CECOT Forever
Plus: Israel stopped from striking Iran nuclear sites, Zohran Mamdani wants to soak the rich, and more...

DOJ tries to prove Abrego Garcia is part of MS-13: Attorney General Pam Bondi has decided that instead of working to facilitate the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) as the Supreme Court has ordered, she will instead take to X to release documents from his 2019 arrest, in which a detective claimed he was an MS-13 member.
That's one approach, I guess.
These documents had already been publicly available, if you cared to look through the prior court proceedings. The Gang Field Interview Sheet, drafted up by Ivan Mendez, then an officer with the Prince George's County Police Department, says Abrego Garcia was arrested with purported MS-13 members in a Home Depot parking lot, that he was wearing clothing that they believe to be affiliated with MS-13 ("a Chicago Bulls hat and a hoodie with rolls of money covering the eyes, ears and mouth of the presidents on the separate denominations" which "officers know such clothing to be indicative of the Hispanic gang culture"), and that a confidential informant said he was part of MS-13.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Get your daily news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.
Interestingly, reporting by The New Republic notes that Mendez was suspended the next month for "providing information to a commercial sex worker who he was paying in exchange for sexual acts." ("The information he provided focused on an on-going police investigation," per the county's news release.)
Information has also come out about Abrego Garcia allegedly beating his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, stemming from a protection order she filed against him in 2021: "At this point, I am afraid to be close to him," she wrote in the protection order. "I have multiple photos/videos of how violent he can be and all the bruises he [has] left me." She cites specific examples from August 2020 and November 2020 in which he was violent toward her. Vasquez Sura told CNN that "she sought a civil protective order in 2021 after a disagreement with Abrego Garcia" and that "she had survived a previous relationship that included domestic violence." She says she did not appear at a court hearing and pursue the matter further: "We were able to work through this situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling."
Working through marital troubles—even when violence is involved—appears to be something the vice president sorta…supports: "Culturally, something has clearly shifted. I think it's easy but also probably true to blame the sexual revolution of the 1960s," J.D. Vance said in 2022. "My grandparents had an incredibly chaotic marriage in a lot of ways, but they never got divorced, right? They were together to the end, 'til death do us part. That was a really important thing to my grandmother and my grandfather. That was clearly not true by the 70s or 80s." (Vance has written elsewhere about his grandparents' marriage turning violent at times.)
"Based on the sensationalism of many of the people in this room, you would think we deported a candidate for Father of the Year," snarked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday. On Wednesday, Leavitt commented from the podium that "it's appalling and sad that Sen. [Chris] Van Hollen [D–Md.] and the Democrats applauding his trip to El Salvador today are incapable of having any shred of common sense or empathy for their own constituents and our citizens," before gesturing to Patty Morin, a woman whose daughter was brutally murdered by an illegal immigrant in 2023. "Nobody knows this more than the woman standing to my right, Patty Morin," added Leavitt.
Whether Rachel Morin or Laken Riley, the 22-year-old nursing student killed by an illegal immigrant while jogging, the administration keeps implying that you cannot both support due process for Abrego Garcia and have empathy for the victims of violence from illegal immigrants. (I think people can hold multiple ideas in their heads at once.)
None of this really matters in terms of what the U.S. government is obligated to do: The Supreme Court has ordered the Trump administration to "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's return. The administration continues to demur on this front, instead choosing to release, via X…the protective order Vasquez Sura filed:
Kilmar Abrego Garcia had a history of violence and was not the upstanding "Maryland Man" the media has portrayed him as.
According to court filings, Garcia's wife sought a domestic violence restraining order against him, claiming he punched, scratched, and ripped off her shirt,… pic.twitter.com/FpSV0k3i90
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) April 16, 2025
Of course, most people are neither angels nor demons, and even very bad and violent people—if that is what Abrego Garcia is—deserve due process. The punishment for wifebeating in Maryland, or entering the country illegally, is not indefinite confinement in a Salvadoran prison. He has not just been deported, he has been locked up in CECOT. ("A prison where there is no education or remediation or recreation, because it is a prison that does not intend to release its inhabitants back out into the world," writes The New York Times' Ezra Klein. "It is a prison where the only way out, in the words of El Salvador's so-called justice minister, is a coffin.")
More specifically, if the administration is trying to deport the man under the Alien Enemies Act, he is entitled to a habeas hearing to confront the charges that he's an MS-13 member (as Glenn Greenwald details below).
A few facts regardless of what side of the due process/deportation debate you're on raised by Vance:
1) Only reason Abrego Garcia case is a controversy is an immigration court blocked his deportation, and Trump Admin admitted he was "mistakenly" picked up by ICE.
2) SCOTUS… https://t.co/b4QF2axiVu
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 16, 2025
Even if the idea that Abrego Garcia deserves due process is uncompelling to you, zoom out for a second and consider the many other people who have been sent to CECOT without the ability to contest the charges against them, unsure if they will ever be released. This isn't deportation. This is cruelty to make a political point (as some resistance types would claim during Trump 1.0): Don't come here. If you're already here illegally, be afraid. After all, home-growns are next.
The Miami Herald published a great article about one man who applied for refugee status, received it, and was seized at the airport and sent to CECOT for no reason: https://t.co/YQoM4UVbn5 I posted it and everyone went "yeah that seems bad". Garcia, though, we can argue over.
— Kelsey Piper (@KelseyTuoc) April 16, 2025
Israel had wanted to strike Iran's nuclear sites: Over the last few weeks, Trump administration officials apparently dissuaded Israel from attacking Iran's nuclear sites. "Israeli officials had recently developed plans to attack Iranian nuclear sites in May," reports The New York Times. "They were prepared to carry them out, and at times were optimistic that the United States would sign off. The goal of the proposals, according to officials briefed on them, was to set back Tehran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon by a year or more."
Essentially, President Donald Trump communicated to Israel that the U.S. would not support them in their plans, while opening up greater lines of communication with Iran possibly to negotiate a new deal related to its nuclear program (the former nuclear deal, negotiated by President Barack Obama, was shredded by Trump during his first term in 2018, but it looks a bit like second-term Trump might settle for something that looks rather similar). Looked at one way, you could say Trump's approach is a bit schizophrenic, with administration officials not totally aligned on which goals they're actually pursuing. Looked at another, you could say the less-hawkish forces are exerting significant influence behind the scenes, which bodes well.
Scenes from New York: Mayoral candidate (and current state representative) Zohran Mamdani plans to increase corporate taxes by 4.5 percent, which he predicts would add $5.4 billion to city coffers. "Another $4 billion would come from the increased taxes on the wealthy, with additional income flowing in by beefing up the city's tax collection agency," adds The New York Post. Mamdani advocates city-run grocery stores, expanded free childcare, fare-free buses, and rent freezes. He also seems to believe that you can just levy infinite taxes on the wealthy without them ever wising up, moving their money elsewhere, or fleeing the city altogether.
QUICK HITS
- "SpaceX is leading a bid to build Golden Dome with startups Anduril and Palantir, six people said," reports Reuters, which would include "a constellation of 400 to more than 1,000 missile defense satellites."
- "A team of researchers is offering what it contends is the strongest indication yet of extraterrestrial life, not in our solar system but on a massive planet, known as K2-18b, that orbits a star 120 light-years from Earth," reports The New York Times. "A repeated analysis of the exoplanet's atmosphere suggests an abundance of a molecule that on Earth has only one known source: living organisms such as marine algae. 'It is in no one's interest to claim prematurely that we have detected life,' said Nikku Madhusudhan, an astronomer at the University of Cambridge and an author of the new study, at a news conference on Tuesday. Still, he said, the best explanation for his group's observations is that K2-18b is covered with a warm ocean, brimming with life. 'This is a revolutionary moment,' Dr. Madhusudhan said. 'It's the first time humanity has seen potential biosignatures on a habitable planet.'"
- This is really disturbing:
I'm furious.
We've gotten official word that "several" students at my college have had their visas pulled (among the hundreds reported across the country). No reasons given. My school is about as activist as a jar of peanut butter.
My other international students are worried.…
— Carl (@HistoryBoomer) April 15, 2025
- Agree:
I think it should be bigger news that a domestic terrorist tried to murder a Jewish governor and his family on the first night of Passover because the perp was made about "the Palestinians." This is what "globalizing the intifada" means in practice, and all those who have been…
— David Bernstein (@ProfDBernstein) April 16, 2025
Reporting today pretty consistent that this was a straightforward attempt to assassinate a Jewish governor and his family on Passover out of revenge for the Palestinians. We'll see what else emerges obviously, but if that's where this is headed it's a bad, bad place. pic.twitter.com/zuJJWGNYh4
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) April 16, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I say we boycott Reason until it stops logging me out every 12 months or so. WHO'S WITH ME?
And miss out on all the fun?
It logs me out once a day. How are you getting every 12 months?
As a beloved fixture here, I have an honorary Reason Plus membership, baby.
It would appear that if you pay Reason some money, they log you out less often. Some might say it’s a pay to play operation.
started logging out every day when I showed up one morning and had already posted a bunch
I used to get logged out several times a day, and could detect no pattern. Then one day it stopped. I'd guess it was a period of a year or two of constant logging out.
My situation was similar.
Until they learn the meaning of due process.
That's a good point. Where's my due process before they make me log in again?
I'M DUE SOME PROCESS HERE.
The process is the punishment.
reading the headlines alone the last month is a punishment
Did you stop beating your wife?
Wait until Lying Jeffy shows up and starts asking questions along this line!
Shit, he already asks if you fuck your sister.
Man I was mean, but I'm changing my scene.
I get logged out nearly daily.
How would sarc see every one of my responses to him if it didn't auto log him out every time I respond to him?
Beat me to this, LOL.
DOJ tries to prove Abrego Garcia is part of MS-13...
I guess this is going to go on for a while more. Usually Trump would have moved us to a fresh outrage by now.
Not sure why the DOJ isn't trying to prove he's an undocumented alien in possession of a firearm. A felony conviction would certainly make him eligible for deportation.
Being in the country illegally with final deportation orders and denial of asylum also makes him eligible for deportation.
Correct. Just not to El Salvador, which was also part of the final deportation orders you referenced.
It’s like your brain refuses to retain information that makes you have to think. Is holding more than one fact in your head at the same time that painful to you?
Garcia lost his deportation hearing.
Garcia was an illegal immigrant.
Garcia could be deported at any time to any place except El Salvador.
What parts are untrue? Which one do you think we’re ignoring? Because I believe that they are all true.
Which laws gives that judge that authority? It isn't part of the asylum laws he was ruling on as asylum was denied.
It's like your brain can't wrap your head around around fact liberal preferred narratives aren't actual law.
Then what's the issue you have?
Except El Salvador is his home country, the immigration "judge" (or, in OTHER words, an executive branch employee) can be overridden by the head of the executive branch, and his deportation is lovely.
