Florida Cops Arrest Transgender Woman for Using Women's Bathroom
“I am here to break the law,” Marcy Rheintgen said after being given a trespass warning.

A transgender woman was arrested last month for refusing to leave the women's restroom at the Florida State Capitol. Marcy Rheintgen, a 20-year-old college student, said she acted intentionally to challenge Florida's antitrans bathroom law.
Passed in 2023, the Safety in Private Spaces Act criminalizes an individual for refusing to leave a restroom or changing area assigned to the opposite sex when asked to by a government employee. Currently, 13 states have passed policies relating to transgender bathroom use, but only two states, Florida and Utah, have opted to impose criminal penalties. Rheintgen told the Associated Press that she "wanted people to see the absurdity" of Florida's transgender bathroom use restrictions under the law.
After sending 160 letters to state representatives, the attorney general, and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis asking that she not be arrested for using the restroom corresponding with her gender identity, Rheintgen arrived at the women's restroom at the House office building in Tallahassee on March 19. Police officers, who had been tipped off to Rheintgen's plan, were waiting for her.
According to the arrest report, officers gave Rheintgen a trespass warning, to which she replied, "I am here to break the law," and entered the restroom. Officers followed her inside and warned her that if she did not leave the women's restroom, she would be arrested. Rheintgen told The New York Times that she was in the bathroom for "probably 30 seconds to a minute" before being detained.
Since its passage, Florida's bathroom law has been criticized not only for its impact on trans and nonbinary individuals' privacy but also for being poorly written. The law imposes complex and confusing regulations on an individual's use of bathrooms and changing facilities in buildings owned or leased by Florida's state and local governments.
While the law impacts the bathrooms in all legislative offices, schools, libraries, jails, and state parks, certain airports and sports arenas could also qualify. The law also includes several exemptions, including for unisex restrooms, using the restroom for government or maintenance purposes, accompanying a child or disabled person, and if the "appropriate designated restroom or changing facility is out of order."
Because of its breadth and vagueness, the law's impact goes beyond transgendered individuals and puts everyone on notice that their mundane use of facilities could invite action from law enforcement.
The law's cumbersome criteria could be why officers in Rheintgen's case opted to arrest her under a completely separate—and simpler—crime: trespass on property after warning. Without being either arrested or charged under the Safety in Private Spaces Act, Rheintgen won't be able to challenge the law directly in court.
Rheintgan now faces a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 60 days of imprisonment and a $500 fine.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“Because of its breadth and vagueness, the law's impact goes beyond transgendered individuals and puts everyone on notice that their mundane use of facilities could invite action from law enforcement.”
Lying or don’t know what mundane means?
The law is also not in the least bit vague, which is a Teen Reason trope , and has many reasonable exceptions. The opposite of “poorly crafted” - it is in fact well crafted
Again, they know what the word 'vague' means. They know what the word 'mundane' means. They know what a woman is. They know that women don't want men in the women's room. They know that we know this. They know that we know they know this. They know that we know that they know we know... and they do it anyway. The lie is their moral pillar. It is the primary industry of their preferred nation.
They aren't just lying, they're axiomatically dishonest and evil.
The insanity of it is a feature, not a bug.
Making the trains run on time - sure, but people *want* the trains to run on time; where's the power in *that*?
But making people pledge allegiance to insanity - now that's *real* power.
“Once your faith persuades you to believe what your intelligence declares to be absurd, beware lest you likewise sacrifice your reason in the conduct of your life…. Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices.”—Voltaire
"The law is also not in the least bit vague, which is a Teen Reason trope"
This.
The Reasonistas have thought it was okay to flat out lie to us for a while now.
Right. If it were actually vague, then what was vaguely a man was vaguely breaking a vague law, the officers only vaguely did anything wrong in enforcing it and it's a pointless article the would only be of vague interest to anyone interested in individual liberty.
But that's not what they want. They need actually vague things to be clear and clear things to be vague so that you can't actually reason things out morally or intellectually for yourself one way or the other and are reliant on them to tell you to be outraged that a man went into a women's room that didn't belong to him and insisted that it was his inalienable right to occupy that space.
