Americans, Especially Women, Feel Less Free. They're Not Wrong.
Unfortunately, the data supports Americans’ take on the state of freedom in the world.

People around the world are, by and large, satisfied with the freedom they enjoy in their everyday lives. The exceptions to this trend are Americans—women, in particular. This could be the set-up for commentary from Euro-pundits and U.N. officials about American political dysfunction or the evils of our culture except for an important complication: By the reckoning of several independent organizations, the world is getting less free, and folks here at home are closer to the truth than are our overseas cousins.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Americans Are Outliers in Feeling Dissatisfied With Their Freedom
"For the third year in a row, Americans are less satisfied with their personal freedom than the rest of the world, including their peers in other wealthy, market-based economies," Gallup's Benedict Vigers and Julie Ray reported of survey data on May 14. "While Americans have been less satisfied in recent years, satisfaction with personal freedom has remained higher and steady worldwide. A median of 81% across 142 countries and territories expressed satisfaction with their freedom in 2024."
Specifically, Americans' satisfaction "with their freedom to choose what they do with their lives" started falling after 2020, when it was 85 percent; this was comparable to the peak 87-percent median recorded in the 38 developed, democratic countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and a bit higher than the 80-percent median recorded globally. U.S. satisfaction peaked several times over the past two decades at 87 percent, making 2020 unremarkable.
As of 2024, after a brief and mild pandemic-era dip, OECD residents' satisfaction with their freedom stands at 86 percent and the global median is at 81 percent. Satisfaction with freedom among Americans, by contrast, has plunged to 72 percent.
Americans are rather less satisfied than their peers around the world with the freedom they enjoy in their lives. As it turns out, folks in the U.S. have a better handle on the real-world situation.
Freedom Really Is Declining
"Global freedom declined for the 19th consecutive year in 2024," Freedom House noted in its Freedom in the World 2025 report. The report called out backsliding among almost twice as many nations that slid further into authoritarianism as opposed to those that improved respect for liberty. It highlighted attacks on political dissidents and candidates, pointing out that "in France, Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States, among others, extremism or partisan grievances motivated physical assaults on individuals campaigning for office." And it also noted that "elected leaders in democracies are increasingly seeking to undermine checks on their power, focusing their assaults on the media, anticorruption authorities, and the courts. These attacks endanger both democracy and basic freedoms."
Likewise, the Economist's Democracy Index 2024 warns that "governments and political parties in many democracies have become estranged from citizens." In response to upstart political movements, the establishments in many seemingly stable democracies "do everything in their power to keep the populists out and to present them as illegitimate or even a threat." The biggest declines have been seen in electoral process and pluralism and, especially, civil liberties which, the Economist notes, have not recovered from pandemic responses "when governments responded to the coronavirus threat with national lockdowns and an unprecedented withdrawal of liberties." Political elites are maintaining their forms of democracy, so long as nobody really challenges them or wants to make their own choices.
The Fraser Institute's Human Freedom Index 2024 agrees "freedom deteriorated severely in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. Most areas of freedom fell, including significant declines through 2022 in freedom of movement, expression, and association and assembly; and in sound money." Fraser sees some small improvements since then but adds that freedom "remained well below its pre-pandemic level." Overall, "87.4 percent of the world's population saw a fall in human freedom from 2019 to 2022."
That's not to say some countries haven't improved—a few have, in dramatic ways. And even in countries that have slid in respect for freedom, the fall isn't across the board. People may see improved safeguards for specific liberties that they value. But if you're comparing where we are now to where we were less than a decade ago, it's fair to say the world is less free, and that includes developed countries with established democratic political systems. Americans are outliers in the Gallup survey because we're right.
American Women Are Especially Dissatisfied With the State of Freedom
Interestingly, American women are particularly less "satisfied with their freedom to choose what they do with their lives." While men's satisfaction with the state of freedom dropped from 88 percent in 2020 to 73 percent in 2023 and blipped up to 77 percent last year, women's satisfaction steadily declined from 82 percent in 2020 to 66 percent last year.