Keep trying to lionize this thug.
What other country would have taken him?
...Mendez was suspended the next month for "providing information to a commercial sex worker who he was paying in exchange for sexual acts."
So he's sex positive. Score one for the copper.
Also a true gentleman, and paying for sexual acts--not just claiming the LEO "discount".
ENB approves.
Yes, but did he leave a tip?
[Insert Bobbitt joke here]
Didn’t she also get the shaft?
I don't want to say Bobbitt's problem is insertion, but ...
Sounds like he gave more than just a tip.
We used to call them hookers and johns. Short and to the point. Very efficient and no wondering just wtf someone is trying to say.
Sexual capitalists.
Odd seeing Reason coming out against sex work...
Reason comes out against all sorts of things that might normally be seen as "libertarian" as soon as Trump does them.
I think people can hold multiple ideas in their heads at once.
You're an old soul. I admire that.
Best comment so far today. A++ humor!
DHS has released the findings from the original 2019 case regarding Garcia. And reason looks retarded blindly repeating the defenses claims.
New Info About Kilmar Abrego-Garcia's Arrest - and Who He Was With - Should Humiliate Dems (But It Won't)
By Jennifer Van Laar | 7:55 PM on April 16, 2025The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana
Wednesday afternoon, while many were riveted by the heartbreaking remarks of Rachel Morin's mother at the White House Press Briefing, the Department of Justice released information from Kilmar Abrego-Garcia's 2019 arrest and deportation proceedings that should put a lot of the whisperings about the "Maryland Father's" gang affiliations and alleged lack of due process to rest.
Abrego-Garcia was detained by Prince Georges County, Maryland officials on March 28, 2019 in a Home Depot parking lot in Hyattsville, Maryland. Here are the highlights of that encounter and a subsequent bond hearing, as found in the documents:
Abrego-Garcia was loitering with three other men either known or suspected MS-13
One of the men had an extensive and violent criminal history, including a conviction four months prior for MS-13 gang activity
Abrego-Garcia and another man at the scene were "detained in connection to a murder investigation."
Two bottles with marijuana inside were recovered at the scene
Abrego-Garcia was in attire associated with MS-13 members, those being a Chicago Bulls hat and a hoodie with rolls of money covering the eyes, ears, and nose of the presidents on the separate denominations (meaning, hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil - in other words, don't snitch)
A confidential informant advised Prince Georges County investigators that Abrego-Garcia was a member of the MS-13 Westerns clique
The confidential informant said that Abrego-Garcia held the rank of "Chequeo" and the "moniker of 'Chele.'"
Abrego-Garcia admitted that he entered the US illegally in 2012 through McAllen, TX, and was a citizen of El Salvador.
While no criminal record was found, Abrego-Garcia had received numerous traffic violations for which he never appeared in court.
One section of the report says Abrego-Garcia did not claim to be fearful of returning to El Salvador, but another section states that he did claim to be fearful.
https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2025/04/16/new-info-about-kilmar-abrego-garcias-arrest-and-who-he-was-with-should-humiliate-dems-but-it-wont-n2187951
Liz actually mentions them, then dismisses them. She also dismisses the part where a judge agreed with the police he was a gang member and ordered him deported.
I stopped reading Liz on this topic. Has been terrible on it.
Was actually wondering if KMW or Sullum was ghost writing her roundup this week.
He got his due process!
Yes. And he could have been deported to anywhere except El Salvador. And probably should have, since he regularly checked in with the government so they knew exactly where he was and he was under a deportation order.
Just not to El Salvador.
The judge literally said he skipped court dates regularly...
And did you skip over the entire due process requirement for removal of a holding order? A single CIS interview.
Your appeals to wrong information continue to be sarc like.
“ The judge literally said he skipped court dates regularly...”
And what’s your point. Do you still not understand that I have no problem with the 2019 deportation case going against him? He was an illegal immigrant. He should have been deported. Just not to El Salvador.
You really struggle with simple cognition, don’t you.
You have yet to give an argument aside from your feels lol.
The gang he was fearful of was removed by Bukele years ago. Was that order based on Garcias claims valid given this fact?
Also what is your claim to restitution here?
My claim is a simple step was missed, the CIS interview, but now that the citizen is in his own country there is nothing that can be legally forced for restitution.
Your claim is ignore 99% of the situation due to your feels.
You're making a fact free emotional argument.
OK, I’ll make another, probably vain, attempt to point out the ends-based logic you are employing here. Then, at the end, I’ll point out why these sorts of diatribes are ignoring the issue that most people are pointing out and trying to falsely replace the real position with this manufactured one. Here goes:
“ the heartbreaking remarks of Rachel Morin's mother”
Yes, it is heartbreaking to hear from the parents of murder victims. It’s also unconnected to this case, nor is it connected to illegal immigrate as a group. Every group has shitty people who do shitty things. That’s why there are brutal murderers who are American born and bred. It doesn’t reflect on Americans as a whole, just like illegal immigrants.
“ in a Home Depot parking lot in Hyattsville, Maryland”
Illegal immigrants arrested in Home Depot parking lots are looking for under-the-table work. I have never heard of a gang that stakes out a Home Depot parking lot as their hangout. Probably because that doesn’t make sense, but a gathering of unconnected illegals looking for illegal work makes perfect sense. So why do you think being in the same place as gang members is proof of anything? Guilt by proximity?
“ Abrego-Garcia was loitering with three other men either known or suspected MS-13”
In a group of 20-25 people, why should the 3 gang members (not all of which were even known to be gang members) be associated with one person, but no others? Because they didn’t say there were a couple dozen gang members, they said three “known or suspected” gang members.
“ Two bottles with marijuana inside were recovered at the scene”
And? Whose were they? And how does some weed being in the vicinity indicate gang membership? Are chemo patients automatically gang members because they have pot at their homes?
“ Abrego-Garcia was in attire associated with MS-13 members”
Seriously? Buying the same version of mass-produced clothing is now proof of something? Anyone who has no knowledge of gang symbols or attire and shops at WalMart is now a violent gang member?
“ A confidential informant advised Prince Georges County investigators that Abrego-Garcia was a member of the MS-13 Westerns clique”
One guy said something and no corroboration was found, so we should believe it’s true? That’s a terrifyingly low bar for “proof”. So if someone says, “Jesse is a pedophile”, that means you should be labeled as a pedophile? That’s what you are advocating here.
“ The confidential informant said that Abrego-Garcia held the rank of "Chequeo" and the "moniker of 'Chele.'"”
The uncorroborated statement has details? Well that changes … nothing.
“ Abrego-Garcia admitted that he entered the US illegally in 2012 through McAllen, TX, and was a citizen of El Salvador.”
That makes him an illegal immigrant who should be deported (but, as was ordered when he had his hearing in 2019, to anywhere except El Salvador). It does not make him a gang member.
“ While no criminal record was found, Abrego-Garcia had received numerous traffic violations for which he never appeared in court”
Well that definitely makes him a violent gang member. He probably jaywalks, too, the murderous bastard.
“ One section of the report says Abrego-Garcia did not claim to be fearful of returning to El Salvador, but another section states that he did claim to be fearful.”
And therefore he’s a violent gang member? How is that?
Finally, although it wasn’t included in the unbiased, non-partisan, moderate article from *checks notes* redstate (that’s sarcasm, which I feel the need to clarify since you probably think redstate is all those things), the judge made a determination that the single, anonymous source that was never examined under oath was telling the truth and the guy who was sitting in the courtroom wasn’t. That doesn’t support the premise that it was a true accusation, it just shows that judges are comfortable with supporting prosecutors who offer paper-thin evidence for their assertions. It’s a condemnation of the judge’s judgement, not corroboration of the cop’s claim.
But, while it shows how disingenuous and credulous the Trumpkins are, it’s irrelevant because who and what this person is has never been the issue.
The issue is due process and the rule of law. This guy had a hearing. He was ruled to be an illegal immigrant who should be deported to any country other than El Salvador. If you want to lean into the fact that he lost his due process case to avoid being deported, you also have to lean into the fact that sending him to El Salvador was illegal and the government has a moral and (because the government lost a different court case) legal obligation to not send him there.
And please, don’t try to claim that Trump can play 4D chess with tariffs and is a master negotiator, but can’t get one friendly leader of a poor Central American country to send people back. Especially because we are paying them to incarcerate these folks. No one is stupid enough to believe that except those who really, really want to.
So your attempt at logic was to ignore the facts by adding in your own supposition and fake facts then also ignoring the 2 courts who didn't use your leftist logic method declaring him to be in the gang?
Very sarc like.
Exactly what point was wrong? It isn’t supposition. It’s, at worst, saying “out of these two scenarios, which is more likely to be true?”
For example, in a group of a couple dozen illegals in a Home Depot parking lot, how likely is it they were looking for work, not hanging out with fellow gang members? Much more likely.
If you’d like to point out which things I said were wrong and why, like I did with you, have at it. But you never engage with substance, just wingnut pablum and vague assertions. When you aren’t outright lying, like your whole ActBlue delusion.
So have at it, Jesse. List what I said and tell us why it’s wrong. Go ahead, genius. Dazzle us with your brilliance and logic.
I'm sorry sarc sock, I shouldn't use words like supposition as you don't know even common words.
When you inject your own beliefs and rationalization sans any actual evidence of those beliefs being true, you're rationalizing and not arguing from logic.
Let me know which words above you don't understand.
Wait, I thought I was a Jeff sock. No, wait, a Buttplug sock. No, wait, a Shrike sock. Oh, wait, that was a White Mike sock.
There are more, I just can’t remember them all.
Just admit you can’t make any detailed, valid criticisms of what I posted and we can all move on.
Or try to make points, if you can. This “I got crushed by a point-by-point takedown of my irrational beliefs, so I’ll make wild, unfounded, and obviously false accusations.
You aren’t even smart enough to realize “I say you’re a sock” isn’t actually substantive or persuasive.
People accuse you of being socks for those people because you display an equivalent intellect to shrike, and honesty about your past statements equivalent to sarcasmic / laursen.
Here's what all you socks don't get. You're NPCs. I call you socks because you mirror the arguments of others relying on liberal narratives with no other inspection. And it is a way to mock your idiocy.
“ the 2 courts who didn't use your leftist logic method declaring him to be in the gang?”
Oh, and besides the pathetic appeal to authority, it was one judge in one court that took the prosecution/cop at their word that an anonymous person said that. Note that person never testified.
But hey, if you want to accept that you’re a pedophile because an anonymous person in these comments said so, you’re a brave man. For me, I would insist that there be some sort of cross-examination and corroboration, under oath, but apparently yiu trust that everyone, especially in the government, is telling the truth.
And then you doubled down on ignoring the actual facts (everything above was presented to the judge) and holding on tight to your narrative about the single source.
Do you even understand the case for deportation falls under civil, not criminal, levels of evidence? You don't seem to.