And the "vague" law was not even what he/she was charged with. So it's moot to fret about it in this case.
you get away with anything if you just say "I am awaiting my trans operation and thought I'd use the lady's restroom"
Didn't any of you go to highschool? This is the standard argument
for doing shitty things.
"Impact on trans and nonbinary individuals privacy"
Hmm. Is there any concern about non trans and non nonbinary individuals privacy?
They are unpersons. We are beholden to our lgbqT masters
Who can even define a woman?
I wonder what Jackson would do if this got to the Supreme Court. Would she have the decency to recuse?
That’s unlikely.
the full frontal exposure of her mendacity would be exquisite
It also doesn't affect their privacy one iota. It affects the privacy of people drawing attention to it and people for whom their idea of privacy on the matter is an illusion.
It does impact their "right" to lie, deceive, and disinform other people in order to bend them to their will and pretend that's privacy, which is why the media and totalitarian leftists love it.
I have no problem with this dude's non violent civil disobedience but hasn't this already been adjudicated?
It isn't non-violent !!!
Nor is it civil disobedience !!!
And it has not been adjudicate !!!!
If you read Simone Weil's biography Simone Pétrement) it was an incident of self-exposure that ruined her life
If civil disobedience is whatever you call it, then it's nothing. What proves opposites proves nothing. I practiced civil disobedience by going into the bathroom ---and I practiced it by decking the bastard
And if the Supreme Court Justice can't tell you what a woman is, IT HAS NOT BEEN ADJUDICATED.
Admitting to a cop that you are breaking the law is not only a good way to get arrested, but to get convicted too.
This is modern day Rosa Parks here
So brave. And, unlike Rosa, actually insane.
The law isn't vague he knew it was illegal
Fuck off you evil cunt. If you were honest or tethered to reality the headline would be "Florida cops arrest MAN in woman's restroom" and you'd realize how stupid this is but here you are unable to correctly ID the participants because you're an insane lefty.
You could really cut down on the insanity if we don't keep confusing sex with gender. Make bathrooms specific to sex. Male and female. Nobody is transsex. Sure...there are few exceptions but many less than the mentally ill or opportunist scumbags.
What do you want, a bathroom police?
They're called regular police, you fucking pervert, and for one hundred years they stopped creepy guys from hanging out in the little girls room, until you thought otherwise.
That's funny, last time I was at a public restaurant, I didn't see any police officers telling people where to go to the bathroom.
There is no 'bathroom police', except the one that you want to create because you hate trans people.
Never in my life did I need police officers to tell tell me where to go to the bathroom either.
Normal people: Rape is illegal.
Jeff: What do you want, penis police?
Those police are called 'normal people'
ACLU Leader Resigns after Daughters' Experience in Public Bathroom
https://cbn.com/news/us/aclu-leader-resigns-after-daughters-experience-public-bathroom
The way we do bathrooms now is just fine.
If Marcy hadn’t made a big deal out of it, I doubt anyone would have noticed. But then, there would be no story and no victimhood.
If you can pass and don't act like a creep, then who cares? If you are obviously a dude in a dress, then just use the men's room. If you are a girl who wants to be a boy, really no one cares if you use the men's room. But it might not be the best plan in certain situations.
Pretty much exactly my thoughts.
Dude looks like a lady
Seperatong sex and gender started in the early 2010s fuck everyone that tryes to change history
I think it started in the 70s. But it took a while to escape from women's studies departments.
First they came for the sex perverts, and I didn’t care because, fuck those monsters.
First they came for the people who lied when they said the wanted to be first and I didn't care because I definitively could not identify anyone to care about.
Ha!
🙂
I don't have a problem with HONEST sex perverts.
Supporting shit like this is why the dems will lose again.
It’s also why the libertarian party is dead. And Reason has been a participant.
Doctrinaire libertarianism takes several absurd public policy positions. This isn't the only one that causes normal people to not take libertarianism seriously.
We know. "Real libertarians" should only stand up for the rights of "normal people". The weirdos don't deserve it.
Yes Jeff, unless of course they only ejaculate on the child and not inside and then it's okay, right?
Also, please don't compose another incestuous rape fantasy about commenter's sisters tonight. I'm already feeling queasy just engaging with you like this.
