Trump Thinks the Feds Can Fix America's Critical Mineral Supply Chain
Invoking the Defense Production Act won't boost the supply of critical minerals.

On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to unleash American energy by reducing regulations and shrinking the size of government. "Burdensome and ideologically motivated regulations have impeded the development of [energy and natural resources], limited the generation of reliable and affordable electricity, reduced job creation, and inflicted high energy costs upon our citizens," the order read.
Trump's campaign to downsize government involvement in energy and natural resources appears to be over. On Thursday, the president signed an executive order to expand the federal government's authority in domestic critical mineral production.
Specifically, the order invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) to direct the secretary of defense "to create, maintain, protect, expand, or restore domestic industrial base capabilities essential to the national defense" by buying critical minerals, making subsidy payments for domestically produced materials and "purchasing equipment for government and privately owned industrial facilities to expand their productive capacity."
The order confers DPA authority to federal agencies to issue loans and loan guarantees to shore up the supply of critical minerals "or essential materials needed for defense purposes." Agencies are also directed to identify "priority" critical mineral projects and expedite their permitting process.
The DPA was passed during the Korean War to give presidents broad authority to "influence domestic industry in the interest of national defense," according to the Congressional Research Service. National defense activities can include programs for military and energy production and homeland security or stockpiling. The DPA grants authority to the president (with minimal Congressional oversight) to prioritize and accept contracts for materials needed to secure national defense, use loans and loan guarantees to incentivize domestic manufacturing, and block foreign corporate mergers and acquisitions that "undermine national security."
Unilaterally granting the executive branch broad powers with little oversight has time and again led to wasteful spending. The first Trump administration used the DPA to expand the production of masks and vaccines for COVID-19, including issuing a $138 million grant to a medical supply company to develop an innovative syringe pre-filled with COVID-19 vaccine. The company failed to produce a single syringe to administer the vaccine.
The Biden administration used the DPA to supercharge domestic production of green energy and grid technology, circuit boards from Canada and the U.S., and critical minerals and mines. Legislation under the Biden administration—including the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the second Ukraine funding package, and federal appropriations—gave the Department of Defense billions of dollars for DPA-related activities.
Through IRA funding, the Defense Department dolled out $250 million to 12 domestic critical mineral projects. The Loan Programs Office, which is administered by the Energy Department and whose budget was supercharged by the IRA, dispersed $2.6 billion to finance the construction of a lithium processing facility in Nevada.
More government involvement and funding have not bolstered America's critical mineral supply chain—the United States still largely relies on imports (especially from China) to meet the nation's demand—or fixed the regulatory issues that have shuttered domestic mining and processing for decades.
In his executive order, Trump says, "It is imperative for our national security that the United States take immediate action to facilitate domestic mineral production to the maximum possible extent." Increasing the federal government's reach in the economy is the wrong way to accomplish this objective.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
> Invoking the Defense Production Act won't boost the supply of critical minerals.
Will it clear legal obstacles from the path of companies who might then go mining for them?
The first Trump administration used the DPA to expand the production of masks and vaccines for COVID-19, including issuing a $138 million grant to a medical supply company to develop an innovative syringe pre-filled with COVID-19 vaccine. The company failed to produce a single syringe to administer the vaccine.
What I'm hearing is that there's a company that should be investigated for gross malfeasance and possible fraud. Indeed, it sounds as though doing so might well discourage other companies from applying for grants if they don't think they have a significant probability of actually succeeding in the task they're receiving the grant for.
On the flip side, if it turns out that they never produced any syringes because the Biden Administration declared that the product would never be granted a medical use certificate, that would point at a need for an investigation elsewhere. And if so, we could try, I don't know, requesting that they return the funds.
Through IRA funding, the Defense Department dolled out $250 million to 12 domestic critical mineral projects.
"Jeff Luse is a deputy managing editor at Reason."
Strong work, buddy!
More government involvement and funding have not [...] fixed the regulatory issues that have shuttered domestic mining and processing for decades.
Well, you see, there's only so much the Executive Branch has the legal authority to do here. Sounds like your real problem is with Congress.
Hey Jeff. Are you too ignorant to understand the amount of minerals the US has but has been protected by democrats through presidents and lawsuits (sue and settle)?
It isn't about the government demanding mineral extraction but government stopping it from happening dumdum.
Kill the EPA, kill the DPA. Save the ATP.
>Invoking the Defense Production Act won't boost the supply of critical minerals.
You guys said Trump couldn't stop illegal immigration. You guys said Trump couldn't do a lot of things - yet he's doing a lot of what he says he's doing.
I'd take a 'wait and see' approach if I were you.
The odds are almost certainly 100% that the existing mineral supply chain was CREATED by the feds. So, yeah, maybe it can be fixed by the feds now.
The old Critical Materials stockpiling program was described in great detail every quarter in The Congressional Record. Besides metals it featured such wares as opium and duck feathers
One measure of the incompetence of National Stockpile management was that its far-flung bureaucracy devoted one desk to curating niobium, and another to columbium.
Trump also thinks his turds are as precious as gold bullion.
Living in your head, is he?
There’s certainly enough room in there.
'Trump Thinks the Feds Can Fix America's Critical Mineral Supply Chain'
Well, given that the lack of a US-friendly supply chain, especially from a domestic mining industry, was orchestrated by the feds, Trump might be on to something.
The Feds have ruined it. Trump is going to, hopefully, reduce that.
You neglected the fact that we're about to buy Greenland. And that Canada is going to resign to becoming Gay North Dakota.
Trump think the feds can have a National Defense dept???
OMG! Communism!!! /s
True ... but at least it's US Constitutional granted 'communism'.
I agree that giving more power to the federal government to attempt to increase the supply of critical minerals will do little or nothing to increase the supply of those minerals or lower their cost. To the extent there is anything the federal government can do, I believe it would be to insure that the government itself is not part of the problem (directly or indirectly) - something governments seem extremely reluctant to do.
I also agree we need more of those critical minerals, Especially the rare-earth elements, which are needed for much more than defense: rare earth elements are bcoming increasingly important to the economy, of the U.S. and the world. For example: rare earth elements are critical to electric vehicles.
Two of the top five countries with the largest reserves of rare earth elements are China (1) and Russia (5). The U.S. is seventh.
Ironically, although I have seen no sign that he's aware of the bigger picture, Trump may be on to something when he advocates making a deal with Ukraine to supply rare eatch elements to the U.S. for a good price. Some of the savings from such a deal can help make up for the aid provided to Ukraine - while also giving the U.S. a strategic interest in Ukraine.
Only rare eatch elements can save us from the coming refrigerator magnet crisis in