Everything you post is ignorant and retarded.
“ And then you doubled down on ignoring the actual facts (everything above was presented to the judge)”
Nice appeal to authority. Does that actually convince you? Because logical fallacies don’t move the needle with intelligent people, but you probably think it’s rock-solid evidence.
A third-hand prosecutorial assertion with no corroboration and no cross examination isn’t believable. The fact that a judge accepted it doesn’t change that fact.
“ Do you even understand the case for deportation falls under civil, not criminal, levels of evidence?”
Apparently you are too ignorant to realize I have never and will never dispute that he should have been deported. I’ve said it numerous times, but I’ll use simple words so you might understand:
Garcia lost his deportation hearing and should have been deported to any country other than El Salvador in 2019.
I can’t dumb it down any further if you can’t understand that sentence.
Nice appeal to authority. Does that actually convince you? Because logical fallacies don’t move the needle with intelligent people, but you probably think it’s rock-solid evidence.
This coming from the same retard who was thumping his chest about "discovery" before Disney waved the white flag.
You definitely have the wrong person. I have no idea about the details of discovery beyond the most basic concepts and I believe it is a very complex subject. I would never wade into something like that, especially in a comment section populated by really good, really knowledgeable lawyers.
No, I definitely do.
Nelson 2 years ago
The biggest W will be discovery in their lawsuit. I figure about half of the legislature will end up implicated in a clear case of government retaliation for protected speech.
Hell, just getting a hard number on the number of districts permenantly impacted by the legislation (one) with the ones that were impacted, but allowed to reapply (five, I believe) and the ones that weren't impacted at all (1400+) will be informative to those who aren't all-in on the culture war.
It's hard to keep all the socks straight.
Haha, Mike Liarson, Lying Jeffy, whatever, it doesn’t matter.
Why do leftists keep thinking they can lie about what they write when it’s still available?
Nelson 2 years ago
Careful, your delusions are showing.
Disney knows they have been handed a prime opportunity to expose the anti-democratic, anti-factual, anti-liberty character of Florida Republicans.
I'll need a super-sized bag of popcorn for the news updates about the discovery materials about Florida politicians.
Nelson - you’re honorable to try using logic and asking legitimate questions, but it’s a waste of your time, I know from recent experience. All you’ll get is being called a “retard” or accused of being a sock account for some other user they don’t like. They’re not here for logic or debate, they’re here to jerk each other off and take turns cumming in each other’s MAGA hats.
Sorry your revolutionary vanguard is getting sent back home.
Yes, we must all be raging leftists, for how else could anyone disagree with you? Embarrassing levels of idiocy on display here.
Speaking from experience?
You consider a thoughtful question to be one ignoring facts in evidence while adding yourbown non facts. This is why you also get called a retard.
You, like Nelson, rely on rationalization to get to your first impression argument or narrative. You're a theist like most of the leftists here.
And now a new report is out showing Biden ordering the release of this precious Maryland father over suspicion of human trafficking.
https://tennesseestar.com/justice/bidens-fbi-ordered-tn-highway-patrol-to-release-maryland-man-recently-deported-to-el-salvador-after-he-was-detained-in-2022-traffic-stop-on-suspicion-of-human-trafficking/tpappert/2025/04/16/
Well, suspicion is guilt, right? Just like accusation is evidence?
Also, that has nothing to do with the issue. You do understand that, right? Or are you so certain if you convince enough people that he is an awful person that everyone will forget that the rule of law is important?
Yeah, you probably do.
Do you know that visas can be revoked on mere suspicion of a crime? The most common visa revocation is references to drugs by travelers at customs. Or the mere suspicion someone on a travel visa intends to work. All on mere suspicion.
But again, you argue from ignorance.
It takes even less to deport someone illegally here. Weirdly you continue to ignore this fact.
As stated above, you rely on ignorance to formalize your arguments.
And what relevance is any of your post to whether or not ICE violated a court order, not by deporting Garcia (who was legally subject to removal after losing his case), but by deporting him to El Salvador.
I have never disputed the fact that he could be deported because, legally, he can. He lost his case.
Why do you keep trying to get me to admit he could be deported? I’ve never said otherwise, nor do I think that illegal immigrants shouldn’t be deported. They should.
Your observations are incorrect. Kilmar Abrego-Garcia had his due process, and should be deported. Not even the court order disputes that, only that he was deported to the wrong place.
Stop trying to defend the Democrats.
Fortunately, I never asserted he was a nice guy. I said he was entitled to due process before the government was allowed to send him to El Salvador. When he was sent there, that was illegal because his immigration classification was such that he could *not* be sent to El Salvador because he faced persecution there. (Persecution from gangs)
Maybe the persecution thing was never true. Maybe it used to be true but things got better. Then hold a hearing on that so his immigration status can be changed in a proper manner.
Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
OMG.
Long story short, Senator Chris Van Hollen got totally REJECTED today when he demanded a meeting with Kilmar Abrego Garcia by the El Salvador Vice President.
The VP said - you'll have to arrange that through the Trump administration.
LMAO!!
Democrats care more about illegal gang members than actual US Citizens.
Xiyue Wang
@XiyueWang9
I was an NJ resident, Sen.
@CoryBooker
’s constituent, when I was jailed in Iran as an American hostage. Sen. Booker never advocated for my release & refused to speak to my wife. Sen. Booker is a hypocrite.
It's the modern equivalent of Hanoi Jane.
Moral Heatmap remains undefeated:
https://x.com/Kitsune_in_VA/status/1885293198634848521
The left sees themselves all as white savior.
And the heat map is wrong as every person on the left loves their own victim hood.
Hey, knowing who is part of your family is white privilege!
I seem to remember a few kerfuffles back in the day when Congress Critters went overseas to annoy foreign governments, and the US president rebuked them about interference in the executive branch's Article II domain of foreign policy.
How any court can think it possible to order the US President to order a foreign president to release one of their own citizens from prison to send him back to where he was an illegal immigrant and will be again ... sorry for the rambling sentence, but the arrogance involved astounds me. What next, an invasion? Special operations mission into the prison? Withhold foreign aid?
Bonkers.
The punishment for wifebeating in Maryland, or entering the country illegally, is not indefinite confinement in a Salvadoran prison.
I guess #MeToo is officially over.
Entering the country illegally is cause for deportation. The indefinite confinement in a Salvadorian prison part comes from his miles long rap sheet of crimes committed in El Salvador. Seems fair to me.
Didn’t he leave El Salvador when he was 11? It would take a really precocious pre-pubescent child to generate a “miles long rap sheet”, wouldn’t it? My guess is you are making things up again.
He did not come when he was 11, he came in 2011. Dumbshit.
Ah, I see. He came when he was 16. Totally different.
Let’s assume you are right about his rap sheet. Where do we find it? I’m sure you have that source handy. I’m interested to see what he did.
Also, I notice you are still, quite intentionally, avoiding the actual issue of due process and the rule of law by pretending one guy’s history is somehow relevant to due process and the rule of law.
He lost his deportation hearing in 2019. The fact that he was deported isn’t a problem. The fact that he was deported to El Salvador in violation of a court order is the problem.
Or do you believe that ignoring court orders is something the government should be allowed to do?
Which laws did the judge execute when he denied asylum but added a withholding order?
Ah, I see. He came when he was 16. Totally different.
LOL, yeah, there's no such thing as teenagers who are gang members.
Didn’t say that. My point was he referenced a long rap sheet and I was wondering where that might be found. My guess is that he doesn’t have a huge rap sheet, it’s just where the demonization effort has gotten to.
I know it’s really hard to make this about one person and not the rule of law. Probably because it isn’t about this one guy at all and it’s so obvious that the hard right has to double down on the “make this guy seem like a monster” strategy.
He should have been deported, since he lost his deportation hearing. Just not to El Salvador, which was also a result of the hearing.
Well, yeah, your side is desperately trying to make it all about "one guy" because then you can justify your stupid open borders policy.
He should have been deported, since he lost his deportation hearing. Just not to El Salvador, which was also a result of the hearing.
He's a citizen of El Salvador, so he gets sent back to El Salvador. This isn't hard.
He won't tell me what law gave the judge power to determine where he can be deported to after denying asylum.
To Nelson the legal system is based on liberal narratives.
“ He won't tell me what law gave the judge power to determine where he can be deported to after denying asylum.”
It isn’t a law. It’s the Constitution. You know, the co-equal, Article I, II, and III powers?
“ To Nelson the legal system is based on liberal narratives.”
Since the Constitution is an Enlightenment-based document, it could very well be described as a “liberal narrative”. Some would call it classic liberalism (or libertarian).
This is about the Constitutional separation of powers, the rule of law, and the Executive refusing to accept the Constitutional authority of the Judicial. Everything else is just gaslighting and window dressing.
Wait, you do know that the Executive can’t ignore the Judicial just because they don’t like the ruling, right? You know that’s not how the Constitution works, right?
Actually, you probably don’t. You’re deeply ignorant and monumentally unintelligent. It’s why you are a paleocon.
Keep going Nelson! You’re doing great!
You’re deeply ignorant and monumentally unintelligent.
How long ago did you break all the mirrors in your house Nelson?
“ because then you can justify your stupid open borders policy”
I don’t support open borders. I have always supported legal, not illegal immigration. I have made detailed posts about the changes I would make to the immigration system to avoid rewarding people who cross illegally, including locating immigration courts outside the US and requiring asylum seekers to apply at embassies.
“ He's a citizen of El Salvador, so he gets sent back to El Salvador. This isn't hard.”
He literally could have been deported anywhere except El Salvador. That was the result of the due process that he received (and yes, he did get due process and was subject to deportation). The government doesn’t get to just ignore court orders that it doesn’t like. That’s how the whole co-equal branches/checks and balances thing works. You know, the Constitution?
This is about the rule of law, nothing more. The attempt to make this about one guy is an attempt to gaslight everyone. And since JD Vance and Trump are both vocally in favor of the Executive being allowed to ignore the Judiciary, it’s not a mystery as to what it’s really about.
Is there a law or statute that allows a judge to reject an asylum claim, but still allow him/her to dictate where the claimant can be sent?
I know the judge did order Garcia not to be sent to El Salvador, but is that legal? My understanding, and I may very well be wrong (IANAL), is that the immigration judge can approve or decline the asylum claim. Once denied asylum, it's not in the judge's authority to dictate where he can or cannot be sent.
I guess you don't have an answer to my question.
“ Is there a law or statute that allows a judge to reject an asylum claim, but still allow him/her to dictate where the claimant can be sent?”
You would have to ask a lawyer for the details, but in general I believe that any question that is within the purview of a court can be ruled on by the judge and that ruling must be abided by unless overruled by a higher court.
I don’t know if there is a statute or law that specifically allows or disallows judgement on issues before the various type and levels of courts.
