Come July, Keys Will Be De Facto Illegal In Minnesota
The vast majority of keys on the market contain more lead than is allowed by the state's strict new heavy metal standards.

Come July, common keys for houses, cars, boats, and motorcycles will be illegal in Minnesota, save for uncertain intervention from the state Legislature.
That's when the state's ban on the manufacture, sale, or import of keys, toys, dishes, and other common items containing more than a tiny percentage of lead or cadmium goes into effect.
The purpose of that law was to remove dangerous heavy metals from products that come into contact with children. The trouble is that almost all keys sold today have more lead than the new law's 0.09 percent limit on lead content.
Locksmiths have been warning that the state's lead ban will outlaw most of the products they sell. Alternative metals would require lengthy and expensive transition to using less functional materials, they say.
"Approximately 75 percent of all products that we stock have become prohibited for sale," said Rob Justen of Doyle Security Products.
"Aluminum is too brittle," another locksmith told Valley News Live. "It breaks instead of bends, and it's not as easily machined as brass is. The same problem with steel, it rusts and it's much harder to machine."
Lawmakers have proposed a range of fixes, including raising the lead threshold to 1.5 percent for keys (which is California's standard) or, more modestly, delaying the ban for another three years.
But a legislative fix is not locked in yet.
Supporters of the lead ban argue that weakening the standards for keys undermines the law's purpose of protecting children from harm.
"As parents know, kids put keys in their mouth," Rep. Rick Hansen (DFL–South St. Paul), the author of the lead ban, told Axios in April.
So, should you end up locked out of your house or car in Minnesota's frigid winter, you can rest easy knowing that the legislature is saving you from incidental lead exposure.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"The Democratic party is the best place for Libertarians to be right now".
Nick Gillespie: Yeah... *nodding*
Why not? The GOP has gone full retard. The tenuous alliance between libertarians and Republicans was based upon a shared understanding of economics and respect for economic liberty. Those are both anathemas to the Trump Party. And they’ve always been hostile to personal liberty. So how on earth can people who value liberty feel at home or welcome with people who hate everything they stand for?
Libertarians didn’t leave Republicans.
Republicans left libertarians.
Libertarians didn't leave Republicans
Libertarians joined the party of Harris and Biden
Liberal-tarians, general. The tell is their demand for lives without responsibilities or consequences.
That implies libertarian thought was ever welcome in the Republican party. It's not and never has been.
The Democratic party has always been Marxism-lite. Republicans just decided to say "fuck that" and go full XXL Marxism. Purges of the kulaks should be coming next month.
I recall a recent Republican presidential nominee who made an attempt to court libertarians and they laughed in his face. Anyone know that guys name?
And then he still pardoned Ross.
Hindsight, probably should not have. Right or wrong is immaterial at thisd point. They provide no benefit so why cater?
Barry Goldwater? That's the last even half-qualified candidate that I can think of...
n00bdragon is a lying pile of TDS-addled steaming shit.
Well, the Republican party at least has some libertarians in office. Not very many, but considerably more than the Democrats. I'm not about to join a party, but if I had to I'd lean towards the one that at least sometimes pretends to be somewhat liberty oriented and pro-smaller government and has a few good members.
...said no Nick Gillespie ever.
Britches, what do you think "de facto" means?
You sure you wouldn't rather use "de jure"?
The green new deals make carbon "de jure" pollution, while it is "de facto" helpful plant food.
Lead is a horrible thing for children.
You are living proof.
Quote: "As parents know, kids put keys in their mouth," Rep. Rick Hansen (DFL, . . .
What kids? What parents allow this? The stupidity of allowing this has nothing to do with lead.
Hey, let's just 'follow the science'. Bring on the completely honest and unbiased data! Out of a million brass house keys made each year, including replacements ground out by Ace Hardware, how many key-sucking kids have been specifically harmed by lead poisoning? The calculation approximately equals the combined total IQs of the Minnesota legislators that wrote and passed this law.
Be fair. In the Democrat-progressive mind, even the idea of something bad not only induces unreasonable levels of fear, it actually causes physical harm.
So once somebody mentioned the minuscule chance of lead poisoning from sucking on brass keys, at least half of sensitive Democrats knew they were already dead.
You're clearly not a parent. Little kids put *everything* in their mouths, darned near every waking moment. Parents aren't around every split second of the day to monitor said behaviour.
do little kids put sharp knives in their mouths? If not, why?
Yes, I've seen kids put knives in their mouths.
How were you affected by your house keys? Lead is bad, but kids have been handling keys for a few years now. The threshold needs changed. Common sense should not suffer becuase of some nanny state nonsense.
And very little lead leaches out of brasses like that. Unless the kids are sucking on them fresh from the cutting machine, I wouldn't worry too much if they licked it once or twice.
And it's not the keys, but the lead in cheap, pot metal keys that will be de jure illegal.
Software/RFID keys, written and verbal passphrases, the big plastic Fisher Price keys will all still be legal.
Also, the locksmith interviewed is full of shit. Aluminum keys work just fine. Steel would be harder to machine, but we aren't talking about putting a million steel transmissions in pickup trucks every year here. It's fucking keys.
