Americans Are Deeply Skeptical of Trump's 'Liberation Day' Tariffs
Polls of consumers and surveys of business owners suggest the White House has a lot of convincing to do.

As President Donald Trump prepares to announce his long-promised set of global tariffs on what he has dubbed "Liberation Day," he faces a public that is unconvinced those import taxes will boost the American economy.
A Fox News poll published last month found that 69 percent of Americans believe tariffs will make products more expensive, while just 7 percent say tariffs will reduce prices. The same poll found that 53 percent of Americans believe tariffs will harm the economy, while just 28 percent say they will improve it.
Confronted with those figures during an interview on Sunday, White House economic adviser Peter Navarro brushed off any worries and argued that businesses will have to "cut their prices to absorb" the costs of tariffs.
Navarro is a true believer who has never been swayed by economic data or reasoning, but his boss does not seem to share that same nonchalance. Trump has repeatedly warned that there will be some pain associated with his new trade policies. He's also reportedly tried ordering car companies to steer clear of price hikes in the wake of today's tariff announcement, which will include huge new import taxes on cars and car parts.
If tariffs were the secret to prosperity, as Trump has also claimed, would such arm twisting be necessary?
The president is probably right to worry. After years of high inflation, the American public voted Trump back into office on a promise that he'd combat higher prices and strengthen the economy. If tariffs go sideways, as polls show many seem to expect, it will puncture what is seen as one of Trump's core competencies.
That may already be happening. Only 40 percent of Americans approve of Trump's handling of the economy (and only 38 percent approve of his handling of trade policy, specifically) in a new poll by the Associated Press and the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Similarly, a CBS News/YouGov poll from late last month showed the public has soured on Trump's economic approach since January. In that same poll, a majority of respondents said Trump was focused "too much" on tariffs and "not enough" on lowering prices.
NEW: Quite a shift since January in latest @cbsnews poll:
Americans want Trump's focus more on prices, not tariffs pic.twitter.com/mThLL3XiJ0
— Scott MacFarlane (@MacFarlaneNews) March 30, 2025
Similar numbers show up in a recent poll conducted by Morning Consult for the National Retail Federation, which found that 76 percent of voters are "concerned about the impact of tariffs on prices" while 75 percent say politicians should focus on lowering prices for groceries and other everyday goods.
And that's before the price hikes from tariffs hit.
As a general rule, politicians shouldn't govern by simply following the polls and doing what is popular. Economic principles and critical thinking are essential in good leaders, and successful politicians can sort out when to seek applause and when to do the difficult thing.
In that regard, the biggest problem with Trump's tariff plan isn't that he's determined to buck public opinion to implement it. It's that he's embracing a bunk economic theory to pursue a nonsensical goal with policies that have a long track record of making people and nations poorer.
Still, public opinion carries a lot of weight in a democracy—and it should be readily apparent that American consumers are not willing to endure the pain that Trump is now threatening.
Probably the best polling on tariffs that I've seen was conducted last year by the Cato Institute, which asked consumers if they'd support a tariff on imported blue jeans to increase blue jeans manufacturing jobs in America. About 62 percent of respondents said yes.
But wait a moment. When told that the tariff would make jeans just $10 more expensive at the store, support for that policy flipped: Now, 66 percent opposed it. And if the tariff would make jeans $25 more expensive, an overwhelming 81 percent said no.
Trump is heading into his "Liberation Day" with a baseline of support for tariffs that seems considerably weaker than what that Cato poll showed. When tariffs make lots of things more expensive—because that's what they do—he'll reap the reward he deserves.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
2022: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!
2025: Low prices are leftist.
Your liver is killing YOU.
No, it's the alcohol and drugs that are doing that, the liver is just the first to start showing signs.
I am still keeping an eye out for someone, other than you of course, saying this.
If you're not seeing the comments where critics of tariffs are belittled for wanting cheap Chinese shit or attacked for being unwilling to pay more for American, then you're not paying attention.
Either that or you finally noticed and can operate the Flag Communist and Mute Lewser buttons that strain out the arnychists, warmunists, ku-kluxers, Beatles-burners, girl-bulliers, nationalsocialists, anti-vaxxers and Thorazine-abstainers the looter kleptocracy sends here to copypaste crap from Xitter and Trump Sozial as an exercise in signals-jamming.
You forgot Long dong and Comstock Hank. You're credibility is in jeopardy.
Hey sarcasmic keep up the good fight. The guys arguing with you are socialist lunatics about to get a rude lesson in economics.
