Zohran Mamdani's Government-Run Grocery Stores Won't Lower Prices
The democratic socialist's proposed "public option" reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the market.

Andrew Cuomo has conceded defeat to 33-year-old progressive upstart Zohran Mamdani in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. With registered Democrats making up over two-thirds of the city's electorate, Mamdani is in pole position to be the Big Apple's next mayor, which could spell trouble for New Yorkers struggling with the city's nation-leading cost of living.
The campaign website of Mamdani, who self-identifies as a democratic socialist, says that he is running "to lower the cost of living for working class New Yorkers." In addition to offering free bus fare citywide, Mamdani is proposing to rein in "out of control" prices with "a network of city-owned grocery stores focused on keeping prices low, not making a profit." Mamdani argues that "without having to pay rent or property taxes, they will reduce overhead and pass on savings to shoppers."
If lowering the price of groceries is Mamdani's goal, his "public option" is a poor way to accomplish this feat, especially given the structure of the city's grocery market.
The grocery market, which includes bodegas, grocery stores, supermarkets, and online grocery delivery (like Amazon, Walmart, and ShopRite), is incredibly competitive in New York City, and its market concentration is extremely low. Based on 2016 market share data (the most recent year data are available) from Chain Store Guide, a provider of retail and foodservice intelligence, the New York metropolitan area's grocery market has a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index score, a measure of market competitiveness, of approximately 550 (an index score below 1500 is considered to be competitive).
Despite the competitive market, food prices in New York City (and the rest of the country) have risen. The cost of food at home, a good proxy for the price of groceries, increased by 27.5 percent between FY 2019 and FY 2023 in the New York City Metropolitan Area, according to an April 2025 report from the Office of the New York State Comptroller using Bureau of Labor Statistics data. However, this price increase was not caused by the city's 1,002 grocery stores focused on "making a profit"—grocery store profits range from 1 percent to 2 percent, Adam Lehodey explains for City Journal—but by inflation caused by federal spending and supply chain crunches.
It's also worth noting that the government already plays a role in the food system by providing subsidies for low-income New Yorkers. The Mayor's Office of Food Policy reports that $4.9 billion dollars were spent on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in FY 2024 alone. New York State received an additional $503.4 million in federal funding for the Special Supplemental Nutritional Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in FY 2024, which served over 230,000 women, infants, and children in New York City.
Mamdani objects that "private grocery store operators…are not even required to take SNAP/WIC," but 100 percent and 82 percent of sampled grocery stores accepted SNAP and WIC, respectively, according to a 2016 study conducted by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The same study found that 87 percent of bodegas accepted SNAP—93 percent of which offered fresh produce, laying waste to claims of healthy-food deserts.
History shows that government ownership of food production and distribution can produce catastrophic outcomes. Daniel Di Martino, fellow at the Manhattan Institute, tells Reason about his first-hand experience with government-owned grocery stores, while growing up in Venezuela, saying they "were subject to extensive corruption by government officials that awarded contracts to friends, they sold rotten or low quality food, and they served as a way to make voters dependent on the government and force them to vote for the socialist leaders."
Even if you imagine corruption away, the conceit that New York City bureaucrats can run grocery stores at a lower cost than highly capitalized private firms enjoying massive economies of scale, decades of market experience, and complex supply chains is farcical.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"who do I see about this bread, it's overpriced and moldy" "sorry, Ma'am, you will have to get a lawyer , start in district court and if the state court doesn't rule for you , take it to the Supreme Court. Neeeeeext !
Due process!
Government; If you think the problems we create are bad, just wait until you see our solutions.
Anyone who stays in NYC with this guy at the helm deserves this fate.
Not everyone can move. This guy should be locked up duo for life as a Marxist.
Yes, they can. Maybe inconvenient but in reality a wise move if one is low income...it will not get better, only worse
He isn't a Marxist.
