Chicago Cancels Cinco de Mayo Parade Over Fears of ICE Deportations
The Windy City has been the target of ICE’s ire since President Donald Trump took office.

This week, organizers of Chicago's annual Cinco de Mayo parade canceled festivities over concerns about deportations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). "Our people are scared," said Hector Escobar, president of the Casa Puebla and Cermak Road Chamber of Commerce.
Unfortunately, the fears of Chicago's Mexican community may be warranted. In the first 50 days of President Donald Trump's second administration, ICE boasted 32,809 arrests, just four hundred shy of all arrests made in 2024. Under the direction of Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, sanctuary cities like Chicago have been the target of enhanced ICE operations, which have already included the improper or warrantless arrests of at least 22 individuals in Illinois.
Homan has also threatened to prosecute Brandon Johnson, the city's Democratic mayor, if he obstructs ICE's mass deportation efforts by upholding the city's sanctuary policies. Meanwhile, federal lawmakers have investigated Johnson and other sanctuary city mayors for impeding federal law enforcement, despite legal precedent under which state and local governments cannot be compelled to enforce federal laws.
Immigrants in sanctuary cities aren't the only ones being targeted and fearful of ICE raids; 238 individuals from across the country have been swept up by ICE and shipped to El Salvador. While the Trump administration has described those in El Salvador as "the worst of the worst," 90 percent have no criminal record in the U.S. And in the case of Marylander Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was sent to El Salvador due to an admitted administrative error, not even a Supreme Court order has safely ensured his return to the United States.
Trump has also suggested jailing U.S. citizens in El Salvador. While imprisoning U.S. citizens in a foreign country is "obviously unconstitutional, and obviously illegal," according to David Bier of the Cato Institute, the president's proven willingness to flout Constitutional due process protections should give everyone—immigrants and natural-born citizens alike—cause for concern.
While Trump's anti-immigration policies have succeeded in lowering the illegal border crossing rate to the lowest seen in over 25 years, Americans' approval of the president is already waning. But the administration is showing no signs of slowing down by using protected personal data collected by federal agencies, like the IRS, to support harsh immigration policies and destroy privacy for all Americans, not just Mexican-Americans in Chicago, in the process.
Trump's evolving immigration policies have created high levels of uncertainty and left little for Chicago's Mexican-American community to celebrate this Cinco de Mayo. Escobar said that the parade cancellation was primarily about safety. "At this point, we don't know what is going to happen next year," he added.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Paranoid much?
On the other hand, to be sure - - - - - -
https://notthebee.com/article/cnn-trump-has-a-positive-net-approval-on-immigration-a-majority-of-americans-support-deporting-all-illegal-immigrants
the makers of Corona Beer, founders of the modern nationwide Cinco de Mayo celebrations, thank you for your support.
...as does MS-13.
we thought our Corona shirts in high school were rebellious because we won the okay to wear them but they made us put tape over the word "beer" ... little did I know
MS-13 isn't Mexican.
Whoosh!
>>"Our people are scared," said Hector Escobar
Is he talking about the targeted illegal immigrants or is he assuming the emotions of an entire ethnic community?
I think he means the globalist democrats.
Oh no, people parading around with Mexican flags are terrified that they...might be sent to Mexico.
The horror.
To be fair, they do probably know from personal experience how much life in Mexico sucks.
Ask any one of them. Mexico is the greatest place in the world.
I was catching a ride from my hotel in Mexico City to the airport after spending 5 days there on business. The driver of the Chevy Caprice cab had time to talk to me. He had lived for 10 years in Chicago which is in the rough area where I was from, ( Eastern Iowa). Seemed natural for him to move back after earning some cash in the US. Never asked if he was legal. Around 2000 or so. And yes avoid Chicago on the Cinco de Mayo.
And yes, Mexico City was an excellent time. I have honestly never had anything but positive experiences in Mexico. Been there ~10 times.
The Windy City has been the target of ICE’s ire since President Donald Trump took office.
Someone hasn't watched any Chicago City Council meetings over the last three years I take...
I’ll take things that don’t support the narrative for eight hundred dollars, Alex.
Answer: It is not constructive to demonize youth who have otherwise been starved of opportunities in their own communities.
...
3...
2...
1...
Ooh, I'm sorry. The question we were looking for is "What is 'wilding'?"... wilding... your turn to pick again.
So they don't want to have their test case of citizen deportation?
And here I thought that they had balls.
This crap again? I'm going to copy in my rant from this morning and before.
The only judicial remedy for crimes is punishment, not undoing the crime. When courts order the President to order a foreign country to release one of their own citizens from prison and send him back to the US, where he was an illegal immigrant and would again be an illegal immigrant, the courts have gone off the rails.
The allegation is that someone kidnapped Garcia and deported him illegally. Find that person, charge him, have a trial (oh, finally, we get to the part that courts are supposed to do), and sentence him. Oh wait, those are all functions of the prosecutor and the police, not courts.
