Brown University Targets Student Journalist for Emailing Administrators
Brown is violating its code of conduct, which guarantees community members’ right to petition the university.

Alex Shieh, a student reporter for The Brown Spectator, is being investigated by Brown University. His alleged crime? Asking administrators about their jobs. On March 18, Shieh emailed each of Brown's 3,805 non-instructional full-time staff members, asking them to describe the tasks they performed in the past week. The university began its investigation two days later.
With Brown running on a $46 million deficit and annual tuition and fees set to increase to a combined $93,064 this July, Shieh launched the site Bloat@Brown (which is hosted by The Brown Spectator) on March 18. Inspired by the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Shieh strives to determine "whether tuition dollars are funding mission-critical functions" and "to expose the bureaucracy to which all 3,805 administrators belong." He would assign each administrator a rating of "low risk," "ambiguous," or "suspect" based on publicly available data used to determine "legality," "redundancy," and "bullshit job" subscores. The full methodology may be accessed here.
Kirsten Wolfe, Brown University associate dean and associate director of student conduct and community standards, notified Shieh that a preliminary investigation had been launched into his activities associated with Bloat@Brown two days following its publication. The notice was shared with Reason by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), which is advocating for Shieh. Wolfe accuses Shieh of "accessing a proprietary University data system," causing "emotional distress for several University employees," and misrepresenting himself "as a reporter for the Brown Spectator," in the notice. These alleged behaviors violate the university code of conduct's prohibitions on emotional or psychological harm, invasion of privacy, misrepresentation, and violation of operational rules, according to Wolfe.
Wolfe also accuses Shieh of accessing a data system that contains "confidential human resources, financial, and student information," but does not specify the system she's referring to. Bloat@Brown only published the names and positions of administrators (both publicly available via the staff directory) alongside a subjective valuation of their value to the college. The directory is provided "solely for the information of the Brown University community and those who have a specific interest in reaching a specific individual," according to its acceptable use policy. Shieh is a member of the Brown community and plainly stated his interest in contacting each administrator.
Dominic Coletti, a program officer at FIRE, says, "It's hard to imagine how…that information could be confidential if it's also public." Shieh did not even publish the email addresses—also publicly available—of the administrators and went so far as to censor the recipient of one email he shared on X.
Brown guarantees students the freedom "of political activity inside and outside the University," including "the right to petition the authorities, the public and the University," per its code of conduct.
Brown claims that Shieh misrepresented himself by identifying as a reporter for The Brown Spectator. But Shieh is a staff member of The Brown Spectator; he is its publisher and a reporter. While the publication is not officially recognized by the university, its staff has been working on its revival with The Fund for American Studies (TFAS) Student Journalism Association since the summer of 2024. Shieh tells Reason they are "just trying to figure [out] the printing situation" but "have a bunch of other articles ready to go." Ryan Wolfe (unrelated to Kirsten Wolfe), the director of the Center for Excellence in Journalism at TFAS, confirms this.
Bryan Clark, Brown's vice president for news and strategic campus communications, tells Reason that Bloat@Brown "appeared to improperly use data accessed through a University technology platform to target individual employees by name and position description" but could not provide additional details about the allegations against Shieh "due to federal law protecting student privacy." Kirsten Wolfe did not respond to Reason's request for comment.
Coletti says that the university "needs to actually provide the allegations—it can't use the threat of possible punishment down the line as a sword of Damocles to impose a chill on any student's ability to, one, do journalism and report on the university and, two, talk about the investigation itself."
Bloat@Brown's interactive map of administrators was disabled by hackers on the day the site launched. Shieh tells Reason that the hackers bragged about their exploits on Sidechat, an anonymous social media app that sorts users by college community, meaning that the hackers must have "brown.edu" emails. Shieh says he and the team at The Brown Spectator are working to get the information back up.
Universities are supposed to be bastions of free speech. Brown's code of conduct reflects this ideal by requiring the university to notify students of charges made against them, affording students the opportunity to review the evidence against them, and recognizing students' right against self-incrimination. By withholding whatever evidence it may have against Shieh while threatening him with an ill-defined preliminary investigation for publishing publicly available information in a critical manner, Brown's behavior belies its values.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Do any of these people ever attend class?