Oh lol, you masturbate to the thought of murdering the people who disagree with you.
What were you doing when you brought up anal sex with my sister?
Were you masterbating when you said that?
You’re literally arguing for special treatment for a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the population (ignoring the social contagion aspect and focusing on those who truly suffer from gender dysmorphia)…
Nobody is entitled to compel anyone else to conform with or to, or to accommodate their individual needs, wants, or preferences. The entitlement mentality infesting the developed Western world is the antithesis of personal liberty. This (the trans movement/agenda) is just one example of the entitlement mentality.
WELL SAID
the gender affirming care has clearly fixed its mental health issues
Gender affirming care
Patient :I was born in the wrong body
Doc: no you weren't skitzo
Can Jeff weigh in on this. Preferably using talking points about sister fucking?
Preferably he mixes up his stories and tries bear fucking and we can see where that gets him.
I would read that story.
If that fat fuck tries to put my sister in a trunk I’m kicking his ass.
Not my fault that Troll Mac fucks his sister. Maybe he ought to stop doing it.
But I'm confused. You support shooting trespassers. That's your libertarian position. So is arresting someone worse?
I'm confused as well. You post here every day all day long yet you claim to be gainfully employed. Isn't it really the case that you sit around on welfare posting endless comments about how librulz are oppressing you?
I was not here all day. Posts have timestamps fat fuck. Easy to verify lol.
But you didn't answer the question. Under your theory of trespass and castle doctrine, even with public property, they should shoot this guy instead of arrest correct?
Oh gee, my bad. You took a 30 minute lunch break or something. Also had to go cash the welfare check. I get it.
Project much, Jeffy?
And, we all know you hate illegals and you are a "fervent" Trump supporter. Where "fervent" is really an understatement here. And, you live in Arizona. Arizona has a lot of desert, right? I'm quite certain you are "doing your part" to stop the "migrant invasion" at the southern border. When you cash your welfare check, what kind of ammo do you buy?
And more lies from lying Jeffrey.
Just because I don't think illegals have a valid reason to be here, abuse our tax payer resources, demand elevated rights to even citizens, doesn't mean I hate them.
Now I do hate pedophiles like you.
You hate conservatives Iike babbit and cheer their death, hate conservatives and enjoy locking them up.
I just want people whose first act is to violate laws to no longer reside in a country they don't respect.
I get you're dumb, so you don't understand words, but you're purely projecting.
Oh, you don't hate them. You just don't think they should have any rights or dignity or even be treated as if they are human beings. Sure. But you don't 'hate' them.
When it's time to 'stop the migrant invasion', how do you round them up? What's the trick? Do you bribe them with welfare cards then pop them in the back of the head?
You show the greater hate. Sick people need to be told 'You are sick" and then helped. YOu shuffle off people to a hellish life and feel extra virtuous about it
Whistleblower Doctor Says Trans ‘Blockers,’ ‘Hormones,’ ‘Surgeries’ ‘Are Destroying Children’s Lives’
https://www.breitbart.com/health/2025/04/11/whistleblower-doctor-says-trans-blockers-hormones-surgeries-are-destroying-childrens-lives/
I just want people whose first act is to violate laws to no longer reside in a country they don't respect.
Thank you for finally admitting what I have been saying all along. Because it's not REALLY about whether they broke the law. It's about your subjective feeling about whether they sufficiently "respect" the country. After all look at all the Jan. 6 rioters that you fully defend being pardoned. They very clearly broke the law especially the ones who committed acts of violence. But they "respect the country" in your view because they were "real patriots" stopping a "stolen election". Contrast that with penniless migrants seeking asylum by coming here. They might have broken the law, but they didn't "show respect" in the way YOU think they should have, which is apparently to wait 30 years in line.
It's not about the law. It's about whether they have flattered your ego.
Not my fault that Troll Mac fucks his sister.
Of all the creepy shit you fantasize about, that one takes the cake. You're so disgusting, you fat fucking Nazi.
Hey Nazi, what do you call someone who thinks that a particular minority group should be rounded up and sent to a gulag without any meaningful opportunity to challenge that action? How would you describe that?