The drop among women from 2021 to 2022 was especially sharp, and while Gallup didn't ask about the specifics of freedom with which people are satisfied or dissatisfied, the report comments that its "fieldwork in 2022 coincided with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on abortion rights, a draft of which was leaked to the press on May 2, 2022." Men's and women's responses to the survey were similar before the leak but diverged afterwards.
Also, "women's satisfaction dropped most among those who approved of then-President Joe Biden," suggesting progressive women who are most inclined to support reproductive rights suffered the biggest drop in satisfaction with freedom right around the time that Dobbs overturned Roe v. Wade's protections for abortion.
Controversial, long-debated, and forever in the news, reproductive rights remain a touchstone by which many Americans—women in particular—assess the degree to which they see themselves as free. The more leeway they have to make their own choices about reproductive issues, the more satisfied they are with the state of their freedom. Curtail their ability to make choices and they become less satisfied. This issue is and will remain a major factor in our politics (consider the weekend bombing of a fertility clinic, apparently by an "anti-natalist" terrorist who opposed bringing more people into the world).
That said, reproductive issues are certainly not the only factor. U.S. men and women alike reported feeling less free before the leak and then release of the Dobbs decision. Dobbs may well have accelerated that decline, especially for women, but Americans already reported feeling substantially less free even before reproductive rights were elevated back to prominence in 2022.
Unfortunately, Americans have it right. Governments around the world have made many of us less free than we were just a few years ago.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"in France, Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States, among others, extremism or partisan grievances motivated physical assaults on individuals campaigning for office."
And how about threats against those already IN orifice! "Hang Mike Pence" and "Execute General Milley"!
Dear Orange Leader is CLEARLY (for all who can and will see) part of the problem, and SNOT a part of the solution!
I was around when Hillary's heinous behavior called Trump in. Many many voters took Trump only only only because of Hillary. As usual you have it completely wrong.
ALL DETAILED IN THE BOOK by Salena Zito
The Great Revolt: Inside the Populist Coalition Reshaping American Politics
Refuted.
If you feel restrictions on killing other humans seriously impinge on your freedom, then you might be seriously misguided on what freedom is.
To arms, Cumrades!!! The womb slaves are rebelling!!! How DARE these uppity ones believe that their wombs belong to THEM!?!?!
Again, late to the news, huh.
That anti-natalist killer in Florida sounds like you
You pushed for abortion and now we get "I will kill people because you let me be born" This is your view of freedom 🙂
Maybe You could get Your PervFected tin-foil mind-reading hate-hat recalibrated? Shit sure doesn't seem to be working right! Do You ALSO self-righteously use Your PervFected Judgments (driven by Your PervFected tin-foil mind-reading hate-hat) to assign grades to Your students? Not on any sort of objective measure of the quality of their work, butt on twat You THINK that they think?
Get shit re-calibrated! (Just an humble suggestion.)
The devil speaks through sqrlsy.
Folks,do you get his premise : He knows what is right and wrong 🙂
The OPPOSITE here is SNOT knowing ANYTHING about twat is right and twat is wrong! "Barks and Howls for 'Normal' People" here apparently advocates sheer moral nihilism... Jesus, Gandhi, and MLK were SNOT "better people", in ANY way, than Adolf Shitler, Idi Amin, etc.!
"Barks and Howls for 'Normal' People" scolds me like a school-marm after reading my mind one second, then accuses me of moral nihilism... Get a load of THAT shit! If there's no right or wrong, how, then, could I be wrong?
Maybe You could PervFectly try LISTENING to normal people instead of Perfectly Barking and Howling at them, some time? Just a suggestion...
Unread
Fuck off and die, spastic asshole.
Show us how shit is done... Else Ye are a PervFected hypocrite! Do ass I say, snot ass I do!!!
This sounds like a setup for a Jeff Foxworthy bit:
If you feel restrictions on killing other humans seriously impinge on your freedom, then you might be a progressive
Democrats are still upset that they lost their slaves.
Given the (D)edication of black women voters, not all of them.
If you have to make-up imaginary unicorn creatures in your head to pretend someone else is killing other humans, then you might be seriously misguided on what freedom is.
If you cannot support ?baby? freedom (i.e. fetal ejection)
UR supporting Gov-Gun forced reproduction.
