New Orleans Police Officer Who Shot a Puppy Will Face Trial
This is far from the first time a cop has shot a dog for seemingly no reason.

A Louisiana police officer who shot and killed a puppy in 2021 will now face trial, after a lengthy legal battle.
On April 10, 2021, two New Orleans Police Department officers were called to Derek Brown and Julia Barecki-Brown's home after receiving a noise complaint. According to legal documents, as the pair approached the house, one officer, Derrick Burmaster, claimed he made "kissy noises" to attract any dogs. Believing there were no dogs nearby, the officers approached the Brown's house. As they did so, a dog began barking, and Burmaster drew his firearm. While the other officer left the Browns' yard after hearing the barking, Burmaster stayed, and the Brown's two dogs then ran down the stairs of the home and approached the officers.
One of the dogs, a 16-week-old, 22-pound puppy named Apollo approached Burmaster while wagging his tail. Burmaster fired three shots at Apollo, striking the dog in his neck and chest. Hearing gunshots, the Browns came into the yard, and Derek "held Apollo as he died from the gunshot wound," according to the couple's lawsuit.
The couple filed a lawsuit against Burmaster and the City of New Orleans in 2022, alleging that Burmaster unconstitutionally 'seized' Apollo by shooting him. "It is clearly established that an officer cannot shoot a dog in the absence of an objectively legitimate and imminent threat to him or others," the suit reads. "A twenty-two-pound Catahoula puppy, standing less than a foot and a half tall, does not present an objectively legitimate and imminent threat to police officers."
A yearslong legal battle followed. Earlier this year, the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Burmaster's attempt to appeal a lower court's decision that the case could not be thrown out on qualified immunity grounds.
"A reasonable jury could conclude that Burmaster did not reasonably believe that Bruno, a small puppy who was wagging his tail shortly before the shooting, posed a threat," the decision reads. "A reasonable jury could further conclude that Burmaster did not reasonably believe he was in imminent danger, based on Bruno's [sic] size, Burmaster's ability to exit the yard, and the availability of non-lethal tools like the taser and police boots." (The ruling appears to have confused Apollo's name.)
Despite efforts to toss the Browns' suit, the case is now set to go to trial. This is far from the first case of "puppycide," where a police officer has shot a dog that posed no obvious threat to his saftey. Burmaster himself fatally shot another dog in 2012, according to The Associated Press. Earlier this month, another Louisiana police department announced that it was investigating two different incidents in which officers shot dogs. It's not uncommon for puppycide cases to be particularly nonsensical. Last year, a Missouri man sued an officer who shot his 13-pound, deaf and blind Shih Tzu. In 2023, another Missouri family's dog wandered away from their home during a storm. When a neighbor found the dog and called to police for help, the officer shot the dog and threw its body in a ditch, rather than simply returning it to its owners.
"[Police] don't need to be dog trainers," Cynthia Bathurst, the executive director of the animal welfare group Safe Humane, told Reason in 2016. "They just need to know what to look for and defuse or control the situation with the resources available. It's the compassionate and right thing to do. It's better for community relations. And if that doesn't move them, the huge lawsuits should."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
At least the cop didn’t eat the dog.
“[Police] don’t need to be dog trainers,” Cynthia Bathurst, the executive director of the animal welfare group Safe Humane, told Reason in 2016. “They just need to know what to look for and defuse or control the situation with the resources available. It’s the compassionate and right thing to do. It’s better for community relations. And if that doesn’t move them, the huge lawsuits should.”
Then she doesn’t get why police shoot dogs. It’s not officer safety or any other lies that they put into their reports. They do it to inflict emotional harm on the owners.
They do it to inflict emotional harm on the owners.
That is a disturbing amount of projection. A restraining order level of projection.
...and it is 100% correct, you window licker.
No it's not. It's partially correct, in fact much more correct than most people would like to realize, but a lot of criminals have violent dogs, on purpose.
Damn. That is right. Not sure where some of these posts by that guy comes from except obvious trolling or extreme suppressed rage. Most cops shoot dogs because they are extremely dangerous. A few cops shoot dogs for no reason so lets go after those guys and gals like the dude in the story.
The biggest problem is that police and the general population are not trained to tell the difference between an aggressive animal and one approaching which is not so assume the worst. The signs are not hard to see and mandatory training should be imposed for all police, firefighters, ems etc. who deal with the general public.
IT'S YIPPING RIGHT AT ME!!! ::BLAMBLAMBLAM!::
sin,
Officer Courageous
Most cops are trigger happy low IQ morons who relish the thought of dropping off a few rounds into someone's pet.
Back in the 1970s a couple cops in Traverse City, Mi. made the news when they were shooting people's cats. T.C. has had a long record of bad cops anyway but that's beside the point.
I wonder if that idiot cop felt proud over shooting that little puppy? Did he brag to the other cops about it?
Fear and/or surprise + quickdraw training = dead puppies. What they need to do is train public facing officers not to draw their guns except as a last resort. Cops that pull in surprise or anger during training should be fired. They can always apply to be prison guards.
Did you people ever watch the Philando Castile video? That cop did not want to shoot Castile, he did it because he was terrified.
Was the pup's name Apollo or Bruno?
Shooting a dog for no reason very likely also violates animal cruelty laws. The officer probably committed a crime.
Considering that breed is the State Dog of Louisiana it could be a crime against the state. Who knows? Very poor judgement in any case.
AT will be shortly to explain why all dogs remotely resembling a Pit Bull need to be shot.
No joke. ↓
Was it a pit bull?
Because if it was, then give the cop a medal. Give the entire force a $1/hr raise for every pit bull one of them kills on sight. There should be some kind of special ribbon they get to wear on their uniform for, “Killed a pit bull on duty. Or off duty. Or while it was trapped in a locked kennel.”
……..
Aww, it was a catahoula. No money for that, coppers.
But, eh, I’m kinda OK with killing them too. They haven’t had the wild killer bred out of them. And their owners usually do very little to temper it.
If you have a problem with this, I am 100% in support of the alternative solution of shooting their ignorant, lazy owners who make no effort whatsoever to understand (let alone temper) what horrible beasts they’re bringing into the civilized world because they’re “cute.”
Makes me want to bring a rabid wolverine onto an airplane and then let it loose saying, “Aww, isn’t he cute. He’s my support animal” as it gives everyone rabies.
I’d rather shoot the cops who shoot dogs that aren’t threatening them. Fewer cowards in uniform would make the streets a lot safer. Such cowards dishonor the uniform and betray the public's trust.
I’d rather shoot the cops [insert whatever to rationalize].
Yea, we know ACAB boy.
I'm actually more of a CCAB (Cowardly/Corrupt/Crooked Cops Are Bastards) person, but if you want to make the argument that all cops are cowards, corrupt, or crooked, that's on you.
Nah, you give off way more of a Immediately' Methodically Against Cops Using Necessary Tactics vibe.
By contrast, you give off a "Type With One Hand, Fellate Cops With the Other" vibe.
Whoosh.
Until the day comes when all cops report or arrest bad cops for their illegal or asinine behavior…then sorry, but ACAB. Protecting or looking away from a bad cop makes one a bad cop as well.
I sincerely hope that neither you or anyone you care about ever suffers as a result of such a foolish mentality.
Unless it's your/their pit bull. In which case, I celebrate its extermination.
People should not discount the viciousness of Weiner Attack Dogs. That thing could have chewed his ankle off or peed on his boot.