U.S. Navy Accidentally Throws $64 Million Jet Overboard Off the Coast of Yemen
Washington is dumping valuable resources—literally—into a Middle Eastern war of choice.

One of the most poignant images of the U.S. defeat in Vietnam was sailors dumping aircraft into the sea. More evacuation flights were approaching the U.S. fleet from Saigon than American ships had room to hold, so sailors had to push helicopters overboard to make room for incoming airlifts.
On Monday, the U.S. military made a similar maneuver, but entirely by accident. While trying to escape from a Yemeni missile and drone attack, the U.S.S. Harry Truman veered so hard that a F/A-18E Super Hornet fighter jet fell from the aircraft carrier into the Red Sea, the U.S. Navy informed CNN. None of the crew were harmed, except for a sailor who suffered "minor injuries," according to the Navy's statement.
Although the cost of the Super Hornet has changed over time, the Navy recently bought 17 of them for $1.1 billion, making for a cost of around $64 million per warplane. And this F/A-18E was the second one lost to the war in Yemen. Last December, the U.S.S. Gettysburg accidentally shot down one of its own fighters shortly after it took off.
And in January 2024, two Navy SEALs slipped and drowned while trying to board a cargo boat allegedly smuggling Iranian-made missile parts to Yemen.
The campaign against the Houthi movement in Sanaa, one of Yemen's two rival governments, has been criticized for its wastefulness. It cost $3 billion in just the first three weeks. But money is not the only issue. The wars in the Middle East are sucking up scarce physical resources that the U.S. military wants to station near China instead. A senior Pentagon official warned Congress that U.S. Indo-Pacific Command was "risking real operational problems" as a result of the Yemeni crisis.
During the first night of U.S. air raids in January 2024, the Navy used up a year's production of Tomahawk missiles. "Are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they going to continue? Yes," then-President Joe Biden told reporters shortly after.
Houthi attacks on shipping (and U.S. attacks on Yemen) paused in late January 2025, with the Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire. President Donald Trump resumed the Yemeni war in March, promising to end the Houthi campaign of "piracy, violence, and terrorism" once and for all. His hawkish national security adviser, Mike Waltz, promised to go further than Biden's "feckless attacks," though the administration wouldn't name any of the Houthi leaders it claimed to have killed.
The new stage of war comes at a severe cost to bystanders. At least 158 civilians have been killed in Yemen by U.S. air raids since March 15, reports The Guardian. On Sunday, a U.S. bomb hit an immigration detention center in Yemen, killing potentially dozens of African migrants. Although the U.S. military publicly claimed that it didn't have information on civilian casualties, Waltz was privately bragging about bringing down a building on innocent bystanders, according to leaked chat logs.
At first, the Trump administration denied that it was looking for regime change in Sanaa. "We don't want a long, unlimited war in the Middle East," Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told Fox News on March 16. "We don't care what happens in the Yemeni civil war. This is about stopping the shooting at assets in that critical waterway."
But earlier this month, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. was considering backing a full ground invasion of Houthi territory by the rival Yemeni government in Aden. The plan was being pushed by the United Arab Emirates, which invaded Yemen alongside Saudi Arabia in 2015 to prop up the Aden government, according to the Journal.
The war in Yemen is tied to two other U.S. interventions in the Middle East: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the nuclear standoff with Iran. The Houthis began their attacks on foreign shipping in response to the war in Gaza, and began attacks on Israel itself, vowing to continue as long as the war did. They held up the promise, pausing operations as long as the ceasefire was in effect.
The escalation also came while Trump was trying to negotiate with Iran over its nuclear program, which the U.S. has been threatening to bomb since the Bush administration. Both Trump and Waltz's public statements on Yemen referred heavily to Iran, and the U.S. government-funded Radio Liberty reported that Trump was using Yemen to "show [Iran] that he is serious" about the threat of military force.
Direct U.S.-Iranian talks have since begun, and both sides are sending out positive signals. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told reporters last week that he is "satisfied with the process" of the "serious and businesslike" talks, despite disagreements that still haven't been resolved. He later accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been warning Trump against a "bad deal," of trying to "sabotage" diplomacy.
"I think a deal is going to be made there. It's going to happen. Pretty sure it's going to happen," Trump told reporters on Sunday. "We'll have something without having to start dropping bombs all over the place."
But in Yemen, that's exactly what he's been doing—dropping bombs all over the place.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>>Washington is dumping valuable resources—literally—into a Middle Eastern war of choice.
maybe give T time to clean up George Herbert Walker William Jefferson George Walker O'Brandon's Middle East mess please and thank you
"We don't care what happens in the Yemeni civil war. This is about stopping the shooting at assets in that critical waterway."
One way you stop shooting at the Houthi's assets is to run out of ammunition.
Do they have any that cost as much as a Tomahawk to replace?