In this case, the judge decided that Garcia was in the country illegally and was subject to deportation, but was justified in fearing for his safety if he were returned to El Salvador. While those details have been discussed, I haven’t seen anything that has questioned the authority of the judge to make the ruling he did.
Any lawyers know the answer to Jefferson’s question? Are judges limited to only ruling on whether or not a person can get asylum, or can they examine and rule on all aspects of the case before them?
I don’t support open borders. I have always supported legal, not illegal immigration.
Which is what open borders advocates have been claiming for decades now. The ruse is over.
He literally could have been deported anywhere except El Salvador.
He's a citizen of El Salvador, so he gets sent back to El Salvador. This isn't hard.
This is about the rule of law, nothing more. The attempt to make this about one guy is an attempt to gaslight everyone.
Is that why your side is so manically focused on this one guy?
And since JD Vance and Trump are both vocally in favor of the Executive being allowed to ignore the Judiciary, it’s not a mystery as to what it’s really about.
The branches are co-equal, and the judiciary is not the supreme ruler of the country. Especially when it tries to assert powers it doesn't actually have.
Is there a law or statute that allows a judge to reject an asylum claim, but still allow him/her to dictate where the claimant can be sent?
ChatGPT said:
This was not validated by me.
“He literally could have been deported anywhere except El Salvador….”
Well sure, if you could find a third country willing to take a non citizen possible gang member with likely no sponsor or connection to said third country and little possibility of self sufficiency.
Maybe that’s the intentional fly in the ointment for this judge, eh Nelson?
I’m sure you have a long list of other countries stepping up to help out this oppressed Maryland dad, no?
QB, that's interesting, but I'm not sure it's correct. Garcia's removal from the country is mostly uncontested (it's him being sent to E.S. that's the big issue), which would violate what ChatGPT is saying in that someone with that status can remain in the US.
Hey, Jefferson,
Sorry, I guess I misunderstood your question. I get it now and I don't know the answer.
"He should have been deported, since he lost his deportation hearing. Just not to El Salvador, which was also a result of the hearing."
I assume this is Nelson's claim, since he's the grey box RRWP was responding to. I'm not going to unmute to confirm.
So, he'd had his due process if only he'd been deported to anywhere but El Salvador. So his deportation, in general, could have been effected without a single additional hearing, due process-wise? It was ONLY the trip to El Salvadore that's the issue?
Nelson and the lefties would have been as quiet as a church mouse if Garcia had only been sent to Haiti or N Korea.
You’re so dumb it’s entertaining.
Would you like to elaborate? Or are you in the “I can’t make any valid counterpoints, so I’ll just make ad hominem attacks on people I disagree with” club with Jesse and Mother and the various other paleocon mouth-breathers?
It’s not an ad hominem, it’s just mocking your stupidity.
So no details or points, just “you’re a stupid stupidheaded stupid!!!l”? Imagine how surprised I am not.
People have been arguing against your points up and down the thread nelson. It's not ad hominem to also point out that, independently of any of your arguments, you are in fact a dumbass.
The point isn't that you're dumb, but that I'm entertained by it. It was a short, one sentence post. How was it so confusing to you?
My guess is you are making things up again.
I'm reminded of your comments about trump's would-be assassins.
You mean the ones that espoused conservative beliefs before they tried to kill him. Well since that is true, I’m not sure what point you think you’re making.
Unless you’re referring to the claims people like Jesse made that ActBlue donors are conservatives? Yeah, that’s complete idiocy. Jesse believes it, but that’s just proof of how stupid it is.
Except they didn't. And you kept denying their donations to act blue.
This is your problem sarc sock, you just make up your own facts.
Of course they did. Especially the one that actually shot Trump.
I mean, he was arrested in a 2A t-shirt.
There are plenty of 2a democrats. They just keep quiet dumdum.
You have a weird definition of facts. It is always supposition.
Donating to a Democrat group is an active choice. A shirt that has members on both sides supporting it is not proof of anything. You're pretty dumb aren't you Nelson.
You also said statements above, not clothing. You're really digging here.
As an example...
https://dpo.org/caucuses/gun-owners-caucus/
Do you say anything not utterly retarded?
Wow, you just won’t stop when you’re behind, will you?
https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/inside-the-mind-of-donald-trumps-wouldbe-assassin-as-mystery-swirls-around-thomas-matthew-crooks-motive/news-story/c760bcf43982c26cd797d08ddb4d2de7
“ It has also been revealed Crooks was a registered Republican”
“He was known to share conservative views during classroom discussions about politics.”
Sure, Crooks’ classmates and teachers heard him espouse conservative beliefs, But Jesse, who lives in Arizona and is a complete stranger, knows better than those who lived and attended school with him.
https://wegotthiscovered.com/politics/who-is-ryan-wesley-routh-the-would-be-assassins-shocking-criminal-history-and-political-beliefs-explained/
“Although Routh had initially voted for Trump eight years ago, it seems the former president’s actions in office angered the gunman.”
So one was a registered Republican who discussed his conservative beliefs and died in a 2A shirt and the other was a Trump voter himself.
“ There are plenty of 2a democrats. They just keep quiet dumdum.”
Oh, I am keeping this one for any future 2A discussions.
You just make it so easy to expose you as an ignorant, unintelligent, ends-oriented imbecile with no foundational beliefs and a love of authoritarianism.
Interesting that you cut off this caveat from your first link, Nelson:
Although, bizarrely, other students have noted that he occasionally wore clothing with the names and slogans of both Trump and Mr Biden. He had also donated money to a progressive campaign three years ago.
It's almost like you're picking out whichever bits back up your "he was a conservative!" position, and leaving out the parts that undercut it...
And? Again, you think his clothing and a donation to a get-out-the-vote organization is relevant, but arguing in class for conservative principles isn’t?
All I have ever said about the two assassins is that they held/shared with others their conservative beliefs. Besides that, one was a registered Republican, the other voted for Trump.
Evidence indicates that they were conservatives. That they also opposed Trump (one after voting for him) seems pretty self-evident. “I love Trump so I’m going to kill him” doesn’t make any sense.
I think your problem stems from believing that someone who held conservative beliefs, like the two assassins, couldn’t also want to kill Trump. You believe those too positions to be mutually exclusive, but they aren’t.
It is quite possible to be a conservative and oppose Trump. Do you disagree?
It's you who have pointed to his clothing as evidence, man. I'm showing that you deliberately left out counter-evidence of the exact same type.
Routh was a Sanders supporter. His vote for trump (as with many others like him) appears to have been because he didn't want to vote for the sea hag. He continued being a bernie supporter up until his arrest.
Crooks was about 21 - his leanings are unclear at best.
It is quite possible to be a conservative and oppose Trump.
Sure. As I already said, neoconservative bulwark types despise trump (and, interestingly, have aligned themselves with leftists like you and shrike). Routh definitely isn't one of those, but sure, I guess Crooks could have been one - but you certainly haven't provided any evidence pointing to it.
"There are plenty of 2a democrats. "
Sure, they're like conservatives who donate to ActBlue!
No, actually, there are plenty. Even my best friend who is gay and *very* liberal has a carry permit.
You should probably give up this angle, Nelson. Admit that you have no knowledge, and are making shit up. You're still mixed up about which would-be assassin was which.
Especially the one that actually shot Trump.
I mean, he was arrested in a 2A t-shirt.
Was this before or after he was shot dead by the secret service?
“ You're still mixed up about which would-be assassin was which.”
The mistake I made was that the one that was killed was wearing a 2A t-shirt and the one that was arrested wasn’t. Both were still conservatives. Crooks was a registered Republican who talked about his conservative beliefs in class and Routh literally voted for Trump the first time. And no, I’m not making those things up:
https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/inside-the-mind-of-donald-trumps-wouldbe-assassin-as-mystery-swirls-around-thomas-matthew-crooks-motive/news-story/c760bcf43982c26cd797d08ddb4d2de7
https://wegotthiscovered.com/politics/who-is-ryan-wesley-routh-the-would-be-assassins-shocking-criminal-history-and-political-beliefs-explained/
“ Was this before or after he was shot dead by the secret service?”
Fair point. He was killed in a 2A t-shirt, not arrested in it. It’s weird that you think that invalidates the point.
It validates the point that you freely spout off without knowing what you're talking about.
"we got this covered .com" Are you serious? Just stop.
So the facts are established, but the messenger has a stupid name so that makes them invalid?
I did a three second Google search and grabbed the one that seemed to be bullet-pointing things.
I notice you aren’t disputing the facts, just mocking the source. That’s telling.
I did a three second Google search
This does indicate your depth of knowledge.
So the facts are established, but the messenger has a stupid name so that makes them invalid?
Your teenage pop culture website didn't establish anything except that Routh voted for trump in 2016, which we already knew.
Again. Since you're a dumbass. Routh voted for Trump in 2016. He then soured on him pretty quickly for trashing 0bama's nuclear deal with Iran.
Is that a typical "conservative" viewpoint, Nelson? Can you name any actual conservative position held by this guy?
Yeah! I *just* said yesterday that I felt like Nelson was Sarc's sock to be used on sober days. I noticed that Sarc doesn't seem to have many sober days, and Nelson disappears for long stretches, and when he does show up Sarc seems to be largely missing.
Sarc and Nelson, along with SQRLSY, are the only users I've muted for being generally disingenuous, dishonest, and generally enshittifying threads with shit-posting. Everyone else muted is a Misek/JFree type because I don't have time for that kind of shit.
Routh denounced Trump for ending relations with Iran, no? He also made donations to noted conservatives O'rourke, Yang, and Warren (via actblue).
Perhaps he was a bulwark conservative.
Nelson is a dumbass.
Well, he voted for Trump in 2016, but I guess we are just supposed to pretend that never happened. Because, you know, that interferes with the preferred narrative of you and Jesse.
If only facts would stop getting in the way of the story you want to tell, you’d be golden.
The one who pretends things never happened is you. Back in the original thread when we went over this extensively the first time, it was explained to you that Routh was a Sanders supporter, and many Sanders supporters voted for Trump in 2016. Routh expressed deep regret about his '16 vote in writing. He continued to be a bernie supporter.
Does this jog any memories, dipshit?
If only facts would stop getting in the way of the story you want to tell, you’d be golden.
Note again, your continued ignoring of Routh's actual political donations.
“ it was explained to you that Routh was a Sanders supporter, and many Sanders supporters voted for Trump in 2016”
So other people acted that way, so Routh did? That’s an interesting take.
I agree that Routh is a great example of the horseshoe theory, but it seems like he believed in and supported Trump. The evidence is that he felt betrayed enough to try to kill the guy.
“I never believed in Trump and he acted like I expected, so I want to kill him” isn’t a rational thought process. “I believe in him and he betrayed me”, however, makes perfect sense.
We can discuss ad nauseum whether either of them were rational people, since they believed that violence was an acceptable means of political expression. But that’s always the same circle jerk when discussed in relation to politics. It’s not something I’m interested in wasting time on.