"Universities are supposed to be bastions of free speech"
Supposed by whom? I have seen very little evidence of free speech on university campuses at any time since the Berkley Free Speech movement decades ago. On the contrary, universities in general seem to have been increasingly captured by progressive socialists since then and are now bastions of cancel culture, heckler's veto, critical revisionism, communism, reparations and equity.
What "free speech" means in academia today is to parrot the Marxist lies the wealthy, clueless and arrogant professors tell you.
An annual tuition fee of $93,064. We need the federal govt to step in and pick up the tab for each student.
Because every American and third world visitor should have a college degree. Underwater basketweaving is a profession in dire need around the world!
This is particularly necessary given this is a university of color.
They should change their name to Bipoc University to be more inclusive.
Actually, you could make a career of underwater basket weaving nowadays on TikTok. And you wouldn’t even need a college degree.
When student debt surpassed credit card balances, you'd think even academia would wake up: The fun ride is finally over. When Biden started offloaded debt to taxpayers to 11-12 FIGURES??? What is academia counting on? They have a few economists on staff who can tell them the truth. That the entire educrat business model needs to be torn down--before someone else does it for them.
"Universities are supposed to be bastions of free speech"
Where have you been the last decade?
Wolfe accuses Shieh of "accessing a proprietary University data system," causing "emotional distress for several University employees," and misrepresenting himself "as a reporter for the Brown Spectator," in the notice.
Two of these are lies, so we're supposed to believe the remaining item "causing emotion distress" is actionable? Do we even need to bother testing whether other actions more supported by the administration but which also caused emotional distress resulted in punishment? More petty tyrants.
P.S. Alex: start with the Title IX office, 100% bloat there.
Universities are supposed to be bastions of free speech.
OMEGALUL.
End higher education subsidies.
Alex Shieh, a student reporter for The Brown Spectator, is being investigated by Brown University. His alleged crime? Asking administrators about their jobs. On March 18, Shieh emailed each of Brown's 3,805 non-instructional full-time staff members, asking them to describe the tasks they performed in the past week. The university began its investigation two days later.
How very DOGE of him.
Universities are supposed to be bastions of free speech.
Said Jack Nicastro, waking up from his 30 year long nap...
Sounds to me like someone's got a case of the "sposedas".
Originally they were about religious learning. Then they gradually became about cultural heeling. In the centuries of teaching, education, and socialization at Universities the idea that they are/were bastions of free speech is a couple decades old... if it ever really existed at all and wasn't entirely the pot-tinged fevered dream of adult-aged adolescents who didn't have to get jobs or go to war and whose biggest contribution otherwise was Buffalo Springfield and setting fire to their own underwear.
Challenge the Vatican, and get burned at the stake.
"Brown is violating its code of conduct, which guarantees community members’ right to petition the university."
Free speech is reserved exclusively for the rich, over-educated idiots running academia.
In other words, leave your constitutional rights at the door when entering Brown.
He can always quit and learn to code, or better yet, weld.
(they can't offshore welding)
I did consulting work in admin for NYU. A close peer to Brown in prestigue, and of being a private northeastern school in a large city. Even the bureaucracy knows many of their peers are useless. I'd say there is a core of 25% in admin who keeps things running. You could easily prune half the jobs. Also the headcount isn't the only problem. I attended a couple of conferences for academia as a guest. I work in Wall St now, and we don't spend on conferences like academia does. The amount of open bars and entertainment was staggering for low-level employees of non-profits.. Hardly any work done at these conferences, either. Now, this yearly conference was scheduled for Vegas for a week. For the first time, schools are cutting back.
Beware of the cult of efficiency. I agree that university staff can be bloated. But beware of young upstarts with no understanding of the world judging whether your job is efficient or not. Universities run on cyclical time schedules. There are weeks where staff are super busy and other weeks where they are not. You could argue that that means we could cut them back but then what happens in the peak weeks?
But seriously, have you tried calling your cell phone provider and getting a refund when they screwed up your bill? Send Doge there. Or how about a routine visit to the doctor triggering multiple mailings that are "not a bill" and with a high probability of being erroneous? And do we really need a hundred insurance companies with the exact same product just marketed differently with a different set of commercial characters designed to support bloated athlete salaries which then yield bloated seat prices in government subsidized stadiums?
