A Judge's Order Freeing Mahmoud Khalil Is Yet Another Loss for the Trump Administration's Immigration Agenda
A federal judge didn't buy the Trump administration's claims about why it was keeping Khalil in an federal immigration detention center.

A federal judge ordered the release of Mahmoud Khalil from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center in Louisiana on Friday, three months after Khalil became a major target of the Trump administration's campaign to deport student visa holders for speaking in favor of Palestine and participating in pro-Palestine protests.
U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz of the District of New Jersey found that Khalil posed little to no flight risk and that his ongoing detention was unusual enough to plausibly suggest, as Khalil's lawyers argued, that he was being targeted for his political speech.
"There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish Mr. Khalil," Farbiarz said. "And of course that would be unconstitutional."
Farbiarz rejected a request by Justice Department lawyers to stay his order to give the government time to appeal, and instead said he would order Khalil to be immediately released and allowed to return to New York, where his wife and newborn child, both U.S. citizens, live.
"After more than three months we can finally breathe a sigh of relief and know that Mahmoud is on his way home to me and Deen, who never should have been separated from his father," Noor Abdalla, Khalil's wife, said in a New York Civil Liberties Union press release. "We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others the government is trying to silence for speaking out against Israel's ongoing genocide against Palestinians. But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family, and the community that has supported us since the day he was unjustly taken for speaking out for Palestinian freedom."
Khalil still faces deportation, but his ordered release from custody is another embarrassing loss for President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, which the president is losing in both the legal courts and the court of public opinion.
"I think we can say that Donald Trump has lost the political battle when it comes to what's happened in Los Angeles," CNN's Harry Enten said on Friday, pointing to recent polling showing the Trump adminstration's recent actions in Los Angeles had a net approval rating of negative 15 points (negative 24 points among independents). Meanwhile, ICE's popularity has declined, with 54 percent of the poll's respondents disapproving of workplace raids.
Polling shows that Trump's lost the political battle over the LA protests, even as immigration had been his best issue.
His net approval on LA (-15 pt & with indies -24 pt) is way underwater.
Further, ICE's popularity has fallen with -9 pt net approval on more workplace raids. pic.twitter.com/k8TTbYonfD
— (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) June 20, 2025
Khalil, who was arrested in Manhattan on March 8, has not been charged with a crime. Instead, the government has sought his removal under a statute that allows the secretary of state to deport foreign nationals whose activities "would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed in a memo that Khalil had participated in "antisemitic protests" that "foster[ed] a hostile environment for Jewish students."
Khalil denies being anti-Semitic, and his lawyers say his arrest, visa revocation, and ongoing detention are all an unconstitutional campaign to punish him for protected First Amendment activity.
Farbiarz's ruling freeing Khalil was not a surprise. A week ago, he issued a preliminary injunction barring the government from removing Khalil from the country based on Rubio's determination that he was a threat to U.S. foreign policy interests. Although the government additionally accused Khalil after the fact of omitting information from his visa application, Farbiarz found that Khalil's detention was almost certainly driven by Rubio's determination, which was causing Khalil irreparable harm by chilling his free speech and damaging his career and reputation.
The Trump administration's other high-profile cases against foreign students have suffered similar fates.
Georgetown University graduate student Badar Khan Suri was detained in March and freed on May 14. Romeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University graduate student, was arrested on March 25 for cowriting an anti-Israel op-ed in her school's newspaper, but a judge ordered her released on May 9, finding that her continued detention "potentially chills the speech of the millions and millions of people in this country who are not citizens." Columbia student Mohsen Mahdawi was detained at his U.S. citizenship interview but released on April 30.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You retards never learn.
Order from a judge (Biden appointee) in Jersey while Khalil is in Louisiana. Not proper jurisdiction. An issue the USSC already ruled on this year.
He is charged with lying on his visa and green card application, putting jurisdiction in administrative courts.
These issues aren't first amendment issues which a judge actually already ruled on last week, admitting Rubios dept could look at invalidity of the applications.
Why do you guys keep making these retarded articles from activists judges violating jurisdiction, the actual laws, and norms? And i have yet to see one of you admit to being wrong after the appeals. Even sullums earlier article didnt admit his first article is wrong.
Learn from your fucking errors. You are just leftist activists at this point.
I don't want Trump vindicated merely on some jurisdiction technicality.