I have never heard of any kidnapper being sentenced to unkidnap his victim, whether dead, sold to some "adoptive" parents, or just plain missing. If the sentence includes restitution, it is money, not undoing the crime. Has any thief ever been ordered to track down the stolen goods he fenced and return them to his victims? Fuck no. This whole thing is based on power-mad TDS-mad judges bent on partisan revenge.
And hey, guess what --- all those prosecutorial functions -- finding who kidnapped Garcia, who ordered his deportation, prosecuting them -- gosh, guess what? Prosecutorial discretion, bitch. Same as when Obama ordered his prosecutors to not deport illegal immigrants who had brought their children in when they were too young to have a say. Prosecutorial discretion, the courts called it, and refused to undermine Presidential authority to tell his prosecutors what to do.
And now the courts want to tell Trump that he can't invoke prosecutorial discretion to not prosecute the actual culprits who kidnapped and deported Garcia.
The hypocrisy is rank.
Dude, that's one of the dumbest things I've read since I muted Dlam.
The allegation is that someone kidnapped Garcia and deported him illegally.
Someone with the power of arrest took Garcia into custody, and someone else put him on the plane. Neither of them broke the law. The person who put him on a plane was defying a court order, though from what I know it was more carelessness than anything else. Neither act was criminal. Especially because law enforcement is basically immune to criminal law being that their entire job is to initiate force, which is criminal for me and you.
The problem is that SCOTUS has told Trump to facilitate the guy's return. Trump has facilitated his imprisonment by paying El Salvador truckloads of money. You would say that it would be easy to get the guy back by undoing some of that facilitation, if you weren't a Trump defending toady. But no. You defend Trump on everything except economics. Still don't understand why.
As far as prosecutors prosecuting law enforcement who commit crimes, that ship has sailed. It just doesn't happen. Law enforcement is immune to criminal law as well as civil law. Locals have qualified immunity and feds have absolute immunity. So that argument is just dumb.
I haven't muted you because your stupidity is just plain entertaining.
Carry on.
since I muted Dlam.
Oh look. sarc mentioned his mute button again. I know "drink!!!" has been done to death on this forum, but...
It is a known fact that I am not muted.
Oh but they did break the law, according to the court cases. Can yee nay read, laddie? That's what all this excitement is about, pinning another crime on Trump. I guess you think that the distinction between civil and criminal, that only criminal actions end up in jail, doesn't apply to court orders.
You completely missed the point of the entire rant, that courts cannot order undoing crimes. They can only hold trials and impose sentences.
You really missed your calling.
Only Congress can appropriate money. If Trump gave it to El Salvador, it was because Congress said to.
Oh but they did break the law, according to the court cases. Can yee nay read, laddie? That's what all this excitement is about, pinning another crime on Trump.
So according to you 'they' broke the law, and a crime is being pinned on Trump. Except Trump didn't collar or deport anyone. I'm not even reading the rest of your comment, fucking moron. Though I do wonder if you'd drown if you look upwards during a rainstorm. At this point you're making Dlam look like someone with a brain, and that's an accomplishment.
Just mute his ass, sarc.
Yeah, mute me, go for it. Another lie for sarc.
I haven't read anything Bertie typed since he told me I cared about what he said. I'm not going to mute you though. At least not right now. You're too entertaining. If someone cloned Jesse and then gave the clone some knowledge of economics and an overdose of self righteousness, they'd have you. It's quite funny to watch. You're always shouting at Reason about them having no principles, yet you have none. That's what makes you so funny.
Glad to know I'm still on the (imaginary) list.
POST THE LIST!
Are these your ideas of IDEAS!(TM)?
Robert Hanssen is serving Life Without Parole. So it does happen. I am surprised Trump hasn't pardoned him.
You have found the "reason" for this judicial activism. It is not to punish any crime; it is to get Trump. It's all about getting Trump.
Is this supposed to make me laugh? Because this made me laugh.
Reason has become the meme.
Fuck, now I laughed twice.
It's not a parade, it's a traffic jam.
They don't celebrate the Mexican victory over the French at the Battle of Puebla this hard in Mexico.
And in the case of Marylander Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was sent to El Salvador
Marylander. This MF actually said "Marylander"
El Salvadorian was sent to El Salvador.
I guess once you break into Billings house, occupy one of her rooms, and somehow convince her she can't deport you, you are family.
I've been in IL longer than Garcia was in MD. I still identify as a Hoosier-native when asked and people often pick up on it if I don't.
And we're talking about a distance of less than 100 mi. My HS is further from my parents house than Kyle Rittenhouse was from his.
Again, "immigration" doesn't mean "movement of people between places or regions" to Reason. It means "political issue that we think we can use to wedge people apart".