The Fatah I MRBM seems about as dear as their gear gets
T is a major contributor to the mess. His buddy Putin is the main reason Iran can continue to fund proxies like the Houthis.
Lol.
Tis all started when the people of Yemen voted for and elected someone the hook nosed Saudis didn't like. So like a good little soldier for PIssreal Washington decided to do the bidding of the hooked nosed Saudis and began bombing them.
Personally I have no bone to pick with the people of Yemen or the Houthis. In fact I don't blame them for their actions.
Washinton's foreign interventionist policies are bankrupting the nation and putting the rest of the world at great risk. As long as the Trotskyite neo-c0ns continue to hold sway over the White House and the Pentagon America will dig itself deeper into the muck until there is no way out.
You are a slimy pile of Nazi shit, aren't you? Fuck off and die, sleaze-bag.
Let me understand this. The Houthis are barbarians, killing their own people, attacking Israel and other countries, attacking merchant ships ... all you can do is harp on the US killing Houthis and African prisoners held by the Houthis?
Criminy. I'd be glad if the US just butted out. But blaming the US for trying to stop a rogue failed nation from attacking everyone else?
You sure got your priority knickers in a twist, Matthew Petti.
Is there any talk here about how Houthi piracy is affecting international trade, in increased costs from having to divert around Afrifca shipping which would normally use the Suez Canal?
All wars our wars of choice, but one does need to acknowledge the costs of surrendering in any war.
I read somewhere, no link, it was 5% or 7% increased shipping costs, Shanghai to Amsterdam, probably about the same as Shanghai to New York.
Trump loves to surrender as long as he can call it a peace deal. Ask the Afghans.
I really hope for your sake you’re a parody.
Nope. I am for real. And what I wrote was the truth. He is about to sell out Ukraine too.
We don’t own Ukraine
And what I wrote was the truth.
BZZZZZZZZZZTTTTT
Why are you supporting Nazis?
Look at the big dick on Charlie! Why not paint that war loving hard-on of yours yellow and blue, kit up, and head over to Ukraine to show Trump how ol' Chuck Hall spanks Russki ass?
Charlie hasn't gone over with his kit yet.
Hey Chuck, why are you giving Crimea to Putin?
Taliban "reconciliation" started in 2010 dude, long before trump was even a candidate.
You can't even read what you write, Matthew Petti.
Gosh, if air and missile attacks don't stop the Houthis from attack merchant ships, what would you suggest, Matthew Petti, a sternly worded letter?
What a lame-ass article.
I guess you have to submit 1,000 words about something to earn your daily bacon...
Peace through dropping bombs all over the place. Where is the Ministry of Truth when we need them?
"Make peace or die"
1st Battalion, 5th Marines (1/5)
Kind of says it all.
To paraphrase Heinlein : *I am sure the city fathers of Carthage would appreciate that thought."
Yeah the Nazi sympathizers in the US said the same thing in 1941. They called themselves "America First".
Your ilk were nazi sympathizers until Barbarossa started.
Hilarious. I am a Jew and certainly not any kind of Nazi sympathizer nor a stooge for Stalin. But America First opposed even preparations for war until December 7, 1941.
Oh, we believe you charlie.
You’re supporting Nazis right now.
" . . . While trying to escape from a Yemeni missile and drone attack, the U.S.S. Harry Truman veered so hard that a F/A-18E Super Hornet fighter jet fell from the aircraft carrier into the Red Sea . . . "
Doesn't read anything like "throws" to me.
How about a story on who didn't tie the plane down?
Maybe focusing on DEI impacts on military capability?
Oh, wait, that would require effort and thought and analysis. Never mind.
There have been other reports of a towed F/A-18 going over the side, but those claim crew losses. This could have been under tow.
I've only briefly heard about this one, but it was suggested that a bit of diversity is at play in how this happened.
I couldn't bother to read the article because 1. Petti and 2. dishonest framing from the outset
Isn't #2 a given from #1?
The Houthi attacks on shipping cannot be tolerated. Let's do what is necessary to stop them. Any collateral damage is the fault of the Yemeni aggressors.
Not according to the Hate America crowd in both the far left and the far right. And right now the far right is dominant.
"Not according to the Hate America crowd in both the far left and the far right. And right now the far right is dominant."
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Very little US trade goes through the Red Sea. Let Europe and Asia deal with them.
They cannot. They do not have the resourced
This is actually one area where the US had officially assumed the role of world police after WWII.
If they can’t keep a trade route safe they shouldn’t use it. And yes, we have been, to our detriment.
If not for decades of our meddling in the region, there would be no Houthi regime today.
Probably not. Who knows what would be there otherwise. Either way it's not our problem.
"If not for decades of our meddling in the region, there would be no Houthi regime today."
You seem to be missing any sort of cite for that counterfactual claim.
Is Sullum now writing under the names Petti and Doherty?
Remind me.
Who are the aggressors, again?
