Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.
Under new State Department guidance, having private or no social media presence "may be reflective of evasiveness and call into question [a student visa] applicant's credibility."

Last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered U.S. consulate and embassy officials to scour the social media accounts of international students hoping to attend Harvard. The plan, according to a copy of a diplomatic cable obtained by Politico "will also serve as a pilot for expanded screening and vetting of visa applicants" and "will be expanded over time."
While Rubio has already started an effort to analyze prospective international students' social media habits—last week, he directed officials to shut down the processing of student visas so a social media plan could be enacted—the details of this specific plan are particularly invasive. Most troubling, if a student's account is private, or if they don't have one, it could cost them the ability to secure a visa.
"The lack of any online presence, or having social media accounts restricted to 'private' or with limited visibility, may be reflective of evasiveness and call into question the applicant's credibility," reads the directive.
Further, this scrutiny will apply to more than just Harvard international students. Rubio directed diplomatic officials to "conduct a complete screening of the online presence of any nonimmigrant visa applicant seeking to travel to Harvard University for any purpose," meaning that foreign speakers and some employees could also see their social media postings scrutinized. "If you are not personally and completely satisfied that the applicant, during his time in the United States, will engage in activities consistent with his non-immigrant visa status, you should refuse the visa," the directive reads, according to Reuters.
It's hard not to interpret Rubio's directive as a call to ideologically discriminate against prospective international students on a staggering scale. This is especially likely given that Rubio has already personally intervened to cancel international students' visas for actions as innocuous as attending a pro-Palestine demonstration or writing an anti-Israel op-ed. And with a French Scientist denied entry to the U.S. in March over anti-Trump views, it is not at all clear that students will only be turned away for posts that indicate they could be a plausible threat to U.S. national security.
Rubio's order is only the latest in a string of attempts to cull rates of international students along ideological lines. In March, Rubio announced that he had canceled the visas of more than 300 students for campus activism. "We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree, not become a social activist that tears up our university campuses. And if we've given you a visa and you decide to do that, we're going to take it away," Rubio said during a press conference. "We don't want it in our country. Go back and do it in your country. But you're not going to do it in our country."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>>Under new State Department guidance, having private or no social media presence "may be reflective of evasiveness and call into question [a student visa] applicant's credibility."
Under new State Department guidance a student visa applicant's credibility may be called into question.
Okay. Not seeing an issue here. Visas are not a right.
We've already seen some of the darlings you love on visas have social media praising terrorist orgs.
Why would we allow people into the Us that hate this country are and are actively working against it?
So... having private instagram means "social media praising terrorist orgs"?
Oh wait, having brown skin and private instagram means you are on social media praising terrorist orgs. There, fixed it for you.
Visas are not a right.
And insisting that they are because of free speech erodes free speech.
Like insisting that restricting your ability to point your gun at people and fire over their head for your own amusement infringes on your 2A right. But then, these people are actively and dishonestly exploiting bad faith.
Scream "We want to track you by your friends and contacts while also feeding the AI facial recognition algorithm, but we're too lazy and/or fired everybody that wasn't a bot to do it properly" just a little louder, why don't you.
We get it, you want more people like the 9-11 terrorists and assorted MS-13 gangbangers roaming free in the country.
Yes.
If you have 100,000 immigrants and one of them is a terrorist, the benefits outweigh the costs vastly.
Even Brookings admits illegal immigration is a net yearly negative. They have to project out over 20 years to find a benefit, using a highly optimistic model.
Lol.
For those that are ignorant. MS-13 started in the US.
I have several thoughts.
It's none of the government's business. But governments make it their business, and everyone else has to deal with it.
There's a difference between open borders (let everyone in, but they're on their own; no welfare, no nothing, and if they commit a crime, out they go) and open boarders (the government entices the lazy with welfare, ignoring crimes, and even flying in refugees whose only interest is getting out of refugee camps and don't give a rat's ass about being here and working for a living). The do-gooders have been bringing in so many bums and thugs that even if they are only 1% of all the immigrants, they drown out all the good immigrants.
Right now I am short on sympathy for all illegal immigrants. I am tired of illegal immigrants assassinating innocent people. I am tired of their woke supporters shouting "Queers for Palestine" and otherwise demonstrating how utterly stupid and evil they are. I am tired of government funding for universities who violate the 14th Amendment and sue for their right to suck up more and more of my taxes.
The longer this keeps up, the harder the wokidiots make it to get rid of the bums and thugs, and the longer they get away with sucking up my tax dollars to abuse citizens, the easier they make it for the xenophobes to lump all immigrants together and demonize them all.
Frankly, I'm tired of the woke destroying what little freedom the government deigns to allow us. If a few good and legal immigrants get deported along with the bums and thugs and queers for Palestine, I'm not in the mood to care. You fucking do-gooders brought this on, you continue acting as if the world owes you everything, and if all the Ivy League and other woke "colleges" got their endowments taxed to nothing, I wouldn't shed a tear.
I saw some comment on Substack the other day about making billionaires pay their fair share instead of dismantling USAID. You keep that up. You keep whistling past the fiscal reality graveyard, and when budgets collapse and you suddenly find you've run out of other people's money, no one is going to care.
And take FAFSA with you.
/rant
Government visas are none of the government' business? That's a bold strategy Cotton.