Eric, have any countries reciprocated by lowering their tariffs? Lowering the average tariff between the US and those countries? For someone obsessed with tariffs you seem to be ignoring this aspect.
Yes we know. If some people give in to threats and bullies, it is absolute proof that bullying is justified.
God you're bad at analogies. If countries give in to bullies who raise tarrifs by lowering tarrifs that makes the countries bullies and the bully just someone using self defense.
And who the fuck uses bullying, outside of grammar school?
And I'm not for tarrifs especially those enacted by EO.
Constitution gives Congress power to tax. That resulted in massive corruption. In the 19th century, special interests bought votes of members to get their Corporate Welfare via tariffs. Franklin Roosevelt realized that tariffs were a catastrophe and now it is income taxes breaks that result in the vote buying.
Unfortunately we have to have federal taxes. Were it not for federal taxes we would be singing "God Save the King".
Actually we needed no income tax until the Constitution was amended to allow the politicians to rob the working man. Tariffs sufficed to pay for the government.
Tariffs are a tax on corporations that buy goods from other countries. It is the Democrat worshiped tax on the wealthy to pay their fair share that won't raise prices. The only real difference is Democrats want to tax business across the board and this only tax those buying foreign goods. The Democrat tax can never be avoided even if the money was used to invest in America. The tariffs can be avoided if the business invests in America.
After being thoroughly brainwashed by the DNC's news outlets using the illusionary truth effect the weak minded will now say the Democrat tax is preferred. Let that sink in.
Hey fag, tariffs are bad, right? So if Trump ‘bullies’ other countries into lowering their tariffs, he’s helping them.
So Trump is helping you realize your dream of a tariffless world.
Jesse-ass and Delta Force Groupies perform the same task the SS perfomed in occupied Netherlands--allbeit with less generous access to torture and summary execution. Anyone listening to stations not approved by Christian National Socialism were caught and shot in pretty short order. Here our communications are jammed by hooded ku-kluxers manly enough to snivel for someone else to bully pregnant women or snitch off neighbors.
Thank God for the Libertarian spoiler votes or the shit would really hit the fan.
Was about to say that I wouldn’t be surprised if the anti-freer market folks would rage but Jeff beat me to it.
Libertarians used to love free markets. Today they love Trump.
Wall street isn't buying his bullshit.
Hey fag, got any other little nuggets of wit you’d like to impart?
Sure. Change your handle to SarcasmicWasRightAboutEverything,
And fertile women aren't buying e-Lawn Jockey's Tesla's. The original Tesla took a loan from JP Morgan, squandered it on frills instead of product, and went crying and bootlicking back to JP for more cash... got none.
Why do you hate African Americans Hank?
Are you suggesting there is a (tariff) free market in place right now?
Those are Herbert Hoover / Adolf Hitler christian nationalsocialists. Hoover IN WRITING deplored economic freedom as "dog-eat-dog" and was satirized with no exaggeration in Atlas Shrugged for that and the prohibitionist Moratorium on Brains of 13JULY1931. When Rand rejected Ronnie Reagan's efforts to revive Comstockist girl-bullying--to the utter delight of libertarians--Christian National Socialists and their mohammedan allies joined forces to ban SOME trade and production and force uppity bitches to squeeze out Hitlerjugend.
Okay Comstock girlbulliers but still no long dong. You're really slipping Hank.
If someone is trying to decide whether or not to shoot themselves in the foot, whether or not other people are doing it doesn't seem relevant.
Thank heavens for Liberation Day, where American consumers are liberated from their choice of where to purchase their goods! Thankfully, we have Nanny Trump to 'nudge' us in the direction that every red-meat-eating patriotic American SHOULD want to spend their money. And if you don't agree with Trump that means you aren't really a patriot. Shame on you!
https://reason.com/2025/04/01/in-defense-of-luxury-beliefs/?comments=true#comment-10984601
Not only do we have many-many rich and powerful idiots (especially Donald Trump) running around today, spamming, scamming, and cramming down our collective throats, the “luxury belief” that tariffs will make us all rich; shit gets even worse! We are SNOT allowed to “opt out” of seeing our finances RUINED ass the stock market collapses because of Dear Orange Leader and His Luxury Beliefs! Worker bees are NOT allowed to escape this destruction of their wealth!