So other people acted that way, so Routh did?
I'm going by Routh's own explanation, which is backed up by his factual history of political contributions (which you continue to ignore).
You appear to be going by emotional hatred of, and a desire to tag any killer as "conservative".
We can discuss ad nauseum whether either of them were rational people
You've been arguing ad nauseam that a guy who supports Sanders, one of the furthest left political figures of the day, is a "conservative".
Have you thought of learning the facts first before commenting sarc sock?
Sarc doesn't. Why would his socks be any different?
These guys will defend a wife beating trespassing gangster because of Trump.
It's a weird hill to die on.
The press cycle reminds me of OD Floyd.
Those who managed to keep their masks on during covid without revealing they are leftists seem to have lost the self control regarding a foreign gang member.
I notice this is about the tenth comment you’ve made claiming my detailed rebuttal of your post is wrong.
Notably absent from all of them is any actual details about why you think I’m wrong, but glaringly obvious is the ad hominem attacks and your baseless beliefs.
So basically, the same as almost every Jesse post, ever.
We will take as many comments as necessary to demonstrate that you've been refuted. Lying to yourself that there was no arguments made doesn't change reality. We stated and made our case that Kilmar Abrego-Garcia got in the country illegally and thus should be deported.
Quit defending what the Democrats are doing to subvert this.
But Garcia gained magic forgiveness from sneaking into the US, right? The let-wing compassion fairies gave their blessing and absolved him of all crimes, past and future.
Kinda like a Biden pardon.
“ But Garcia gained magic forgiveness from sneaking into the US, right?”
No. He was an illegal immigrant, had received a hearing which he lost, and was subject to deportation at any point.
Anywhere but El Salvador.
See the problem? The first part is true and he deserved it. The second part is also true. Where did he get sent, again?
How the fuck does somebody NOT get deported back to their country of origin? Are you going to start shopping around for other countries willing to accept deportees? Putting them out for bids?
Or maybe into international waters. I could accept that.
“ How the fuck does somebody NOT get deported back to their country of origin?”
I’m pretty sure that’s why he was still in the country and didn’t worry about checking in regularly with Immigration. I believe the government has to find a third country that’s willing to take them. I’m sure it’s more than that (they couldn’t then deport them to the disallowed country, for example).
Think about Uyghurs and China. Or democracy advocates and Russia. Or opposition members and Syria, before Assad was ousted. There are scenarios where sending someone back to their country is indistinguishable from a death sentence.
"Are you going to start shopping around for other countries willing to accept deportees?”
Yes, I believe this is what is legally required to deport someone who would be in danger in their home country.
I don’t think that being in danger in your home country is sufficient to get you asylum, however. I think it takes a good amount more than that.
“ Or maybe into international waters”
You kid, but I’ve always thought that there has to be some country, group or organization that would be inclined to establish a place that would accept refugees. After all, we were that at one time and have benefitted greatly from it.
"Yes, I believe this is what is legally required to deport someone who would be in danger in their home country."
Well, then you'd better get on that. I hope you are independently wealthy with a huge international relations Rolodex.
When my college roommate got kicked out of Spain for violating his student Visa, the federales threw him into the back of a VW Van and drove him to the Portuguese border, and kicked him out there.
His w/o was moot after MS/13, the gang he was part of per his original immigration judge, was designated as a terrorist organization. TdA was also grouped into that designation early this year.
So on that basis he can be deported there legally (even apart from his “ rival gang threat” claim vanishing completely.)
That is the punishment Bukele and El Salvador has decided on for gang members in the country. US laws have nothing to do with their decisions.
But rulings about where he could be sent has everything to do with it.
Tell me, Jesse? When the government says, “Oops, we made a mistake.”, do you believe them?
When they say, “We made a mistake, but we can’t fix it.”, do you believe them?
When Trump says he can end the Ukraine war, prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons, and reduce worldwide tariffs to zero through negotiation, but is unable to fix the mistake his government made, do you believe him?
If you wait a few days, I’m sure there will be new talking points that will help you avoid the issue of the rule of law by endlessly talking about one of the 238 people that were deported. You’re nothing if not predictable (well, that and deeply intellectually challenged).
Just to get you on the record, do you believe that if the government makes a mistake that violates a court order, it isn’t required to fix it?
The deportation of Kilmar Abrego-Garcia itself was not a mistake. You know this and are now being dishonest. If a person gets in illegally, deportation is the consequence, no matter who the person is.
Trump has also made plenty of effort with Ukraine, Iran, tariffs, etc. With the latter, he has gotten many countries to make negotiations with him. Did you think all this would be done in an instant?
Reason was okay with withdrawing all troops from Afghanistan despite all the mistakes that happened in the process. Why is this suddenly not okay with deporting a gang member from El Salvador?
Severe punishments only apply to white men. Left wingers presume brown men are unable to control themselves and thus are less culpable.
Sometimes they only jack off.
Technically, Tara Reid ended #MeToo about 5 years ago.
Pfffft. I used to think you were up to speed on these kinda things……
Non-binary journalist melts down on air in interview about UK Supreme Court ruling that transwomen are not legally women for Equalities Act compliance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2Aw6mzOwDY
Maybe it was his/her time of the month.
They felt "unsafe", in part, because the interviewer was pushing back on the idea that not affirming transwomen as women was denying their existence.
To the extent that it was an authentic reaction, it showed emotional fragility and paranoia.
I was looking forward to one of these countries going full retard and loading up the women's prisons with non-binary and trannies, only to be befuddled that rates of prison rape and pregnancies mysteriously went through the roof
I believe this has already happened. It just is not much talked about outside the "far right" corners of the media.
Didn't that already happen in ireland?
True in Jersey.
https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/2-inmates-pregnant-at-all-women-jail-in-nj-after-transgender-prisoners-allowed-in-new-jersey-edna-mahan-correctional-facility-two-women-child-baby-female
Also in Scotland.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-64796926
A double rapist who changed gender while waiting to stand trial has been jailed for eight years.
Isla Bryson attacked two women in Clydebank and Glasgow in 2016 and 2019 while known as Adam Graham.
The judge said Bryson posed a high risk of reoffending and would be supervised for three years after release.
The case sparked a heated debate over whether Bryson should be housed in a male or a female prison after transitioning from a man to a woman.
Bryson, 31, was initially remanded to a women's jail after being found guilty, but was then moved to a men's facility.
Prison bosses defend sending rapist to women's jail
This followed concerns about the safety of any women held alongside a transgender sex offender in a female jail.
Mayoral candidate (and current state representative) Zohran Mamdani plans to increase corporate taxes by 4.5 percent, which he predicts would add $5.4 billion to city coffers.
This Bond villain wants to send more New Yorkers to red states. Are you going to let him get away with that???
We need some sort of tariff to prevent that.
Income and corporate taxes don't cost anything.
The only real danger is TARIFFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Or due process.
I’m sure there’s penguins in a zoo somewhere in New York.
New Yorkers and Californians should have to pay the rest of the country reparations when they realize finally that they've fucked up their own homes so much that they need to leave.
Also common sense voting control, like a 10 year cooling-off period when these refugees land in some sane state.
This for sure.
If I hear "When I lived in California" one more time...
Why don't these fuckers stay in Washington?
EbHS, that's a fantastic idea.
Especially since they fled the blue-state shithole, which is largely a shithole because of these far-left politicians and policies, only to vote for the same kind of far-left politicians and policies in their new state.
“ New Yorkers and Californians should have to pay the rest of the country reparations”
They already do. They provide a massive chunk of the money for the social services that the poor red states (who dominate the bottom of GDP in America) receive.
Blue states are net givers because they are far more economically successful than red states. Red states are net takers because they are the entirety of the bottom 20% economically (with the notable exception of New Mexico, which still beats 2-3 red states every year), and are the vast majority of the bottom 40% as well.
I remember one of you objected to me pointing out that Kansas passed supply-side laws under Sam Brownback and got worse. One of you even claimed that the median income in Kansas was as higher than New York. Spoiler alert: New York was in the top 10 and Kansas was 39th.
I’m not sure why conservatives believe that the economic policies of the red states, which economically are mostly in the bottom half, are better than the economic policies of the blue states, which are mostly in the top half. I believe it’s called “wishful thinking”.
California, the number one state receiving the most federal dollars, gets more than the bottom 10 combined. California ($162.9 billion), New York is #2 ($110.2 billion).
Glad to see this canard still making the rounds.
Blue states are net givers because they are far more economically successful than red states.
Then they shouldn't have a problem with a national divorce. But like an abusive spouse, they keep claiming, "You'll be nothing without my money! Who's going to take care of you?"
It also deflects from the "tax the rich" position. Cali and NY have such positive taxes because they house a lot of billionaires and multi-millionaire celebrities, who pay a lot of taxes. Cali and NY paying a lot of taxes collectively is therefore a feature, not a bug. But those locations have been seeing a steady drop as those rich people move elsewhere.
I would have sworn this was an Onion article poking fun at progressives, but this guy really is that much of a wingnut.
It’s like people can see everything that capitalism and the free market has brought America, but can’t understand that it isn’t a magical money tree that will create as much wealth as they want to spend.
“Supply and demand? Profit motive? What are these strange creatures you speak of?”.
Zohran Mamdani is not a capitalist, that's the thing.
"Attorney General Pam Bondi has decided that instead of working to facilitate the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) as the Supreme Court has ordered,"
Stopped reading.
Funny thing, I thought the supreme court order was to the lower court, not the administration.
It was. And the judge ignored it and told the DoJ to facilitate his return. Then declared they hadn't returned him quickly enough so she is considering contempt.
Reason is fine with judicial abuses now.
principals > principles.
The courts can order all they want. Abrego Garcia is out of US jurisdiction and not a US citizen. The US cannot compel El Salvador to give him back. That the Trump administration has little desire to do so only compounds the problem and giving a wink and a nod to the El Salvadoran government.
What us the US supposed to do?
Not much besides ask the El Salvadoran government for him back, but he is their citizen and under their jurisdiction and control.
Yesterday, Liz had it that the US deported him to that prison, which is a power the US does not have.
Is this a farce, or does Liz expect to be taken seriously?
"SpaceX is leading a bid to build Golden Dome with startups Anduril and Palantir, six people said," reports Reuters, which would include "a constellation of 400 to more than 1,000 missile defense satellites."
That's it, I'm moving my anti-missile lasers to Bluesky.
Six people said it!
Look, you complained when they used "reportedly" all willy-nilly. Now you're complaining when they give you hard numbers? MAKE UP YOUR MIND.
I only believe stories told by seven or more unnamed people.
Just tracking satellites. International agreements disallow weapons in space despite threats from doing so from Russia.
[tilts hand]
Tracking satellites and fodder.
Now, if said fodder happens to be made of a mass of tungsten or other ablation-resistant material...