Amazing to me with all the information at our fingertips that more Americans don't understand economics, finance, and how a free market vs a government control market are very different! If you want more opportunities to make money, the free market is the way to go, but if you want people telling you how big your home or apartment, what kind of car to drive, etc., all while taking more than 50 percent of your pay, then go with socialism that has many fleeing to America! We already have too many socialist programs that are destroying our drive to work and weakening our men!
The Mayor's Office of Food Policy reports that $4.9 billion dollars were spent on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in FY 2024 alone
Good god. New yorkers are spending 5Bil a year to feed dumb fat single moms. This is not sustainable.
Hey now. They also used it for illegals.
The following non-citizens are eligible for SNAP benefits with no waiting period:
- Refugees
- Individuals granted asylum
- Victims of severe trafficking
- Deportation withheld
- Amerasians
- Cuban and Haitian entrants
- Iraqi and Afghan special immigrants (SIV)
- Certain American Indians born abroad
- Hmong or Highland Laotian tribal members
- Compacts of Free Association (COFA) citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau
The following non-citizens are eligible for SNAP benefits after a five-year waiting period:
- Lawful permanent residents (LPR) or Green Card holders
- Those granted parole for a period of at least one year
- Conditional entrants
- Battered non-citizens
Added since I know Jeff would claim that's a lie.
Most of the SNAP is spent of 12 packs of Coke, bags of potato chips and corn pops along with frozen dinners and PopTarts.
Some of that SNAP credit is excchanged for cash so they can purchase wine and beer.
I actually agree with government run grocery stores. SNAP and all welfare must be restricted to those stores only and there are no junk foods in the aisle. No soda, Ice Cream, Hot Pockets or frozen pizza. Only basic food. Don't like it then get a job and buy your own damn food.
"I actually agree with government run grocery stores."
It's among the dumbest things possible.
The Zohan says these Citi-run grocery stores wouldn't pay rent or taxes, and would not try and make a profit" - so he's going to compete with tax-paying stores by occupying seized store fronts, kicking other, tax-paying stores off the street? All this to compete with one of the lowest-margin industries (grocery stores) in a highly-competitive market?
"SNAP and all welfare must be restricted to those stores only and there are no junk foods in the aisle."
Wow, that would never fly - you want to deny poor folks their Cheetos and Mt Dew, pork rinds and TastyKakes? That will be seen as racist.
If The Zohan wants to drive for-profit grocery stores out of NYC, all he needs to do is implement his proposed $30/hr minimum wage - you won't believe how fast they can close the grocery stores!
I can't imagine how the city could possibly operate a city-run, non-profit grocery store without subsiding the price of everything to somehow get it to approach the prices at big box grocers.
And when the rich move out of NYC and take their tax revenues with them... oh my!
He only wants five government owned grocery stores. He claims that he needs to create greater accessibility to good food. Sounds like Robert Kennedy.
But the government stores will force the hundreds of privately owned grocery stores out of business. Less access to good food.
I was making a point about SNAP being used to buy junk food not actual food. Government run stores are a stupid idea as the Soviet Union demonstrated.
Assholes like Sullum told us to put adults back in room back in 2020. Here they are. Eat shit Reason.
He can be denaturalized and deported under the Communist Control Act of 1954 which is still on the books.
Trump has the chance to make headlines.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/google-searches-communist-control-act-1954-soar-after-zohran-mamdanis-nyc-primary-victory
That's not lawfare though. If it's against Trump then it's lawfare. If it's by Trump then it's not. Trumpians determine right and wrong based upon who, not what.
This remains retarded and incorrect.
Nope. Just using existing federal law, as written. Unlike you commies, who have to make shit up.
Having to follow the rules sucks, doesn’t it Drunky?
There’s a fair bit of difference between using an existing law on an avowed Communist and twisting laws for political aims, passing laws just to use on one person, etc.
Not that I think this tankie should be gone after.
This would be fun to watch.