Trump. Vance. Rubio.
Western Europe wants that Black Sea hardcore
Even on a subject I might partially agree with a Reason writer on, their disingenuous framing makes it difficult to
Do they understand how much damage they are doing to any libertarian movement? Is this the intended effect?
They’re midwits.
Yes. All must be sacrificed on the altar of wokeness. Nothing must remain. This is the only way to achieve true freedom and equity.
Said Satan.
It was used.
One of the most poignant images of the U.S. defeat in Vietnam was sailors dumping aircraft into the sea. More evacuation flights were approaching the U.S. fleet from Saigon than American ships had room to hold, so sailors had to push helicopters overboard to make room for incoming airlifts.
On Monday, the U.S. military made a similar maneuver, but entirely by accident.
If serious- Next time, for brevity, just lead with "If you enjoy your reasoning faculties, understanding of history, and factual interpretation of facts and the English language, stop reading here."
If unserious- LOL
Petti: "Remember the vehicle ramming attack at the Wisconsin Christmas parade a couple years ago? Where a red SUV ran over a bunch of people?"
Mrs. Pett: "OMG yeah! What a horrible tragedy! All those people killed! What made you think of that?"
Petti: "I accidentally backed over the dog."
The carrier moves to avoid a shot and you claim they 'accidentally' lost an aircraft and are wasting money?
Fuck you, Petti. Fuck you.
They cannot. They do not have the military resources
This is actually one area where the US had officially assumed the role of world police after WWII.
Actually this remained the British sphere of influence for two decades after the war. I remember Harold Wilson's withdrawal from "East of Suez". South Yemen immediately went communist. The US was too bogged down in Vietnam to do anything in the region.
America needs to maintain bases in the middle east in order to maintain its vast world wide empire. It's all about our vast world wide American empire!!
On the other hand it could be that the tiny hats in Pissreal and Washington gave orders. Which is why America has been at war in the middle east ever since the creation of that rogue outlaw, zionist state, Isntreal.
Whenever the tiny hats fart, Washington obeys.
>America has been at war in the middle east ever since the creation of that rogue outlaw, zionist state, Isntreal.
Which isn't true. At all.
Yes it is. Isntreal has had control over Washington's middle east foreign policies for decades.
No, it's not, slimy pile of Nazi shit.
Not rogue, not outlaw, but a friendly country. Trump will eventually get around to betraying it.
Gee, it's almost as if lubbertarians never heard of Thomas Jefferson and the Barbary pirates.
Petti after Dunkirk: "Well, so much for fighting Germany, we've lost too much stuff. The war is off."
Jefferson's attacks on the Barbary Pirates had no lasting effect. Only the Ottoman reconquest of Tripolitania and the French conquest of Algeria did.
Our combat aircraft are now too expensive to risk in real combat. But the Military Industrial Complex benefits. We should have listened to Eisenhower.
As Dr. Ron Paul continues to reiterate, "Washington's foreign interventionism is going to, sooner or later, bankrupt the nation and bring it to the point of just another failed state."
America's empire is collapsing and like earlier empires, once it has exhausted itself in foreign wars and maintaining more than 800 foreign bases, many of them now in countries that have no freedom of speech, overrun by millions of unwanted immigrants and now controlled by the globalists in Brussels who rule over them with a gloved iron fist. Soon, the gloves will come off and western Europe will sink into a form of dictatorship even Orwell could not imagine.
It's time for Trump to shutter every military base throughout Europe and the U.K. and let them sink or swim by themselves.
It's a shame you're such an assholic antisemite piece of shit. You occasionally make sense
Yes, I believe it's time for the US to back out and let Canada handle the piracy and the sinking of international shipping in the Red Sea.
Carney himself said Canada would take over the world leadership role if America refused.
Personally, I can't wait to see their carriers.
Who needs aircraft carriers when you can defeat your enemies with pure unadulterated smugness
"South Park - Smug from George Clooney's speech"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHqL43ZDqF8
The headline was very deceptive. The aircraft and tow cart were lost due to emergency maneuvers.
It's not "deceptive". It's a straight-up lie.
making for a cost of around $64 million per warplane. And this F/A-18E was the second one lost to the war in Yemen.
OK, let's make it up with Yemeni lives. A dollar per.
Hey, I just solved our Yemen problem. (We'll go ahead and eat the difference.)
How about some Econ 101?
We increase the wealth of the world by converting a good into another good of a higher value: We cut down some trees and convert the wood into wall-studs for a dwelling. Presto! The world is wealthier!
Now you'd have a hard time finding an activity which reduced the wealth of the world compared to war or preparation for war.
We spend hundreds of millions of dollars developing these amazing technological war machines and (it seems) $64m building the machine and the best we can hope for is its obsolescence before it ever gets used.
Not to trivialize the issue, but they were designed to be wasted from day one of the process; one got wasted over the side? So what?