Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Media Criticism

Roseanne Reconsidered?

An interview with the controversial comedian.

Robby Soave | 6.12.2025 2:28 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Roseanne Barr | Darla Khazei, PacificCoastNews/Newscom
Roseanne Barr (Darla Khazei, PacificCoastNews/Newscom)

Roseanne Barr is a comedian, actress, and one of the more notable victims of cancel culture. Back in 2018, she was enjoying a popular resurgence after a revival of her '90s sitcom, Roseanne, achieved massive success on ABC. Roseanne, the television character, and real-life Roseanne were both ardent supporters of Donald Trump, and while the show did not necessarily promote a specific political viewpoint, it was nevertheless well-liked by conservatives. Trump himself called Barr to congratulate her.

And then she tweeted.

The tweet—written while Barr was apparently in an Ambien-induced fog and sent at 2 a.m.—concerned Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to former President Barack Obama. Barr said that Jarrett was what would result from the union of "the Muslim Brotherhood and Planet of the Apes." Jarrett is a black woman, and thus Barr had repurposed a vicious, racist caricature: comparing a black person to an ape. Barr was universally condemned as a racist, and ABC swiftly canceled her show.

"Roseanne's Twitter statement is abhorrent, repugnant and inconsistent with our values," said the network in a statement at the time.

When I wrote about the cancellation of Roseanne—the show, and the person—I, too, said it was a "vile" tweet. And I still think it was extremely rude and offensive, as were any number of other things Barr has said over the years. But I think it's usually worth hearing people out; Barr didn't really get that chance, as ABC canceled the show without asking for an explanation or letting her address the controversy on any of the network's news programs. ABC then rebooted the show and killed her character off-screen.

In the years since the tweet, Barr has become even more associated with MAGA. She starred in a comedy special that streamed on Fox Nation and contributed to a Daily Wire cartoon show. The right has embraced her, and everyone else shunned her. Needless to say, many in the media would probably view this as an example of mainstream liberals correctly rejecting a racist.

Barr disputes that she is a racist, of course. She also disputes that there was anything intentionally racist about her tweet. In fact, she says, she had no idea that Jarrett was a black woman—she thought she was white. (Jarrett was born in Iran to American parents and is of African-American descent.) Moreover, she maintains she never wrote that Jarrett was an ape; rather, she made a reference to the film Planet of the Apes, which she describes as a movie "about fascism." Barr claims she was making a political remark—a criticism of the Obama administration's policies—not a racial one.

At least, that's what she told me. Earlier this week, Barr appeared on Rising to promote a new documentary film about her life: Roseanne Barr Is America.

We discussed the tweet at great length. My co-host, Lindsey Granger, is a moderate liberal and a black woman, and she asked Barr some very tough but fair questions about the tweet, why it was offensive, and how it was received.

It was a conversation worth having. I don't know if anyone's minds will be changed, or should be changed. You're still welcome to dislike Barr, or to think she's nuts, or to conclude that likening Jarrett to a terrorist group and a science-fiction movie was offensive regardless. You're also free to disbelieve her. Nevertheless, I was happy to hear her side of the story—and I think it's telling that most of the media coverage at the time did not include Barr's perspective on the tweet. The cancel culture mobs of 2018 did not exactly appreciate nuance.

This Week on Free Media

I am joined by Amber Duke to discuss the Los Angeles riots, the breakup between Trump and Elon Musk, and more!

 

Worth Watching

I've just started reading Brideshead Revisited, a novel recommended by Peter Suderman on an episode of the Reason Roundtable podcast a year or two ago. I don't know why exactly the recollection of this recommendation popped into my head after so much time had passed, but I'm enjoying the novel so far.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Illinois' Sports Betting Tax Means All Bets Are Off

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Media CriticismCancel CultureFree SpeechEntertainmentComedy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (24)

Latest

Guan Heng Exposed China's Uyghur Camps. ICE Wants To Deport Him.

Robby Soave | 12.17.2025 3:56 PM

Hegseth Won't Let Us See a Video That Might Undermine Support for Trump's Bloodthirsty Anti-Drug Strategy

Jacob Sullum | 12.17.2025 3:35 PM

Governments Are Pushing Digital IDs. Are You Ready To Be Tracked?

John Stossel | 12.17.2025 2:25 PM

Porn Sites Must Block VPNs To Comply With Indiana's Age-Verification Law, State Suggests in New Lawsuit

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.17.2025 12:18 PM

Thanks to Antitrust Officials, iRobot Will Be Acquired by a Chinese Robotics Firm Instead of Amazon

Jack Nicastro | 12.17.2025 11:15 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks