Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Attempt To Block Return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia
"This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear," Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson warned.

Warning that the executive branch's claims should shock "the intuitive sense of liberty" of Americans, a panel of judges for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit today unanimously rejected the Trump administration's attempts to stay a lower court order to release Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a prison camp in El Salvador.
The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration last week to facilitate the release of Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man that three government officials admitted was mistakenly sent to El Salvador's most notorious prison, along with several hundred other alleged gang members. However, the Trump administration has done nothing to comply with that order; it insists it has no power to return Abrego Garcia from another sovereign state—nor does a court have the authority to force it to do so.
When the federal district judge overseeing Abrego Garcia's case attempted to enforce the Supreme Court's order, the Trump administration requested an emergency stay from the Fourth Circuit Court.
Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, a Ronald Reagan appointee to the Fourth Circuit, wrote that allowing the administration's passive interpretation of "facilitate" would "reduce the rule of law to lawlessness and tarnish the very values for which Americans of diverse views and persuasions have always stood."
"It is difficult in some cases to get to the very heart of the matter," Wilkinson wrote. "But in this case, it is not hard at all. The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order. Further, it claims in essence that because it has rid itself of custody that there is nothing that can be done."
"This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear," Wilkinson warned.
Trump administration officials have made no secret of its contempt for the concept of due process.
"To say the administration must observe 'due process' is to beg the question: what process is due is a function of our resources, the public interest, the status of the accused, the proposed punishment, and so many other factors," Vice President J.D. Vance wrote in a post on X this week. "When the media and the far left obsess over an MS-13 gang member and demand that he be returned to the United States for a *third* deportation hearing, what they're really saying is they want the vast majority of illegal aliens to stay here permanently."
White House officials have also repeatedly said—and President Donald Trump was caught on a hot mic with El Salvador's president confirming—that they're exploring ways to send U.S. citizens to El Salvador as well.
The grave due process implications of Abrego Garcia's case, the Trump administration's plans to expand foreign detention to American citizens, and its increasingly obstinate and mendacious rhetoric leave little doubt that we're heading toward a legitimate constitutional crisis, which Wilkinson acknowledged in the court's order.
Wilkinson ended his order with what amounts to a plea to the Trump administration to come to its senses: "We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos," he wrote. "This case presents their unique chance to vindicate that value and to summon the best that is within us while there is still time."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Well, Reason is firmly aligned with wife-beating gang members who are in the country illegally now.
I hope their shitty leftist friends run on this.
Love how a protective order isn't justification to take away someone's guns because there's no due process, but it's retroactive justification for sending someone to a foreign gulag with no charges or convictions, apparently for life.
He had his day in court, but you don’t care because you’re an ignorant liar.
And his day in court granted him an indefinite suspension of removal to El Salvador. That was six years ago.
He hasn't had a day in court that alter that outcome.
He should have been deported under Biden. I wonder why that didn’t happen?
(I don’t really wonder.)
What law allows a judge to deny asylum but pick and choose where he can go?
It’s time to start removing democrats.
To the gulf of America? I approve.
Preferably the bottom of it.
Again and again, no mention of prosecutorial discretion. No mention of why Obama could decline to prosecute and deport millions of illegal immigrants because they had young children, yet Trump can decline to investigate and prosecute whoever kidnapped Garcia.
You like Rule of Law so much now. Where were you then? Was something different?
ETA Yes I'm going to keep beating this. The hypocrisy reeks.
That 2019 court order is also suspicious. Here is someone with no gang ties, allegedly under threat of murder by MS-13, yet he hasn't been murdered in the 6 years since. Maybe that threat of murder was not quite as real as thought.
Or maybe MS-13 is such a pussy gang that a 6 year old court order is scary.
Odd also that he hasn't been accused of committing an actual crime. "Being in a gang" usually indicates one is engaging in criminal activities, but isn't a crime in and of itself. So...is he just really bad at being in a gang?
I guess domestic abuse doesn’t count anymore?
What a dumb shit you are.
Right, I'M the dumb shit. She applied for a protective order. Plenty of conservatives and libertarians don't believe that's sufficient cause to take away someone's guns...but YOU think that a protective order requested two years AFTER his last immigration hearing is justification for sending him to prison for life in a foreign country.
But you're right: for people who don't understand context, I guess I should have said "he hasn't been accused of a crime by the government aside from possibly crossing the US border without the proper permissions."
All it takes to be deported is to be here illegally dumdum. Committing a crime is not a required condition of removal when in the country illegally dumdum.
That's why not one but 2 judges ordered his deportation dumdum.
Being here illegally is justification for sending him back where he came from all by itself.
No gang ties or domestic abuse allegations needed.
Do none of you get that?
The due process goes like this--
"are you an illegal alien?'
'yes'
'Goodbye'
He was an illegal. He was in a gang. He wa lawfully deported as such.
Period. These lawless attempts to interfere with the executive branch is turning into insurrection.
Odd that the leftists here refuse to learn anything about how the laws of our country work but still have an opinion.
They still keep making the same bullshit claims about this case. This makes them useful idiots for the democrats, or democrats themselves.
That means they should burn.
You don't need to be convicted of any crime to be deported. This is another one of these fantasies the left cook up on the fly, with no rhyme or reason - like "hate speech isn't covered by 1A" or "the 2A only applies to militia". Or "Nazis weaponized free speech".
I can be escorted out of a federal building for violating their rules of conduct or policies. They do not have to observe my due process rights to do so. I CAN try to sue them for wrongful removal, but only if a judge agrees that the case is worth moving forward.
Deportation is sort of the reverse of that, since most people about to be deported was ordered to be so by a judge. The citizenship status was already determined. If you think Bill Clinton and Obama afforded "due process" to every single deportee under their watch, I have a bridge to sell you. I remember instances where Mexicans who went to Mexico were denied reentry after it was discovered they were illegal. Should the courts have ordered them to be returned so they have due process?
This is clown world stuff. Unicorns and leprechauns. The courts basically want our president to strongarm another president to return a criminal wanted in his own land. The courts never ordered Biden to negotiate for the release of Griner or Americans held by Hamas. That is outside their authority, even if they're our citizens. Bukele deserves no small praise for refusing to endanger the lives of Americans to satisfy the dictatorial impulse of activist judges. "He's ours, you can't take him" That's standing up to a bully.
Rejecting asylum and deportation doesn't require a fucking crime you dishonest dipshit.
My understanding is that he’s a member of MS-13 and he feared a rival gang retaliation if he went back to El Salvador. That was the basis of not sending him home.
But the basics of your point stand.
So Leftists in the judiciary are demanding the US actively break US law. Somebody deserves a bullet.
Just put them in federal prison without charging them. There is precedent for this.
Courts are free to engage in their foreign policy if they so desire.
Are CBP agents or even soldiers standing at ports of entry blocking Abrego Garcia's return.
Haven't read the government's filing but this guy has had years of due process. Trump didn't decide that he's a member of a terrorist organization, an immigration judge did that six years ago and he had a deportation order. The government can not order El Salvador to release this guy so I would suggest that the Court determine exactly how it defines "facilitate" without implicating the exclusive power of the executive to manage international affairs.
Courts order is riddled with activism in an order saying no to a stay. Starts out by calling the judge a funeral judge. Pretty hilarious.
Remember when the dems sent in a SWAT team so they could deport Elian Gonzalez?. Now they’re trying to rescue a gang member from El Salvador.
Imagine if his removal was deemed "illegal" by a judge, and he orders Clinton to "facilitate" his return - even though he was not our citizen, and was asked to be returned by Cuba.
It's a freaking ridiculous nonsense. The fact that the media is going along with this comedy is a surefire indication of their retardedness. A right leaning judge should order Trump now to extract every dual citizen Ukrainian serving in their military. Were they given due process? An opportunity to renounce their Ukrainian citizenship? I'm guessing nah.
Again, imagine Spain asking us to return an American criminal who had fled to his country. HOW he got back is irrelevant. Maybe he came back on his own, or their president sent him back in error. Are we going to send him back?
Bondi should send in a SWAT team to deal with this judge.
Garcia had his time in court in 2019 when a federal immigration court deemed him an MS-13 member and recommended deportation.
So, the argument he was denied due process is a false one.
He's in an El Salvador prison, and he's going to stay there for quite some time where he belongs.
More good news.