'Whether Rachel Morin or Laken Riley, the 22-year-old nursing student killed by an illegal immigrant while jogging, the administration keeps implying that you cannot both support due process for Abrego Garcia and have empathy for the victims of violence from illegal immigrants. (I think people can hold multiple ideas in their heads at once.)'
And Liz seems to be implying that people can mouth support for actual victims and then declare that empathy for perpetrators should preclude actual punishment because of multiple idea brains. In olden times we called such people bleeding heart liberals.
And the only ones ignoring he had due process are the left and corporate media.
Or "assholes".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
--Ayn Rand in "The Romantic Manifesto"
also repeated in Terry Goodkind's "Faith of the Fallen," where I first heard the quote.
"I think it should be bigger news that a domestic terrorist tried to murder a Jewish governor and his family on the first night of Passover because the perp was made about "the Palestinians."
It would have been bigger news but the guy who did it just had to go and spoil it for the media by saying some shit about Palestine instead of something MAGA related.
Yeah, this one might have set a record for left-wing news ramping up coverage and then going silent.
The King Soopers shooter in Boulder is the only other one I can think that got suppressed with that kind of speed. Every shitlib cockroach was yapping about "white supremacist terrorism" until it came out that the guy was a Syrian who bought the gun in Arvada.
The Washington Post hasn't printed a reason for his attack, so it can't be true that it was based on antisemitism. The commentariat is pushing mental health issues.
He was declared 'obviously MAGA' by most of the left-wing twitterati before it came out that he was a registered socialist, and this 'free Palestine' bullshit. Then the story was quickly disappeared.
I can't wait until the memory hole is full.
I’m hearing a lot about it, but I live in the Philadelphia media market. I know my mom and sister are hearing a lot about it in Chicago. Where is this news vacuum you are talking about?
He was probably a conservative.
When the media didn't crow about MAGA connections within 5 seconds of the first report, and loudly every 5 minutes thereafter, you knew the story would get memory-holed quickly.
'This isn't deportation. This is cruelty to make a political point (as some resistance types would claim during Trump 1.0): Don't come here. If you're already here illegally, be afraid.'
Gee, what part of actually closing a porous border do people not understand?
Or just self deport so you don't end up much worse off. There are planes leaving every day. Illegals are smart enough to know this.
“There are planes leaving every day. Illegals are smart enough to know this.”
Maybe so, but next month they will need the new RealID to board a flight, and we all have been told that POC are just not smart enough to get ID.
So they better hurry.
his 2019 arrest, in which a detective claimed he was an MS-13 member.
In which a judge agreed and order him to be deported.
Only reason Abrego Garcia case is a controversy is an immigration court blocked his deportation...
Block his deportion to El Salvador, he was still ordered to leave the country.
The punishment for wifebeating in Maryland, or entering the country illegally, is not indefinite confinement in a Salvadoran prison.
No, it is deporting back to him home, El Salvador, which put him in the prison for crimes he cimmited there.
It appears Reason just can't help but lie and obfuscate to defend a wife beating violent gang member.
They have lost all good will. Reason has devolved into mother Jones and slate level of omissions.
The court didn't block his deportation. It only has an order he couldn't be removed to El Salvador. The full due process to remove this order was a single CIS interview once Bukele shut down 18th street gang.
At this point reason is intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
After all, home-growns are next.
Attorney General Pam Bondi is reportedly considering legal mechanisms by which Trump could send American citizens to El Salvador's infamous Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo.
The word "reportedly" in this context means "we made this shit up".
'Mamdani advocates city-run grocery stores, expanded free childcare, fare-free buses, and rent freezes. He also seems to believe that you can just levy infinite taxes on the wealthy without them ever wising up, moving their money elsewhere, or fleeing the city altogether.'
I feel like donating to Mamdani's campaign just for the spectacle, especially if he somehow gets elected.
Can you imagine what a NYC-run grocery store would look like?
Let me guess. I picture a mostly empty storefront with sacks of rotting onions and a few unidentifiable broken plastic objects on a shelf, manned by the worst type of surly DMV government clerks, and only open for two random hours each day. Sorta like peak USSR, but instead of bowed peasants the customers would be loud-mouth New Yorkers.
See, huge entertainment potential.
A repeated analysis of the exoplanet's atmosphere suggests an abundance of a molecule that on Earth has only one known source: living organisms such as marine algae.
How ironic that the first space aliens we encounter will end up on a vegan's menu.
More ironic; if the algae turns out to be a Blob that feasts on vegans exclusively.
Now that's one illegal alien I will fight to keep in the US.
I was gonna ask if he'd ever seen an episode of Looney Tunes where the Tasmanian Devil or Wile E. Coyote puts a carrot or a pile of bird seed under a teetering anvil or on top of a plunger rigged to a pile of TNT.
Fire a million cows at it at the speed of light. If, in about 240 yrs., you detect the faint trace of cow farts in the atmosphere, the coast is clear to fire the Space Cowboys at the planet.
We've gotten official word that "several" students at my college have had their visas pulled (among the hundreds reported across the country). No reasons given. My school is about as activist as a jar of peanut butter.
AMERICA HAS A PEANUT ALLERGY, YOU FUCKING MONSTER.
Aren't all schools peanut free zones? Saying his students are like peanuts is a damning admission of guilt.
Didn't a study recently find that avoiding peanuts at all costs was one of the primary contributing factors to the increase in peanut allergies among children over the past few decades?
Yes.
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/introducing-peanut-infancy-prevents-peanut-allergy-into-adolescence
We had a peanut free lunch table in the cafeteria. That's about it.
Schools nowadays will suspend a student for a week for brining something containing peanuts to school.
They might only get detention for fentanil?
This was part of one on my COVID-era discussions with a friend...
If you feel like you're in an at-risk group, then by all means take whatever measures you feel are reasonable for yourself. You can politely ask me to help you protect yourself, but don't expect me to make any effort to help you though and if you try to force me to do so, there is going to be backlash.
If your kid is deathly allergic to peanuts, I expect you to teach your kid to not eat peanuts, to carry an epipen in case he accidentally does so, and to politely ask me if the cookies I'm serving might possibly have peanuts in them. If you inform me before hand, I'll probably even make an extra effort to avoid creating an issue for your kid.
But if you say "No one who sends a kid to this school can be permitted to have any peanut products in their home because they could be uncaring assholes and let their kids eat peanut butter toast and wipe their hands on their jacket before coming to school and killing my kid." I'll probably say "Fuck you" and slick my kid's hair back with peanut oil and send them to school with a PB&J for lunch.
I like the cut of your jib, sir.
“ AMERICA HAS A PEANUT ALLERGY, YOU FUCKING MONSTER”
Shit, man. You are on fire today.
Although this one still wins:
I think people can hold multiple ideas in their heads at once.
You're an old soul. I admire that.
'Looked at one way, you could say Trump's approach is a bit schizophrenic, with administration officials not totally aligned on which goals they're actually pursuing. Looked at another, you could say the less-hawkish forces are exerting significant influence behind the scenes, which bodes well.'
Looked at another way, you could say that Trump is trying to keep adversaries off-guard and not sure. And looked at yet another way, Trump enjoys playing the media and talking heads.
Suspension of disbelief is important when reading fiction. It’s not a good strategy in the real world.
I think it should be bigger news that a domestic terrorist tried to murder a Jewish governor and his family on the first night of Passover because the perp was made about "the Palestinians."
Yeah, we don't really do motives if they're of the left.
Golden Dome
Capable of showering our Russian adversaries with streams of missiles no matter where they hide?
Kinky.
Are there enough Russian prostitutes available?
Ask Stormy.
I’d rather not summon the squirrel.
More like cumstock than Comstock.
Snot cool man, snot cool.
Yes and Elon will find and impregnate every last one of them with his space lasers to create his own X* Legion.
*an X, not Roman numeral 10.
How about this policy Liz, if you are a visitor in my country (greencard visa tourist etc) and you say you hate my country and want to destroy it, then we forcibly remove you.
But that's not just! (Said the leftist who recently cheered the idea of putting Trump supporters in concentration camps.)
The fucking courts can order anything they want, but how the hell is the Attorney General supposed to negotiate anything with a foreign president?
Come on, Liz, you're supposed to be Good Liz.
The only judicial remedy for crimes is punishment, not undoing the crime. When courts order the President to order a foreign country to release one of their own citizens from prison and send him back to the US, where he was an illegal immigrant and would again be an illegal immigrant, the courts have gone off the rails.
The allegation is that someone kidnapped Garcia and deported him illegally. Find that person, charge him, have a trial (oh, finally, we get to the part that courts are supposed to do), and sentence him. Oh wait, those are all functions of the prosecutor and the police, not courts.
I have never heard of any kidnapper being sentenced to unkidnap his victim, whether dead, sold to some "adoptive" parents, or just plain missing. If the sentence includes restitution, it is money, not undoing the crime. Has any thief ever been ordered to track down the stolen goods he fenced and return them to his victims? Fuck no. This whole thing is based on power-mad TDS-mad judges bent on partisan revenge.
And hey, guess what --- all those prosecutorial functions -- finding who kidnapped Garcia, who ordered his deportation, prosecuting them -- gosh, guess what? Prosecutorial discretion, bitch. Same as when Obama ordered his prosecutors to not deport illegal immigrants who had brought their children in when they were too young to have a say. Prosecutorial discretion, the courts called it, and refused to undermine Presidential authority to tell his prosecutors what to do.
And now the courts want to tell Trump that he can't invoke prosecutorial discretion to not prosecute the actual culprits who kidnapped and deported Garcia.
The hypocrisy is rank.
America made a big mistake when they elected this judge president.
"Come on, Liz, you're supposed to be Good Liz."
That was then, this is now.
I've given up on hoping for a reappearance of even "mediocre Liz" at this point.
They’re not even trying to hide it anymore.
https://x.com/captgouda24/status/1912662152986402931?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
The jackass even wrote a Substack for this.
Cool. Let's review the gun owner demographics again. Especially for those nasty military death weapons.
The comments are hilarious.
Just so everyone is aware, Mr. "We Must Kill Them" and his family live in Ashburn, Virginia. Daddy died in 2012, and look at this:
A highly valued employee of the Central Intelligence Agency since 2000, Chris was the intelligence community's central analytic voice on global health security issues.
So we have the shitlib faggot son of a glowworm openly admitting that his side's ultimate motivation is political power by any means. I don't think this idiot realized how easy it would be to find out his background, but when you think you have Deep State top cover, opsec doesn't come into play.
He’s quite the piece of work. What’s disconcerting are the people who support Mr. “We Must Kill Them”. These folks don’t want a divorce, they want to control all.
I've been calling for a national divorce for some time to avoid this very thing. But the left doesn't want that kind of arrangement, they're basically an atheist version of Muslims who want to force conversion or dhimmitude, at the point of a gun.