Did a woman hurt you or something?
Did a trans woman fool you into a night of sexual passion?
Jeff is a pedo. So it would be a girl, not woman. But would put my money on boy.
I mean he went right to ass sex in his original post.
This demonstrates the absurdity of the law, how?
A person who is not a female goes into a female designated space and is asked to leave and is given an opportunity. When male person refuses, they are arrested.
Where is the absurdity?
If Marcy has a penis, then he should be in the men's room. If Marcy has no penis, then she can use the women's room. Simple enough. On the off chance that Marcy was born with male genetalia but has two XX chromosomes, then Marcy can decide where to pee without state supervision.
Truly, what this country really needs is a bathroom police grabbing crotches to tell people where they must go to the bathroom.
Fuck off, shill. No amount of makeup hides the fact that you predatory creepers are men.
And to enforce this, the government must have bathroom police to make sure the correct people go to the correct bathroom. Right?
Trump when questioned about this issue (2015 IIRC) said he thought they should use any bathroom they wanted to.
Nuh uh, Trump hates all gays and transgender people. It is known!
Trump has probably never used a public restroom.
Then we saw VA school boards covering up sexual assaults of girls by boys in school bathrooms and...well, things change.
Nah, he's Hitler and said use the bathroom that has the gas sign on it.
'A transgender woman was arrested last month for refusing to leave the women's restroom at the Florida State Capitol. Marcy Rheintgen, a 20-year-old college student, said she acted intentionally to challenge Florida's antitrans bathroom law.'
I guess libertarian ethics support "Marcy's" fantasy, and the decision by Reason editors to play along. But those same ethics allow me to call her "freakazoid" and them "idiots", right?
He is a man.
There is no such thing as "a transgender woman".
Corrected headline:
Florida Cops Arrest Male Pervert for Loitering In Women's Bathroom
As a trespasser, "she" should count "her"self lucky that sarcjeff wasn't around.
At least “Marcy” had the courage to take the arrest. Most of these activists don’t have that.
He has the balls that most women lack to stand for his convictions.
Good for him for being willing to be arrested. He should be arrested. I have no problem with Florida following through with it.
s/she/he/g
s/her/his/g
And fuck Autumn Billings for kowtowing to the insane.
"I am hise to break the law."? 🙂
Better than the crap they come up with 🙂
I just want to know what happens if a penguin enters the woman's restroom.
So is this person gonna be held without bond for years, given a draconian sentence and forced to denounce transgender ideology...I was told this was acceptable treatment for trespassing in a government building?
Shouldn't she have been shot in the face?
Since you can't read, I know you can't understand
from above.
Rheintgan now faces a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 60 days of imprisonment and a $500 fine.
She'll pay the fine and be on probation.
"He", not "she".
Dems and chicoms really peed off!
So they arrested a dude, dressed up as a woman who wanted to peek on women.
It's curious that the only people who keep pushing this nonsense are trannies and white women. If they want more dudes in their washrooms just say so. I can go piss all over the seat to remind them why its a dumb idea if they'd like.
They don't want dudes in the washroom. They don't even want dudes in the gym. They want physically, mentally, and morally weak acolytes to affirm their egos.
No, the only people who keep "pushing this nonsense" are hateful Rethuglicans.
The truth can be a harsh mistress. You'll be okay buttercup.
'Rethuglicans' is the kind of term that my Very Liberal Neighbor (tm) uses when describing how worried he is that he's going to lose his welfare status now that he has a job.
Rethuglicans right up there with Latinx huh?
Guess 80% of the country is republicans now. You know where you would be accepted and your pronouns used. The Middle East. You should go there.
“I can go piss all over the seat to remind them why its a dumb idea”
You say this like they would know the difference.
Source: Worked at Six Flags for three summers. Women’s restrooms were ALWAYS worse than the men’s, and by a wide margin.
This isn't ALWAYS a fact, but I would put it in the 95% range.
I've measured-up my fair share of restrooms.
Fair enough.
I've done enough janitor work, but admittedly this was in an industrial setting, where the women's bathrooms got about 5-10% as much traffic as the men's. So, no wonder the women's were cleaner.