Garcia is in El Salvador, and despite the desperate rantings of the leftist vermin, that country does not have to turn him over and won't.
https://floridaphoenix.com/2025/04/17/u-s-born-man-held-for-ice-under-floridas-new-anti-immigration-law/?_sm_au_=iVVRMHMZkH4t6fJjLB48jK0KGWfCF
Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, a 20-year-old U.S. citizen, was being held in the Leon County Jail Thursday, charged with illegally entering Florida as an “unauthorized alien” — even as a supporter waved his U.S. birth certificate in court.
A Florida Highway Patrol trooper arrested Lopez-Gomez after a traffic stop in which he was a passenger. The 20-year-old is set to remain in jail for the next 48 hours, waiting for federal immigration officials to pick him up despite his first-degree misdemeanor charge being dropped.
Leon County Judge LaShawn Riggans held Lopez-Gomez’s birth certificate up to the light after community advocate Silvia Alba silently waved the document in the courtroom.
“In looking at it, and feeling it, and holding it up to the light, the court can clearly see the watermark to show that this is indeed an authentic document,” Riggans said.
Based on her inspection of his birth certificate and Social Security card, Riggans said she found no probable cause for the charge. However, the state prosecutor insisted the court lacked jurisdiction over Lopez-Gomez’s release because U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had formally asked the jail to hold him.
“This court does not have any jurisdiction other than what I’ve already done,” Riggans said.
Riggans said she was very sorry as Lopez-Gomez’s mother left.
Wait, I thought everyone had to comply with every judge's orders no matter what.
Sullum will have an article up shortly advocating for criminal contempt of the sheriff.
It’s true, in fact, I just declared myself Supreme Judge of the Universe. And my first act was to retroactively give myself the power to do that in the past. So it’s legit.
I’ve also handed down a ruling ending the existence of the democrat party, and further ordered the assets of all democrats be confiscated. Since democrats believe in the unlimited power of all judges, they must obey.
Oh, I handed down one more decision. No fat chicks.
To the extent that the Trump administration has not done much of anything to ask for Abrego Garcia to be returned, this consternation may be understandable. That the US government as a practical matter also has no way of compelling El Salvador to send him back. The courts cannot order absolute compliance with an improbable task.
We're paying for these people to be there. So what happens when we stop paying?
I hope they go to your house.
We’re paying for Venezuelans to be held there, not citizens of El Salvador, supposedly.
Well, that would be El Salvador's problem then.
Alt text: “Aren’t you sad these poor little angels aren’t lose in your community?”
No one - including the judge - will specify what actions would satisfy the 'facilitate' requirement.
Instead they insist you read their mind.
Reason keeps ignoring the fact that this guy had his due process.
This guy had a deportation order. He was not kidnapped.
The error by the government - and it's not a small one - was deporting him to El Salvador. That's it. That was the mistake. A mistake that happened because the administration is running roughshod *not* over due process but over paperwork.
They didn't file the right paperwork to review the 'no El Salvador' order.
But dude is a gang member, a fairly senior one, and he wasn't supposed to go back because *another gang* would try to kill him. Boo hoo.
Sorry, but this guy isn't the poster boy you are looking for. Indeed, so far Reason and the media have singularly failed to find a sympathetic case to rally people around.
It's a pretty small one.
The only process missed was an interview with CIS after 18th street gang was eliminated in El Salvador. Didn't require another court session.
Also as was pointed out by Bondi and others, the withholding order is invalid for designated terrorist terrorist groups, which MS13 was declared as one.
I’m sure the usual crowd will call me a heartless bastard for this take, but fuck anyone in a gang/mafia requesting asylum for fear of rival gang retaliation. That makes a mockery of people fleeing shitty authoritarian governments.
You're a heartless bastard...just kidding.
I'm gonna pick on you, DesigNate as I know you to be among the most reasonable and willing to listen to opposing views of those criticizing the courts here.
There's a lot of strawmanning going on here on both sides. I request we all try to suspend the binary "Trump can do no wrong" or "Trump can do no right" type casting. There are logical reasons to find yourself on either side, without being a partisan NPC, as Jesse would say. Here goes:
THE PROBLEM IS NOT THAT HE WAS DEPORTED. The problem is that he's in prison.
If you find yourself arguing how his deportation is justified, you are not addressing the true issue.
THE PROBLEM IS NOT THAT HE DIDN'T GET ANY DUE PROCESS. The problem is he was put in prison without warning, due process, trial or conviction by the US federal government, nor with any way to appeal or rectify an "administrative error."