I just had a chat with “Perplexity”, my favorite AI. As of the end of 2021, only 2% of USA corporations allowed “money market funds” as a choice for their 401 K funds. This is what I call “flat cash”, earning near-guaranteed about 5% (recently) APR, as in, for example, VMRXX Vanguard fund. This is FAR better than watching your money drain away because of Dear Orange Leader and His Stupid Tariff Wars! WHY must 98% of workers be FORCED to subscribe to Stupid Donald’s beliefs, and watch their money go down the drain? This sure is NOT religious or political freedom, or freedom of ANY kind, to be enslaved to Donald’s “luxury beliefs”!!!!
(Financial types and Corporate types ALSO have “luxury beliefs” about, for example, the stock markets will always go up-up-up in the long run, and the workers are too stupid to make their own 401 K choices freely.)
#FreeTheWorkersAndTheir401_K_FundsFromStupidTradeWars
Markets have collapsed? DJIA 42225 today. 41938 Jan 10 2025. 40829 Sept. 9, 2024.
Once inflicted with TDS the ramblings and nonsense from bidenettes is completely irrational.
Tariffs are not going to make anyone rich. Tariffs are essentially taxes on corporations that import goods. Just a few short months ago bidenettes were on board with the Democrats raising the corporate tax rate across the board for all businesses promising it would not increase prices or hurt the economy. bidenettes must have vertigo after flipping 180 on taxing the wealthy and making them pay their fair share. Now taxes on the wealthy are going to break the little man. Let that sink in.
"Tariffs are essentially taxes on corporations that import goods."
And the corporations will all turn (management and worker bees alike) into welfare-bennies-producing slaves? They will ABSORB these costs, and work AT A LOSS? Because they are now declared to be working AT A LOSS per the Cummand of The TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer, they will SNOT pass along their new tariff-taxes to the buyers?
Twat planet do Ye PervFectly cum from, stranger? Planet Slavery?
That is well below the peak it hit in December. Even in Jan/Feb it was much higher before recently plummeting. Way to cherry-pick some numbers. And before you say anything, I've only ever voted for Libertarian presidential candidates.
Hey fag, you lost big.
Seethe harder.
Taken from a CNN poll?
So basically brain dead morons like jeffy.
wishcasting is only my third favorite kind of casting.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,
No Taxation without Representation!
Congress.
Not the President.
Supreme Court should rule all tariffs not specified by an Act of Congress unconstitutional.
Here's what Congress says:
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48435#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Constitution%20gives%20Congress,impose%20tariffs%20under%20certain%20conditions.
SCOTUS could do that, but then Congress would whine that they have to do their goddamn job.
And now the rest of the story: Congress has long enacted laws authorizing the President to adjust tariff rates on goods in certain circumstances. Courts have generally upheld these laws against constitutional challenges, holding that they do not impermissibly delegate Congress's legislative power over tariffs to the executive branch. The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.
I don't subscribe to the Living Constitution theory. Pass an amendment. The rest of the story is the New Deal and Great Society.
There's still plenty taxation without representation. I was taxed without representation when I worked as a teenager. Immigrant workers on VISAs are taxed without representation. If you're ever taxed without having voting rights, it is "taxation without representation".
So, what I'm reading on other sites seems to be vastly different.
Apparently there's a whole bunch of slashing and eliminating of tariffs going on.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/04/countries-dropping-slashing-tariffs-ahead-of-trumps-liberation-day/
I remember in Trump's first term, at it's beginning, when he got laughed at for suggesting full on free trade.
Not 'free and fair trade' (a codename for centrally planned trade), but actual free trade.
Looks like he may have figured out the right threats one needs to make to get the central planners to get their damnable hands off the damned economy.
And, of course, Reason's "libertarians" are siding with the central planners.
Again.
Yeah it looks like Trump is getting at least some of the results he was looking for. Canada offering to go to zero both ways is pretty surprising. And inflation is down along with some staples like eggs and gas. A lot of us have seen our investments take a serious hit which I think has affected the public perception a lot but it looks like things are moving back up. I've been pretty skeptical but he might just pull it off. We shall see.
"Trump has repeatedly warned that there will be some pain associated with his new trade policies."
If so, then what is the ultimate goal of those trade policies? If the American people are willing to suffer some initial economic costs in order to achieve a greater economic benefit in the long run, what is that future economic benefit and how do we know that it's coming eventually as a result of tariffs and other trade policies being implemented now? I looked and I could not find it ANYWHERE in this article or elsewhere!
If so, then what is the ultimate goal of those trade policies?
It's to force us to be 'patriotic' in the manner that Trump thinks we should be.
Ok fag.
If so, then what is the ultimate goal of those trade policies?
To make imports more expensive so people will buy American.