Inefficiencies are everywhere in the private sector and Reason does not want to report it. I get emails all the time for "rewards" programs for my bank/internet/cell phone company...etc and these are a joke. Corporations are designing "sludge" to extract money from us in creative ways. Your local grocery store no doubt has multiple discounts. One for everyone, one for being a member and another one if you use their app. This "price discrimination' tactic may make them more in profit but it has not made my life more efficient. Just the opposite. And that is the state of beinga consumer in America.
So write about those inefficiencies. We could do away with most insurance companies, most rewards programs, and a host of other sludge-producing activities if we truly want to be efficient. Let's have a corporate Doge.
Gee, which assistant associate dean do you work for?
Oh, and since in the free market people spend their own money, why do you care about how a business operates? If you don't like one company, then switch to another.
Oh don't pretend to be on his side when you screeched like a good lefty when DOGE did the same thing.
You gotta wonder why a school with 850 teachers has 3800 administrators.
[rolls eyes] Yeah, really gotta ponder on that one a while don't you Professor Malvolio? 🙂
Somebody has to hire all the delusional, and indebted, graduates with degrees in left wing activism.
The only place I see a potential for real problems is if his "subjective" value to Brown is eerily accurate to their actual compensation and not benchmarked to publicly available comparables.
More likely he valued their DEI and bias response teams to be of $0.00 value and this is revenge.
While the publication is not officially recognized by the university
Kind of a big "while" there, Jack. That chucks out the whole "student reporter" angle too.
That aside, let's talk about Brown - and about the overall situation of the Left wing in general.
Universities are supposed to be bastions of free speech.
So, I read a really great article today: Let Them Eat Woke. If that's paywalled for you, let me know - but here's the mic drop:
Our public servants amassed such money and authority that they became our masters. Their creation swelled cancerously as they gorged on the toil of the people. Our rulers became sick with power, and their virtue signaling produced feverish absurdities: Men can be women. Genders are unlimited. Children should be disfigured. Free speech is violence. Borders are racist. The real victims of crime are the criminals.
And last November, in front of the entire world, to the horror of the Ancien Régime, the cancer they could not stop feeding killed them all.
Above us, Ronald Reagan is smiling. His jibe that “We’re from the government, and we’re here to help you” was the laugh line at the old Democratic Party’s wake.
The Democratic Party of FDR and the Great Society, or what is left of it, is a ridiculous anachronism. It’s obsolescence runs deeper than its ideas. If you don’t think that party fears the future, note its defensiveness as Elon Musk and DOGE assault their corruption. Democrats tremble at the efficiency of technology, much as elevator operators dread automation. The party’s top-down, aristocratic idea of government is as out-of-date as powdered wigs.
This is what Brown doesn't get.
The Democrat party is dead. It will NEVER recover from cancerous bloat and the wokeness that, to this day, they STILL bitterly cling to. Woke Academia is just one of the suicide pills they ate and tried to force on everyone else. So is Woke "put a woman in it, make her black and gay!" Entertainment. So is The Science. So is LGBT Pedo. So is Barack's race-grifting BLM and "anti-racism". So is Open Borders. All have been revealed to be cons and grifts and intentional American subversion that only enriches their pimps. ALL of them.
Anyone who politically identifies as a Democrat is a walking corpse that doesn't know it's dead. (Congrats, they now have something in common with the majority of its ballot submissions who still couldn't win.) And make no mistake, that's not a feather in Orange Man's cap. The Democrats did this to themselves.
Universities ARE supposed to be bastions of free speech. But the Democrat Party destroyed that. And in doing so, they destroyed Academia. And the entirely predicable response is exactly what we would expect.
But fret not. Their shambling corpses will collapse eventually. Trump, to his credit - which, as an OG#NT is difficult for me to give (but as an honest person have to admit he's now earning) - and Elon is just kicking down those corrupt shrines left and right.
It won't be long. And then America will rebuild. Whether or not Trump's vision is a good thing, YMMV - but regardless, the Democrat vision is now 100% completely dead and buried.
Trumps vision is to make himself feudal lord again. The vision of the Project 2025 folks who puppeteer him is to Make America a Christian Theocratic Plutocracy again.
Hi Whoopie.
Universities are mostly descendants of seminaries, especially the Ivies, and later became finishing schools for the genteel blue blooded gentlemen. Except for a short time after WWII, they have not really produced much value for greater society.
Well, it looks like they gave him his story!