THE PROBLEM IS NOT THAT EL SALVADOR WON'T RETURN HIM. The problem is the Trump administration is actively obstructing his return.
THE PROBLEM IS NOT THAT WE WANT A WIFE BEATING MS-13 MEMBER TO REMAIN IN THE COUNTRY. The problem is one of rule of law. Our laws are clear, one can be deported based on the likelihood he's a gang member or wife-beater, but not put in prison.
I have a request for you (or anyone):
For your argument, skip justifying his deportation. Justify that it's consistent with US Justice for an administration to send anyone to prison without indictment, trial, conviction or sentencing with no opportunity for appeal.
It is not a problem*for the US* that he is in prison. He committed crimes in El Salvador.
What crimes? I've seen both claims that he did and that he did not commit crimes in El Salvador.
He was given due process. The judge said 'crominal, deport him'.
What about PRISON?
Trump isn't actively blocking anything.
Oh you sweet summer child.
So the problem isn't the declared problem but som soft peddled other thing, fuck off you dishonest cunt. the problem is you are America hating, gang loving nihilists looking only for power or destruction by applying the rules for radicals playbook.
Let me know if you have a point when you're done screaming at clouds.
Yes. You are completely correct. We all know that Trump could get this guy back tomorrow if he wanted to do so. He doesn't. Problem is that the courts have no business looking through Bukele's "no."
And I love watching the courts fulminate over their impotence.
Oh, the selective morality, it burns.
Garcia was found deportable by the courts, when they affirmed that he was in a gang. His wife had put out a restraining order against him. There's apparently evidence that he communicated with gangs. No one was "shocked" when Biden ignored him, and let this potential wife beating gangster in the country?
And what about this nonsensical decree that he can't be sent back to El Salvador until some anti torture treaty can be verified despite there being zip evidence that he was actively wanted by gangs? Should we be "shocked" that Biden didn't try to negotiate with Japan or Britain to take in foreign national?
The notion that (illegal) immigrants don't get due process is absurd. They get lawyers. They get court dates. They get to apply for asylum coming from countries where no genocide or war is occurring. Judges order Trump to reunite families he separated, but American dads or college kids accused of rape get no such heroic rescue.
We've treated foreign nationals in this country like a special class for years. They're cause celebre in all aspects of American life, get all kinds of benefits and attention, including judicial patronage. NONE of these "shocked" judges did anything when Biden let in gazillions of foreigners with the minimum background checks. We were letting in criminals, and some of them killed American citizens.
And now, "libertarians" are supposed to rejoice in the fact that our courts have ordered the president to remove citizens of sovereign nations to satisfy OUR due process. What you gonna say if the court says Elian Gonzalez was removed illegally? What about people we denied reentry to? Have them all return so they can all have due process?
"Courts aren't part of big government that affects your liberty" - Is that the new Reason motto?
They showed 0% of thr concerns from J6 citizens than they do here. Dozens of articles attacking them, defending Garland going after even non violent protestors for 20 year sentences.
It’s time for the democrats to burn. And we should have a good opportunity to destroy them when they ramp up the violence this summer.
He didn't come in under Biden. He came in fifteen years ago. The last Trump administration was giving him work permits.
I'm for the feds enforcing the immigration laws - and obeying them, too.
As the 4th Circuit pointed out, if the 2019 order is outdated and needs to be updated to allow him to be sent to El Salvador, then a new hearing with new evidence could have accomplished that. Assuming the new evidence is as unfavorable to Garcia as commenters say it is.
But now he's gone. Fait accompli.
It is very clear that this is a deliberate strategy by the Trump Admin to try and undue the vast amount of lawbreaking damage performed by the Biden organization. I don't condone it. I condemn it as immoral. But I understand what is happening.
Here is the real situation:
There is a loophole in our immigration law. When someone claims asylum, they get a temporary stay in the country until their hearing. This is why many of these resident aliens are not actually illegal. They have temporary permission to stay in the country until a hearing. They even have permission to work.
The Biden Administration gave hundreds of millions of dollars to NGOs whose sole purpose was to facilitate these people coming to the country, and filing asylum requests so that they could stay, put down roots, and fundamentally change the fabric of this nation. This was done without the consent of the people and in many cases in direct opposition of the political leaders and populations that had to absorb these migrants.