Joe McCarthy was right.
Mamdani isn't a communist.
Oh and the communists have made Kerala the best run state in India. They talk like Marxists and rule like welfare state capitalists.
"The democratic socialist's proposed "public option" reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the market."
But he sure understands New York politics, doesn't he?
As a good communist, he will be the absolute best at this part:
"were subject to extensive corruption by government officials that awarded contracts to friends, they sold rotten or low quality food, and they served as a way to make voters dependent on the government and force them to vote for the socialist leaders."
He’s just a charismatic retard. Spews a bunch of Obama happy talk about hope and change while he promises it will be better if they elect him and he has the government take over everything.
Trump should absolutely strip him of his residency and kick him out of the country for good. There is ample justification.
>Zohran Mamdani's Government-Run Grocery Stores Won't Lower Prices
That is not true at all.
Prices *will* be lower - there just won't be anything to buy.
Like Social Security. You'll get every dollar you were promised, but you'll need a wheelbarrow full of $1000 bills to buy a bag of beans.
Will Mandami go full on Holodomor? Only time will tell. But if so, a warning to residents of NYC. You can have my last can of beans when you pry them from my cold dead fingers. After you get past the barrage of bullets you encounter on your way in.
I wonder why there wasn’t a spate of headlines hyperbolically bemoaning the future horrors to be visited upon NYC citizens here. Weird
Of course prices can be lower. Who says that these gov stores have to break even? They can sell eggs at $1 per dozen, if they pay the chicken egg farmers market prices, and make the taxpayers come up with the difference. Why I'd bet Cousin Lenny will actually make a real nice profit on that egg contract he signs with the city.
Oh yeah. Os Tod the grocery stores will be gone. You’ll maybe still have Whole Foods for the elites, But that’s about it.
Are we finally at a point where the rest of you will openly admit, out loud, that it’s time to get rid of the democrats?
Exactly.
No, youll just pay for it elsewhere. Lower prices, higher taxes.
Communists do not misunderstand markets. They are opposed to them.
"Zohran Mamdani's Government-Run Grocery Stores Won't Lower Prices"
Correct, but they will certainly empty the shelves: "The eggs are much cheaper than Kroeger, but we don't have any".
The food is free.
Many years ago, on starting company #1, the sales director had a valuable aphorism, and since the sales staff was paid on commission, it got a welcome reception:
Customer asks what oats for his horse cost, and we quote a number which we hope he'll buy and will allow us to make money.
Customer says; "X has them for at least a 1/3 less than your price!".
He can
OK, why not buy them? "Well, they are 'used' oats, but Y has them at half your price"!
OK, why not buy THOSE? "He doesn't have any".
I'll quote you gold for $35/Oz, but I don't have any for sale.
He can 'nationalize' the retail outlets but as a failed 'rapper' he has no idea the products need to be bought from non -'nationalized' sources.
He is a fucking lefty ignoramus, but Liz has been voting D all these years.
His first action need to be banning privately owned stores. States have done it with liquor, why not food.
People need to learn for themselves how badly these ideas will fail.
They won't. No so long as the socialism comes with champagne.
We owned/operated a retail store in a beach town. We had an a-frame white board on the sidewalk in front of the store to get the attention of passersby. One of our most popular was “Huge Inventory Reduction Sale - All In Stock Furniture 75% Off!!!” In parentheses at the bottom was the disclaimer, “We Don’t Sell Furniture.”
Since I mentioned "You Don't Mess with the Zohan" the other day, it's been on my mind. I like how the Jewish (or was it Muslim--I can't recall) owners of the electronics store in NYC named the store, "Going Out of Business" so everyone would come in thinking they'd get a steal of a deal.
If he manages to get it up and running, it won't work. Let's hope that there are enough sane minds - or it was just campaign bullshit - to stop this absurd idea.
Why? This is where your democrat party is headed. He’s just a decade ahead of the party.
