What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations
"New opportunities for innovation, economic growth, and global engagement," says one expert.

President Donald Trump pledged to remove barriers to American leadership in AI in January. The president recently made good on this promise by directing the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) to scrap President Joe Biden's Framework for Artificial Intelligence Diffusion on May 13, two days before it was set to go into effect. Although it is unclear what the Trump administration will replace it with, the rescission of the Biden-era framework recognizes the necessity of exporting American chips and AI to maintain America's technological, economic, and strategic dominance.
The Biden framework would have amended export regulations to impose a worldwide license regime on all advanced semiconductors designed for data center use. This would have also hit graphics processing units (GPUs) used for AI acceleration, including foreign product chips that are "direct products" of American technology.
This would have not only subjected geopolitical rivals such as China to strict controls but also restricted the number of GPUs sold to 150 other countries, many of which are close trading partners and allies, such as Israel, and some which are NATO members (Greece, Portugal, Poland, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania), per the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Neil Chilson, head of AI policy at the Abundance Institute, tells Reason that the diffusion framework "established a world-wide regime that would have restricted American companies from trading with friends and allies overseas." Chilson says the rule's rescission helps American companies keep the global lead in AI technology. Keegan McBride, a senior policy adviser in emerging technology and geopolitics at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, agrees. McBride tells Reason that rescinding the Biden rule "opens up new opportunities for innovation, economic growth, and global engagement."
With the Biden-era framework dead, the Trump administration has announced its "Industry Guidance to Prevent Diversion of Advanced Computing Integrated Circuits." Instead of imposing a complex regulatory scheme, the new guidance informs semiconductor manufacturers how to remain in compliance with existing export restrictions that have been in place since October 2022. The guidance still recognizes the danger of China acquiring advanced chips through transshipment or diversion and by accessing data centers. The guidance also provides "common sense recommendations about how companies can help [prevent] such chips from ending up in Chinese hands," explains Chilson.
Chilson anticipates the guidance to be followed by "a new rule that attempts to address some of the divergence scenarios highlighted in the guidance" and expects a more tailored solution that reflects awareness of the negative effects of the Biden approach. Matthew Mittelsteadt, a technology policy research fellow at the Cato Institute, is less optimistic. "At this juncture, the administration has signaled a desire to negotiate controls bilaterally, country by country," which Mittelsteadt warns may lead to "195 country-specific flavors of AI export controls" that would hamper American companies' competitiveness and overburden the license processors at the Commerce Department.
Overinclusive regulations like Biden's Framework for Artificial Intelligence Diffusion would have hampered economic growth and national security; capping demand for American-made advanced GPUs reduces revenue to domestic semiconductor and AI firms that require capital to invest in research and development, innovate, and maintain industry dominance.
McBride is confident that the Trump administration understands that the "active promotion of American AI to the global community" is a crucial component of winning the AI race against China. Hopefully, he's right.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I’m not yet sure where AI will land, but it’s going to fuck some shit up.
It fucked up RFK's MAHA volume. It is full of citations to non-existent journal articles. AI software is famous for doing that. RFK was too lazy to write it himself -- or has been so disabled by drugs and brain worms that he can't write anything anymore. Given his recent testimony before Congress, the latter can't be ruled out.
In the realm of unintended consequences, we should expect China, which might prefer to import chips, to develop its own. If China is an adversary, would "we" really want to encourage its indigenous tech sector?
Well, and same thing with Chinese university students, who are the next generation of excellence in ... Chinese universities.
After all, localizing economic activity is one of the stated goals of the current administration's tariff policies. Sauce for the goose, and all that.
It is intended consequences. MAGA hates America and wants it to lose to China and Russia.
What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations
If we can undo anything Biden did, we can expect a better outcome.
This article seems to be saying nice things about Trump and bad things about Biden (and said administrations). Can this article even EXIST?!?! Will it implode at any moment?
(Can Reason.com haters EVER admit that they are PervFectly WRONG?)
Hi sarc!
OH LOOK! A NEEDLE IN THE HAYSTACK! /s
The fact this always get brought up when an article doesn't hate on Trump and the Fact I see these comments about once-a-week in a mist of 10-articles a day is plenty of evidence Reason.com haters are NOT WRONG at all.
Two needles in one day.
Which only proves the point that you value the narrative over the truth.
You just want to point to someone and say "He supports Democrats. So I hate him. I don't know him, but I hate him. I really, really hate him."
What was Jill thinking with this FFAID stuff?
Rookie mistake I guess...