The thing about asylum is that it is very difficult to get. The vast, vast majority (on the order of 70%+) of asylum cases are denied. I had a good friend who was a bleeding heart liberal lawyer that worked for cash in one of those offices across the street from the Federal Courthouse in LA. These people come to the US and sign the application, not realizing what it means. They don't speak the language or read the contracts, someone takes their money, sends in the application and gives them a work permit. And then one day they get a summons to court.
The problem for Trump is that Biden INTENTIONALLY swamped the Asylum court system. The last time a big rush of applications occurred in ~2004, it was hundreds of thousands of migrants being sent by a pipeline of Noticias in Mexico and LA who were making shit tons of money doing this. Those 100s of thousands of immigrants were enough to backlog the asylum system by 2 - 3 years. A person comes to the country, settles down, gets going in their job and WHAM, deported. This was criminal when Noticias were doing it, and it is just and cruel and criminal today when Biden's minions do it.
Tens of Millions of asylum seekers will take DECADES to clear through the Asylum system. Biden's Administration knew this. They INTENTIONALLY overwhelmed the system, in order to get people into this country- knowing that they were on borrowed time.
They did this to create millions of anchor babies who WILL be sent back to their homeland when their parents are deported. They did it because they know that in 8 years, the only way to get through this backlog is mass amnesty or a long string of newspaper stories about families that have been working for years being sent back to Ecuador.
Let's be clear: The Biden Administration facilitated lying to these immigrants to get them into this country, to settle where they are not wanted, and to then use them as props in the next immigration showdown. That is fucking evil.
And that is why Trump is being an evil fuck right now. Everyone acts with disbelief that Trump would let a man rot in a prison for the rest of his life. He wants this. More specifically, he wants every asylum seeker currently in the nation to see this. Garcia is an example to every person in this country on an asylum permit. They have a choice: self deport on their own terms and go home, or risk being swept up in a dragnet and shipped to the gulag.
I don't like it. It is disgusting how Trump is treating Garcia as a pawn. But then, what the fuck do you expect? THIS IS THE GOD DAMN GOVERNMENT. They just spent the last 4 years ushering millions of pawns into the country on false dreams built with taxpayer money. We are all pawns to them- Every. One. Of. Us. And woe be unto all the assholes at Reason, the Left, and the Right who fail to call all this bullshit- Biden AND Trump- out for what it is.
Well said. Holding back the info that Garcia was a wife-beating gang member until after the leftists went full retard defending him supports your premise.
Anyone that's been paying attention to Europe understands that Trump must do whatever it takes to get as many of these people out as quickly as possible.
Here's an post by an interesting X account I follow I shared last night:
https://reason.com/2025/04/16/new-21-tariff-will-make-fresh-tomatoes-more-expensive/?comments=true#comment-11006888
“They must be defended with force. The world that is ruled by authoritarians with fire and sword cannot be allowed to dictate terms, political or economic, to the world that is ruled by debate, consensus, and ideas.”
I feel like a lot of the people that we argue with don’t understand this aspect of liberty, but rather are nearly pacifistic in their ideals.
Biden told everyone south of the border to surge the border
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYwLYMPLYbo&ab_channel=SpeakerKevinMcCarthy
If this isn't treason than what is?
There is precedent for repatriating millions of illegals. Hoover, Roosevelt and Eisenhower did it. No fucking lawyers involved including the ones in black robes.,
If a judge disagrees with Trump then the judge is committing treason. Trump is god emperor. Anyone who disagrees is committing wrongthink. Wrongthink is thoughtcrime, and thoughtcrime is death.
So. Who's going to criticize him. Come on.
Poor sarcbot.
If a judge is told they don’t have jurisdiction to even hear a case, it doesn’t really matter if they think Trump is the second coming of Hitler or Jesus.
I wonder if anyone has considered the fact that Garcia might actually be safer in CECOT at this point.
Because I'd bet dollars to dimes that if that criminal steps foot in America again, some good 'ol white boy in a MAGA cap (which he won't wear that day) is going to off him in response to the sheer audacity of the TDS media-spectacle of bringing him back.
Maybe one of the brothers, if he thinks he can get a Cadbury Karmelo/Luigi Fettuccini-type gofundme scam going.
School shootings and gang violence only happen in America.
They don't happen in civilized countries like Singapore.
No one should seek asylum here.