And no matter how many times you wave you BS flag about 'killing' anything; unless there's an actual act of violence in the process you're just pretending NOT forcing reproduction = murder.
I wonder if being forced to go to the bathroom, shower, and play sports with mentally ill men had any effect on women’s perception of their freedom?
folks here at home are closer to the truth than are our overseas cousins.
There is, of course, an alternative explanation.
A median of 81% across 142 countries and territories expressed satisfaction with their freedom in 2024.
And that alternative is that most people, the world over, simply reject freedom, as libertarians define it.
That isn't surprising to me, as I also reject that freedom is at the hearts of everyone. But if you favor open borders, this should make you rethink exactly what kind of people you let in.
I remember making a joke on social media towards an Australian during covid lockdowns about their concentration camps. He didn’t get the joke and supported his government’s actions.
Self proclaimed "libertarian" and editor of the Australian magazine Quillet Claire Lehman loved the lockdowns and swore up and down that locking the unvaccinated in camps was totally acceptable.
My buddy who relocated to Australia has been insufferable about the superiority of socialism over the last decade. Ignoring that they plunder the resources of a landmass the size of the US to enrich a monochromatic population the size of greater L.A., they do have their shit together in a way we absolutely do not. So it was a little hard to fully discount... until 2020.
Since I pointed out that his feel-good socialist government rounded up the dirty, slapped an armband on them and shoved them into concentration camps, he doesn't make those proclamations anymore. (At least not to his American friends.)
This article has zero substance except to say that during the Covid lockdown/censorship regimes freedom took a hit. The rest is just do you feel free...all about the fee-fees.
2Chili phoning it in.
Not only that, what struck me is the framing. The way its presented people are not feeling free when they don't think they can have what they want... which is not freedom. Its the freedom to pursue what you want that is freedom. The idea in the minds of these respondents is that if I pursue something I will acquire it - and if I don't get my outcome I'm not free. That's the underlying interpretation of freedom that is being investigated in the article (at least that I'm seeing) and its just wrong right off the bat.
Well said
So the story boils down to the only demographic that favored Biden is most unhappy with trump
Inasmuch as that demographic exists.
It should also be noted, once again, that this is the demographic that was parking abortion vans out in front of rally/campaign centers.
If the pro-MAID demographic, setting up MAID vans outside campaign centers, were butthurt about their "loss of freedoms", I would expect a normal, functional person to have at least some schadenfreude on the matter.
I wonder how much overlap there is between the pro-MAID demographic and the pro-"ban public establishments from serving customers who lack proof of taking one vaccine" demographic.
It’s a perfect circle
That demographic is college-educated and/or black women (or "women").
Imagine being a fully grown adult and still believing that your overall freedom level hinges on your ability to terminate a fetus or not.
NO, now it's that the non-person's fetal rights to the personal right be killed is what the pro-aborts have gliven to the world.
The Dem leadership abandoned "My Body, My Choice".
And calling it reproductive rights
Overturning RvW did not "take away the right to abortion" as the stupids on the left claim. It made it a state matter, not a federal matter. People who make that claim are as stupid and dishonest as the Jesses, MLs and other retards on the right.
Even when you try to criticize the left, you're so deranged you have to try to attack the right lol.
This is why it is called derangement syndrome buddy.
Even when you finally cavity agree the repubs dud a good thing, reducing federal power, you have to attack to signal to your allies on the left. So weird.
Now if only youd recognize that reducing regulations, federal agencies, etc was a good thing instead of defending lower court leftist judges.
stupid and dishonest
Remember when you told us Joe Biden was spared from prosecution for holding secret documents because he "cooperated"?
The cooperation clause of the law. Still waiting for saec to show us that clause.
Of course by cooperation he means hold onto it for a decade and use it to publish a book, exposing the information to his ghost writer.
"I hate both teams equally"
sarc
Meanwhile he praises democrats as advocating freedom lol.
By his logic, all Brian Mitchell had to do was return Elizabeth Smart to her family on March 11, 2003 and no harm, no foul.
That's really dumb. Let's see the name behind the grey box you're responding to. Ah, that explains it.
Yes. Your use od the give back clause to defend Joe was really stupid.
Finally you're getting more honest.
