Forget Woke Snow White. Disney's Remake Is More Like Socialist Snow White.
The long-delayed remake is a flat, limp, relentlessly boring film, strung along by bland, uninspiring songs.

If you've heard anything about Disney's new live-action Snow White remake, it's probably that it's woke, that star Rachel Zegler is a "DEI princess," and that the movie caters to cringe left identitarianism. The long-in-the-works movie, most of which was shot in 2022, has been embroiled in online controversy for years, and most of the complaints were made by people who hadn't seen the movie.
But I have. And the movie is indeed a trainwreck. The problem isn't that it's woke. It's that it's awful—and lamely, bluntly socialist.
The remake's big idea was to twist the idea of the word "fair." See, in earlier versions of Snow White, an evil queen asks a magic mirror, "Who is the fairest of them all?" It's always the queen, until one day the mirror responds that it's actually her stepdaughter, the Princess Snow White. The question, "who is the fairest," in other words, has always been a question about beauty. But in the remake, there's something else going on. The movie goes to great lengths to demonstrate that the queen isn't fair because she's not a socialist. I am not kidding.
The film doesn't quite use that word. But early in the film, Snow White encounters a handsome thief named Jonathan in the castle. Jonathan is the leader of a group of bandits who live in the woods and survive by stealing food. He feels justified in stealing because he and other ordinary people have very little while the queen has a lot and she won't share.
This isn't just a generic lesson in being kind. Later, after Snow White takes up with seven computer-animated dwarfs in the forest, one of the dwarfs explains that the bandits in the woods are "only there because of the queen's greedy economic policies, which forced them there into a liminal space where ethics are harder to define." This might not be a precise word-for-word quote—the line gets spat out so fast I am not certain I transcribed it exactly right—but it's pretty close. This is a movie about how stealing is justified because of the evil queen's economic policies. She's not fair, you see, because her privilege and selfishness have impoverished ordinary people. It's Snow White by way of Occupy Wall Street.
Jonathan and Snow White continue to flirt through a song called "Princess Problems," which is mostly about how Snow White needs to understand her own privilege. Sure, she might have lost both her parents and has been essentially turned into a maid by her evil stepmother. But she's literally a princess who lives in a castle. Wow, elite. I was almost surprised when there wasn't a couplet about intersectionality—but in fairness, it's difficult to rhyme.
That song also nods to the queen's evil worldview. She's "poisoned all of us into believing it's everyone for themselves." The entire movie is like this, as if the screenplay was given a write-through by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.). It's less a magical fairy tale than a cloying, clunky disquisition against Ayn Rand.
Reader, I shrugged.
I am not against political ideas and metaphors in films, even political ideas I strongly disagree with, so long as the movie in question is entertaining, interesting, clever, or amusing in some way.
But Disney's Snow White remake is none of those things. Politics aside, it's a flat, limp, relentlessly boring film, strung along by bland, uninspiring songs. The production budget reportedly soared past $250 million, yet somehow the film manages to look very cheap. The sets look like cardboard stands painted for a community theater play—or, when filled out by animation, like video game levels where you're supposed to roam around performing fetch quests. The computer-animated dwarfs have been awkwardly rendered to look like three-dimensional, not-quite-lifelike versions of the characters in the 1937 cartoon; their creepy figures plumb the depths of the uncanny valley.
The whole movie looks fake and ugly. In some ways, that's the remake's greatest betrayal of its source material. Disney's 1937 animated Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs remains a beloved classic nearly a century after its release, partly because it was a technical marvel and partly because it was flat-out gorgeous—each frame beautifully animated, every visual detail lovingly attended to.
But there's no love or beauty in this limp, desperate remake—nothing to admire or appreciate. No matter how you define it, it's not the fairest of them all.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The lead actress doesn't even identify as white. I am offended by the obvious cultural appropriation yet again by Disney. Will they ever get it right?
She. Was. Born. When. It. Was. Snowing.
This is what Disney went with.
Rand was born, when it was snowing.
No wonder she looks like Grumpy in the remake.
Rachel Zegler needs to jump in a porn contract ASAP. This massive bomb will finish off her mainstream career.
Might be for the best if they can keep her mouth too full to obliterate a product.
lol
Zeglar is white enough, she's half Polish. This is the second bomb she's involved with. I think her only chance left is to star in The AOC Story but only if it's done by someone like Tex Avery.
Of course. You'll notice when these woke entertainment corps race swap, they kind only go halfway.
No, she could also star in the porn version of the AOC story.