Not that I think the "No Safe Exposure Level" legislation or justification makes sense either. As long as you aren't coming home every night and sticking your car keys in your baby's mouth you almost certainly aren't doing any damage. However, as obliquely suggested, in a couple decades it will all be replaced with RFID or similar anyway.
When are these legislative fools going to introduced to a bayonet?
Meh. Just put on a face mask or three.
Trump issues executive order promoting nuclear power.
We are so fucking back.
Four out of five eco-progressives just had aneurisms.
What does this have to do with Tariffs?
The idiot Kennedy thinks vaccines cause autism.
Lead actually DOES cause severe cognitive impairment in children. You may not like this but it really does address a real problem.
Why isn’t it 0% lead content then? Can’t be too safe!
Can you get lead poisoning from looking at a picture of a brass key online?
Yes, lead can cause cognitive impairment. No, this is not a real problem.
First, the amount of lead you could extract from the alloys used for keys using only saliva and gum power is miniscule to the point of being almost unmeasurable. That amount is far below the exposure to lead that you get from common activities like being outside or visiting any major city in the world for a weekend.
Second, like almost every other toxin, the human body's dose-response curve is non-linear, especially at the low end of exposure. The "no safe dose" assumptions have been proven wrong repeatedly. By setting such an absurdly low standard, the leguslators are making that same mistake.
Yes, readers, look up "hormesis". Just about everything has a proper dose. Too much or too little isn't good for you. Water, salt, a billion different kinds of nutrients... And even ionizing radiation!
“Helminthic therapy” is of interest to me; so is “radiation hormesis”.
On radioactive wastes (ionizing radiation), Google “radiation hormesis”, and see USA government study of the Taiwan thing (accidental experiment on humans) at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2477708/ … Low-dose radioactivity is actually GOOD for you! Seriously!!!
On “helminthic therapy”, AKA gut parasite worms are GOOD for you, too, see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20054982 (USA government again) or others …
Well anyway, WHAT is a summary of what I am saying? I thought I heard you asking about that, through my tri-cornered aluminum-foil hat, as I am sitting here…
HERE is your summary: Hollyweird is WAY off base, with their horror movies! A Giant Gut-Parasitical Radioactive Teenage Mutant Ninja Tapeworm would be GOOD for us!!! Bring it ON, ah says!!!
Well anyway, dilution is the solution to pollution… Dilute the hell out of the radioactive cooties, release them, and they will do us GOOD!
Not a problem for me. My house has a keypad and my phone opens my car.
You guys living in the 19th century carrying keys are funny.
Minnesota is cooked.
Throw it on the pile with California and Illinois. Kick 'em out of the union and force them to go it alone.
Indeed. So is Colorado.....run by Marxists.
Hilarious! The author writes "should you end up locked out of your house or car in Minnesota's frigid winter, you can rest easy knowing that the legislature is saving you from incidental lead exposure" about a law that has no effect on existing keys!! Where do they find these reporters? Trump University School of Jernalizm?
No...the Biden University of Journalism.
Yeah, because your existing keys will last forever and you'll never need to replace them.
Moron, it doesn't matter whether the existing keys are grandfathered in. It matters how long the existing locks will be around.
Fuck you, asshole. Bye. Muting you now.
EdG holds a post-grad degree from the University of TDS-addled Steaming Piles of Lying Shit.
"As parents know, kids put keys in their mouth," Rep. Rick Hansen (DFL–South St. Paul), the author of the lead ban, told Axios in April.
Oh, FFS! Just ban *everything* that a kid might put in its mouth, and be done with it!
Unless it's LGBT genitalia. They're super in support of that.
How about a brass buttplug, in pre-teen sizes?
I put a penis in my mouth when I was 12. Ban men!!!
Your own penis?
That explains a lot about you.
On other words, keys won't be illegal.
Hyperbole is one thing, this is just straight fantasy.
Nobody is making your keys illegal. You just may not be able to easily replace them if you need a new one because of a stupid law.
Sounds like 75% of the State Government needs to get FIRED since obviously they have too much time on their hands and just want to DICTATE the world about everything.
Manufacture, sale, or import - not possession.
Good luck selling your car.
Here, you have bought my car - without the keys ... the doors are unlocked and I have misplaced MY keys. They may or may not be under the floor mats.
Key Condoms!!!!
Sounds like Minniesoda alright. Soon, the migrant Somalis will take over the state government and everyone will be eating BBQ cats and dogs.
That state is just another in a gathering mud puddle of low IQ liberal, moral busybody run states.
Christian, that would be an ex post facto law, no doubt, so what are you claiming.
New such keys will be de jure illegal but existing keys will be de facto legal because any such law applied to them is ex post facto
Ban brass keys and legalize pot. Makes perfect sense.
That's when the state's ban on the manufacture, sale, or import of keys, toys, dishes, and other common items containing more than a tiny percentage of lead or cadmium goes into effect.
I'd be more concerned with the cadmium part of the ban, that goes into a lot of paints (reds, oranges).
I'm going to guess the ban doesn't apply to resale.
Just make it illegal for children to possess keys. Duh.