The U.S. Is Closing Every Door on Afghan Allies
Afghan prosecutors, interpreters, and other U.S. partners are being evicted, abandoned, or forced back into Taliban hands.

As the U.S. wraps up the congressionally mandated Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts (CARE) program, uncertainty for allies overseas is on the rise. Some allies who relied on CARE housing for safety while waiting on a yearslong processing queue now face an uncertain future, while multiple endangered U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) applicants have reportedly been deported from Pakistan, where they once sought refuge during case processing.
Closing Every Path to Safety
According to Shawn VanDiver, president of #AfghanEvac, the CARE-funded housing where Special Immigration Visa (SIV) holders and USRAP applicants were sometimes kept safe during processing in Islamabad and Kabul "has been kicking people out…for months."
VanDiver also confirmed that the State Department is beginning to present options for dismantling Camp As Sayliyah, the main facility for SIV and USRAP case processing in Doha, Qatar. Around 1,500 Afghans remain on the base, VanDiver said, about 1,200 of whom are waiting on USRAP processing, while another 300 are SIV recipients awaiting privately funded movement to the U.S.
There are four possible plans being considered for the future of Camp As Sayliyah's residents. First, relocating to a third country. This is at present a "hypothetical," according to VanDiver, because the State Department "has been trying for four years to identify countries willing to take Afghans who can't pass vetting, and they've been unsuccessful."
The second option, and the one VanDiver said is "looking like the only option," is to leave Afghan residents' futures to the whims of Qatari officials. "Kicking the can to Qatar while refusing to take responsibility ourselves isn't strategy," VanDiver said. "It's cowardice dressed up as diplomacy."
The third possibility, forcing those Afghans to return to their homeland, would be "a legal and ethical failure," said VanDiver. The final option is resettlement in the U.S. for eligible USRAP applicants; however, this is not a viable possibility, given that the USRAP remains suspended.
VanDiver said these individuals, who often "sold all of their belongings and entrusted the U.S. government to keep them safe, are being abandoned and will likely be killed."
Deported Afghan Prosecutors
In mid-June, three unrelated Afghan prosecutors with USRAP cases were deported from Pakistan to Afghanistan, according to Mark Dumaine of the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys (APA). One of the deported prosecutors, a female, had previously been beaten by the Taliban on account of her work. Another, a male from the Hazara minority, has an open Taliban warrant for his arrest and detention. Dumaine has not made contact with either deported ally for weeks.
The third deported prosecutor worked with the Afghan attorney general to prosecute criminal drug cases. The prosecutor has been in touch and told Dumaine that he has relocated to a remote region in Afghanistan with no access to services. He said he feels "exposure might lead to violence or death."
According to Dumaine and the APA, at least 53 former prosecutors have been murdered by the Taliban since the U.S. withdrawal in August 2021.
Each of the 750 Afghan prosecutors Dumaine has referred to the USRAP program supplied individual testimony and evidence of the threats they personally faced due to their work. Dumaine says male prosecutors "were targeted simply because they chose, in hindsight, the wrong side." Women prosecutors, however, "were actively recruited, trained, and placed in face-to-face roles with the Taliban at U.S. request," Dumaine explained, because the U.S. would only fund the creation of the Attorney General's office in Afghanistan if it employed "20 percent female prosecutors."
Prior to January 20, the State Department routinely interceded in the cases of USRAP applicants arrested by Pakistani authorities, Dumaine said. Now, he reported that those intercessions are no longer taking place.
"It's disheartening and dishonorable," Dumaine said.
The final deadline for Afghans—including USRAP applicants—to self-deport was June 30, and Dumaine sees tragedies ahead, including likely suicides for hopeless Afghans in U.S. processing pipelines who fear for their lives under the Taliban.
I reached out to the press counselor of the Pakistani Embassy in Washington, D.C., and the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs to ask whether they were aware of the deportation of Afghan allies and if they intended to continue deporting endangered Afghans back to the Taliban. I received no response.
Expanding the Travel Ban
The International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) continues to be embroiled in a legal case, Pacito v. Trump, to force the government to resume USRAP processing. Although a judge previously ordered the government to process 160 refugees who had travel booked within two weeks of the USRAP suspension, IRAP media relations manager Spencer Tilger said in a press release last week that the federal government informed IRAP that it planned to include refugees in its travel ban. This, Tilger wrote, effectively banned travel for two-thirds of those 160 cases ordered to be processed and admitted.
Amid the uncertainty, VanDiver said that "unless they get serious about restarting USRAP, it's insulting to even discuss it and give false hope. You don't offer a parachute with no ripcord."
The State Department did not respond to questions about Afghans being displaced from CARE housing or about considerations underway for the future of inhabitants of Camp As Sayliyah.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"You fucked up. You trusted us."
The US spent northwards of $2T kicking the shit out of assholes and bullies in Afghanistan and we just couldn't kill enough of them to make a difference. While I feel sympathy for individuals who assisted US troops, in the end, the people of Afghanistan are responsible for themselves. They need to effect change in Afghanistan and within Islam. We don't owe them anything more.
