Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Free-Range Kids

A Car Hit and Killed Their 7-Year-Old Son. Now They're Being Charged for Letting Him Walk to the Store.

Letting children walk alone isn’t a crime. But in North Carolina, prosecutors are treating it like one.

Lenore Skenazy | 6.4.2025 1:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Roadside memorial for a seven year old boy hit and killed by a car | Screenshot via WBTV
(Screenshot via WBTV)

A mom and dad are grieving in Gastonia, North Carolina. Their 7-year-old son, Legend, was tragically killed by a car after running into the street on a walk to the store with his 10-year-old brother. 

If you were tasked with determining a punishment for the parents, would you: A) arrest them for manslaughter, set bail at $1.5 million, and forbid them from attending their son's funeral, or B) decide this tragedy has been punishment enough?

Authorities in Gastonia chose option A.

Jessica Ivey and Samuele Jenkins are facing felony charges of involuntary manslaughter and child neglect, as well as a misdemeanor child neglect charge, according to The NC Beat.

The tragedy occurred on May 27. Ivey claimed it was the first time she allowed the kids to walk to the store. A witness to the accident said the older boy tried to grab his little brother from running, but he broke away.

The Gastonia Police Department issued a statement on its Facebook page, saying that while it extended its "deepest sympathies" to the parents for their "heartbreaking loss," the investigation revealed that the children were unsupervised during their walk.

As if that's a smoking gun. As if no kids have ever walked unsupervised to the store. As if every parent who lets their kids run an errand is guilty of a crime.

"In such cases, adults must be held accountable for their responsibilities to ensure a safe environment for their children," the department declared.

They must be held accountable for an unpredictable tragedy? Parents aren't prosecuted when their child chokes on dinner or slips in the bathtub—because accidents happen, even in the safest homes. How can parents ever guarantee a perfectly "safe environment"?

Do they think the parents haven't learned a lesson from this heartbreak? Who is served by this arrest? Has the Gastonia Police Department considered the impact on the surviving brother who will now believe "that his failure to save his brother resulted in sending his parents to prison?" asks David Pimentel, a law professor at the University of Idaho. "Does anyone believe that child will be better off in foster care while his parents rot in jail?"

The parents were arrested because our country has come to believe that any child who is unsupervised anywhere for almost any amount of time is automatically in danger, and therefore, that any parent who trusts their kids to do anything on their own doesn't care if they live or die.

This delusion—that any parent who doesn't hover doesn't care if their child is safe—is what allows the authorities to act as if Legend's parents deliberately did something so evil it warrants felony charges.

But in fact, it was a normal, rational, and common thing the parents did. "Ten-year-olds and 7-year-olds have been walking to and from school, unaccompanied by adults, for over 100 years," says Pimentel.

The implications of this prosecution "are very troubling for parents everywhere who can never provide a guarantee against their kids getting hit by a car, even if they were right there with them," notes Diane Redleaf, author of They Took the Kids Last Night and a legal consultant to Let Grow, the nonprofit I helm.

This isn't an isolated incident either. Across the country, parents are being criminalized for allowing their kids modest independence. These prosecutions reflect a growing distrust in parental judgment and an inflated sense of risk.

The sad truth is that often when something awful happens to a child, it's not the result of bad parenting. It's the result of bad luck. Blaming parents just means we have a scapegoat and can continue to believe that bad things only happen to the children of bad parents.

Turning tragedy into punishment doesn't make kids safer. It just makes all parents more afraid—and all families more vulnerable.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Everything Got Worse During COVID

Lenore Skenazy is president of Let Grow, a nonprofit promoting childhood independence and resilience, and founder of the Free-Range Kids movement.

Free-Range KidsNorth CarolinaParentingAccidentsFamilySafety
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (38)

Latest

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Police Blew Up This Innocent Woman's House and Left Her With the Bill. A Judge Says She's Owed $60,000.

Billy Binion | 6.6.2025 1:51 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!