This is what you’ve been working for.
He’s just a decade ahead of the party.
Not sure what Democratic party YOU'VE been watching, but from my front row, court-side seats he's The Ghost of Christmas Present for the Democratic Party.
It's not my Democratic (sic) Party, fuckwit. I am a registered independent. :I'm just not a craven authoritarian cultist POS.
If Mamdani wins the mayoral election, I will feel like I hit a fucking triple double in this election season. God if you grant me just one last political wish, let this guy be elected as mayor. That is all.
"....33-year-old progressive upstart"
Another one to provide us with an abject lesson and serve in the vein of "Everyone has a purpose, if only to serve as a bad example."
Problem is they keep popping up; at what point will these useless idiots reach a level of actually running things [into the ground]? As it is over 40% of households have 0 tax liability, and aside from the virtue seeking champagne socialist [who like to feel good from their enclaves while others reap the consequences] these are the people who will vote for whomever promises them the most, and taking from the rich will include anyone who makes or has more than they do.
Problem is they keep popping up; at what point will these useless idiots reach a level of actually running things [into the ground]?
*looks at Seattle*
I'd say around 2012 is when things really started to go hard-sideways, although I was predicting many of the eventual problems we have now way back in the 90s when the ideology began it's long, national nightmare experiment with "harm reduction".
"fundamental misunderstanding of the market."?
More like a fundamental misunderstanding of anything but GREED.
Exactly what market has Government socialized that didn't SKY-ROCKET prices?
Electricity. Government owned utilities consistently charge customers less than investor owned utilities.
Strange. All Electric companies in my State are Private. My State also has the lowest electricity rates in the nation.
Sounds to me like UR a car salesman trying to sell a lemon.
Chicago Mayor (Let's Go) Brandon Johnson stated last year that city run grocery stores would replace those that have closed down due to violence and theft(gasp!). So where are those socialist grocery stores?
The local 7-11 or Speedway, that is if you don't get shot, raped or stabbed while shopping.
meanwhile: https://cwbchicago.com/2025/06/pritker-stalker-gets-probation-for-throwing-rocks-at-governors-gold-coast-mansion.html
The problem with Socialist Asshole who has never had a job is that, as Adams has pointed out, none of what he promises to do can be done as mayor. The only things he can do is drum up Jew Hatred and try to mobilize American Hating Marxists in the street to block ICE both of which he has said he want's to do. Make NYC better isn't on the table.
Government supermarkets will lower prices. Since they can operate at a loss, they can undercut other stores that will then have to lower their prices to avoid losing market share. What can go wrong?
When they run out the competition, and everyone in NYC has to buy their food at reduced, subsidized prices in gov't grocery stores, the point of the subsidies will be moot! The people buying subsidized food will, in fact, also be the very same people paying for the subsidies!
^THIS +1000000....
For anyone not loaded up with Leftarded economics...
Buying sh*t (+) A ton of useless Gov-Gun poking = MORE Cost.
Course Criminal Leftards don't know how to think beyond BIG 'plans' on how to 'Gun' down those 'icky' people for their benefit. They are, after all, the party of slavery. Something, something about a leopard and it's spots.
There are only two ways government grocery stores end:
1) They end up being total dumps that are devoid of products because they won't pay enough, and are managed by government, which is incompetent.
2) They will become pass-through subsidies to wholesalers, pushing up prices everywhere else thanks to that sweet, sweet government subsidy money. If government subsidies anything anywhere, it becomes more expensive EVERYWHERE.
This article makes several critical errors.
1. "The city already owns thousands of buildings and lots, including underused or vacant spaces like:
Former schools, libraries, or warehouses
Municipal buildings with unused square footage
Public housing complexes or community centers
By placing a grocery store in one of these, the store pays no rent — it’s just reallocating existing public space." So not only would a public store avoid paying rent, but also it would not pay taxes, nor generate profits, leading to a 15-25% reduction in prices: "In NYC, a well-run public grocery could realistically offer 15–25% lower prices than for-profit stores, by cutting rent, taxes, and profit out of the equation—especially effective in food deserts where private competition is scarce or exploitative."