It's funny how you dropped that line of argument after the Hur report came out, and now just respond to posts about it with "dur, grey box, you're a moron, etc"
A representative democracy with constitutional safeguards places limits upon your ability to force others to do as you wish, presumably (per the propaganda) “for the good of all.”
That should be the case regardless of what team is in power.
You're kidding, right? The entire point of getting your team into power is to punish the other by forcing them into things that you support and that they oppose. For you it's no big deal, while to them it's authoritarianism. And when they scream and cry, you laugh, not caring that when they regain power you'll be the one screaming and crying. That's what politics has become now that so much power has been delegated to the executive that the president is basically an elected king.
Poor sarc.
Well, we see how see "democracy worked the past four years under the Biden/Fauci administration and the females were quite happy with it.
Democrats did it first so whatever Republicans do is ok?
Progressive women led pandemic-era totalitarianism. Now that their influence is curtailed, I'm sure they feel picked-on. Their loss of freedom increased freedom for the rest of us.
'Specifically, Americans' satisfaction "with their freedom to choose what they do with their lives" started falling after 2020, when it was 85 percent'
WTF is "freedom to choose what to do with your life"? Is this some childish-leftist (to be redundant) wish for a life without responsibility, especially paying your own bills?
I want to know who in America is not free “to choose what to do with your life”.
What if doing what you want requires others to support you?
The drop among women from 2021 to 2022 was especially sharp, and while Gallup didn't ask about the specifics of freedom with which people are satisfied or dissatisfied, the report comments that its "fieldwork in 2022 coincided with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on abortion rights, a draft of which was leaked to the press on May 2, 2022."
...
Also, "women's satisfaction dropped most among those who approved of then-President Joe Biden," suggesting progressive women who are most inclined to support reproductive rights suffered the biggest drop in satisfaction with freedom right around the time that Dobbs overturned Roe v. Wade's protections for abortion.
"Women who were surprised to learn that Joe Biden was both senile and a politician whose lips were moving were upset when the Dobbs decision was leaked."
At this point, I'm going to need to see evidence that these women exist. Because the only women I know that are this stupid write for Reason Magazine.
Splendid.
Freedom has never enjoyed popular support anywhere. To the extent that we have it, it's because it's been imposed by elites.
Not to mention that, for a long time, libertarians used to be strong on active freedom (e.g. turn your pasture into a field) vs. passive freedom (e.g. let your field turn to pasture) vs. positive freedom (e.g. free to grow your own crops) vs. negative freedom (e.g. freedom to trample through other peoples' fields) and have completely liquidated themselves on the issue with fanatical open borders and pro-abortion and pro-lockdown/MOAR TESTING positions.
The article isn't lamenting the loss of freedoms. It's lamenting the loss of having infinitely successive privilege subsidized by others.
Plus the "freedom" to control people with wrong ideas.
I think you're talking about negative vs positive liberty.
Negative liberty requires nothing from others (e.g. the right to move freely, the right to speak your mind without retaliation, the right to seek employment).
Positive liberty puts an obligation on others (e.g. the right to healthcare, the right to education, the right to not be offended).
As a general rule, libertarianism and classical liberalism embrace negative liberty and view positive liberty with great skepticism.
Republicans used to promote negative liberty, but not anymore. They hate that shit.
Democrats have always been all about positive liberty, though now that Trump's GOP has become hostile to negative liberty they appear to be giving it a try.
Did you go to school with Kamala Harris in Montreal? Or was it your overpriced post secondary education that gave you the ability to speak word salads of nonsense so effectively?
Do you actually think you have the "right to not be offended", or should?
Do you actually think you have the "right to not be offended", or should?
No. I said it was an example of a positive liberty that puts an obligation on others. In this case the obligation is to not say things that offend whiney progressive trash.
I consider myself to be a classical liberal.
Now re-read what I wrote. But this time engage your brain first.
"women's satisfaction dropped most among those who approved of NON-President Joe Biden,"
Fixed.
