Celebrate Earth Day by Going Nuclear
Sunbeams and breezes are too fickle. The most climate-friendly power source is using magic rocks to boil water.

"Our power, our planet" is the theme for the celebration of the 55th Earth Day, which is today. The organizers are calling for "renewable energy generation, globally, to be tripled by 2030." Consequently, they urge the billion or so Earth Day celebrants to "support and adopt the rapid transition to renewable energy sources now, be it solar, wind, hydro-electric, tidal or geothermal." Their goal is to cut back on burning coal, oil, and natural gas that emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, where it contributes to man-made climate change.
Entirely unmentioned by the earnest Earth Day activists is the emissions-free energy produced by "magic rocks," a.k.a. uranium, that fuel carbon-free nuclear power. Nuclear power plants currently produce about 9 percent of the world's electricity. Globally, nuclear energy is the second-largest source of carbon-free electricity, following hydropower. Nuclear power plants supply a steady stream of electricity, unlike intermittent solar and wind power.
To get some idea of the advantages of nuclear power, let's compare electricity production in Germany vs. France. In a ridiculous overreaction to the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, Germany chose in 2011 to begin closing down 17 perfectly fine nuclear power plants. The last three were shut in 2023.

Conversely, next-door-neighbor France announced in 2022 that it would build six new plants and perhaps as many as eight more. France is currently the world's largest net exporter of electricity due to its very low cost of generation, and brings in over 3 billion euros per year from this, according to the World Nuclear Association.

The carbon dioxide emissions of both countries have been dropping, but largely as a result of their differing polices with respect to nuclear power, France emits 4.1 metric tons vs. Germany's 7.1 metric tons per capita.

Keeping in mind that the cutoff of Russian natural gas to the European Union after that country's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has roiled the region's electricity markets (especially Germany's), let's compare the recent price of electricity in France and Germany. In Germany, the household price of electricity was recently just shy of 40 cents per kilowatt-hour. In France, the price was just under 25 cents per kilowatt-hour. For comparison, the average price in the U.S. is over 16 cents per kilowatt-hour.
Overregulation has stymied the deployment of new advanced safer, greener, and cheaper nuclear power plants. It is past time that Earth Day celebrants recognize that magic rocks beat fickle sunbeams and breezes when it comes to producing steady power that can protect our planet. Happy Earth Day to all.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
More testing needed!
Why do we ALWAYS have to do this?
How about you tout the efficacy of nuclear power. It mean, it stands on its own two legs. It's better than coal, better than gas, better than oil, and far better than renewables.
Instead, you talk about "The carbon dioxide emissions". LIKE ANYONE WITH A FUNCTIONING BRAIN GIVES A RATS BACKSIDE. Earth is NOT going to be killed by carbon dioxide emissions. NOBODY believes that junk science and even if they do, all the rest of the NORMAL people don't give a flip what they think anymore. We know it was all a hoax. The gaia cultists are not fooling anyone anymore. The jig is up.
Just build the friggin' power plants. Why are we still even debating this. If an environmentalist says no, just punch them in the mouth as hard as you can and then throw them off the nearest bridge.
People do believe it. Not very smart people, but that's the Left for you.
I don't think that radio-active symbol with a dot and emissions pointing out on all sides means "emission-free"..
It's not that radio-active is crazy deadly. It's that it lingers around for 100-years and science/invention hasn't found a way to neutralize it.
On the contrary CO2 is literally plant sustenance thus plants are CO2's neutralizer. Frankly the very 'indoctrination' that CO2 is some sort of hazard is about as GD stupid as this....
https://dhmo.org/facts.html
Or just getting to the point behind all that....
If you have to politically lobby for it ..... It's going to be a massive F'Up.
If the people can do it without 'Guns', while ensuring Individual Liberty and Justice for all-others, it will be magical.
This article literally bases all of it's talking-points on the political lobbying of the Green-Mon(b)sters in D.C.
I can't with you Shrinking Violet.
"But if they use the gas stoves," the luddites scream...
All these years , I don't know how Ronald stays with Reason.
He makes MORAL cases for things but has to be all 'MR detached Science dude" to get away with it.
So is not the following the epitome of utterly immoral
THIS
BLM proposes opening 31M acres of public land to solar development
The updated Western Solar Plan proposal expands potential development by 9 million acres beyond the agency’s original proposal
AND THIS
China to hold over 80% of global solar manufacturing capacity from 2023-26
Despite local manufacturing policies in overseas markets, China’s expansion will dominate global solar supply chain, and widen the technology and cost gap
Is not Biden a fool of Hitlerian proportion. This is riding the US citizenry in a tumbrel to the execuition , all the while smiling your assshole smile
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/482abaa/2147483647/resize/1300x/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-origin-images.politico.com%2F2012%2F10%2F121010_biden_simonsays_ap_328.jpg
Nuclear may be fine for electricity we don’t need until about 2038. Meanwhile wind and solar can provide our expansion needs, at about half the cost.
Sooooooooooo cheap wonder why it always needs Gov-Gun 'armed-theft' subsidies?????
Anyone who champions solar and wind have obviously been indoctrinated by the physics illiterate. Such people should consider hooking up a fan blade to their drill press because here's some basic natural laws. If the wind won't run your drill press with a fan on it; it isn't going to power your drill loosing 80%+ to electric generation, mechanical friction and conversion.
New nuclear plants are significantly safer than those built in the 3 mile Island times. However Trump would rather subsidize coal to please some of his donors. Large new nuclear plants are expensive and take many years to amortize. There are mini nuclear plant designs called SMRs for local use (say a data center) that could be pretty economical
New onshore wind is actually pretty cheap. Only gas beats it. New coal plants are both expensive and dirty.
Awe the leftard LIE ... "subsidize coal".
How did the LIE start? Well leftards made-up a story that went like this ... businesses have tax-deductions, the coal industry is a business ... therefore under the complete BS narrative ... coal is subsidized because it gets tax-deductions just like every business does.
Doesn't matter how many times it's proven to be entirely FALSE the leftards just keeps the LIE alive.
But why stop there. After close to $1 TRILLION in REAL subsidies. Literally Gov funded projects. After curbing by regulation every other energy legislatively. Wind makes a total of 10%. Oh boy!
Try to deny any of that... You can't. It's plain as day. Need more?
If Wind and "Green Energy" is so cheap then WTF does CA (Green-Energy Central) have the HIGHEST energy cost in the USA?
Now pretend it is Iran that wants to convert to nuclear power. That is well known. Their initial goal was 9 power plants - in 1974 when the Shah first outlined the plan. The more recent goal is likely 16 or so.
That it doesn't want to depend for fuel on foreign powers that perpetually sanction/attack them for reasons that have nothing to do with nuclear anything and more to do with regime change
The negotiation model that those two powers overtly aim for is the "Libyan model" where the target gives up their nuclear energy ambitions in return for getting sodomized to death with a broom handle.
Now pretend to "greenify" the Libyan model so that it becomes more widespread as a solution for renewable energy.
With a deadline of May 2025 - which is already being planned for -and known about - and news worthy if progenocide shitrags like Reason weren't so willing to ignore the war drums