So if Decker is that set on it, I have no problem hunting him down and exterminating him and his friends. And he even helpfully power-leveled himself to facilitate that.
Bring it.
Boasberg ignores Supreme Court and goes rouge.
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1912607719170724233?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
I think it’s time the DOJ investigated Boasberg for corruption. I’ll bet he’s filthier than the underside of of movie theater seat.
"Look how pink he is!"
Hahahahaha
Oops. That was for ITL above.
Well, it kind of works for the rouge / rogue joke.
Some people do look good in rouge.
Is it a Khmer Rouge?
Don't pull a Nelson and claim Boasberg is red.
Jk.
Turns out the judges wife owns an abortion clinic. Wonder why the judge is so invested.
Do stem cell milkshakes keep him looking younger?
That is just from the fetal pituitary juice. Probably.
So the government can avoid a contempt trial by complying with an order that was vacated by SCOTUS. This dude is a full on nut job. I'm not sure even the DC/DNC Circuit court will swallow this shit. This guy is deranged.
If roberts had any balls and wanted to end this he would hold Boasberg in contempt for these actions.
Apparently Jeb and John are good buddies.
>>If roberts had any balls
c'mon
>> and wanted to end this
living in the limelight, the universal dream.
I will always appreciate a Rush reference. Well done, sir!
I would say that a judge wouldn't put himself out there like this if he had skeletons in his closet, but Leticia James has proven (some/most/all?) leftists are either stupid or so confident they can get away with it that they don't care.
Projection.
My school is about as activist as a jar of peanut butter.
So Jimmy Carter level...
it's appalling and sad that Sen. [Chris] Van Hollen [D–Md.] and the Democrats applauding his trip to El Salvador today
Stupid issue to dig in on.
Reminds me of the GOP going apeshit over Terry Schiavo.
Both parties suck.
I told you Peanuts that GRIDLOCK IS BEST.
Whatever happened to Well Adj Biden guy? In these uncertain times, his wisdom is sorely missed.
I would bet you were one of those nutjobs screaming about Terry Schiavo.
nutjobs screaming
Post more ALL CAPS, shrike.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
And you about Elian Gonzalez.
Didn't care.
Also did not care - Taryvon Martin, George Floyd, Kyle Rittenhouse.
Still don't care.
Oh, I think you do care. Rittenhouse iced one of your pedophile compatriots.
Shrike sees Kyle in his nightmares.
It is kind of uncanny that he fired 3 shots at a left-wing protest and hit 3 pedophiles.
Reminds me of the GOP going apeshit over Terry Schiavo.
You mean the woman who's insurance company didn't want to pay for her anymore and who's husband got a new girlfriend, so the judge sentenced her to die of hunger and thirst despite the pleas of her parents to let them take her.
Zero surprises where you sat on that one, Shrike.
He’s vile.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Stupid issue to dig in on.
Remember when you were insisting that orangefuhrer was hit by shards of a teleprompter?
Your commitment to "GRIDLOCK IS BEST" was belied when you actively campaigned in the comments for the Dems to win the runoff senate elections in 2020 in GA, which would and did give the Dems control of the Senate, in addition to the House and White House.
Turd lies. It’s what Turd does.
Speaking of those run-offs...
Jon Ossoff (D)
2,211,603 50.2%
David Perdue (R)
2,194,578 49.8%
(a total of 4406181 votes, and a margin of 17k votes)
Raphael Warnock(D)
2,230,231 50.61%
Kelly Loeffler*(R)
2,176,048 49.39%
(a total of 4406279 votes, and a margin of 54k votes)
You'd think that someone voting for Ossoff would also have voted for Warnock and vice-versa, and similarly that a Perdue voter was also a Loeffler voter and vice-versa.
But 20k fewer people voted for Ossoff than Warnock. There is a similar 20k vote differential in Perdue over Loeffler, so the implication seems to be that 20k people voted for Perdue AND Warnock, which I find virtually unfathomable.
Meanwhile, there was another state-wide race, for PSC
McDonald, Lauren Bubba i (R)
2,214,057 50.78%
Blackman, Daniel (D)
2,145,636 49.22%
(a total of 4359693 votes)
So it seems that about 46.5k people voted for Senators but didn't vote for a PSC. That is in itself not unusual, as it is not rare for people to only vote on the "important" seats and skip down-ballot votes.
The AMAZING thing to me is that despite 46.5k FEWER votes total, that 20k MORE people voted for a Republican for the PSC seat than voted for Senator Perdue and 38k MORE than Senator Loeffler. Heck even 3k MORE people voted for the Republican PSC candidate than voted for Jon Ossoff.
In this run-off election when EVERYTHING hinged on the Senate seats, I find it very hard to fathom that the Republican candidate for PSC District 4 received more votes than did 3 of the 4 Senate candidates.
I have to admit the possibility that thousands of people would vote for Jon Ossoff *and* Bubba whatever his name was, and that there is a possibility that thousands of people would vote for Republican Bubba for PSC but not vote for either Republican for Senate.
Sure, it's possible.
I'm just dumbfounded by it, so much so that if it came out later that somehow 15 or 20k votes for Republican senators were erased but the perp forgot to erase a similar number of votes for Bubba down-ballot, it would make a lot more sense than the alternative voting patterns.
There are numerous "anomalies" like this, especially in the 2020 elections. My gut tells me the Dems cheated their asses off. My head tells me it's likely the case, but there is no "smoking gun" definitively proving it.
If the claim "the Dems did cheat" were in a criminal court, I don't know if I could convict "beyond a reasonable doubt." But in a civil trial I'd say the Dems cheated by the preponderance of evidence.
So many red flags in 2020 especially.
12 GOP House members say NEIN to Medicaid cuts
A dozen House Republicans fire warning shot to Mike Johnson
https://www.axios.com/2025/04/16/mike-johnson-budget-medicaid-house-republicans
12 GOP House members say NEIN to Medicaid cuts
How many House Democrat members said NEIN to Medicaid cuts?
Sarc just told us yesterday Republicans don't cut spending. The small minority is proof of his assertions.
Just ignore these are the conservatives he supports.
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Posted these questions that I've encountered and don't know the answer to, earlier this morning under the Sullum propaganda. But that comment section is dead, so I'm reposting here.
1. How does Boasberg enforce contempt? Trump controls the Federal Marshals.
2. Something is strange about offering to let the government to purge contempt by taking action they can’t be ordered to take, when the alleged criminal contempt was defying an order the Supreme Court says Boasberg wasn’t allowed to issue.
3. If the Judicial branch is allowed to issue Executive branch decisions, can the Executive branch issue Judicial branch decisions? Both the Lightbringer and Biden kindasortof started down that road if I remember rightly.
4. How can Boasberg think he can hold the federal govt or its representatives in contempt in a case where SCOTUS has already determined that the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case from the very beginning?
5. Boasberg has no way to enforce its decision, without the Executive Cooperating, right? The DOJ and Federal Marshalls report to the Executive, don't they? Like when the Republican House referred things to Biden's DOJ and they were ignored.
6. How is Boasberg able to conclude criminal as opposed to civil contempt?
7. How can Boasberg say he will appoint a prosecutor himself if the DOJ declines? Isn't that a separation of powers violation?
8. If criminal contempt is upheld on appeal does that mean Pam Bondi goes to jail? Or one of her deputies? Can the judge physically do that on his own, without DOJ cooperation?
Boasberg is a corrupt judge answers most of these.
The entire purpose of the process is to be annoying and take up time and resources. Like a bad rash. The rash doesn't care about jurisdiction.
Attorney General Pam Bondi has decided that instead of working to facilitate the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) as the Supreme Court has ordered, she will instead take to X to release documents from his 2019 arrest, in which a detective claimed he was an MS-13 member.
And as you can see from the comments, Trump defenders care only about who, not what. No principles at all. They say the law is the law is the law, and the law and court decisions cannot be questioned because they are inviolate and sacred when it comes to illegal immigrants. But when it comes to their political Jesus the law and court decisions don't matter at all. No principles, no ethics, no integrity, and no intellectual honesty. Just team loyalty, leader worship, and blind hatred. Modern brownshirts. Different hero and different scapegoats, but otherwise the same.
If you aren't just a shitty little troll, answer the questions that I posted above.
Criminal trespassing, domestic violence, and MS-13 gangster.
I remember you sucking G Floyd's dick with the same enthusiasm.
Completely support a criminal, and cheer when a prior-free grandmother walks through the capitol on J6 goes to prison.
Talk about intellectual dishonesty, not to mention that leftist projection. When will start defending Leticia James for real estate fraud?
He was calling Trump a felon for listing legal expenses as legal expenses earlier.
Well when the who is the AG and Equally Bad Liz wants her to engage in foreign diplomacy, then yes, the who is pretty fucking important retard.
I’m furious.
We’ve gotten official word that “several” students at my college have had their visas pulled (among the hundreds reported across the country). No reasons given. My school is about as activist as a jar of peanut butter.
This can be debunked in five seconds once he names the university.
But I’m sure the Trump administration is carefully vetting their deportation lists, not just doing random searches of social media sites for dangerous words like “trans,” or “Palestine,” or “free speech.”
Because we can trust the government.
LOL, yeah, I'm sure you were fully practicing your Marcusian "liberating tolerance" when your side was in charge. Sounds more like you're really pissed because your revolutionary vanguard is getting its privileges removed and they can't subvert the US anymore.
Time for your side to get its own medicine shoved down its throat until you choke on it.
This can be debunked in five seconds once he names the university.
No need even for that:
My school is about as activist as a jar of peanut butter. But I'm sure the Trump administration isn't just doing random searches for "trans", "Palestine", or "free speech". [Blue Checkmark] [Rainbow flag] [Ukraine flag] [Israeli flag]
Either he doesn't know what activists are, doesn't know what peanut butter is, doesn't know what 'random' means, or is too genuinely stupid even by his own precepts to be helped by an actual institution of higher education.
think he knows "all the above"?
I'll make it even simpler--he's a marxist academic cockroach that's lying his ass off, and trying to appeal to patriotic feeling that his side has no claim to whatsoever.
Here’s more from Carl, including his X feed: https://x.com/historyboomer/status/1683090355246252032?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
He’s certainly a nasty little shit. Asshole has a Substack as well where he even praises Matty Yglesias. Apparently he’s from Brooklyn, New York, and works as a professor in New York. That should limit the number of colleges and universities.
It’s embarrassing Liz included this in the roundup. This is ENB level bullshit.
ragging on the authors for ridiculous takes is getting played.
>>This is really disturbing:
it would be if I was the type who jumped to conclusions because a tweet and not a jornolist
the lack of coverage from the left media is super not surprising but I'm not going to feel sorry for Shapiro the only thing that happened was second Seder was late and a psychopath got arrested. Elijah will be okay about it.
As soon as they found out it was just another progressive radical the whole thing got dropped.
Same with the Bernie-fan commie shooter.
