150 Economists Sign Letter Opposing Trump's Protectionist Agenda
Only time will tell if America heeds their clarion call.

President Donald Trump issued his executive order on regulating imports via "reciprocal tariffs" on April 2, which has been paused, substantially amended, or walked back in the two weeks since, wreaking havoc on the global economy. Economist Don Boudreaux, economic historian Phil Magness, and an unnamed group of economists authored the "Trade and Tariffs Declaration: A Statement on the Principles of American Prosperity" to warn Americans about the dire consequences of these protectionist policies.
The authors characterize the president's actions as inverting "the principles of liberty that ushered in an American-led age of human freedom and prosperity." They object to the president's recent executive actions for "misdiagnos[ing] the nature of our nation's economic ills [and] repudiat[ing] long-standing and widely held economic first principles," which are peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, as Thomas Jefferson stated in his first inaugural address. Over one hundred other economic scholars signed the statement before its publication, including Nobel laureates James Heckman, director of the Center for the Economics of Human Development at the University of Chicago, and Vernon Smith, professor of economics and law at Chapman University.
The authors begin by stating that free trade is associated with greater economic growth and higher per-capita income, while erecting tariffs will hamstring domestic production and impoverish American workers. They clarify that the president's tariffs are "reciprocal" in name only, and deny that trade deficits used in their calculation are economically deleterious. The authors enjoin the president not to "repeat the catastrophic errors of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930," which led to a retaliatory trade war that froze international trade. Finally, they emphasize that the tariffs unilaterally imposed by the president usurp Congress's Article I powers to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises."
Magness tells Reason he was inspired to co-author the statement by his past scholarship on the 19th century tariff system that culminated in the Smoot-Hawley disaster of 1930. Magness says he "watched the 'Liberation Day' announcement in shock, seeing the same fallacies and errors from a century ago being repeated today." Boudreaux says the letter's goal is "to counter the unfathomable economic ignorance that is fueling support for Trump's protectionism."
Magness says the nonpartisan, evidence-based letter is an attempt "to correct the myths and falsehoods that have been promoted by tariff supporters in their misguided cause" that "will impose extraordinary costs on Americans from all walks of life." Boudreaux hopes the letter will move "opinion makers and voters to reconsider their support for these policies that destroy not only our material wealth but also–and more importantly–our liberties."
Only time will tell if Americans heed the economists' clarion call.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"150 Economists Sign Letter Opposing Trump's Protectionist Agenda"
Then it must be a really good idea.
AFAICT 150 Economists puts us above the 51 former intelligence officials who are certain the Hunter Biden laptop story is Russian disinfo, but below the >96% consensus of climate scientists who are certain that economists are just a bunch of morons in the pocket of big oil.
I was hoping the 150 economists had weighed in on the Hunter Biden laptop myself.
In 2022, there were approximately 33,245 economists working in the US. So, like, 0.45% of economists in the US wrote a letter.
Were these the same economists (including Nobel laureates) who signed the letter saying that biden's economic agenda was sound?
"150
EconomistsLeftists Sign Letter Opposing Trump's Protectionist Agenda"Fixed that for you. How do we know they're leftists? They oppose Trump. That and economics is leftist for opposing Trump. Everything that economists have said over the last two and a half centuries was wrong. Mercantilism and protectionism is where it's at. All true libertarians know this. Just ask Jesse. He read a book about game theory that said all economic principles are garbage.
"Everything that economists have said over the last two and a half centuries was wrong."
The Evidence would indeed say so.
How would you know? You don't know dick about economics and you're proud of it.
Talking to yourself in the mirror today?
Sarc usually does.
A lot of emoting and projection from you today. Zero intelligent comments.
It is amazing claiming you understand economics yet don't even realize there are multiple schools of economics. That's how fucking ignorant you are on the subject.
Poor sarcbot.
[and] repudiat[ing] long-standing and widely held economic first principles," which are peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations
That's a two-way street, and "all nations" aren't keeping their end of the bargain.
There's also the other problem that nobody seems to want to talk about: the American consumer. Now, this is (and always has been) far more true on the left than on the right - but the simple reality is that they want slave labor. They just don't want to sully their own hands with it in 2025, so they'll happily outsource it to China, India, Africa, Indonesia, etc. and get their slave goods imported.