I've had plenty of jobs that involved cleaning bathrooms. At best, the women's room was equally as bad. At golf courses it was close to even despite the 9-1 ratio. Women's rooms have way more piss and shit on the walls and seats. Gross.
The liberal white women will also be the first ones to call the police if it happened to them.
We tried to accommodate this 'issue' by providing unisex, multi-purpose restrooms in many public building types. But, for some reason, that's not anywhere near enough for the activists.
In fact, in states where they have attempted to pass 'Trans Rights' 'Pick-Your-Own-Restroom' Laws, they almost always specifically exclude this form of accommodation. Which leads me to believe that the motivation is one of the following: (No particular order)
1. They're perverts
2. They enjoy making other people uncomfortable / feel unsafe
3. They think they require active affirmation from others
4. Some combination of 1-3
How about:
5. They don't want to be stigmatized and told by the state that they are some freak that must use some bathroom different from everyone else.
Maybe if you spent just a few minutes listening to the people you hate, you might understand a little bit where they are coming from.
But the state can force everyone else to cater to the mentally ill's delusions?
The state is not forcing you to use any pronouns at all. You are completely free to refer to transgender people in any vulgar way that you wish. You are NOT free to force THEM to tolerate your indignities and to shut up when you insult them.
You want to have it both ways: to be a shithead towards trans people, and to not suffer any repercussions for being a shthead towards trans people.
Stopping adult men from whipping out their cocks in front of little girls or lurking in ladies washrooms, is not being a shithead towards trans people, you evil fuck.
Its stopping the creepers from being shitheads towards woman, and you know it.
It's not without reason that I call Jeff a monster, folks.
Oh and there we have it, trans people are creepy perverts. It's a shitty move to assume that all trans people are creepy perverts, yes.
That's not fair.
They are also overwhelmingly violent with a startlingly large percentage of spree killings.
But, yes, they are also creepy perverts.
And this crap comes from the same people who are upset when anyone calls them merely 'deplorable'.
You are not just deplorable, you're a bigoted asshole.
*sniff*. A tubby anal incest afficianado does not like me. How shall I ever live?
You can ignore the reality. Does not change it.
Is there absolutely no reason you can think of why we have always had mens and women’s bathrooms?
trans people are creepy perverts
Men who go into women's restrooms are creepy perverts. Calling themselves "trans" makes no difference.
They aren't all creepy perverts. But it is pretty much a certainty that creepy perverts will exploit the situation.
If I saw a trans-'man' using a men's room, or a butch lesbian, or even a very feminine actual lady in there, I would perhaps briefly think 'huh' and move on and not worry about it at all. I'm not really worried about that side of the coin.
No, the big problem is men invading the private spaces of women and girls.
I've seen that quite a few times when the line for the ladies' is too long and someone really needs to go. Good for a mild chuckle and that's about it.
You're asking Jeff this question? He advocates for state control of many decisions. How much charity, masks, vaccines, bear control...
Let's ask Jesse how much state control he wants over people's purchasing decisions from foreign countries. Hmm.... looks like, Jesse wants the government to have total control over that one!
Raising the price is not dictating what you can buy.
I mean, if you raise the price enough it is.
Maybe, if you had bothered to actually read Minadin’s post and comprehend it, you wouldn’t have gotten your knickers in a twist.
To whit, “We tried to accommodate this 'issue' by providing unisex, multi-purpose restrooms in many public building types. But, for some reason, that's not anywhere near enough for the activists.” As a building professional, I can attest to the attempt at accommodation.
So he didn’t take issue with the form of accommodation that was offered, he took issue with the activists bitching it wasn’t good enough. But congratulations on reading his mind and soul to extract hatred of trans people from his post. Goddamn man.
They don't have to use some different bathroom. We made one that can be used by anyone. It's just that it's typically not shared, it's what we call a 'single-hole' restroom. They can also be referred to as 'unisex', and in some cases, 'family assist', which are also unisex but have additional features.
Typically these come with the full complement of features - they are accessibility code compliant, have extra accessories for diaper changing (in some states, even ADULT diaper-changing) and are typically a lot roomier and more private than your standard public restroom.
So, what's the problem?
