Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Trump Administration

Trump Thinks the Feds Can Fix America's Critical Mineral Supply Chain

Invoking the Defense Production Act won't boost the supply of critical minerals.

Jeff Luse | 3.21.2025 1:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
President Trump speaking in the Oval Office | Sipa USA/Newscom
(Sipa USA/Newscom)

On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to unleash American energy by reducing regulations and shrinking the size of government. "Burdensome and ideologically motivated regulations have impeded the development of [energy and natural resources], limited the generation of reliable and affordable electricity, reduced job creation, and inflicted high energy costs upon our citizens," the order read. 

Trump's campaign to downsize government involvement in energy and natural resources appears to be over. On Thursday, the president signed an executive order to expand the federal government's authority in domestic critical mineral production. 

Specifically, the order invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) to direct the secretary of defense "to create, maintain, protect, expand, or restore domestic industrial base capabilities essential to the national defense" by buying critical minerals, making subsidy payments for domestically produced materials and "purchasing equipment for government and privately owned industrial facilities to expand their productive capacity." 

The order confers DPA authority to federal agencies to issue loans and loan guarantees to shore up the supply of critical minerals "or essential materials needed for defense purposes." Agencies are also directed to identify "priority" critical mineral projects and expedite their permitting process. 

The DPA was passed during the Korean War to give presidents broad authority to "influence domestic industry in the interest of national defense," according to the Congressional Research Service. National defense activities can include programs for military and energy production and homeland security or stockpiling. The DPA grants authority to the president (with minimal Congressional oversight) to prioritize and accept contracts for materials needed to secure national defense, use loans and loan guarantees to incentivize domestic manufacturing, and block foreign corporate mergers and acquisitions that "undermine national security." 

Unilaterally granting the executive branch broad powers with little oversight has time and again led to wasteful spending. The first Trump administration used the DPA to expand the production of masks and vaccines for COVID-19, including issuing a $138 million grant to a medical supply company to develop an innovative syringe pre-filled with COVID-19 vaccine. The company failed to produce a single syringe to administer the vaccine. 

The Biden administration used the DPA to supercharge domestic production of green energy and grid technology, circuit boards from Canada and the U.S., and critical minerals and mines. Legislation under the Biden administration—including the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the second Ukraine funding package, and federal appropriations—gave the Department of Defense billions of dollars for DPA-related activities. 

Through IRA funding, the Defense Department dolled out $250 million to 12 domestic critical mineral projects. The Loan Programs Office, which is administered by the Energy Department and whose budget was supercharged by the IRA, dispersed $2.6 billion to finance the construction of a lithium processing facility in Nevada. 

More government involvement and funding have not bolstered America's critical mineral supply chain—the United States still largely relies on imports (especially from China) to meet the nation's demand—or fixed the regulatory issues that have shuttered domestic mining and processing for decades. 

In his executive order, Trump says, "It is imperative for our national security that the United States take immediate action to facilitate domestic mineral production to the maximum possible extent." Increasing the federal government's reach in the economy is the wrong way to accomplish this objective.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Did Trump Just Abolish the Department of Education?

Jeff Luse is a deputy managing editor at Reason.

Trump AdministrationClean EnergyDefense SpendingExecutive orderExecutive overreachEnergy & Environment
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   2 months ago

    > Invoking the Defense Production Act won't boost the supply of critical minerals.

    Will it clear legal obstacles from the path of companies who might then go mining for them?

    1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   2 months ago

      The first Trump administration used the DPA to expand the production of masks and vaccines for COVID-19, including issuing a $138 million grant to a medical supply company to develop an innovative syringe pre-filled with COVID-19 vaccine. The company failed to produce a single syringe to administer the vaccine.

      What I'm hearing is that there's a company that should be investigated for gross malfeasance and possible fraud. Indeed, it sounds as though doing so might well discourage other companies from applying for grants if they don't think they have a significant probability of actually succeeding in the task they're receiving the grant for.

      On the flip side, if it turns out that they never produced any syringes because the Biden Administration declared that the product would never be granted a medical use certificate, that would point at a need for an investigation elsewhere. And if so, we could try, I don't know, requesting that they return the funds.

      1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   2 months ago

        Through IRA funding, the Defense Department dolled out $250 million to 12 domestic critical mineral projects.

        "Jeff Luse is a deputy managing editor at Reason."

        Strong work, buddy!

        1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   2 months ago

          More government involvement and funding have not [...] fixed the regulatory issues that have shuttered domestic mining and processing for decades.

          Well, you see, there's only so much the Executive Branch has the legal authority to do here. Sounds like your real problem is with Congress.

  2. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   2 months ago

    Hey Jeff. Are you too ignorant to understand the amount of minerals the US has but has been protected by democrats through presidents and lawsuits (sue and settle)?

    It isn't about the government demanding mineral extraction but government stopping it from happening dumdum.

  3. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Kill the EPA, kill the DPA. Save the ATP.

  4. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    >Invoking the Defense Production Act won't boost the supply of critical minerals.

    You guys said Trump couldn't stop illegal immigration. You guys said Trump couldn't do a lot of things - yet he's doing a lot of what he says he's doing.

    I'd take a 'wait and see' approach if I were you.

  5. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    The odds are almost certainly 100% that the existing mineral supply chain was CREATED by the feds. So, yeah, maybe it can be fixed by the feds now.

  6. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

    The old Critical Materials stockpiling program was described in great detail every quarter in The Congressional Record. Besides metals it featured such wares as opium and duck feathers

    One measure of the incompetence of National Stockpile management was that its far-flung bureaucracy devoted one desk to curating niobium, and another to columbium.

  7. Your Therapist   2 months ago

    Trump also thinks his turds are as precious as gold bullion.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Living in your head, is he?

      1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

        There’s certainly enough room in there.

  8. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Trump Thinks the Feds Can Fix America's Critical Mineral Supply Chain'

    Well, given that the lack of a US-friendly supply chain, especially from a domestic mining industry, was orchestrated by the feds, Trump might be on to something.

  9. damikesc   2 months ago

    The Feds have ruined it. Trump is going to, hopefully, reduce that.

  10. AT   2 months ago

    You neglected the fact that we're about to buy Greenland. And that Canada is going to resign to becoming Gay North Dakota.

  11. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    Trump think the feds can have a National Defense dept???
    OMG! Communism!!! /s

    True ... but at least it's US Constitutional granted 'communism'.

  12. JEP41   2 months ago

    I agree that giving more power to the federal government to attempt to increase the supply of critical minerals will do little or nothing to increase the supply of those minerals or lower their cost. To the extent there is anything the federal government can do, I believe it would be to insure that the government itself is not part of the problem (directly or indirectly) - something governments seem extremely reluctant to do.

    I also agree we need more of those critical minerals, Especially the rare-earth elements, which are needed for much more than defense: rare earth elements are bcoming increasingly important to the economy, of the U.S. and the world. For example: rare earth elements are critical to electric vehicles.

    Two of the top five countries with the largest reserves of rare earth elements are China (1) and Russia (5). The U.S. is seventh.

    Ironically, although I have seen no sign that he's aware of the bigger picture, Trump may be on to something when he advocates making a deal with Ukraine to supply rare eatch elements to the U.S. for a good price. Some of the savings from such a deal can help make up for the aid provided to Ukraine - while also giving the U.S. a strategic interest in Ukraine.

    1. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

      Only rare eatch elements can save us from the coming refrigerator magnet crisis in

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!