And that's why they're balking at Trump. Trump is actively threatening their beloved slave trade, and hoping it has the added effect to encourage more honest labor practices in America, by Americans, for Americans. ('course, to date I haven't seen Trump really address the other half of that equation - which is getting the regulatory boot off the American producers neck so that profitable businesses not strangled by artificial overhead can flourish).
That's an interesting take from someone who has said that he'd like the United States to wage war against the world and kill anyone who doesn't want to become an American. You'd cheerfully murder billions of people, and you're bitching about what you call slave labor? Talk about messed up priorities. On the one hand you pretend to care about workers, and on the other you'd murder those very same people if they didn't want to become American. That's fucked up.
and kill anyone who doesn't want to become an American.
Pretty sure I've never said that. Now, granted, Islam will almost certainly have to be exterminated just on general principle - because they'll refuse to culturally evolve until their dying breath. But yes, a war to liberate all persecuted people and bring American culture and values to their backwards despotic and communist and authoritarian slave societies?
You're against freeing slaves and helping the oppressed?
But, I guess that's par for the course for a leftist.
Look, this isn't as complicated as you seem to be trying to make it out to be. The government has NO ROLE in trade between Americans and anyone else. The only thing that matters is if Americans can make a profit selling to or buying from other traders. What happens to the little pieces of paper after they are in foreign hands is irrelevant - or should be irrelevant - to any government entity within the limits of the original intent of the Constitution of the United States of America. It should be obvious to anyone who has a brain to think with that getting gadgets and food in exchange for paper is a win for the people who get the food and the gadgets. If foreigners can use the paper for purposes of their own, then it's win-win for everyone concerned. This trade balance or reciprocal tariffs crap is a smoke screen for an otherwise illegitimate agenda.
When you think economics has no complications you know jack shit about economics.
Just saying.
Let other countries violate markets, harm domestic suppliers, steal IP... and your argument is no recourse. Shorter summary of your argument is government has no right to even protect private property. Didn't take you for a complete anarchist.
I take it this is your first time reading his posts?
“The government has NO ROLE in trade between Americans and anyone else.”
The Commerce Clause says wut?
I'm sure this letter has Trump quaking in his boots! Let's see: a letter signed by one hundred "economists" in one hand and a pile of steaming dog poo in the other hand - which one weighs more?
Ooh, ooh. I know this one. If she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood, and therefore a witch. Right?
"A witch! A witch!"
Did they also sign a letter declaring that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation? And that the Wuhan lab leak was a racist conspiracy theory?
I happen to at least partly agree with their feelings on tariffs. (Though, as always, Reason always conveniently leaves out the abject lack of free trade from the other side.) But this is the problem with "experts" consistently beclowning themselves at the alter of politics the last couple of decades. Nobody but evangelical Democrats believes anything you say anymore. Which is why your mammy told you not to cry wolf.
These are the same economists who all claimed transitory inflation, repeatedly, endlessly in fact.
Although it might be easy to mistake a disinformation specialist or a virologist for an economist, they are not the same. All of them and many others do have much in common as shills for the authoritarian state they could not survive without support from, however.
Did they also sign a letter declaring that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation? And that the Wuhan lab leak was a racist conspiracy theory?
My bad. Should have scrolled down.
Is this like the 50 National Security "experts" who signed the letter that Hunter Biden's Laptop was Russian disinformation?
All universities have a few token conservatives on faculty. You'll find them in the economics department.
It's true.
Bullshit. They’re usually in the various engineering departments.
Congrats QB. You've resorted to having sarc following you around while the rest of us laugh at you. Mask coming off i guess.
Thanks Jesse, It used to be you that followed me around so it's a big improvement.
You mean like Kruggman and the rest of the MMT clowns? Sorry but communists like to pretend to know economics too and their proposals work wonders at getting government grants.
Those idiots are outliers who are pandering to politicians, not practicing economics.
Keyenesians are outliers? You truly are retarded.
You forgot Peter Navarro and Ron Vara.