They can use the bathroom appropriate to their sex or a private unisex one. A M to F Trans is not a female and therefore cannot use a women's space. Why is that so offensive to you?
Rheintgan now faces a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 60 days of imprisonment
in a men's prison, one presumes.
She’d prefer a women’s prison, where she could get other women pregnant.
One of the inferior court judges is forcing men into women's prisons, so undetermined.
Probably, because Rethuglicans are hateful.
Did anyone ever tell you that you’re retarded, Anastasia? If not, then I’m telling you: you’re a fucking retard.
Wow, you show us with your well thought out argument. Next we will be burning Tesla and burnings. Oh wait...that's you
"A man in drag was arrested for using the woman;s bathroom."
Fixed that for you.
I feel sorry for women who naturally have a masculine appearance. They're the ones likely to suffer unjustly from "transgender" bullshit. Back when it was assumed that anyone in a women's private space was female, they weren't in danger of being suspected of being male.
Trannies are heavily over-represented in media. I feel bad for having to question whether uglier women are men.
The MtoF trannies I've known are obviously men. Very few males have the physical traits and/or the money that it takes to pull off a convincing "transition". In the vast majority of cases, they're not going to fool anyone.
All you people cheering on the arrest of this woman, just remember: The morality police is going to come for you, too. There is no such thing as a "normal person". Everyone is different and unique in their own way, and often, in ways that they don't want the rest of the world finding out about. Maybe you like sex a little bit on the rough side. Maybe you are more of the voyeur type. Maybe, like Troll Mac, you enjoy fucking your sister in the ass. (Well, that last one ought to be illegal.) But no matter how much you now claim to support "normal people", the witch hunt mob will come for you in turn.
Maybe, instead of trying to force everyone to conform to this stereotypical norm, you could just accept people for who they are and stop trying to change them into someone that they are not. But that is asking for too much around here, because social conformity is a hallmark of social conservatism, and that is what most of you are.
stop trying to change them into someone that they are not
But that's exactly what the genderists are doing. Those of us who reject their deceptive language ARE accepting what they truly are.
So now we get into the "genetic predestination" that Team Red currently is engaged in, which fundamentally denies free will.
Genetics determines your sex organs. Genetics do not determine the type of clothes you wear, how you present yourself in public, or the individual choices you make on a day-to-day basis. Does it?
You reduce people to nothing more than their sex organs while refusing to acknowledge the sum total of who they truly are. A man is more than just a penis, and a woman is more than just a vagina, and it's insulting for you to declare otherwise.
Nobody gives a fuck how you "present".
If you have a dick, you don't get to go to girls' spaces.
Not sure why this is so offensive to you.
I guess women can just suck it up, eh?
Yes we know. People are entirely defined by their genitals. A woman is nothing more than a walking vagina. Isn't that right, O Enlightened One?
A woman has one. A man does not. Are you retarded or something?
The types of clothes you wear, the kinds of toys you play with, even how you present yourself, isn’t what makes you a woman/man. Congratulations on pushing the same stereotypical bullshit that 50’s conservatives did.
So now we get into the "genetic predestination"
Of course. They aren't changing their genes, which determine their physical and mental faculties. You can modify the appearance and people are able to choose their behavior, but their genes remain the same. And that is the determining factor. XX vs XY. Anyone with a Y must use the male facilities (this sweeps in the <.1% XXY and XXYY types). A simple genetic test, not a physical exam, is the deciding factor.
What exactly do you all want transgender people to do?
Go to counseling? What if they refuse? Will you force them?
Stay away from children? What if they refuse? Will you throw them in jail?
Stay hidden in a closet? I think that is the answer here.
I don't give a fuck what they do as long as they don't try to tell others what to say or think, and they don't invade the private spaces of the opposite sex.
Oh, so you have no problem with 'drag queen story hour' then?
You mean dudes being sexually inappropriate around children.
Kill yourself.
There is zero sex at drag queen story hour. Sorry to disappoint you.
We've linked to the videos repeatedly, liar.
You mean, the videos which don't depict any sex?
Could they ever demand to do them for anybody BESIDES children? Retirement villages might be willing to accomodate them, but they ONLY want to read to young kids.
Any idea why?
