Will Trump's Tariffs on Venezuelan Oil Matter?
The latest tariffs appear to be like many before that were promised but never enacted.

After setting April 2 as the day that tariffs on most global goods will go into effect, the White House appears to be walking back its plans. Levies on products like lumber, automobiles, and semiconductors may not be enacted until an unspecified later date, reports The Wall Street Journal. Other unspecified countries may be exempt entirely, President Donald Trump told reporters on Monday.
One that won't be exempt from the Trump trade war, at least for now, is Venezuela. On Monday, the president signed an executive order imposing retaliatory tariffs on Venezuela for the government's alleged aiding and abetting of the Tren de Aragua gang. Beginning April 2, any goods imported to the United States from a country that directly or indirectly imports Venezuelan oil may be subject to a 25 percent tariff. The order authorizes the secretary of state to impose the levy, which will expire a year "after the last date on which the country imported Venezuelan oil," at his discretion.
Venezuela is the world's 20th-largest producer of crude oil and plays an important role in providing petroleum products to several countries, including Spain, India, and Russia. The U.S., too, relies on Venezuelan oil imports, bringing in an average of 232,000 barrels of crude oil and petroleum products per day from the country in 2024. (This is about 3 percent of total daily crude imports to America.)
While these tariffs could impact the energy supply of some countries, Muyu Xu, senior crude oil analyst at analytics firm Kpler in Singapore, tells Bloomberg she believes "Trump's order is primarily aimed at Venezuela—cutting off its economic ties to the global market and pressuring it to come to the negotiating table with the U.S."
The move could also be a targeted attack on China, which is a major purchaser of Venezuelan crude oil.
After the U.S. imposed sanctions on Venezuela's state-owned oil company in 2019, China officially stopped importing crude from the nation. "Unofficially, the world's top crude importer never stopped its purchases, with Venezuelan oil often being masked as bitumen mix, according to traders and third-party data providers," reports Bloomberg.
If imposed, the levy would likely not have a large impact on China's oil sector—the country gets most of its crude from Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq—but it could deal a blow to Chinese refineries, which have been struggling due to higher costs and slow economic growth.
Since Trump took office in January, the U.S. and China have targeted each other's respective energy sectors. In February, China implemented a 15 percent import fee on American liquefied natural gas. Last week, the U.S. issued sanctions on a Chinese teapot refinery—which are smaller, privately owned, and operate outside of the U.S. financial system—for receiving $500 million worth of Iranian oil, some of which was under U.S. sanctions. This was the first time that the U.S. sanctioned a Chinese teapot refinery, according to Energy Intelligence, an energy information company. Separately, the U.S. also sanctioned a Chinese crude oil terminal for transporting Iranian crude last week.
These sanctions are unlikely to stop the transfer of sanctioned Iranian crude to China. Energy companies can implement workarounds like "ship-to-ship transfers in waters off peninsular Malaysia," Bloomberg points out.
Similarly, these tariffs will probably not halt Venezuela's oil exports. Countries can easily avoid Venezuela-related tariffs by altering data and lying about sourcing (which China has done for years). Unless the Trump administration is prepared to thoroughly enforce these duties, the latest tariffs appear to be like many of the measures before it that were promised but not enacted.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This will fuel a larger debate.
It could be rather crude.
Gas pain is no laughing matter.
Folks are fuming over it.
Laughing gas is NO pain!!!
It will run out of gas.
So this is a big nothingburger. But TARIFFS!!!!!!!?
JD Vance and RFK Jr are wrong about tariffs.
I was hoping for a full debate on the subject but at Reason the needle is on empty.
Opponents would tank in such a forum.
Leftards have had 100-Years to UNDO their executive order Tariff F'Up.
Start there instead of handing all the power to the executive and then only complaining when a Republican uses power leftards gave them.
Or more reasonably the take-away is Leftards and Libertards don't really give a sh*t about Tariffs. They just want an excuse to complain about Trump.
The Demon-Craps did stupid and destructive tariff-tax wars first and worst, so shit is TOTES OK when The TrumptatorShit and His Trumpanzees Gone Apeshit do shit, too!!!
OJ Simpson got away with murder, so shit is OK when I do shit, too!!!!
Actually the Democratic Party has been anti tariff since at least 1876. The Republican Party was the high tariff Party until Eisenhower. Trump is returning the Republican Party to its roots.
Yeah.. /s That why FDR and the [D] - trifecta passed the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_Tariff_Act ...
It was all Republicans fault.... /s
You leftards do nothing but Self-Projection day-in and day-out.
You've had 100-years to help stop the sh*t.
Yet you only find reason to complain when Trump is in office.
But instead of pointing fingers maybe the left can join the right for once and repeal the BS law that gave Executive Tariff power that FDR and the [D] - trifecta put into place.
Stillllllllllllll Waitttttttttttttinnnggggggggggg for leftard support.
"Will Trump's Tariffs on Venezuelan Oil Matter?"
No.
Venezuela will still be a communist run shit hole.
Venezuela. The Democrat Parties utopian dream-land of perfection.
Until one day it wasn't anymore.
A perfect example of what Democrats have in-store in the long run.
""The latest tariffs appear to be like many before that were promised but never enacted.""
Sarc hit hardest.
Wait - I am till trying to figure out if the US is going to tariff itself for being a purchaser/importer of Venezuelan crude.
It's all so confusing. Wonder how long US based int'l corporate CEOs are going to put up with this tariff clown show before they just throw their hands up and say F it. It's got to be intensely frustrating to plan around a proposed tariff, for all that time to be wasted when its called off a few days later. Then reimposed 2 weeks later. Then put in some weird limbo. Do they just go to Mar a Lago and bribe Trump directly to make it stop? Buy some $Trumpcoin? Invest with Kushner?
Not when we get American drilling, refining, and production back out from under the boots the gaia cult and their bureaucratic enablers.
As a professor said a million years ago "everything reticulates" --- you don't want to get into Biden's failed energy policy, failed foreign affairs,and horrible record on human rights, but that is the most germane consideration
"Biden’s oil policy toward Venezuela is wrong for two main reasons. First, it finances a dictatorship 3,000 miles away from Miami that is well-known for both harboring terrorists and the drug operations that have created chaos on the U.S. southern border. Second, if we consider all the domestic energy potential in the U.S., it seems irrational to make amends with a communist dictatorship for a few thousand barrels of oil per day."
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/bidens-energy-hypocrisy-with-venezuela/
The world got darker the day Biden/Kerry winked at horrendous human rights abuses (organ harvesting) to get a climate agreement that now India and China are not only not honoring but are exceeding all pre-treaty limits !!!
China's growing use of coal including the LONGEST coal transporting railway - which carries 200 MILLION tons of fossil fuel 1,141 MILES annually - draws pundit outrage as western nations spend BILLIONS to push citizens to reduce carbon footprint
A Scottish journalist highlighted the incongruity between the green initiatives coming from Western countries and those coming from China
China is responsible for 33 percent of the world's greenhouse gas, but continues to power itself by coal and establish itself as a global superpower
In the US, the Biden Administration continues to propose tens of billions of dollars be allocated to green initiatives that may or may not be effective
--Where was REASON when Janet Yellen said that US needs to put at least $3 TRILLION a year into climate change.
THE UTTER ABSURDITY OF WHAT BIDEN DID
may not be enacted until an unspecified later date
Who doesn't want The Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads?
Do nothing because everyone will cheat anyway - Go Reason.