Florida Woman Fined $165,000 for Trivial Code Violations Takes Her Case to the Florida Supreme Court
Sandy Martinez was fined for a parking violation on her own property, driveway cracks, and a storm-damaged fence.

Sandy Martinez, a homeowner in Lantana, Florida, has been battling over $165,000 in fines for three minor code violations for years. She's now asking the Florida Supreme Court to consider her case and put a stop to what she says are unconstitutionally excessive fines.
Martinez's accumulated six-figure fine amounts to nearly four times her annual income, financially crippling the single mother over infractions that have since been corrected and never threatened health or safety.
What atrocities warranted such devastating debt? Cracks in her driveway, a storm-blown fence, and cars parked on her own grass. First, Martinez faced daily $75 fines while saving up to replace her cracked driveway in 2013, ultimately owing $16,125 in total, "far greater than the cost of an entirely new driveway," as noted in the initial lawsuit. Then, the city began fining her $125 per day in 2015 for a fence knocked down after a storm. While Martinez waited for her insurance claim to pay for the repair, she accrued another $47,375 in fees—again, "several times the cost of the repair and substantially more than the cost of a completely new fence," according to her complaint.
Finally, while living with her three children, mother, and sister in 2019, Martinez was cited for parking cars slightly beyond her driveway. Although she promptly fixed the issue and left a voicemail with code enforcement requesting a compliance check, no inspector came by. Martinez was being fined $250 per day. By the time the city recognized that the parking violation had been corrected, the total fine for the infraction had ballooned to $101,750.
Unable to cover this debt—even if she sold her home—Martinez took her case to court in 2021, arguing that the city's fines are grossly disproportionate for her offenses and excessive under the Florida Constitution. So far, the lower courts have ruled against Martinez, reasoning that "substantial deference should be given to the legislature's determination of an appropriate fine."
But she and her lawyers at the Institute for Justice believe it is time the Florida Supreme Court, which has not considered a case on the state constitution's excessive fines clause in over a century, revived the right to be free from excessive fines as a meaningful bulwark against government abuse. "Six-figure fines for parking on your own property are outrageous," said I.J. Attorney Mike Greenberg. "The Florida Constitution's Excessive Fines Clause was designed to stop precisely this sort of abuse—to prevent people from being fined into poverty for trivial violations."
Martinez's circumstance is not an isolated incident. Florida homeowners across the state have endured massive, unjust fines without recourse, including a woman fined $103,559 for a dirty pool and overgrown grass, a family facing $250,000 in fines for invasive trees, and an elderly couple facing $366,000 in fines for duplex code violations.
"Municipal code enforcement has become a major and recurring source of government abuse in the form of catastrophic fines," said I.J. Senior Attorney Ari Bargil. "The time has come for the Florida Supreme Court to once again interpret this important constitutional protection and finally put a stop to this injustice."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The process is the punishment. Oh, and the punishment is the punishment too.
FYTW.
It’s seems to be the issue is the per day fine. Should be per inspection at the most. Inspector comes by and sees a car illegally parked, that’s a 1 day fine of whatever amount, not a fine every fucking day till she can drag the inspector back out to her house to see the car is moved. fucking ridiculous.
Language.
And the issue there is gaming the system.
I’m also curious to know what paperwork she got from the city, which invariably came along with the fines, and what it said and why Reason didn’t see fit to tell us about it.
The per day fine is intended in these sort of laws to address the large corporate property owners who would simply ignore the $75.00 fine. Without that mechanism, fines would be essentially worthless deterrents for that category of property owners, creating more blight. That being said, the city should have settled for a lower amount a long time ago.
Hopefully IJ can repeat their success, Timbs v Indiana. If a heroin addict gets to keep his Land Rover safe from excessive fines due to a possession charge, I think the same should be applied to homeowners with minor civil infractions.
Can’t decide if this is right or wrong without knowing her politics. If she’s a Democrat then she deserved it. If she vote for Trump then this is a great injustice.
The Triumph of Tribalism is Truly at hand!!!
(All Praises Be Unto His Majesty, Trump the Magnificunt Pussy-Grabber in Chief!)
This is what happens when you say low taxes, but then realize the state actually needs money. They then illegally (or at least immorally) fleece the population for fines & fees. Usually its the poor, who can’t hire a slick lawyer to sue them.
Baltimore was in the news for the same thing, something like financing 1/3rd of the local government off fines, parking violations, suspensions, tickets, etc and the inspection fees to halt the former.
And you somehow blame low taxes for other means of government extortion…it government agencies are allowed to run amok without restriction [ “substantial deference should be given to the legislature’s determination of an appropriate fine”] that is the problem, not how much money they’d like to have in their general fund.
Seems the legislature to which “substantial deference should be given to the [their] determination of an appropriate fine” needs to be on the spot for addressing this [as the courts are playing Chevron while citizens get fleeced without recourse]. I would be all over my representative and senator and insisting on time in front of the house.