I have a problem with anyone being sexually inappropriate with children, regardless of what they call themselves.
Of course. Wearing a dress means 'sexually inappropriate' because you just define your terms to mean whatever you want them to mean as long as the trans people are shoved back into the closet or in prison or the insane asylum or anywhere but in ordinary society.
as long as they don't try to tell others what to say or think
Oh okay. So if a person named "Robert" wants to be referred to as "Bob" instead, you would regard that as a gross insult? How dare Robert tell us how to refer to him!
as long as they don't try to tell others what to say or think
You're right, no one ought to request to be treated with any modicum of dignity. If, instead of referring to you as "Mr. Depner", someone refers to you as "Hey shithead", your response is "well, that person has the right to refer to me however they wish, I really shouldn't try to tell others what to say or think". Right?
Fuck off with your "TREAT THEM WITH RESPECT" horseshit.
These hyperviolent pedos deserve little respect.
How about the walking vaginas that you think women are? Do they deserve respect?
How 'bout the drag queens ridiculing women and femininity? Are they being respectful?
You forgot to change socks when you respond to yourself.
I missed the part where I demanded that they call me shithead.
No, you demanded they call you "Mr. Depner". They called you shithead and worse. But according to your own rules, you have no right to tell them to stop.
What does "treated with any modicum of dignity" have to do with demanding a right for a male to be in women's spaces and institutions?
Robert asking to be called Bob has no deceptive or manipulative intent behind it.
Oh, I completely disagree. Robert's birth certificate says "Robert", not Bob. He is trying to deceive me about who he really is when he demands that he call him by some other name! How can you possibly stand for this deception?
I explained this before but one more time, slowly. If you don't get it now, you are being intentional.
Your own name is yours. Within bounds of decency ("call me fuckitall"), others are bound to respect that.
Otherwise, the English language is not yours. No one is bound to call you "he" or "she" or "sir" because you think that's what you are. What you think doesn't matter.
You really should be sent to El Salvador.
You really should be sent to deep space. Without a spacesuit.
We all know where an evil fuck like you is going eventually. Don't forget to try to pet Cerberus.
You are far more likely to hang out with Hitler in the afterlife.
You fantasize about blowing him, so you might want to stick to your lane.
Or are you going to give us MORE of your anal incest fan fic?
Giving a blowjob to ML? I could hardly compete with ML's vacuum cleaner.
No, Hitler. Right after you, apparently, want to anally violate your sister.
I think it's kinda funny and sad that THIS is the 'culture war' hill your side has decided to die on. It's another 80/20 issue (might be more lopsided than that) that the left is instinctively, reflexively, extremely wrong about.
Forcing other people to cater to your delusions / psychosis / personal quirks is SO FAR from libertarianism, I don't know where to start. Should they be persecuted? No. Should they be able to demand other individuals do some weird shit they wouldn't normally? No. Should they get some special status? No.
I don't really care how they want to live their own lives, present themselves in public, or any of that. Doesn't bother me. When they start making demands on other people to appease whatever their personal sensitivities are, they cross a line.
Migrate to a commune in some blue state, and stay there.
I do "see the absurdity" but it's not with the law.
Rheintgen told the Associated Press that she "wanted people to see the absurdity"
Certainly you meant "he wanted to see the ladies at their most vulnerable in a confined space with their pants down. Because he's a degenerate pervert."
Maybe we just need to replace the man on the men's room with a penis? If you have one, use this bathroom. And then a no-penis sign on the other.
If you are so committed to being a different gender than your biological sex and you have surgery, well, then you are probably still crazy, but you're not going to be able to use a urinal anyway
Such people are the worst of society, only happy when causing trouble
Without being either arrested or charged under the Safety in Private Spaces Act, Rheintgen won't be able to challenge the law directly in court.
The patriarchy strikes again.
No, they arrested a man in a dress looking for thrills.
Not every man in a dress is a transgender - the vast majority are transvestites.
They arrested a mentally ill pervert and potential rapist.
Arrested? Thim're real ginnlemen. In Grand Goblin Greg's Godly Texas they'd've lynched s/her and left s/her hanging from a branch.