He and his defenders feel that by making things here that could be purchased more cheaply abroad, instead of making things where we have a comparative advantage, that we will become wealthier. That's the exact opposite of what Adam Smith said in his 1776 book 'The Wealth of Nations' that basically started the field of economics. He and his defenders flat out reject the everything economists have said from Adam Smith to present day. They're willfully ignorant, and damn proud of it.
His lying defenders will say that Trump's goal is bilateral free trade. If that's the case he wouldn't have burned the free trade agreement he helped to create. But they'll lie and keep saying that's the case because that's what liars do.
Well Trump is promising to extend the tax cuts, eliminate the income tax on tips overtime and SS, eliminate a lot of regulation, slash government spending, corruption and waste, bring in hundreds of billions in investments and more. He's already succeeded on some of these. These tariffs, or as it seems tariff threats are not happening in isolation. The strategy may fail but there is a well articulated plan.
eliminate the income tax on tips overtime and SS
Seems like a pandering stunt to me. How about just reducing the tax rates for everyone?
slash government spending
I'll believe it when I see it.
He is trying to by extending prior cuts. KMW was calling this spending.
Far left international socialists like her do that.
It absolutely is pandering and a stunt.
But that's politics for you - some of this shit is just part of the package. You can't be *perceived* as a good politician unless you fund some circuses.
Simply replying to a comment that there is no articulated long term gain to offset the short term pain. The proposed elimination of income tax on the specified income sources would require an act of Congress but Trump has a history of trying to keep his promises. If that were to happen it would put a lot of spending money in the pockets of the working class that would more than offset price increases due to a potential tariff. As far as slashing federal expenditures DOGE is doing unprecedented investigation of every executive agency and identifying many billions in waste and fraud. Will it be enough? I don't know but it's happening right now and you can see it if you bother to look.
These tariffs are being imposed with option of them being removed - if the other nation reciprocates by removing its own tariffs. This has been the case with all the tariffs imposed by Trump 2.0. Its in the articles where Reason whines that Trump is imposing tariffs and then immediately revoking them when the other country immediately caves and agrees to drop theirs.
Same thing here. Unilateral free trade is still good. Multilateral free trade is best though. Unfortunately there are always incentives for countries to put up barriers to free trade. Sometimes the only way to get them to drop those barriers is to slam your own gate shut to their traders.
That's what's happening here - we're gonna make it painful for you to do business with the US until you agree to make it easy for us to do business with you. And considering that any individual nation only makes up a small percentage of US imports while the US makes up a huge percentage of imports for most every other country in the world . . . everyone else is taking notice when the 500 lb gorilla starts throwing shit around.
And democrats have a 21% approval rating.
Because most are rolling over and playing dead.
Special elections so far this year are swinging 15 points to the Democrats. If that holds in 2026, that would result in a nine seat swing to the Democrats in the Senate and a 44 seat swing in the House of Representatives.
Hey fag, instead of playing dead, you should all try BRING dead.
See what all the fuss is about.
I'm skeptical, but if this is what's happening, I will hope for the best. If it's a negotiating tactic and we end up with freer trade and more wealth in the end, great.
Calling it "liberation day" is fucking retarded, though. Increasing taxes is a funny kind of liberation.
Calling it "liberation day" is fucking retarded, though. Increasing taxes is a funny kind of liberation.
We're all Orwellians now.
The stupid fucker doesn't even realize he's raising taxes. That's what's truly frightening. Today will long be remembered by history but not for what Trump thinks.
Hey fag, Trump also wants to lower income taxes. Which one do you think will have a bigger net impact on most people?
Think about that, fag.
A negotiating tactic for what, I wonder. Trump has never indicated that lowering trade barriers was his goal, so whatever he's after, it's not going to be good.
Hey fag, Trump repeatedly said that he will reciprocate if any country will drop all tariffs
Not indicated it - but has done exactly that every time the target has agreed to lower their tariffs in exchange for the US doing the same.
He has indicated it many times. So has Bessent. He even did his first term.
No taxes are being increased no matter how many times leftists try to convince us that tariffs are tax increases.
Weird how they're not screaming about the tariffs levied by other countries as 'tariffs that are hurting their own people' isn't it?
Just us. Why is that? Why are tariffs levied against us hunky dory, but tariffs WE might level are wrong?
They're lying scum. Stop believing ANYTHING they say.
Poor Eric.
Shermichael Singleton
@MrShermichael
Ontario Premier Doug Ford says they are willing to drop ALL tariffs against the U.S. if President Trump is willing to do the same.
Video
https://x.com/MrShermichael/status/1907459062452617513
Ontario agreeing to the reciprocal tariff plan lowering tariffs to zero.
