U.S. Abandons Afghan Allies as Trump Administration Shuts Down Resettlement Programs
The State Department is eliminating the CARE office and ending the Enduring Welcome program, stranding U.S. allies who risked their lives and were told America would protect them.

Last week, the Trump administration eliminated the Congressionally mandated entity that oversees vetted Afghan allies' travel to the U.S. and stated that it will dismantle the program that oversees their resettlement, continuing the series of blows dealt to our Afghan allies since January 20.
In a document sent by the State Department to multiple Congressional Committees on May 29, the Department announced that "the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts (CARE) Office will be eliminated and its functions will be realigned to the Afghanistan Affairs Office."
The decision angered Rep. Dina Titus (D–Nev.), sponsor of the CARE Authorization Act, which passed with bipartisan support in November 2024. The act states that the Secretary of State "shall appoint" a coordinator for a term of three years to assist in relocating and resettling "eligible Afghan allies," facilitating the relocation of American citizens or legal permanent residents, and coordinating with the interagency.
On May 29, Titus shared a video on X of a question she asked of Secretary of State Marco Rubio only a week earlier, as he came before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. "We are going to continue with this Afghan relocation…this CARE office, is what you're committing to me?" Titus asks. "We're going to comply with the statutory requirements," Rubio replies.
"Clearly, he lied," Titus commented.
Two days later, the White House's Technical Supplement to the 2026 Budget included notice that the government will soon terminate the Enduring Welcome program, "the U.S. Government's long-term resettlement program which relies on standard immigration pathways for immigrant visa, Afghan Special Immigrant Visa, and refugee admissions programs."
"The Department will shut down the Enduring Welcome program by the end of FY 2025," the document explains. With no additional funds for the program, the document states that "any remaining prior-year balances will be used solely to finalize contractual and/or other legal obligations."
I asked the State Department whether CARE will recommence funding travel for vetted allies prior to its July 1 sundown date, and whether the Trump administration has made a final decision about the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), the 90-day suspension and review of which was meant to end on April 20. I received no response.
On June 4, days after announcing the sunset of the systems that assist our allies, the Trump administration announced via executive order that it will ban travel for nationals of 12 countries, including Afghanistan. There are exceptions for Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) applicants, and the executive order states that it does not "limit the ability of an individual to seek asylum, refugee status, withholding of removal, or protection under the [Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment of Punishment]."
Shawn VanDiver, president of the nonprofit #AfghanEvac, said the exemption for SIV applicants is "functionally useless" given that CARE and Enduring Welcome no longer exist to help with resettlement and travel. According to VanDiver, the order blocks some family reunification programs, eliminates student visas for Afghans, and "does nothing to help our allies, including the family of active duty U.S. military service members stranded" in third countries.
The nonprofit No One Left Behind expressed gratitude for the SIV exemption in a press release but noted that the order does not protect Afghans "who were injured in the line of duty and were unable to complete a full year of service" or "the women and men of the Afghan National Army who trained and served with U.S. Special Forces," among others.
Advocates, such as veteran Elizabeth Lynn, director of government affairs at the nonprofit evacuation organization Operation Recovery, are concerned about the developments. "It is as if the chaos of the withdrawal in 2021 continues and our allies are not just being left behind but dumped. Ending both Enduring Welcome and CARE places this administration at the epicenter of the chaos," Lynn said. "Essentially stranding our allies across the globe while potentially deporting them from the United States," is something Lynn said veterans and "people around the world will remember."
Multiple Afghans, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity, explained the impact these decisions have had on them.
Ahmad, who has been waiting on a Priority-1 referral to the USRAP due to his work with the Ministry of Interior, has been living in Camp As Sayliyah in Qatar for nine months. He says that the elimination of CARE has increased his "stress and sadness" as "CARE was a vital source of support, hope, and guidance for us during such a difficult time." Ahmad reports that camp life "has become more unstable" as families have "started to lose hope about relocating to the U.S."
"Personally, my 206 bones have pain from inside," Ahmad said, though he said he tries "to hold on to hope."
Feroza said that "living in Afghanistan is [a] nightmare as a girl who worked with USA government [sic]." Though it feels that "they left us behind and totally forget us [sic]," she implores the U.S. to relocate its allies to countries friendly to Afghan women if it will not help them directly.
Masud says that his "adorable" son perished of cerebral palsy while he underwent USRAP processing in Pakistan because he "wasn't able to help him with proper medical care and treatment due to our refugee status" and a lack of funds. Awaiting word about the USRAP, Masud says he is "devastated."
Nasir, another USRAP applicant, says he faced "extremely difficult conditions" once he made the difficult decision to relocate to Pakistan on the U.S. government's advice after working for several years on projects supported by the U.S. Embassy in Kabul and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
After selling his Kabul home "for half its value," Nasir says he "faced three years of hardship and instability," including a lack of employment and education for his two children, and a "constant fear of deportation." Though his case was in its final stages and he was set to travel to the U.S. within two weeks of the January suspension of USRAP, Nasir says he is now "trapped in limbo."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“Our Afghan allies” WTF?
The U.S. did have allies in Afghanistan.
They are now members of a very large and prestigious club.
There were translators and guides, and they face a real risk of death or worse punishments if they go back to Afghanistan. They were collaborators by the current government’s standards, and by the standards of the government at the time.
The rushed withdrawal didn’t just abandon working equipment. We should have brought the collaborators out too, with our troops and equipment. Biden blew that one bigly, but I don’t think Trump’s withdrawal plans included getting the collaborators out in timely fashion either.