Doesn't this apply equally to a trans man using the mens restroom? A lot of trans men are very convincing due to the testosterone. They have muscles and beards etc. Forcing them to use the women's room would cause more disruption then letting them use the men's room. I also agree with the 'penis/no-penis' suggestion for bathroom usage. If you don't have a penis and look mostly like a woman you are safer and less disruptive in the women's room.
Most people don't seem quite as concerned with (biological) women invading men's spaces. They may have to put that into the law for equal protection / equal treatment, but I don't think that it would be enforced nearly as often or for the same reasons.
Realistically, men are on average a lot stronger and tougher than women, (Yes, even women taking testosterone.) and are acculturated to be thick skinned. So we're generally not threatened by it.
Also, a lot more men are pretending to be women, than the other way around...
Trans men are never convincing. A scraggly beard and teeny bit of muscle are not 'passing'.
And no one's worried a crazy transman will sexually assault them. Shoot the place up, absolutely, rape, notsomuch.
Yes, although there are rare exceptions, "trans men" typically end up looking and sounding like teenage boys rather than like men.
But who gets to decide what you "look mostly like"? Is there going to be a government employee outside every restroom to decide who gets to use which pottie?
>The law imposes complex and confusing regulations
No it doesn't.
You have a dick? Use the men's restroom.
You have a pussy? Use the women's restroom.
You're an outlier, the .000001% - use the one you pass for and no one's coming to inspect you.
To me, the 0.1% of 0.1% of people who are actually transgendered are not the real target of this law (despite all the crying about it). If someone has had hormone therapy and surgery to change their outer sex appearance, they will not even be noticed unless they do something to specifically call attention to themselves.
The fraction of transgender men (biological women) who cannot pass for men who want to use a men's bathroom are also not really the issue. Women in a men's room pose no significant threat to the men there regarding sexual assault or voyeurism. There are not a lot of "upskirt" photos taken in men's rooms.
The fraction of transgendered women (biological men) who cannot yet pass for women (call these group A) who want to use a women's bathroom maybe are being unfairly asked to go along with society and use the men's room instead, in an effort to deny a safe haven to would-be rapists and general perverts.
Any male pervert (group B) in a women's room for nefarious reasons could just say "Gender fluid. Feel like a woman." to avoid any charges of peeping or waiting for a chance to rape.
It may not be possible to tell A from B by looking. We also must wonder how many of group A are *really* group B. Indeed it seems like a regular occurrence that people in Group B claim to be in Group A (e.g., male rapists who claim to be trans after they are convicted, so that they can be sent to women's prisons where it's easier for them to continue to rape biological women).
Or... we recognize that the bathrooms are designed differently based on sex and gender identity is irrelevant in this case.
Now do their shenanigans in women's sports.
First, I'm sorry for real people that have this issue. There are some but that is a small group.
Most, think it's cool or convinced by horrible parents. I mean what 3 year knows if they want to change from a boy to a girl? It's the parents that thinks it makes them interesting.
Liberals don't care that the hormone treatments are irreversible or the mental damage they are doing to people. As long as they can get votes.
The LGBTQXYZ movement should be thankful they are not in countries such as Saudi Arabia or Iran.
Iran has more male-to-female sex change procedures per capita than any other country.
Because they kill gay men, but seem somehow okay if they "become women".
Being a man is a relative thing in that part of the world. That's why they look the other way when men have sex with boys below a certain age—it's not "homosexual" if the boy isn't YET a man.
They arrested a man for using the women's room? How is this news, and why does Reason insist on calling this dude a woman?
Dude does look like a girl. No one would complain about him/her in the women's room if he/she hadn't announced it.
Marcy Rheintgen, a 20-year-old college student, said
shehe acted intentionallyWhy are we misgendering this guy?
Why would a government employee be asking me to leave a restroom in the first place?
And is there a specific reason to arrest under Trespass instead ?
Who is this author? Look you can have gender neutral bathrooms (when it is a single bathroom) but public bathrooms for multiple person use are based on biology not mental illness. Period, end of story. You have the right to be delusional but not when it impacts my rights and public restrooms are based on biology. If this man had a problem with that go in the woods. and keep your mental illness to yourself and leave the kids alone.