writers share one mind (or vote).
Good point. But MC rightly brings up something that was strategically (and reluctantly) omitted from the article. Who exactly has encouraged and driven all of this division over the last 25 years? Is it auto workers? Is it the military? Or is it the fucking media? They moved from dependably left to hysterical to participating members of the resistance. And Reason certainly hasn't been an innocent bystander.
Who exactly has encouraged and driven all of this division over the last 25 years?
Democrats of course. They are the root of all evil. Did you know that they killed Jesus? Yeah, that was Democrats.
He certainly hasn't taken any "Sullum is an idiot." or even "Let's call a riot a riot" stances and it's conspicuously only been people like Taibbi, Weiss, Greenwald, and similar who played the "Fuck it, I'm out!" card. And he certainly doesn't fit that mold.
Sitting behind your media DNC solidarity credentials criticizing the divided plebs for not living up to your one, true standard of what the FF envisioned for America, Democrats and Republicans to be sure, is a shit take all the way around.
We are supposed to ignore that the Republicans, at their lowest since 2001, had 85% support for the country.
Pride in which nation?
'Democrats' [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire
or
The *Constitutional* USA?
And within that question answers all the questions about why Democrats are flakes on American Pride.
Of course, because one political party, the one that hates independence, is actively trying to destroy America.
I blame pride month.
I blame assholesl like you. Run over to Reddit and have a good time.
I bet you are fun at parties.
It keeps searching for invitations to parties.
In these over-politicized times, it's not surprising that the most dramatic decline was among those whose political tribe is out of power.
In what sense have Dems been out of power relative to Reps since 2000 or 2004? Dems held the Presidency for 12 of those years, and most of the time they didn't they held the house or Senate. The only period of veto-proof government was theirs, and they controlled the bureaucracy and our other institutions the entire period. It's not that they are out of power so much as they realized their complete and total dominance is not both nigh and inevitable.
^This
Take note that only one side of the political spectrum changes how they feel about the USA based upon if their side is in charge or not while the other side is proud of the USA even when someone they detest is POTUS.
"The American's of that time wanted government to matter less relative to their personal preferences."
Which political party's ideology wants the government's fingers in everyone's personal decision making? Which party embraced the notion wholeheartedly that the "personal is political"? Look at the response to the recent Mahmoud SCOTUS decision, where giving parents an option to drop their child out of what was openly indoctrination on LGBTQ matters is a threat to those demographic groups.
If Republicans feel uncomfortable with the idea of Democrats in power, it is because of bad experience under Obama'a and Biden's misrule.
"Which political party's ideology wants the government's fingers in everyone's personal decision making?"
Every party except the libertarians?
Sorry, that narrative died with the covid response. Or, more specifically, the lack of a covid response from the morally superior LP. That was the moment libertarians have been warning about their whole lives, and they fucking blew it.
Okay. Every party, period?
Although the LP's alleged failure on the covid panic (I don't know the details) doesn't mean that the party generally wants the government involved in everyone's personal decision making.
Better.
Not just COVID and for clarity:
Similarly, here's her predecessor in the LP Presidential nominee role saying Jewish bakers should be forced to bake Nazi cakes.
In your defense or acknowledgement of your statement, you said *l*ibertarian and not *L*ibertarian. The LP's position as the "Plotting to take over the world and leave everyone alone." party rather than just the Progressive-eGOP-lite party definitively went out the window with Bill Weld.
Yeah, Jo was when I was "Oh, fuck libertarians". I respected their views until I realized they were as much for sale as anybody else's.
Don't conflate the LP and libertarians in general. And large parts of the party did pretty much revolt because of shit like that.
Precisely. Still just a collection of people, many of whom are as flawed and love power as much as any other group.
But Republicans dipped down to 85%, thus proving that even Republicans are partisan hacks.
What a stupid way to try to justify "but both sides".
Yup. If Reason would write about what does happen instead of what they wish would happen, the articles would be considerably more interesting (and factual).
The article should be about the steady decline of national pride among "independents", who are by far the biggest voting block in America. Since this group includes libertarians, communists, greens, and loads of Ds and Rs who decline to state, the fact that it is consistently moving in one direction on any topic makes for an interesting article. But we didn't get that article.
The only people you describe are Leftists like you. Now run along to whatever blue city you're looking to burn and loot this weekend while telling everyone how peaceful you are and how all your policies creating the situation are someone else's fault. In short, GFY you America hating twat.
"Basically, for many Americans—yes, especially Democrats—party affiliation has taken the place of citizenship, and so they're proud only when their party is bossing everybody around."
My confirmation bias for the day.
Democrats are ignorant lemmings. Their pride in America fell off a cliff after trayvon Martin and BLM rose up.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/07/what-happened-in-2013-2014-that-caused-democrat-pride-in-america-to-fall-off-a-cliff/
It is insane that those things had such an effect. Nothing was different. There wasn't some horrible wave of bigotry and racist violence. Yet all these people became convinced that it was some crisis and some deep flaw in the country (which is in many ways probably the least racist society ever to exist).