She'd have to get implants.
Dental implants?
Horse teeth implants are now available? Wouldn’t want to be saddled with that bill given it would be challenging to pony up the money.
Ass implants.
Saw a clip from behind of AOC walking onstage (in AZ I think). She ain’t big booty in a kinda sexy way no more. She just fat.
Shame. She’ll have a hard time transitioning back into bartending with an ass so large it barely fits behind the bar.
>>Tex Avery.
I didn't miss this reference.
Yeah, she is basically Temu AOC
I don't know if I would want to see that. She would have to be the girl boss telling the guy/girl/dog what to do.
People can overlook that. It's when she opens her mouth - insults half the country, insults Disney, whines, insults co-stars.
People said she actually sing the crappy songs well. It's the message and movie that is horrible.
Woke / Socialist / Cultural Marxist - take your pick.
The idea that there is not a lot of overlap between between "woke" and "socialist" means that you have not been paying attention.
Yes. The socialists use "woke" nonsense to try to destroy the very idea of private property.
Are we sure Hollywood hasn’t perfected socialism? After all, they make bomb after bomb, and never go out of business.
Sounds terrible, but do they ever explore how the Queen's "economic" policies are the result of her monopoly of state violence, over taxation and lavish spending on her court bureaucrats? Probably not.
She's a fucking monarch, not a capitalist - for all the dumbass socialists.
Head of State getting rich off her position. They do not object to the corruption, just not getting their cut.
She could avoid this criticism by increasing taxes on her subjects and giving grants to well connected aristocrats with recently formed NGOS. Once their mortgages are paid off and their retirement is fully funded they could return a percentage of the cash to the subjects. After ongoing administrative expenses are accounted for of course. It's called democratic socialism and that should satisfy the screen writers.
Remember, these are the people think that it's fascist to cut government and make it smaller and less intrusive.
Apparently the original seven wokesters was actually an anit givernment Robin hood like group. They did snow white as Robinhood girl power mash up.
It would have been closer to the original if they hired seven real dwarves to gangbang Zegler on film.
They get Robinhood wrong too.
agitprop in a kids cartoon remake how wasteful.
And they thought this would attract movie audiences, who go to movies to be entertained?
I guess I'm not ready to go to modern movies. I had to look up "liminal".
Let's help him out here.
Intersexuality?
Innersexuality?
Limber sexuality? Oh, yeah, now we're cooking with gas!
Cult of personality
Cooking with gas??!!
Climate destroyer!
He should put that phrase on the back burner.
Potential actuality?
Wow, elite. I was almost surprised when there wasn't a couplet about intersectionality—but in fairness, it's difficult to rhyme.
Isn't intersectionality...woke?
Suderman also tries to portray the anti-woke being ridiculous when he claims they haven't seen it, but of course the star has been running around the world proclaiming it for years. So you have to wonder why his focus is attacking the anti-woke for criticism which largely doesn't exist for something he admits the movie includes after all.
The answer points to what is wrong with so many Reason articles. They understand the left controls our institutions, but rather than oppose them forthrightly he believes he can persuade them. But to do so he has to show he's part of the in-group. These illogical attacks on the right are performative markers akin to what the token NYT conservative columnist has to include because otherwise leftists simply ignore them.
Yes and. It's partly their desire to be part of the in-crowd, which is about as unlibertarian as it gets. But it's also the need to only chastise Democrats if you can follow up with, "But Republicans did it too!"
At some point the few remaining libertarians are going to have to accept that while L's and R's don't overlap enough, they do overlap. While L's and modern D's are more like repelling magnetic poles. If one party is actively working against you while the other is partly in your camp, maybe you should focus your fire accordingly.
Knowing the retarded socialist slant makes all of the other decisions make a lot more sense.
I’m convinced they’ve known this was going to be shit for a while and decided to just use the loss for tax purposes.
Then they should have permanently shelved it. Much bigger tax break.
Forget Woke Snow White. Disney's Remake Is More Like Socialist Snow White.
This is that moment where I wonder if Reason writers like Suderman really have just been sitting on the sidelines or they have some general sympathy or adjacency with woke.
poisoned all of us into believing it's everyone for themselves.
Certainly human beings never entered into mutual welfare agreements before the modern state came down with the iron fist of fairness.
*Meeeow!* Suderman. You need to review more bad movies - this is the most effort I've seen you put in;)
This is Suderman complaining about masks while wearing a mask so it doesn't make him look like a Republican.
Perfect.