They put their lives on the line to help US troops. In return we promised that they would be allowed to come to the US. How can you say we don't owe them to keep our word?
See below. They don't care. It's because they're Muslim and they don't want the dirty Muslims let in the door. Haven't you been following the news? They are going bonkers that the next mayor of NYC is very likely to be... gasp... MUSLIM. That is why the Charlie Kirks and the Stephen Millers are telling us all that even legal immigration is wrong, as long as it includes Muslims. So yeah, they will use whatever means they can to keep the Muslims out.
Well, those Southwest Asian Muslims are down with sodomizing little boys, so we can see why you sympathize with them.
Should Muslims be banned from coming into the country?
At the least, they should go to the back of the line, and be subjected to close scrutiny. A total pause for a while on letting them in might be wise, as I've suggested for Chinese.
Yeah I didn't think you'd answer seriously. I suspect the answer is yes.
Unlike you, I have a life and can't be here around the clock.
don't want the dirty Muslims let in the door.
Thanks for letting us know how YOU really feel about them. Too bad your mom was so bad with a wire hanger you racist piece of shit.
In return we promised that they would be allowed to come to the US.
Bullshit. You know it's bullshit and you don't care.
And you know that the US is sending them back to torture and death but you don't care, you sociopathic POS.
Afghan prosecutors did this? When did the US promise "don't worry, when we finish losing this war all y'all will have a home in the USA".
Shameful.
Can we kick it the ragheads animals in deerborn while we're at it?
Are you saying it’s a shithole country?
Compromise.
We'll let them in if they present with a written renouncement of Islam and the head of a known Taliban member*.
*(Really any terrorist will suffice. If they bring in a Palestinian's head, their whole family gets instant admission.)
The message it sends is don't help the U.S. We'll abandon you to be persecuted or killed. There's no more reason that these people should be required to renounce their faith than you should be required to renounce yours. In fact, there is less. These people are Muslim but not Islamists. They put their lives at risk to oppose the Taliban, who are the radical Islamists and enemies of the U.S., which is a lot more than you or I have done. As far as bring in a Taliban head, these people had prosecuted Taliban before the Taliban came back to power after the U.S. left. That's at least as good as a head.
To hell with the message. We want good Afghanis. Bringing us the verified head of a terrorist as their entrance ticket is a real good way to discern that. And decrying Islam is the least they can do. How bad do these guys want our help? For pete's sake.
Tiny concessions here Bruce.
Bullshit, AT. We asked them for THEIR help at a risk to their lives. Using your policy, we'd never have recruited ANY Afghanis to help us. AT, if you were a U.S. operative in the field somewhere, would you be able to recruit more or less allies, supporters, informants, etc. if word gets around than the U.S. will abandon anyone who helps them? They have as much right to practice their religion as you have to practice yours. Again, there is difference between being a Muslim and being an IslamIST.
Would it be a tiny concession for you, AT, to renounce your Catholicism to obtain personal safety in the U.S.? All this after helping the U.S.
"thaT the U.S." not "than the U.S."
Language.
We asked them for THEIR help at a risk to their lives. Using your policy, we'd never have recruited ANY Afghanis to help us.
That was then. I'm talking about right now. I'm talking about Afghani's seeking USRAP. We'll go ahead and reactivate USRAP. In order to qualify, you'll need to bring a terrorist's head and renounce Islam.
Otherwise, best of luck.
Would it be a tiny concession for you, AT, to renounce your Catholicism to obtain personal safety in the U.S.?
Comparing Catholicism to Islam is like comparing astronomy to astrology; mathematics to numerology. The former is wholly fact and truth. The latter is just a bunch of mumbo-jumbo used to rationalize dumb things.
But if I were an astrologer or a muslim or some other dumb thing, you're darn right I'd renounce it. Wouldn't you? That's a free trade. I get safety and all I give up in return is idiocy.
(Plus, don't forget the added bonus of the dead terrorist!)
The Taliban weren't terrorists. They were irregular forces fighting to expel invaders and restore the legitimate government of Afghanistan.
We will still accept their heads as trade for safe passage for any Afghani who seeks it.
"You don't offer a parachute with no ripcord."
Sounds like workable solution.
So, we should fuck our friends (and not in a good way)?
It's very short sighted, of course. If the US need local allies again in some conflict, it will be much harder to find them because there is no reason they should trust the US at all.
Good. Maybe that will make us less likely to get involved in "nation building" in the future.
Are you giving Biden 'credit" where it's due.
BOMBSHELL REPORT: Biden Admin Left 9K Americans in Afghanistan, Originally Claimed 150
February 3, 2022
I voted for this. They did a job, and they got paid.
This is what they do to narcs, 'The third deported prosecutor worked with the Afghan attorney general to prosecute criminal drug cases. The prosecutor has been in touch and told Dumaine that he has relocated to a remote region in Afghanistan with no access to services. He said he feels "exposure might lead to violence or death."'