Gang violence only happens in America, huh?
Write that when you were drunk, did you?
And yes, it happens even in Singapore. Hence why they had to crack down harder than any other nation on the problem. Go google the "Secret Society Branch".
"This would reduce the rule of law to a state of lawlessness," says a judge who has been reducing the rule of law to a state of lawlessness since the Reagan Administration. I continue to chuckle wryly as the judiciary that invented "legislation from the bench" to bypass all Constitutional limitations on central government authority, and which has issued hundreds of thousands of pages of tortured logic in order to render it impossible to "get to the heart of the matter" now sputters in effete rage over "Trump Shrugged." The judiciary has achieved the socialist nirvana of the Constitution as a "living document" rendering it ineffective against demagogues, and now wails in anguish that Trump has put the final nail in its coffin. So sad!
Where was Reason when Biden/ Mayorkas was flying illegals in en mass? Not standing up for the common man but only interests that align with the ( Ds).
And Brandon was flying them into a country where their kids could get killed in school shootings and gang violence, and where they could die if they couldn't afford health care.
Have any of you heard the term, "fait accompli." The Administration has established facts on the ground.
The SCOTUS did not order the return of Abrego-Garcia. They ordered the US government to facilitate his release from custody. The lower courts are demanding the executive branch make something happen, which is exactly what the SCOTUS warned the district court not to do as it may exceed its authority. The district court and the appeals court both misrepresented or outright lied about the SCOTUS ruling when they tell the executive branch to return Abrego-Garcia to the US. The SCOTUS never ordered the return of Abrego-Garcia, they ordered the US government to facilitate his release from custody. Why are so-called journalists getting these basic facts incorrect?
The SCOTUS told the US government to be prepared to provide the lower court what it can. That means the determination of what it can provide is left up to the Executive Branch, not the lower court. The lower courts lack the authority to determine what the executive branch can provide them, which means they have no authority to say the executive branch hasn't provided them adequate information. These are two lower courts openly defying the SCOTUS order and overstepping their authority.
Assumptions Unstated
Every postulate rests on a set of assumptions. So it is with the cases against President Trump regarding his refusal to order the airliners bound for El Salvador filled with illegal aliens and the deportation of Kilmar Ábrego García. The Democrats have made the issues constitutional ones, claiming that the President is violating the law by not bending to the Judicial branch. After all, isn’t the U. S. Supreme Court the supreme law of the land? The answer is . . . No!
There are two, primary assumptions put forth by those against Mr. Trump. Are they valid for, be either or both invalid, the postulate of judicial supremacy becomes invalid?
The first is that, according to the Constitution of the United States, the three branches of the federal government are co-equal. Invalid! The are not co-equal. The Legislative branch is supreme with the Executive branch second, and the Judicial branch third. Only the Legislative branch can remove from office via impeachment members of the other, two branches not vice versa. Congress has the final word.
The second is a judgement by the Judicial branch is final. Invalid! Where in the Constitution does that authority appear? Nowhere. That power was usurped by Chief Justice Marshall appointed by President John Adams in Marbury v. Madison (1803) and has remained the prevailing guideline since.
Until recently, these assumptions were not challenged because the courts exercised judicial restraint. In recent years, however, the courts have become corrupted by politics and used as illegitimate agents of imposing judicial tyranny, mainly by the Democrats. Witness the egregious legal attacks against Mr. Trump between terms. Currently, witness the egregious attacks by the Obama-appointed Judge Boasberg and Judge Xinis against the authority of the Executive branch.
President Trump rightly is launching a counter-attack and attempting to drive the Judicial branch into its proper place. He is using case of Boasberg’s orders and the case of Xinis’s orders as the vehicles. With regard to To avoid controversy, he easily could have deported this illegal alien and likely member of a violent gang of hoodlums to a neutral country. He purposely chose not to do so.
Where will this controversy end? Who knows? Will Judge Boasberg hold the President or other members of the Executive branch in criminal contempt as he is threatening to do? How will he enforce doing so? Only via U. S. Marshalls, who operate under the authority of the President. Will the president countermand Boasberg’s order for arrests? Ultimately, what will Boasberg do?
A question arises. Are we heading towards the President intentionally creating a constitutional crisis in order to impose martial law? Would he be right to do so?
“I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” -President Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
https://www.nationonfire.com/rebellion/ .