The US has a sorry track record of turning its back on collaborators, going at least back to Vietnam. But I don’t blame the collaborators for not knowing that; I doubt many Afghans learned much at all of US history in whatever passed for schools there.
The real solution is to stop meddling in foreign countries. Then it will be impossible to make promises which will never be kept.
I’d love to see the contract that says “when we finish losing this war you and your extended family win permanent residency in the USA”.
What’s the breakdown on these “allies” between “he was our guide and translator and he saved my life” and assorted local US Embassy employees and corrupt officials in the puppet “Afghan National Government”?
I bet there was a lot of crossover. I also bet that there was a huge range of assistance, from living with the US troops to translating some map once and never again.
Translators must have been fairly elite to speak a foreign language. I doubt very many were peasant farmers. Probably like you say, a lot of government employees, corrupt as hell, taking paid time off to get paid as translators and guides, and even if they didn’t pass word directly to the Taliban, it’s easy to imagine saying where you are going and why as you leave your government office.
I’m also sure that a lot of them hated the Taliban and did want to help the foreigners get rid of them. It takes at least two sides to make a civil war.
The surest sign that someone is a corrupt member of the elite is that they’re bilingual. Yup. What if they know three languages? Does that make them Illuminati?
Now apply that to dirt-poor countries like Afghanistan.
Context matters.
There are plenty of bilingual people in dirt poor countries, and they’re not elites.
Just admit that you’ll defend anything Trump does to immigrants and foreigners (as long as they’re not white or Christian).
Last week, the Trump administration eliminated the Congressionally mandated entity
Only leftists think Trump answers to Congress. He answers to no one. And it’s not like he has to execute every law. He gets to pick and choose. If the law was passed by Democrats then he can ignore it. Because fuck Democrats. If he deems the law to be unconstitutional then he can ignore it. Unless he likes it. Because fuck you, he does what he wants.
The president doesn’t answer to congress, anymore than the congress answers to him. Were you drunk during civics class?
Musta been. Or maybe he got lost in the woods, couldn’t find his still. Maine has lots of woods.
Name the last president who actually did answer to Congress. Show in Article II where it says the president is Constitutionally-bound to answer to Congress.
It’s a trick question. There are three co-equal branches of government. They all answer to each other, and none of them answer to each other.
Another answer is that Congress is the laziest bunch of asswipes in government. They prefer handing off their authority to the president and the courts, because taking responsibility would be work, and they’d much rather bleat to the press about the president and the courts behaving irresponsibly than be blamed for doing anything which goes tits up. How many bills has Congress actually passed so far, 5? I’m glad they’re not doing anything, but I’d rather they did something useful like reform entitlements and rein in spending than pass garbage like the Big Bootyful Bilge.
And as for Trump, maybe you haven’t noticed, but other than two deportations in violation of court orders, he has obeyed the courts, he does appeal court decisions he doesn’t like, he actually goes through the process.
You could have just said it’s ok because Democrats did it first.
I could have tap danced on the ceiling too, or said you were a nice guy.
And you could have answered my comment.
What’s there to answer? You’re a lying sack of shit just like Jesse. Only difference is you understand economics. Here’s a bit from Article II, section 3.
he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed
I assume you’re going to do a Jesse and claim that that doesn’t mean the president shall take care that laws be faithfully executed, and that it really means something else. Like he executes laws if he wants to. Or he only has to execute laws passed by his own party. Or some other dishonest nonsense.
You’re not a libertarian. You’re a Democrat hater who understands economics. Just like the rest of the Trump defenders you have no principles other than Democrats bad hurr durr.
I have no love for Democrats, but I don’t base my entire political philosophy on them being evil incarnate. Get yourself some principles other than hate.
What’s there to answer? You’re a lying sack of shit just like Jesse.
On the rare occasion when sarc is here, it’s just to discus ideas™ .
I assume you can’t read, because that quoted clause doesn’t say the president answers to Congress.
Very lawyerly response. While the Constitution doesn’t have that exact phrase, it does say that his duty is to execute the law. Not to pick and choose as you claim. Besides that, Congress can remove him from office. And there’s that state of the union thing. So yeah, the president answers to the People through their representatives in Congress.
Shorter response, fuck you Jesse Jr.
Tell us you never read the Constitution without telling us you never read the Constitution.
Hint: It is not that long, and what you say is not in there is actually easy to find. And what you say is in there is not.
It’s short-sighted if one assume that the US will be involved in another occupation where it needs the assistance of local allies. The “hey you fucked up, you trusted us” school of American foreign policy is in full swing.
“Fuck You” is the Trump’s foreign policy doctrine.
Abandoning allies is Trump’s MO.
To be fair Bush/Cheney started two wars with no plan on how to deal with the Iraqis and Afghans that helped us. Liz Cheney and George P Bush could have testified before Congress in 2012 about the importance of SIV and yet they never did.
Beth and most you dumbshit posters: This is down to Biden completely. He had years to deal with it. YEARS !!!!
BOMBSHELL REPORT: Biden Admin Left 9K Americans in Afghanistan, Originally Claimed 150
February 3, 2022
A new report released by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee found that as many as 9,000 Americans were left in Afghanistan during the Biden Administration’s disastrous withdrawal.
Trump surrendered to the Taliban and then Republicans pretended to care about terps in August 2021 when Trump’s surrender turned out to be politically unpopular.
Completely ignores what I said
Gosh, it’s like we never should have pulled out of Astan in the first place.