Trump Pledged To Support Tesla. His Trade Policies Will Do the Opposite.
Tariffs on steel and aluminum imports inflate the cost of electric vehicles.

After experiencing a drop in sales and its worst day on the stock market in five years on Tuesday, Tesla received a ringing endorsement from President Donald Trump, who took to Truth Social to pledge his "support for Elon Musk," promising to buy "a brand new Tesla."
Trump followed up this announcement by implementing a global 25 percent tariff on steel and aluminum imports on Wednesday. While the president's social media posts may be pro-Tesla, his trade policies are not.
In an unsigned letter to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Tesla said Trump's trade war would have "disproportionate impacts" on the manufacturer's business. The Model Y, for instance, weighs almost 4,400 pounds and is composed largely of steel and aluminum. The Cybertruck, meanwhile, relies on Finnish suppliers for its exterior stainless steel panels.
The U.S. is the second-largest steel importer in the world and sources most of its aluminum from overseas. The latest move in the Trump trade war "will add significant costs for automakers, suppliers and consumers," the American Automotive Policy Council told CBS News. In February, Citi Bank warned a 25 percent tariff could increase steel prices by $100 to $150 per short ton. Aluminum producers say these fees will "nearly immediately" result in higher costs for everything from cars to beer cans.
The 25 percent tariffs on most Canadian and Mexican goods, which are paused but set to resume on April 2, will inflate vehicle prices even further.
Car manufacturing is a globalized industry and relies on inputs from numerous countries, especially Mexico and Canada, which are America's top trading partners for automobiles, explain Scott Lincicome and Alfredo Carrillo Obregon of the Cato Institute. In 2023, the two countries accounted for 47 percent of U.S. motor vehicle imports and 54 percent of imported motor vehicle bodies and parts. Nearly half of the cars imported from Mexico were made by the Big Three Detroit manufacturers—Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis. Roughly 45 percent and 75 percent of America's exports of cars and motor vehicle bodies and parts went to these countries, respectively.
For Tesla, the tariffs set to go live next month will increase costs throughout its supply chain. A Model Y is composed of 70 percent American and Canadian products and 20 percent Mexican products. (The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does not distinguish between American and Canadian components because manufacturing is so interwoven.) The Model 3 is 75 percent American/Canadian and 25 percent Mexican.
Of course, Tesla isn't the only car company that will be impacted by these tariffs.
The Mustang Mach-E—Ford's midsize electric vehicle—is 13 percent American/Canadian and 78 percent Mexican. Ford's gas-powered vehicles, including the F-150—which gets 45 percent of its components from the U.S. and Canada and its 3.5-liter engine from Mexico—and the Ford Bronco Sport (65 percent Mexican and 23 percent American/Canadian) could also see production costs increase.
The first Trump administration's tariffs on steel and aluminum increased input costs and decreased production in the automotive industry. A 2019 report from the Center for Automotive Research estimated that tariffs on Mexico and Canada alone cost light-duty car manufacturers $500 million per year (in 2019 dollars).
The tariffs of the second Trump administration appear to be just as damaging. On Wednesday, S&P Global Mobility projected there to be a 50 percent chance that the auto industry would experience extended disruption, reports the Detroit Free Press. The firm says North American production could decline by as much as 20,000 vehicles per day within the next week.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Trump Pledged To Support Tesla. His Trade Policies Will Do the Opposite.
*scratches head*
So does this mean Trump is corrupt or not corrupt?
You didn't complain when Biden continued Trump's tariffs, so that makes it ok.
You're like Smeagol/Gollum constantly muttering to himself about how he hates the Baggins.
Sarc and SQRLSY are ina. Race to se echo can become a complete shit eating freak. Historically, SQRLSY has helped the lead, but now Sarc is catching up.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,
Somebody needs to being a lawsuit pointing out how blatantly unconstitutional the law allowing a President to impose tariffs without Congressional approval is.
Here we go again. Everyone who can think for themselves knows how clumsy tariffs are, both on their own and as weapons in trade wars.
Not a single mention of how they grow government coffers. Not a single mention of how they increase collectivism and decrease individualism.
Isn't this supposed to be a libertarian website?
So how would you get our trade partners to lower trade barriers? Or get a Canada and Mexico to behave better?
A. I wouldn't. Their tariffs are their business.
B. Natural trade would. They can't sell us stuff unless they accept dollars in trade. The only use of those dollars is to buy US stuff. The more they want to sell us, the more they have to buy from us. If they don't want to buy from us, they can't sell to us.
It isn't for the US to force Canada and Mexico to stop impoverishing its citizens with high tariffs.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does not distinguish between American and Canadian components because manufacturing is so interwoven.
Another one a long line of useless statistics.
The auto manufacturer knows, why don't these chucklefucks?
It’s so confusing!
Because there was a free trade agreement for the auto industry way back the 1960s. The manufacturers haven't even thought abouth this for decades. Basically Trump has declared all out war on a major US industry and no Republican is objecting.
> Trump Pledged To Support Tesla.
Meaning moar subsidies to the subsidy king, King Elon. Holy shit, a new fleet of Tesla trucks for the military! They're not draining the swamp, they're dumping sewage into it!
Cite?
Didn't you fall for the last narrative for when Biden ordered cyber trucks but claimed Trump? Didn't learn i guess.
You’re one of the gullible fools who swallows all that garbage about Trump cutting veterans vpbenefits.
(Checking notes)...
I could have sworn the collective narrative is that everything Trump is doing is to make his billionaire friends richer, yet this article states the opposite.
I am confused, which is it today?
The clown world is getting really bad at Reason. It's like you're not even trying to keep up a coherent narrative anymore. It's all just, "How can we torture reality to make Trump seem evil and/or dumb."
And this tariffs angle has you really twisted into pretzels, because for some weird reason you're super reflexively against it, but you never make any argument other than "it'll make things more expensive." Like, ever. Which is highly suggestive that it's as I said above - just a torturing of reality for the sake of being anti-Trump. (Though, it could also be your Marxist tendencies at work, because Marxists REFUSE to ever consider anything outside of the paradigm of preserving/stagnating the existing status quo.)
I mean, look - you can do both. I've always been highly critical of Trump (though, admittedly, Trump 2.0 so far has given us a lot less to complain about than Trump 1.0 or Beta Trump). But when I consider what he's doing, I always ask myself: Am I against this because it's wrong, or am I against this because it's Trump? And if it's the latter, I reconsider my position.
Reason, otoh, like most leftists have taken this weird short-circuit of just equating the two things. And as such, it makes all your articles nonsensical. And, frankly, come off like weepy hysterics. You lost the election. Just get over it already and accept the results.
Trump's trade policies - debate them if you want - but to try and pretend that they're "anti-Tesla" (or anti-EV in general) is nonsense. Pretending that it's a betrayal of his "pledge to support" is similarly nonsense. I know it, you know it, Elan knows it.
But you persist with the lie anyway. Why? What is it about that Orange Bad Man that seems to force you people into this constant state of deception and falsity?