Either you really are that shallow a reader, or you think there's some social advantage with your peers to pretend you're that shallow a reader, or you're just plain dumb.
Madison argued the Federal government has no authority to control immigration in peacetime.
Good for him. The reality is that we need to control who can come here.
Funny, the country managed to survive for a century with no immigration restrictions at all for a century, until things got racist.
This is asinine. We already know the FedGov has backdoor access to social media, they don't need you to unlock your account to be publicly visible.
Oh, and while we're on the subject if we had done some ideological vetting on student visa back in 2001 maybe the World Trade Center would still be there.
We don't want those people in our country. They would likely mispronounce the phrase "park the car in Harvard Yard*." Can't have that.
*Correct pronunciation is "pahk the cah in Hahvahd Yahd."
Literally yesterday you had someone denied a visa 20 years ago enter and overstay his visa and set people on fire. Fuck off.
Obviously we need together eat rid of people like JeffSarc so we don’t have to worry about open borders anymore.
Thoughts and prayers
No it is not.
There are plenty of problems with what universities are doing. But foreign students ain't the cause of that. Getting rid of them ain't going to solve anything.
But it is going to eliminate the tech and other STEM industry. Only exception is probably MIC/defense. Fighting permawar is the only way the US wants to engage with the world - so the technology and propaganda requirements of that will always keep that pipeline filled -at all levels.
This remains false since the last time you said it.
I even gave you the links.
Only 35% of current citizens with STEM degrees work in STEM careers. There isn't a lack dumdum.
Most STEM foreign workers are not high level but low level STEM workers.
So what?
It means we don’t have a shortage of them.
Logic isn't the lefts forte it seems.
I know a couple of electrical engineers that couldn't design an amplifier circuit if their life depended on it.
There are different levels of STEM degree holders.
But it is going to eliminate the tech and other STEM industry.
Absurd at face value. Last I checked STEM fields are doing layoffs.
Oh golly. So no students will study a STEM field ever again because layoffs and probably buggy whips
The fascist xenophobia of the Trump administration is disgusting. They treat legal immigrants and students almost as bad as illegal ones.
See SGT’s rant for why that could be.
How?
#1 reason a student would have a private social media account? So Mom & Dad won't see what you do for fun when you are supposed to be studying. Pro move? Have two accounts: 1 for the `rents and the rest of your family. The other for your college buddies.
Keep in mind who these foreign students are. They are not white Europeans. They rarely come here for college, including grad students. They are primarily (Red) Chinese, Muslims, and Africans. And some S and SE Asians. The Chinese come to steal our technology, and a lot of the Muslims come for Jihad against the west. The Chinese aren’t going to give away their plans on social media. But the Muslim students sometimes do. And that is probably where this is targeted.
Get rid of them all.
Dream on trolls - the veritas of the matter is that, even before the place fell in to a state of fawning captivity under the thumb of Latin-illiterate, albeit numerate , MIT-educated Presidents like Summers & Bacow, even with Harvard parking permit, there's no such thing as legal parking in Harvard Yard.
"If you are not personally and completely satisfied that the applicant, during his time in the United States, will engage in activities consistent with his non-immigrant visa status, you should refuse the visa," the directive reads, according to Reuters.
Yes, that is correct.
It's hard not to interpret Rubio's directive as a call to ideologically discriminate against prospective international students on a staggering scale.
But why do you say it like it's a bad thing?
"Hi, I'd like to come to America on a visa please."
"Why?"
"Mostly to spread anti-American sentiment and facilitate insurrection and sabotage in its cities. I might do some like, kinda educational things there too I guess? Or at least pretend to."
"Um... no. Denied."
Exactly what is your issue with that, lol JuRnaLisT Emma?
Visas SHOULD be discriminated. HIGHLY discriminated. There is absolutely nothing whatsoever wrong in any way with doing that.
"We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree, not become a social activist that tears up our university campuses. ... We don't want it in our country."
Why do you, Emma?
(Countdown to Marxism in 3...2...)
Language
“The less exact our words, the less clear our thoughts, the less sincere our sentences, the less honest our behavior.” Robert Hartwell Fiske (1948-2016)
What exactly is an "international student"? "Foreign student" I understand; namely, a student from a country not this one. "International student?"
Another example of a nation hell-bent on destroying itself. The term, "international student" is neither precise nor accurate.
https://www.nationonfire.com/language/ .
I find it fascinating a snob factory like Harvard puts the interests of foreign nationals over Americans.
Oh, wait.
I shouldn't be surprised since Harvard has been an American-hating institution for decades.
Yeah, this is an exceedingly relevant "SSDD" point.
If Harvard had been even half-MAGA for the last 10, 20, 40 yrs. no one would really care about free trade or student visas. If, for the last 40 yrs. Harvard had been educating people to set up private space programs, satellite internet and domestic infrastructure, and thumb their noses at the CCP, EU, and Russian authoritarians around the world, prioritizing individual and ideological freedom, Trump wouldn't have a base to appeal to.
Instead, they and the majority of other Western universities have been on the same goofy, ideological bandwagon nodding, "Ah-Yup, Yessir, It's a good idea to castrate kids to prove women are just as strong and just as independent of men and their penises as men are. And we can't recruit those Asians or Jews or other White/adjacent people because we gotta make it seem like 'inner city kids' are just as smart and just as bright as the white and white-adjacent kids are are." for decades.