You mean like Kruggman and the rest of the MMT clowns?
You're too spupid to know this but Krugman has written that MMT is voodoo economics. He calls it by its original name - Chartalism.
I used to find them in STEM fields, like engineering disciplines, chemistry, computer sciences, etc.
There are way more Keynesians than Austrians in economics programs….
Is this like the 50 National Security "experts" who signed the letter that Hunter Biden's Laptop was Russian disinformation?
Turned out the laptop was filled with useless dick pics.
That probably turned you on until you realized they’re adult dicks.
Except you’re full of shit, as usual.
If only everyone would obey and listen to the 'experts'...... /s
That the line Reason is selling now?
Right. Obey the politicians instead...as if you had a choice.
There is always a choice.
It may not be a pretty choice, it may not even be a clear choice, but there is a choice.
Jews in Germany chose not to resist the Nazi purges, and six million died. I often wonder how it would have worked out if every Jew they came for had at least come out swinging a frying pan.
A lot of people here chose not to obey civil rights restrictions enacted as a response to the discovery of a new strain of flu. Some lost jobs, some lost friends, some lost freedom. But they choose.
The iron fist crushes the invisible hand.
Nope. The invisible hand ALWAYS wins in the end. ALWAYS.
The end you say?
We might be in luck! Ron Paul is saying we're almost there on his Liberty Report.
You cannot always SEE the invisible hand at work. That's why Smith called it "invisible." Nevertheless, the invisible hand IS at work now and is apparent to anyone who is familiar with the concept of "under the table" and how the underground economy works.
150 Economists?! That's like (consults calculator) 300 worthless opinions!
Just think of all the better opinions you could have gotten if you had foregone these opinions!
Ah. A clarion call. A plaintive bleating in the wind. A sirens song. The tolling of the iron bell calls the faithful to their knees. The collective wisdom of 150 economists is a powerful force that will not be denied. And here the heretic Trump dares nail his theses on their church door. The orthodoxy is not amused and libertarians appeal to their authority.
Trade income tax for tariffs and I'm in.
Add tariffs to income tax and I'm out.
Wait ... you think you have a CHOICE whether to be in or not? Bwahahahahahaaaaa!
You silly man
We all have seen this before and you end up looking stupid
NY Times’ Paul Krugman says ‘inflation is over’ — if you exclude food, gas and rent
By Ariel Zilber
Published Oct. 13, 2023
Where were you when this similar case happened
=============
A study by 3 Ph.D. economists at the San Francisco Fed has found that “price markups for goods and services” — aka, price gouging — has “not been a main driver” of recent inflation. Instead, the root causes are “large” federal government “fiscal transfers and increased unemployment benefits” (aka, social spending) and Federal Reserve policies like lowering “the federal funds rate target to essentially zero.”
==============
I can find that many who oppose you. Bet you don't let economists say who has the better constitutional theory:)
The Fed study confirms that the real cause of inflation is the big government spending agenda that Warren, Biden, & Co. supported and enacted.
Something tells me this will age as well as the intelligence officials who signed that letter about the Hunter Biden laptop.
Economists don't work in factories. And economists make damn sure that their children never have to rely on factories for jobs. So eliminating every last American manufacturing job and bringing down consumer goods prices another dollar is an obvious win-win for them. This is class warfare, and Trump is on the side of the working class.
Trump is ruling by executive order in class warfare for the workers at the expense of the capitalists? Hmmmm....
It is with a heavy heart that I must announce that the economists are at it again.
It took Trump for these people to promote a group of economists not down with protectionism.
LOL. Doesn't matter. Trump does not (cannot?) read.
Getting rid of direct Chinese sellers like temu makes sense. But for American importers of components and even finished products the structure of the tariff is destructive. When an American importers brings in a product for $1 and resells it at $15, $14 of gross profit stays here in America. The nature of the tariffs is socialist, denying American producers the right to buy the best product and resell it. The Boston Tea Party had something to say about this. A much better policy would be investment tax credits for capital equipment purchases here in the USA and used here in the USA. Incentivize domestic production while increasing demand. Tariffs slow domestic demand and do not necessarily increase domestic production because demand falls.