The retards should be to dragged to the supreme court and explain why a spokesperson for a criminal organization that openly advocates for violence on Jews and took janitors hostage by taking over a campus building could not POSSIBLY be a flight risk. After Jews were shot and burned by acolytes of his movement? How can the judge rule out the risks? Based on what? I would pay to see the sane parts of the SC tongue lashing the retards while the 3 harpies screech.
The unequivocal sacrificing of one's morality and integrity on the alter of immigration required to justify this as "yeah but even bigots have rights" is beyond words. Reason essentially argues that a white supremacist who urges for the killing of nonwhite people must be given green cards in deference to their free speech rights. Nothing in the constitution guarantees citizenship to foreign nationals.
I expect moral confusion from the left, who say "you can't shout fire in a theater" to justify criminalizing "disinformation" but defend plain hate speech. I didn't expect this from this site. I have everything now to never vote libertarian. Again. Who cares how limited the government is, if they let in people who might want to kill people like me? Guns scare me, but they do not kill on their own. I can tolerate the risk in the name of freedom. I can't tolerate retards who would let in KNOWN bigots and criminals in the name of immigration.
He is wrong on the law itself, the constitution, and precedence.
They already told this judge Khalil lied on both applications. Judge agreed. Then issues this shit the day Khalil is ordered removed.
He already lost in the current jurisdiction, the immigration court.
You're wrong about the proper jurisdiction.
Habeas was initially filed in New York (where Khalil was seized). But Khalil was moved to New Jersey before the Habeas action could be filed. When the New York court determined jurisdiction, it transferred the case to NJ, because that was where Khalil was being held *at the time the Habeas filing was made*.
And that's what SCOTUS precedent requires - that Habeas be heard in the district the plaintiff is held *at the time* the case is first filed.
So no, Louisiana is not the proper jurisdiction. NJ is. And a court has already applied SCOTUS precedent to arrive at that conclusion. (https://www.aclu.org/cases/khalil-v-trump, see Southern District of New York, Opinion and Order on Transfer)
As usual you just push reddit lie after reddit lie.
I mean you even end it with the same judge already declaring he had jurisdiction and you accept it as fact. Boasberg also said the same thing earlier this year and what did the USSC say dumbass?
It's right there in a court order. How is that a 'lie', a court literally determined that?
(On your edit:)
No, the Southern District of New York determined it did not have jurisdiction, New Jersey did.
God damn. Which judge ruled he had jurisdiction?
Now. What did the USSC ruled regarding jurisdiction when Boasberg tried this shit?
I gave you a link and told you which order it was. Go read it yourself.
USSC ruled that the proper jurisdiction for a Habeas petition is the district the plaintiff is held in *at the time the Habeas petition is filed*. And at the time Khalil filed his Habeas petition, he was held in New Jersey. That the government subsequently transferred him to Louisiana does *not* change the proper venue, according to SCOTUS precedent.
I'd also like to point out that ICE has acted illegally at almost every step of the way. They had no warrant, not even an administrative warrant. They claimed they were arresting him because his VISA was revoked, but he didn't have a VISA, he had a green card. There was no lawful basis for his arrest.
The government has also apparently abandoned it's 'misrepresentation allegations' (on the application for the greencard), so that's not a winner either.
There's no lawful basis to hold him or deport him.
And more falsehoods lol.
Thos very same judge just days ago said the misrepresentation on applications was valid dumbass. This release is while Khalil is on "trial" for those charges. He is on bail with limited travel restrictions.
Lol. You get basic facts wrong as usual.
The government abandoned the misrepresentation accusations in *immigration court* way back in early June. So sure, the NJ court thought there might be something there, but it wasn't making a decision on that, and the government and meanwhile dropped that argument in the immigration court.
And the rest of that is 100% accurate. There was no warrant. He didn't have a VISA that could be revoked. A greencard cannot be revoked without due process. The arrest was illegal on its face.
Remember when Trump defenders whined and cried and claimed activist judges were aiding in the theft of the election by refusing to take cases based upon jurisdiction and standing?
Now when judges take cases these same people are whining and crying that activist judges don’t have standing or jurisdiction.
What’s the difference? Who. Not what.
The argument was courts refusing based on standing until the count then ruling moot as soon as the count occurred retard.
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you lie so much?
I suppose it's really just like breathing for him at this point. He certainly isn't making any effort at consistency.
Gray box say anything interesting other than the usual "Trump this" and "Trump that" bullshit?