*Also, "women's satisfaction dropped most among those who approved of then-President Joe Biden," suggesting progressive women who are most inclined to support reproductive rights suffered the biggest drop in satisfaction with freedom*
I really don't know how to say this without coming off as the comments section dude-bro, but the number of women who can't get past their feels in the voting booth has become something of a crisis. I can't tell you how many spoiled white women I'm surrounded by who hate the crime, graffiti, homeless camps, etc that their chosen party has inflicted on our metro area. But they pretend to embrace it all, parroting the party line of the day, purely because of abortion and maybe a dollop of homophelia. Dead babies uber alles.
How many of those women were aware FJb abandoned "My Body, My Choice" for the Dems?
(He himself never stood for "My Body, My Choice" as he voted for the Human Life Federalism Amendment in 1982)
White liberal suburbanite females. otherwise known as dumb c****
The same ones who take their children to watch naked men dance in the streets.
And to sit on the laps of near-naked "men" to hear stories at the libraries.
This issue is and will remain a major factor in our politics (consider the weekend bombing of a fertility clinic, apparently by an "anti-natalist" terrorist who opposed bringing more people into the world).
Interesting that the women lamenting abortion rights and the manifesto-carrying anti-natalist who blows up a fertility clinic get paragraphs between them despite their acts to destroy embryos and women's reproductive health while the Republicans who oppose destroying of life in either situation get shoved in the same sentence.
Almost like you were more fanatically manipulative, dishonest, and inhuman about this as ENB.
The bombing was not done by a woman. It was a mentally ill male individual over come with self hate and nihilism. He was psychotic.
Hannah Dugan has a legal defense fund.
https://civicmedia.us/news/2025/05/19/dugan-says-she-will-not-accept-contributions-from-milwaukee-county-residents-local-attorneys-lobbyists-judges-county-employees-or-anyone-with-pending-cases-before-milwaukee-county-judges
I must wonder though. What would happen to regular people who helped Nikolas Cruz, Dylann Roof, John Mohammed, or Timothy McVeigh evade arrest?
Oh, please....spare me the whining and nonsense. Women in America gave the freedom to do as they please, even murder their unborn children if they so desire without guilt. They run major corporations, fly airliners, are now placed in infantry/front line positions...ain't it nice ?
Women in this country are so brainwashed and of course they suffer from white liberal suburban female guilt over something happened 160 years ago. So much so they can sway elections.
So spare me the "woe is me" rubbish. You get what you vote for and besides, if you vote, you have no right to complain.
How did they become brainwashed?
Feminist college courses, certain televised programs ie: The View.
By the way, the entire feminist movement was created by the CIA. Gloria Steinham was CIA.
12 years of public ed, and, increasingly, 4 more years of higher ed. All leftist tripe.
https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/brain-dead-georgia-woman-kept-life-support-due-states-abortion-law
A Georgia mother declared brain-dead at two months pregnant remains on life support due to the state’s heartbeat law, leaving her family without medical decision-making rights.
She's gone. Nothing more can happen to her.
Having the government issue decree over what happens to her body despite her, or her family's wishes should be a red flag to any freedom conscious person. If not for compassion, at least for principle.
Second, who is going to get the medical bill for this potential seven-month travesty of full life support in an ICU ? The state of Georgia isn't going to want to pay for it, so who is going to foot the bill ?
The more Gov-Guns make plans for your labors and life the less free you'll fill.
As-if 'obvious' reality has somehow gotten lost on the people.
Put another way. How free are you suppose to feel while leftard-criminals hold a Gov-Gun threat over your head and demand their ?free? ponies?
Women have Tuccille Junior to thank. Throwing away a leveraged, law-changing spoiler vote and helping Orange Hitler/Jesus Caucus declare pregnant women Siamese twins or slaves stripped of individual rights takes a special kind of cowardice. Jerome would die all over again again at the sight of it.
Right.. /s Because Trump banned abortion not State Legislatures. /s
Trump is more Pro-Choice than not.
Republicans wrote Roe v Wade.
Republican voters are majority Pro-Choice in Roe v Wade terms.
Catholic Democrats literally created the Pro-Life lobby.
You're just megaphoning hypocrisy.
What the fuck kind of libertarianism (or ever libertinism or liberal-tariansim) judges freedom on the basis of lack of responsibility? IMO that is a irrefutable sign of a progressive/socialist.