That brings up the second point, which is not about lower prices, which of course would be the case with 15-25% lower overhead, but NYCity is full of food deserts...so the public stores would concentrate in these areas, which are the poorer areas, and bring healthier food to the population, which rely on bodegas and small stores which sell mostly processed and unhealthy foods. So the goal here is better nutrition, where fresh fruits and vegetables, are currently lacking.
"New York City does have food deserts — areas where residents have limited access to affordable, nutritious food, particularly fresh fruits and vegetables.
Key facts:
Low-income neighborhoods like parts of the South Bronx, East Harlem, Central Brooklyn, and Far Rockaway are commonly cited as food deserts.
These areas often lack full-service supermarkets, forcing residents to rely on corner stores or bodegas that stock mostly processed, packaged, and unhealthy foods.
According to studies and city reports, residents in these zones face higher rates of diet-related illnesses like obesity and diabetes."
The small stores would still be there but residents in food deserts would now have access to healthier food choices. Choice and health and lower costs are important values for especially the poor of New York.
"In wealthy neighborhoods like the Upper East Side, life expectancy exceeds 85 years.
In low-income areas like Brownsville (Brooklyn) or parts of the South Bronx, it can drop to 74 or even lower.
That’s a 10–12 year gap, purely based on zip code — and strongly tied to income, education, and race."
So public stores would narrow the gap of nutritious food choices, lower costs, and improved health for the poor of New York. The article completely misses the importance of this idea, by ignoring the saving through public ownership along with offering the poor the choice of healthy food.
Only an arrogant elitists could ignore these points, but the people of New York get it because, unlike the author of this flawed argument, they know the problems and see public stores as beneficial.
"These areas often lack full-service supermarkets"
I can't speak for the other areas but there are full service supermarkets in every Bronx neighborhood.
Did someone say "Step into the bread lines!" ?
How much longer will be before "Step into the shower lines!" ?
BEWARE of Democrats [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism].
Step this way to the gulag.
Title: Zohran Mamdani's Government-Run Grocery Stores Won't Lower Prices
Subtitle: The democratic socialist's proposed "public option" reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the market.
The title to this article deserves a big ol' DUH! And the subtitle only reveals the author's fundamental misunderstanding of political marketeering. I would elaborate, but I would be guilty of the same sin as Nicastro of stating the obvious. Reason (and Nick) can do better.
All one need to do is look at the history of government run food stores in the old Soviet Union....long bread lines where you were given a number and if you were lucky, you got a loaf of bread.
As far as anything else, it was hit or miss.
This is exactly what will happen if the government gets involved. Nothing is more incompetent than the government so expect only the worst situations.
Mamdani is the best thing that could ever happen to libertarianism.
All we have to do is sit back and watch as he very rapidly ruins NYC, and then we can point at his failures any time somebody argues in favor of the same policies anywhere else.
Now we say, "don't Californicate our [locale]," but it will become "don't Mamdani our [locale]" soon enough.
Also, another key point is that if NYC actually elects Mamdani, it will be absolutely clear that the problem isn't the politicians, the problem is other voters.
People like to blame the politicians but they're a distraction. It's the Free Shit Army that is the true enemy of every citizen (even themselves, as they rob each other via the ballot box). (And the neocons aren't too far behind, robbing us to pay for their forever wars and MIC jobs programs.)
He can make life less expensive for New Yorkers. All they have to do is send their entire paychecks to the NYC tax collectors, who will then pay the federal government what due to them and keep the rest to give away free subway rides and cheaper groceries. What can possibly go wrong with this plan? Also, if he provides free gasoline and diesel, goods can be shipped into NYC much cheaper, further lowering prices of goods.