War With Iran Could Create Millions of Refugees
Iranians are already beginning to flee to neighboring countries.

After days of mounting tensions between Iran and Israel—and rising fears that the United States might directly join the fight—President Donald Trump said Thursday he would "make [his] decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," pending negotiations. "The president has made it clear he always wants to pursue diplomacy, but believe me, the president is unafraid to use strength if necessary," said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
It's unclear what shape U.S. involvement in the conflict might take. (As Trump told reporters on Wednesday when asked whether the U.S. would attack Iran, "Nobody knows what I'm going to do.") But even isolated strikes could very well devolve into a broader, deadlier, prolonged conflict with terrible outcomes. For one, it could create a large-scale refugee crisis.
Iranians have already begun to seek refuge elsewhere amid the conflict with Israel. Some have left for Armenia. "Observers in Turkey say the arrivals have increased since Israel on Friday launched strikes targeting Iran's nuclear program," reported the Associated Press. Though Turkish officials say the country "has not yet seen any increase in people trying to cross" its border with Iran, per Reuters, it "has stepped up security" there. Pakistan has suspended all border crossings from Iran, according to Al Jazeera.
Recent wars in the region provide some lessons about the potential displacement this conflict could cause. "Iran's current population is over 92 million—almost exactly four times the size of Syria when it collapsed and sent a quarter of its population abroad as refugees," Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute, pointed out. "A similar refugee outflow from Iran would be about 23.4 million people and increase the worldwide refugee population by about 76 percent."
Afghan refugees in Iran, who already face ill treatment and deportation, could also be swept up. Iran is home to nearly 4 million Afghan refugees. Over 1 million Afghans left their country for Iran after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021, including some who assisted the U.S. and other foreign governments during the war.
Brown University's Costs of War Project estimates that 38 million people have been displaced from and within Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, the Philippines, Libya, and Syria by the wars the U.S. has fought since 9/11. Though 26.7 million people have returned home following their displacement, that "does not erase the trauma of displacement or mean the displaced necessarily have returned to their original homes or a secure life," notes the Costs of War Project.
The U.S. has previously welcomed people who became displaced during American military interventions, including after the Vietnam War and Operation Desert Storm. But there's little reason to believe that the Trump administration would welcome displaced Iranians to the United States (for one, the White House earlier this month barred the vast majority of Iranian nationals from entering the country).
The Trump administration will own the consequences if it decides to go to war against Iran—a war Americans largely don't want. That includes the refugee crisis it could produce.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Let them go to China to supply the cheap shit this magazine demands.
And was there any kind of point to this article? Beyond Fiona doing her usual screeching.
They like to do these weird false comparisons to obfuscate their Marxist intent.
"Well if you like bombing Iran, then I guess you're open borders!" "If you don't like immigrants, then maybe you shouldn't bomb Iran!"
Like they genuinely believe that this weaponized empathy/virtue crap still works on anyone.
Hey Fiona - for the record, I was against abandoning Iran to Islamist scumbags back when the Shah was cool. Why aren't you? Ayatollah Khomeini should have been shot in the face in broad daylight on live television, and Microsoft should have later used the video as its default screensaver instead of those flying toasters. Tell me why you disagree.
Same goes for Khamenei (we still have that opportunity, just saying!). The fact that Carter ever believed that the revolts in Iran would result in something "moderate" instead of absolutely theofascist is insane. But go ahead and tell me why I'm wrong.
Democrats - you stupid pissants - created the problem that is 2025 Iran. Republicans, once again, are here to solve it.
You don't know shit about what happened during the Iran revolution
I know what happened to your mom. Did you never question your pedigree?
I’m a proud fucker of mothers…they are sure things. 😉
Fiona is a retard. Europe wouldn't have had a refuge crisis if Angela Merkel hadn't sprung at the opportunity to let them in. Trump will not make the same mistake.
And neither will the right-wing parties in the Eastern block.
AND?
What kind of crisis will a nuke in the hands of nuts trying to bring about the apocalypse cause?
They already have 90 nukes. Oh, were you talking about the Iranians?
So the financiers of terrorism and purveyors of genocide should be allowed to do as they wish? Are you that evil or just that stupid?
So close the border.
Warmongering and Islamofascism have consequences? How could they possibly have predicted that?