Rage Eric.
Lower prices for producers, lower prices for consumers, and the bumpersticker brigade (I coined this) is seething.
They don't actually want free trade. They want designed advantaged markets.
And if we can cut taxes a bit more, that will make American. Businesses even more competitive.
You coined it but didn't copyright it then posted it on the internet. Haha. I'm stealing it!
If these tarriffs are coupled with income tax reductions, then I'm all in. Consumption based taxes? Yes, please. It's about time 1/2 of the population pull their own weight. And I'm not even getting into the millions of illegals who never paid a dime. We need a good hit of regressive taxes to make it more fair and less insanely progressive.
If these tarriff are a plan to return to the 1950s, manufacturing base yeah, I don't see it happening.
RFK Jr. Was installed at HHS to bring back the Iron Lung manufacturing industry.
Hey fag, that was really clever. You should really sign up for open mic night at your local comedy club.
Observe that Christian National Socialists never mention repealing the Communist Manifesto income tax and replacing it--as before 1913--with traditional low tariffs for revenue only. Their yearnings are as vague and looterly as the hinted bait that the commie income tax "would" absolutely replace those nasty and often protectionist import tariffs--back when folks knew how to spell the word. https://libertariantranslator.wordpress.com/2016/10/15/herbert-hooverville-economics-2007/
Donald Trump and Peter Navarro. What else would you expect from a couple of pro-union Democrats from the 1980s?
Hey fag, I don’t know what else to expect. Do you?
Are they.
Because the Canadians, the Israelis, etc, have either dropped their tariffs or are now c completely reversing their positions and negotiating to drop them.
As I said - yes, tariffs are bad economics.
As policy tools - to encourage multilateral free trade and a WORLD (remember, we're globalists, right?) with lower barriers to trade they work amazingly well when the country throwing its weight around is the economic center of most of the globe.
American tariffs cause some small *overall* (remember how you collective the effects of illegal immigration to 'net good, ignoring bad effects on individuals? Well, we're gonna do that here too - sauce for the goose and all that) negative effects on some Americans is nowhere near the pain that, say, Canadians will, feel. Canadians make up around 2% of the value of American imports, America makes up 20% of the value of Canadian imports. This is something you ignore - deliberately - since you insist tariffs only have domestic harms.
The rest of the world certainly isn't acting like that is the case.
Ackshully, Little Baron Trump was declared the winner because 1.5% more registered voters believe Noah put male and female Ebola virus on the Ark and Jesus woke Lazarus from death and maggots, than believe that gasoline cars and electric power cause Warmunist Sharknado End Times. With the Libertarian party's best candidate--who knocked a girl-bullying Trumpanzista lawn jockey out of the Georgia Senate race--stabbed in the back by Jesus Caucus infiltraitors, there went our regular to 3.28% vote share which might have defeated the nationalsocialist looters. https://libertariantranslator.wordpress.com/2023/06/13/shopping-for-clout/
I'm totally cool with your racist rants Hank don't get me wrong. But can you reference the section of the 1974 Libertarian party platform that identifies the lawn jockey threat to liberty? Need to know before I cast my spoiler vote.
Hank would have made a great Bolshevist.
— EU mulls lowering tariffs on U.S. cars to ease trade tensions. The European Union is exploring a proposal to reduce tariffs on U.S. car imports from the current 10% to a rate closer to the 2.5% imposed by the U.S. on European vehicles. The move aims to de-escalate trade tensions with the Trump administration and prevent a potential trade war.
Current situation and proposed changes:
· The EU imposes a 10% tariff on U.S. car imports, while the U.S. applies a 2.5% tariff on European cars.
· The EU is willing to lower its tariff to match the U.S. rate, applying the reduction on a most-favored-nation basis to all WTO members
https://www.profarmer.com/news/policy-update/eu-mulls-lowering-tariffs-u-s-cars-ease-trade-tensions-u-s-brazil-braces-potential-u-s-tariffs#:~:text=The%20EU%20imposes%20a%2010,2.5%25%20tariff%20on%20European%20cars.&text=The%20EU%20is%20willing%20to,basis%20to%20all%20WTO%20members.
What will Reason have to write about if Trump wins the trade war? OH that's right. Gangster tattoos.
Where’s that sick clown who went around calling everyone critical of Trump “TDS addled”? Does he still think we’re deranged? lol
Enjoy higher prices and a deep recession, Trump cultists. Shame on you!
Hey fag, that was some pretty weak democrat fan fiction you wrote there.