If an R shot up a bunch of democrat congressman, we would have J6 level weekly reminders of the horrors of right wing extremism.
Most people paying attention to politics in the last 4 years probably dont even remember Scalise got shot at all.
I've had coaches get on me for not getting down on grounders but shooting the 2d baseman seems extreme
What the Democrats (And Reason!) Don't Want You to Know About Abrego Garcia
At Wednesday’s White House press briefing, Karoline Leavitt... laid out exactly who the deported suspected MS-13 gang member Gilmar Abrego Garcia is — and it’s everything the Democrats don’t want the public to know.
“When Gilmar Abrego Garcia was originally arrested, he was wearing a sweatshirt with rolls of money covering the ears, mouth, and eyes of presidents on various currency denominations,” Leavitt said. “This is a known MS-13 gang symbol of ‘Hear no evil. Speak no evil. See no evil.’” She emphasized that Abrego Garcia wasn’t alone when he was taken into custody. “He was also arrested with two other well-known members of the vicious MS-13 gang.”
Leavitt went on to point out that not one, but two separate judges confirmed Abrego Garcia’s affiliation with MS-13 — a finding that has never been disputed. But the gang ties are just the beginning. “Just this morning, it was revealed through Maryland court documents that Abrego Garcia’s wife petitioned for an order of protection against him for two instances of domestic violence in May of 2021,” she told reporters.
She continued, “The court ordered that ‘the respondent committed the following acts of abuse. Once, in May of 2021, assault in any degree….’” Then she added, “On May 4th of 2021, he punched and scratched his wife, ripped off her shirt, and grabbed and bruised her.”
“This is from a court in Maryland,” she stressed. “So not only are Democrats rushing to defend an illegal criminal foreign terrorist gang member, but also an apparent woman-beater.”
Then Leavitt brought the focus back to the most basic fact of the matter. “He was illegally inside our country and had a lawful deportation order,” she said. “That made him subject to removal back to his home country of El Salvador.”
She made it clear that if Abrego Garcia ever tries to come back, he’ll be sent packing again. “If he ever ends up back in the United States, he would immediately be deported again. Nothing will change the fact that Abrego Garcia will never be a Maryland father. He will never live in the United States of America again.”
Leavitt then pointed to the recent Supreme Court ruling as the final word. “The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the president of the United States and the secretary of state could not be compelled to forcibly retrieve this citizen of El Salvador who is currently locked up in a maximum security prison in his home country due to his MS-13 membership.”
Again, you don't have to go very far back in even this country's history to find people who fled across *state* lines to effectively evade law enforcement.
Bill Ayers, Whitey Bulger... if Stephen Paddock had fled to El Salvador and El Salvador denied him amnesty and shipped him back to the US would he get the same "He's never been tried and convicted of a crime!" treatment?
Garcia might be a mistake or a 'mistake', but between immigration, capital punishment, and their desire to impugn racists and facilitate child molesters, Reason has made it abundantly clear that they aren't dedicated to correcting the mistakes in a quest for greater freedom or greater quality of life as much as they are just trying to get the mistakes to favor their own social and political proclivities.
>>Over the last few weeks, Trump administration officials apparently dissuaded Israel from attacking Iran's nuclear sites.
bombs evidence a failure to communicate.
>>'It's the first time humanity has seen potential biosignatures on a habitable planet.'
sweet! now if only we could get to the world peace necessary for Starfleet ...
It's the first time humanity has seen potential biosignatures on a habitable planet.
Dude. [touches grass]
makes sense I guess to those from the Academy of We Already Destroyed Earth
The whole article is hilarious in-their-own-head innuendos: “Unless we see E.T. waving at us, it’s not going to be a smoking gun,”
That's right! Fuck You E.T.!
glowy middle finger gif would be perfect here.
Is that like 'heroic' Katy Perry kissing the ground after her 11 minute billionaire's amusement park ride?
Now you know why, when 10 yr old pregnant girls show up 15 minutes after an abortion law takes effect, at the door of a well-known abortion activist, and then is hustled quietly out the door, and the mother doesn't speak English, and the accused doesn't either, and is an illegal immigrant who can be quietly deported, I tend to be skeptical.
All they do is lie.
Reposting this one again:
UK Supreme Court ruled that sex is a biological reality, not something that is assigned to you by the government.
Anthony Kennedy now worried the Biden nominee to the SC will have trouble reconciling this decision.
Xe'll have to recuse xerself.
if the Justice had any sense of justice it would be permanent recusal ... from the SC ... I'm perfectly happy with everyone being alive and well
The Sarcasmics and Jeffs are making marching orders. Kill MAGA.
When Must We Kill Them?
Why Progressives Increasingly Support Violence
A new survey finds more than half of left-wing respondents believe assassinating Donald Trump could be justified.
Sarc's list is going to take on a new meaning soon.
We’re heading for a dangerous place, and not just in the US, but across Western Civilization. Just watched a video last night on the odds of civil wars breaking out. A bit sobering. David Betz was the person explaining: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uG_5dFaTje8&pp=ygVAT2RkcyBvZiBhIGNpdmlsIHdhciBicmVha2luZyBvdXQgaW4gd2VzdGVybiBjb3VudHJpZXMgZGF2aWQgYmV0eg%3D%3D
The author is apparently the son of a gloworm according to RRWP above.
Makes sense. They've been behind this sort of thing since the end of WW2.
No joke, is this what they really want to start? They are always yapping about the alt right, but if they start murdering MAGAs, they will get the alt right good and hard.
"if someone tries to kill you, you try to kill them right back!"
Capt. Malcom Reynolds
(as best as I can remember)
Saffron: Are you gonna kill me?
Mal: What? What kind of crappy planet is that? Kill you.
Saffron: In the maiden's home, I heard talk of men who weren't pleased with their brides...
Mal: Well, I ain't them. And don't you ever stand for that sort of thing. Someone ever tries to kill you, you try to kill 'em right back.
And also
Book: [to Mal] If you take sexual advantage of her, you're going to burn in a very special level of hell. A level they reserve for child molesters and people who talk at the theater.
Here is Steven Miller laying out the administrations case that Garcia's deportation was not in fact a "mistake".
https://slaynews.com/news/white-house-blames-saboteur-false-claims-ms-13-gang-member-mistakenly-deported-el-salvador/
“Where is he from? El Salvador,” Miller went on.
“Where is he a resident and citizen of? El Salvador.
“Is he here illegally? Yes.
“Does he have a deportation order? Yes.”
Although Miller didn’t name names, he said that the initial reports came from a particular Justice Department attorney with an agenda.
“A DOJ lawyer–who has since been relieved of duty, a saboteur, a Democrat–put into a filing incorrectly that this was a mistaken removal,” Miller noted.
“It was not. This was the right person sent to the right place,” Miller added.
Miller said that there was a strong case that even with the withholding order, Abrego Garcia had to go.
“Now some have said, ‘well, but he had a thing called a withholding order’ – so a withholding order means you’ve been ordered deported, but an immigration judge is saying you cannot go back to a particular country,” Miller said.
“Here’s the thing: if you are a member of a foreign terrorist organization, you cannot have a withholding order.
“Since he’s in MS-13, there is no withholding order,” Miller added.
Trump designated the gang as a terrorist organization as one of his first executive orders after taking office.
Abrego Garcia claims he can’t return to El Salvador because he will be targeted by a rival gang.
“Furthermore, the gang he is accused of being persecuted by doesn’t exist anymore in El Salvador,” Miller noted.
“The 18th Street gang is gone.”
The Left believes Abrego Garcia’s assertion that he is not a gang member despite evidence to the contrary."
Short take: A withholding order can not be placed on a member of a designated terrorist organization. When Trump declared MS13 to be a terrorist organization the withholding order became null and void added to the fact that the gang he purportedly feared no longer exists.
"Whether Rachel Morin or Laken Riley, the 22-year-old nursing student killed by an illegal immigrant while jogging, the administration keeps implying that you cannot both support due process for Abrego Garcia and have empathy for the victims of violence from illegal immigrants. (I think people can hold multiple ideas in their heads at once.)"
They are pretty accurate.
"zoom out for a second and consider the many other people who have been sent to CECOT without the ability to contest the charges against them"
Am I supposed to be smiling so broadly?
"Mayoral candidate (and current state representative) Zohran Mamdani plans to increase corporate taxes by 4.5 percent, which he predicts would add $5.4 billion to city coffers. "Another $4 billion would come from the increased taxes on the wealthy, with additional income flowing in by beefing up the city's tax collection agency," adds The New York Post. Mamdani advocates city-run grocery stores, expanded free childcare, fare-free buses, and rent freezes. He also seems to believe that you can just levy infinite taxes on the wealthy without them ever wising up, moving their money elsewhere, or fleeing the city altogether."
If he wins, NYC will deserve EVERYTHING that happens.
Perhaps y'all should move somewhere else...
Perhaps y'all should move somewhere else...
And give up the cocktail parties? Yeah right.
I have to vent.
I just got home and noticed that somebody keyed the front fender of my 2023 F-150, that otherwise has no scratches or blemishes.
My rational brain tells me this is likely a random event committed by some equally random asshole. But my enraged brain blames it on the dominant left-wing contingent of this small blue town in a red county, recently amped up to Resist and Act Out by both current events and local activist groups. And thus some stupid cunt thought she could strike back by vandalizing a vehicle that must belong to the oppressor class. BTW, I have no stickers of any kind on the truck.
Thanks for listening.
Were you anywhere near Maine? Because I have a suspect.
Are we sure he was sober enough to do that?
How exactly does someone go about becoming the Reason comments punching bag?
Get broken by the rest of the commentariat, while also randomly admitting embarrassing details of your personal life, and being too drunk to remember posting them.
Low quality drunken trolling, harassment of other posters and then making crazy confessions about your life.
BTW, I have no stickers of any kind on the truck.
A 2023 F-150 truck is a MAGA hat.
And if that truck is red…..
"any of you homos touches my shit I kill ya."
political or not you don't touch another guy's vehicle. men know this.
My neighbor sold his Tesla and bought some other electric car. Left it parked in the garage with the door open for a week so everyone would know he got rid of the Tesla.
Those MEGA hats are a liability.
I hope the dealership raped him on the trade-in value.
CRIME DOES NOT PAY sometimes.
https://nypost.com/2025/04/16/us-news/karmelo-anthony-renting-900k-home-in-gated-community-with-family-bought-new-car-after-release-on-bond-in-austin-metcalf-murder-case-report/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=nypost
Anthony allegedly told police he was acting in self-defense, and his family claimed “the narrative being spread is false, unjust, and harmful” on a GiveSendGo.com fundraiser for their legal fees — which has raised more than $440,000 as of Wednesday.>/i>
As Actual Justice Warrior said, he is doing the BLM thing all the way.
There should be no foreign students on any campus in america as long as there is even one american kid who is unable to attend.