But seriously, the entire history of warfare tells us that this is what happens when you let your bullies get out of control.
FFS, the US should just offer a bounty of $10,000 to every Iranian citizen involved in an effort to overthrow the regime to be payable upon the ratification of a Constitutional government. We would save that much on munitions.
Bonus cash for the heads of the mullahs and top officials.
Well, Turkmenistan better get ready, then.
I would welcome more Persian women eager for a western lifestyle, though.
Well, the hot ones anyway. There should be a special VISA program for hot chicks.
H1DD visas.
Iranians are good people who live under a tyrannical government that does not represent the society it rules. Any nation that takes in refugees will benefit from it.
I think that's probably largely true, within reason (obviously no country is all good people and there's a limit to what a country can take in refugees without significant disruption). I do feel for the Iranian people here. And there are a lot of them. Even if millions left, the population is close to 100 million. Pity they haven't figured out how to get rid of their insane rulers and replace them with something better (the latter being the harder part).
They know how. And they know which foreign countries will try to kill them in order to turn any changes into a police state - the US will coup, Israel will train Savak, Iraq will invade to carve up pieces, Russia/UK will invade (as often as needed) to impose a puppet, Turkey will invade to carve up pieces.
They just aren't willing to incur the cost in blood when they know that all those foreigners prefer a police-state puppet and the domestic history leads to military rulers.
First cite your data and percentages. 2nd, then let them make their own country good.
I actually agree with you for once. I’ve known a lot of Iranians who fled the revolution. In fact one of them attended the same prep school. He’s the one who got me into Teenage Republicans when I was 15. Which lead me to meet Ronald Reagan (very briefly) in 1986.
Remember, sarc was against even vetting visa applicants social media.
There are good ones. There are bad ones. But in sarcs world government isn't allowed to determine that.
I did the maths, the earth will keep rotating around the sun just fine with a billion fewer Muslims. Light ‘em up!! 😉
Iranians are good people who live under a tyrannical government that does not represent the society it rules.
How does that government derive its power? How can you separate government from society in a theocracy? What is your opinion about the people and government of Israel?
Are you not just trolling us?
From what I’ve seen, most Iranians would gladly overthrow their government. Unfortunately, that is no easy proposition. Especially with democrat presidents and weak, leftist EU leadership regularly kneecapping them when they’re working their way up to it.
They can seek refuge with all the friendly neighboring countries Iran had been building strong ties with for 50 years.
Also, what? You want to just stop now that it's almost done? So we can do it again in 10 years?
Yes. That is EXACTLY what Fiona and the gang want. Iran has every right to their nuclear arsenal and is entirely justified nuking Israel and establishing their Caliphate across the Middle East.
And I’m sure she will wring her hands and clutch her pearls when Europe and the US are in their nuclear crosshairs.
Not if you take them all out
If Trump defenders weren’t dishonest idiots they would see a distinction between people and their rulers. But they don’t. No, instead they dehumanize the people, equate them with their government, and have nothing but ill will towards them. But they themselves would feel totally aggrieved if others defined them by Democrats when they’re in power. Oh boy would they get mad. Principles shminciples.
It’s gotta be driving your drunk ass crazy that people love Trump,
Like say... demanding 20 year sentences to j6ers?
Help me out here a little bit; do refugees outrank illegal "immigrants" on the oppression hierarchy?
Drunky trusts anything the CCP tells him.
According to Marco Rubio, yes. If you are country full of pussies that allows Fidel Castro to take over your island with barely a fight then you are entitled to fastracked American citizenship along with a huge say in domestic and foreign policymaking. Makes perfect sense to me! 😉
It's hilarious that in the Middle East Israel is more popular than the countries westerners love - Iran and Palestine.
Palestine isn't a country. It's not even a thing.
There is no such thing as "Palestine." "Palestine" is a bunch of petulant children calling Israel something other than "Israel." It's the functional equivalent of a boy in girl's clothes calling himself "Sally."
Lots of very stupid people may be going along with it, but that doesn't change the reality of what it is. There is no Palestine. It's all Israel. Palestine is Israel in drag.
Fiona has apparently never heard of "Tehrangeles." Besides, if the U.S. lets in more Iranians, where will Fiona's beloved Tren de Aragua go?
So is Harrigan saying the war is a good thing now? Because think of all the economic growth those refugees will cause....