Isn’t there also a due process issue here? If they impose fines until an inspector turns up, which can apparently take a very long time, there is in fact no evidence of her violations after the initial inspection.
Isn’t there also a due process issue here?
Like I said to the dude above – I’m 100% certain it was in the paperwork that came along with the fine that Reason didn’t bother to include in their oBjEcTivE jOuRnaLiSm.
How exactly would the paperwork have changed the situation?
We don’t know, because Reason doesn’t tell us.
But, having received similar paperwork myself and from clients, I can tell you that it often outlines the infraction, articulates the corrective action, the deadline for doing so, the consequences for failing to do so, and the method and… wait for it… process for challenging/appealing the issue.
Come on. She doesn’t think she owns her home does she?
Looks pretty hillbilly parking on the front lawn.
Y’know, this is what pisses me off about Reason so much. Yea, there is a very valid argument to be made here about municipal fines and bureaucratic sluggishness – but their foaming-at-the-mouth obsession with “government abuse” just completely undercuts it. That, and they always pick the most unsympathetic “victims.”
Cracks in her driveway
Which she ignored for six months.
a storm-blown fence
Which she could have had fixed and then been reimbursed by her insurance – instead she chose to wait for them to fix it knowingly racking up fines.
and cars parked on her own grass
And the only effort she made was a voicemail.
It’s no different than an HOA. Correct the action, take a time-stamped photo of it, march it down to the HOA, and demand written verification that the infraction has been resolved. Might even ask if they’re willing to waive the fine because you were so pro-active about it – sometimes they will.
No reason she couldn’t have done the same with the municipal court. They even offered her corrective options AND hearings on the issues, which she elected not to take advantage of.
Instead she went with… a voicemail. When nobody has listened to a voicemail anyone has ever left in the last decade.
There’s a reason this has made it all the way to Florida Supreme. The Courts see the problem with the excessive fines. But they can also see that this woman plainly was complicit in putting herself in the position of ending up with $165K worth of them by not simply taking immediately corrective actions and then following up with the city.
But Reason never tells you that side of the story. It’s always Oppressor/Oppressed and whining about f-f-faaairrrness and pretending that “neediness” exempts you from legal obligations that apply equally to everyone else with these guys.
It’s why they’re not a libertarian magazine. They’re contemptible Marxist pukes.
Is there any government stupidity you won’t defend?
Plenty. But not for bad actors. Their stupidity is the very reason government inevitably has to go tit-for-tat.
Ever heard the term, “This is why we can’t have nice things.”
Florida woman is a prime example. Repair your driveway, fix your fence, get your car off the lawn, and have a little friggin’ self-respect lady.
She did move the car and it took 400+ days to stop fining her for it
Nobody listens to voicemail.
Language!
?
You said “pisses me off”.
OK…?
C’mon man $250 a day for having a wheel on the grass?
I’m not disagreeing. Reason, vis a vis this article, is – but for all the wrong reasons.
Like I said, there’s a very legitimate argument to be made about municipal fines and bureaucratic sluggishness. But there’s a reason this has made its way to FL Supreme, when it could have been easily resolved in municipal court (or any of the other lower courts).
But Reason doesn’t want to talk about that part, do they. That would disrupt The Narrative.
Which she was saving up for.
Oh yes, I’m sure this single mom with a low paying job could just sell some of her stock holdings to buy a new fence, then no problem to wait months for insurance to pay her back. The city is supposed to work with people who are trying to fix these things, not make the process more difficult.
No, the effort she made was to move the car to comply with the ordinance. It’s up to the city to prove she violated it after that point. Our system is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.
Which she was saving up for.
To her detriment. Do you seriously think Visa or Mastercard would have been hitting her for $75/day juice?
The city is supposed to work with people who are trying to fix these things, not make the process more difficult.
lol, says who?
Our system is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.
That’s criminal law. These are civil penalties.
The per day thing is nuts. OK my car was on the grass give me a $250 ticket and it’s done.
“The time has come for the Florida Supreme Court to once again interpret this important constitutional protection and finally put a stop to this injustice.”
If only Comrade Stalin was aware of this injustice…
I see a crack in the sidewalk in the top picture. How long has that been there, and how much does this city pay back to its taxpayers per day until it’s repaired?
Why didn’t she sue the insurance company for taking so long to repair the fence?
For what? Bad faith? They paid her didn’t they?
1986 in Florida, I got a $250 fine for changing the oil in my car, in my driveway. Had the car on ramps and just installed the filter when the Cop kicked my shoe. I came out from under the car and he handed me the citation. Total time for the job 20 minutes. Monday I made an appointment with the JAG Officer and told him what happened. He took the citation and I never heard about it again. Something to do with a City Counselman owning the only Oil Change place in the City and an illegal order to the Police.