/"Muting" Sarc exactly how he "mutes" other people.
Luckily his stupidity leaks through the Grey.
Yeah, I don’t remember that. I remember them bitching about “standing” and refusing to even look at the “evidence”, but nothing about jurisdiction.
"I think we can say that Donald Trump has lost the political battle when it comes to what's happened in Los Angeles," CNN's Harry Enten
Beyond. your.own. parody.
Sad.
Dems keep dropping in polls. Deportation keeps rising in polls. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's literally the first such 'loss'.
Ignore them.
Why have three branches of government? Let one man rule by decree.
Or based on the appeals courts let him execute the laws and his own constitutional powers retard.
Gray box whine again?
When the headline focuses on "yet another loss for Trump", it's pretty clear the actual court ruling is immaterial to the writer's partisanship.
But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family, and the community that has supported us since the day he was unjustly taken for speaking out for Palestinian freedom.
You shouldn't repeat their lies without context CJ, shame on you.
They are not speaking out for Palestinian freedom, they are speaking out against Israeli freedom. They want to see Israel sanctioned for the defense of its citizens. They want Israel cut off from supplies. They want Israel defenseless and hungry. And when Israel begs for food, they want to deny them.
Why? Denial.
From their current provisional Constitution:
They will never get it. They don't deserve it.
A loss for for Trump or just another activist judge going way outside his Constitutional bounds? I choose the later.
how does this guy pay for stuff?
Funny how Tump defenders are exactly like the leftists they hate in that they scream “Activist!” whenever a judge rules against their Dear Leader. Though I’m sure they will justify it by saying Democrats did it first.
Harry Truman moved to deport Peter Harisiades, a legal resident alien who had immigrated from Greece as a teen, because of probable cause that he was once a member of the Communist Party.
The lower court found that the evidence was sufficient, and ordered Harisiades deported pursuant to the McCarran-Walter Act.
Harisiades argued that the deportation violated his freedom of speech. The Supreme Court rejected the argument, not because of lack of jurisdiction, or because Harisiades failed to argue the point in the courts below, but on the merits. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580 (1952)
Because treating people like criminals for their thoughts is so American.
You mean lying on visa and green card forms.
Guess there are some people you feel are above the law.
Look at the insurrectionist drunk reject the ruling of the court.
Was that the judge who ordered Khalil released?
But our cases do make clear that, despite the impact of these classifications on the interests of those already within our borders, congressional determinations such as this one are subject only to limited judicial review.
Fiallo v. Bell, 430 U.S. 787, 795 fn.6 (1977)
Limited doesn’t mean zero.
Where does the constitution or law grant article 3 inferior Courts review for immigration matters? Neither do. In fact the law written by article 1 (who has the power over immigration) excluded article 3 review you fucking ignorant moron.
How many of these judges have been rebuked by the appeals courts again?
Hard to tell, Reeeeason never covers those.
And the one time they do they try to spin Trump lost. Like with sullum.
No CJ. It’s a loss for America. So I’m sure you’re ecstatic.
Khalil still faces deportation, but his ordered release from custody is another embarrassing loss for President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, which the president is losing in both the legal courts and the court of public opinion.
I'll be curious as to your thoughts when the court of public opinion leaves him facedown in an alley in a pool of his own blood.
I keep trying to warn you morons about this (same with the antics of the LGBT Pedos), but it's like you're hellbent on asking for it. Y'all love Luigi Fettuccini. Something tells me you're not going to be too happy about the next version of him that's wearing a MAGA hat.
You just can’t wait to murder people. You’re as disturbed as Nardz.
You cheered and applauded the death of babbit.
https://c.tenor.com/ur_mBCjWdrQAAAAC/tenor.gif
That clip will never not be funny.
Gets even worse for CJ.
Immigration judge already had ordered Khalil removed before this order.
Homeland Security
@DHSgov
An immigration judge, not a district judge, has the authority to decide if Mr. Khalil should be released or detained. On the same day an immigration judge denied Khalil bond and ordered him removed, one rogue district judge ordered him released. This is yet another example of how out of control members of the judicial branch are undermining national security. Their conduct not only denies the result of the 2024 election, it also does great harm to our constitutional system by undermining public confidence in the courts.
As with Western Europe, USA will be conquered by the death cult without even firing a shot in our own defense. We welcome our new rulers with open arms.
When will you people learn?