Once the creepy socialists co-opt an institution it is lost forever. See: the dark cloud known as The Black Thing in "A Wrinkle in Time" by Madeleine L'Engle.
Once the creepy socialists co-opt an institution it is lost forever.
See: Reason.
*projectile vomits into Mickey Mouse ears hat
Is this going to be one of those 94% Rotten Tomatoes critics score with a 14% User Score? Sounds too shitty to even pull that one off.
Wouldn’t surprise me.
It’s sitting at like 45% critic score on RT. Which means they really don’t like it, but they got paid enough to not shit on it.
I really hope it ends up being a record bomb for Disney.
Update; it’s turning into a huge bomb for Disney, it isn’t even going to crack $100 million worldwide for it’s opening weekend.
Most of us in the antiwoke brigade don't make distinction between socialism and woke. Youtuber Nerdrotic famously derided the latest Antman movie as "Antman Commiemania" for for its socialist overtones.
Socialism is the denial of an individual to uplift the community / state. Wokism is a branch of this ideology that specializes or racial or gender identity. If everyone in this movie was properly cast, it would still be plenty woke, because they mangled a classic fairy tale to promote socialism.
"Woke" is a fairly nebulous term. But as I interpret it, I don't think all socialism is necessarily woke. I think "woke" refers more to the racial and sexual identity based strains of socialism/collectivism. Woke may be socialism, but socialism isn't only woke.
"..."woke" refers more to the racial and sexual identity based strains of socialism/collectivism."
Hmm, where have I heard of racial socialism before? Could it be... in the 1930's... in Germany?
I guess everything old is new again.
Socialism sucks, no matter what flavor it is.
It's not that they don't make a distinction but that the things they were criticizing are different from the plot.
The decisions to race swap SW and initially get rid of the dwarves were woke concerns. The girl power to slant RZ was putting out as the new story is a woke staple. You didn't need to see the movie to criticize those visible decisions.
That the plot is explicitly socialist is entirely separate though often co-located.
The first Snow White helped Disney become a major company. It would be poetic if the remake was the final nail in the coffin.
At least they had the decency to put Snow White in a yellow dress.
The Little Spermaid was more crony-socialist given all the stimulus packages tossed around.
At least it could swim upstream.
This film was shat on for years.
At what point would it make more sense to kill it and eat the loss instead of spending tons of cash in making a total bomb?
Peter, you're supposedly a free market guy!
Why would you spend money on this? I mean, thanks for the article, but I feel like we all owe you a refund.
The sets look like cardboard stands painted for a community theater play
Bruh, what do you think leftists are. They're all theater kid failures and rejects. Cardboard stands and CGI fakery is the ONLY WAY they see the world.
"Jonathan is the leader of a group of bandits who live in the woods and survive by stealing food."
So we're talking a mashup of Snow White with Robin Hood?
With a little ‘Communist Manifesto’ liberally peppered in.
So to be fair, this suppoed to be set in fairy tale medieval times, and its highly unlikely a queen back then was anything but a tyrant. You're arguing its a socialist message, but in the sense of some absolutitist Monarch, it seems like a stretch to compare the economic condtions to "well the queen is rich and they are taking her stuff"
The movie might be terrible, but this point seems particulalry sus
Except Snow White is also a spoil person that doesn't have any solutions. Only has a socialist message. The people are 'opposed' because they don't have anything sweet to eat. She wants to solve it by baking Apple Pies. That everything should be shared equally.
Snow White is the fairest of them all because of her economic polices not her looks (I s*** you not)
The guards don't kill her when the Queen orders because she remembers their names.
Yes, the Queen wants power but also has an army to protect the country.
But basically it comes down to, girl boss has to rule. Queen bad because has stuff. If you get old don't fight it and give up.
I don't even want to think about what an Ayn Rand version of Snow White would be like. Brrrr. Let me guess -- Snow White is an architect who is symbolically trapped and dead (the glass coffin) because the plebes won't acknowledge her greatness and also insist on snickering about her and the dwarfs, who are really sex workers and grow peyote in their cottage. Hi ho, get it?
Sounds like ENB’s screenplay.
Why even bother remaking it? Why not just make the same movie, but its not called snow white, then you can get all the virtue signaling you want and not annoy people with fond movies of the cartoon? Dont we have tons of more PC movies now anyway? Moana etc. with lots of diverse characters fighting for various social causes? Why the need to turn some ancient cartoon into one of them?
$$$...or so they thought.
Look up Critical Drinker on Youtube. He destroys this movie (as well as other hollywood movies)