This is such a "Washington Monument Syndrome" move. Even if I were inclined to bee on their side on an issue, this sort of ridiculous posturing would make me want to rethink my position. What a joke.
It’s pathetic propaganda.
'Unfortunately, the fears of Chicago's ILLEGAL Mexican community may be warranted.'
FIFY, you stupid open-borders Reason cunt.
The Windy City has been the target of ICE’s ire since President Donald Trump took office."
Chicago offered illegal aliens free housing, medical and perhaps even debit cards at the expense of those who lived in that democrat-run outhouse all their lives.
I believe a good sweep of ICE and arresting the illegals is more than justified.
It's necessary.
Josie’s going hard at Reason and Cato and I’m here for it:
Billy Binion, a low T Reason magazine journo, who is too retarded to understand the constitutional tests the Alien Enemies Act passed, fails repeatedly to dispute my constitutional knowledge so he just resorts to subtweeting orange man bad strawmen like a bitchboi for likes.
https://x.com/TRHLofficial/status/1912590788791333145
Once again you are being a disingenuous pussy, Alex, too much of a CATO biitch to face me directly, so you subtweet. Weak.
This is the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, not some emotional platitude like the ones you keep spouting off. “So It’S OkAy?!
https://x.com/TRHLofficial/status/1912906709678370971
No provision in the text in the Alien Enemies Act mandates a hearing for actions like deportation or detention. It is simply your criticism which you are flaccidly lashing out at me over. You may read the act here:
https://x.com/TRHLofficial/status/1912912714667618698
The actual link for those not on X:
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/alien-and-sedition-acts
OK, maybe the people she criticizes are bad, but notice the Alien Enemies Act's reference to a "hostile nation or government." If the Founders had meant criminal gangs they would have said so; they knew what criminal gangs were.
"Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall be lawful for the President of the United States at any time during the continuance of this act, to order all such aliens as he shall judge dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States, or shall have reasonable grounds to suspect are concerned in any treasonable or secret machinations against the government thereof, to depart out of the territory of the United States,"
It's the first sentence.
That law, along with the Sedition Act, destroyed the Federalist Party. It never won another national election. And history will likely repeat.
So?
Well, the Democrats ceasing to be will not hurt my feelings at all.
The party is on the side of illegal gangbangers and firebombing domestic terrorists. Unsure how a party can CHOOSE to back evil each time but they are doing so.
And now Hogg is saying they will oppose several Dems in Congress right now. Because that is not going to ruin their hopes of capturing the House...
“If the Founders had meant criminal gangs they would have said so; they knew what criminal gangs were.”
And U.S. immigration law says nothing about criminal gangs present in an illegal alien’s home country as being grounds for asylum or temporary protected status.
The Constitution does.
Where?
Hilarious!
wait ... they venture forth with their various idiocies into the general public?
Reason staff are not overly popular in the libertarian community on X.
That's because they're not libertarians. They are lefties who want free hos and blow.
Josie and Angela's take is solid and doesn't just apply to due process.
It used to be generously/backhandedly called "bleeding heart liberalism". They do the same thing with free speech too. Native-born Jews, or even complete bystander non-entities, don't have a right to peaceably assemble in educational institutions on US soil because Palestinian immigrants have a right to belligerent disruption under the 1A. Lifted straight out of Bill Ayers and the WUO and similar militant Marxist and/or racial supremacists groups' playbook.
You want to bleed from the, your own, heart to support them? Fine. Otherwise, forcing other people to bleed from theirs is attempted murder. Fuck you. Keep it up and I'll you facilitate your own hemorrhaging.
That's a shame. Think of how many illegals could have been rounded up all in one place. Let me know when the deportations reach one million. That will be a start.
The real question to ask is how there are now so many Mexicans (legal, illegal, born here, etc) that it's considered worthwhile to put a 5th of May parade on in the first place?
Cinco de Mayo no es una fiesta importante México afuera de Pueblo.
It's so hard to keep track of what Reason decides is "too local" to report on.
Luckily nobody thought to cancel St Patricks day, so ICE was able send all them Irish back to Scotland where they belong
"federal lawmakers have investigated Johnson and other sanctuary city mayors for impeding federal law enforcement, despite legal precedent under which state and local governments cannot be compelled to enforce federal laws."
Hmm. Impede, enforce. I should probably consult a dictionary but I don't think either of these is like the other.
Autumn is only an assistant editor.
She forgot harboring, as in harboring fugitives.
This is the excuse given. In reality, it probably has more to do with the typical escalating yearly gang violence that occurs at this time before, during, and after the parade. Of course, the city can’t help themselves and give a TDS ridden response that would make Sarc proud.
Where did I put my LOL emoji? I need at least ten of them for this article.
"Our people are scared," said Hector Escobar
Who are "your people?"
Americans? Or... something else?
I'm not afraid of going to a Cinco de Mayo celebration with our people. Americans have nothing to fear. You must be talking about someone else.