Yet all these people became convinced that it was some crisis
Rather, all these people became convinced they could use the outpouring of opposition to further their agenda and political control.
I think we are talking about different people. By "these people" I mean the ones doing the outpouring, not the ones exploiting them for political advantage and control. The "ignorant lemmings" in Jesse's words.
Just so. All the wealthy white girls in my neighborhood who put out BLM signs and did all of their Christmas shopping in BIPOC stores. They believed they were doing it in good faith, which is pathetic and embarrassing, but they were the exploitees.
Obama did all he could do to increase dissent with that.
Race relations might never recover from our first black President.
Agreed.
Peace sells but who is buying. Too much money in the race grift.
I wonder why this shithead doesn’t cite Trumps approval numbers?
Where I live we are hugely happy with how things are going.
Prouder than ever.
Although cause and effect are notoriously difficult to demonstrate, I interpret the decrease in pride in the United States as a loss of trust and faith in the good intentions of our fellow citizens. Although this is certainly linked to the increasing political and social polarization recently, the political authority and increasing willingness to impose non-majority opinions on all of us, especially during COVID, certainly aggravated the problem.
The concept behind "I may not agree with you, but I will defend your rights with my life" is the ONLY thing that provides the necessary cohesion to maintain the so-called fabric of society. When one group is loudly calling another group traitors, I may not be willing to risk my life to protect and defend them.
We need an education system that actually teaches about the American system and not just "We're evil due to slavery"
I don't know about anyone else, but I am not a mindless automaton, programmed by the education system. Insofar as I learned basic thinking skills and facts from my parents and my teachers, I have the basic skills to assess the world around me and draw my own conclusions. One of the conclusions I reached long ago is that the only way that any of us can keep our fundamental rights under the Constitution is for almost all of us to protect each of our rights for each other as if they were our own.
When all your input is "America is terrible", that is going to impact heavily.
I'm giving Dems benefit of the doubt. I could just argue that Dems hate when the country is prosperous.
I don't think it's so much that dems hate the country (though some clearly do) as that they are more likely to conflate the country with the current government. And they by and large do hate Trump. Which is how the polling could shift so fast between last year and now. You didn't see large numbers of republicans losing their national pride because Biden was president, for example.
Biden's election SPIKED their support...to 60%. I do not think Dems are fond of this country.
Doesn't help that the Trumpian motto is to make America great again.
The clear implication is that America is not great. America sucks. What is the solution? Raising taxes and rounding up scapegoats!
The founders would be ashamed.
Poor Rachel Maddow.
Speaking of people the founders would be ashamed of...
That's so funny considering the founders set-up Tariffs as the means to fund the national government and Trump did Tax-Cuts.
UR 100% opposite of what the founders implemented.
Course that's why people call you a leftard. Leftards are famous for trying to get the US government to do what the founders prohibited from doing and curse everything the founders set it up to do.
Checks; you previous comments on 'invasion control' ... YEP; The evidence still shows 100% a leftard.
"Republicans aren't immune to partisanship affecting feelings for the U.S., with their pride in country dipping in 2016"
What did it "dip" to? I notice you did not mention it dropped to a low of, let's see....85%. Yup, Republicans have a problem close to the Democrats.
Mind you, the lower number for Republicans is a tiny sliver lower than the absolute apex of Dem support for the country.
Just as an aside, the Dems APEX was 87%. So, the Repblicans' nadir was not much worse (honestly, inside margin of error) than the best the Dems have ever pulled off.
Of course, yet another opinion poll should have us all fleeing for the hills. Unfortunately, we never find out what pride in our nation means until way after it's too late to matter. When it hits the fan, the only thing that counts is who is willing to risk their lives to defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies - the ORIGINAL Constitution before it was violated repeatedly by the enemies of liberty and limited government.
"Too many people elevate their political tribe and its power over all other concerns."
Hey, Tuccille.
Tell us something we don't already know.
It is a long article that seeks desperately to 'boaf sidez'.
But it is not.
Democrats, and the left, express a 'pride' that is contingent on getting their way. and the sad leftists at Reason who pretend to libertarianism do the same.
For collectivists this is unsurprising.
But the right, and those Republicans who are actually on the right, pride in country is pride in the people, the land, the accomplishment --not the government, and so they approve and have true pride.
The left can never have this
>>Less Proud of Their Country Than Ever
those assholes can make my country even better and go somewhere else ... fuck off you hateful horseshoe end tiktok addict awfl whiny fucks gtfo
Big Decline in National Pride
Only on Bluesky. Not on Twitter.
Why should we celebrate the ideals of 1776 while those with money and position have no incentives or interest in keeping them alive? When government at all levels serves the powerful, not the People?
You do it because it's right, DH. Not because it's popular.