Government Goons Destroy Tree House
The owner of a beloved neighborhood structure spent years—and thousands of dollars—trying to comply with L.A. bureaucrats’ demands.

A Los Angeles homeowner has conceded defeat in his fight against the city to keep a tree house on his property. After seven years and more than $50,000 spent on legal fees and permits, the battle ended this weekend with a demolition crew.
The tree house, which was built and owned by The Simpsons producer Rick Polizzi, was a staple of the Sherman Oaks neighborhood for 24 years. The structure was three stories tall and inspired by the show's "Treehouse of Horror" episodes. Originally built for his daughters, it eventually evolved into a centerpiece for a family-friendly, light-up Halloween display called Boney Island open to the community.
In 2017, a neighbor complained about the large crowds of children accumulating during the 10-day Halloween event. The city shut down the Boney Island attraction—which Polizzi later revived and turned into a fundraiser at the Los Angeles County Natural History Museum—and cited Polizzi for the tree house's permit violations. Since the tree house was built around the three sweet gum trees in his front yard and couldn't be moved, Polizzi began applying for the necessary permits to keep it for all to enjoy.
Bringing the tree house into compliance was no simple task. Polizzi tells Reason that while he had secured the necessary zoning permit for the tree house—a feat in and of itself—he'd been unable to obtain a building permit from the L.A. Department of Building and Safety (LADBS). While one would think it'd make sense to permit the structure as a tree house or play structure, Polizzi says that the LADBS took a strict stance, ruling that the roughly 120-square-foot tree house instead had to meet the arduous requirements for an accessory dwelling unit (ADU).
Los Angeles defines an ADU as "an attached or detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities" and must include "permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation." Securing these building permits requires "soil reports, structural designs, Americans With Disabilities Act compliance, and all this stuff that is just kind of absurd" for an existing treehouse that has stood for 25 years with no safety incidences, Paige Gosney, Polizzi's attorney, told The Los Angeles Times. According to Polizzi, meeting the ADU demands would've cost another $50,000 to $80,000 on top of what he had already spent. "It's felt like a strong-arm tactic meant to get me to buckle."
Despite ongoing good faith efforts to comply with the city's regulations, Polizzi was criminally charged with four misdemeanors by the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office in 2020 for the tree house's noncompliance. Unable to move forward with renovations, he applied for a permit waiver in April 2024 but never heard back from the city.
Stuck in limbo without an accepted or denied waiver, Polizzi's last hope was for the misdemeanor charges to be dropped. However, with a fast-approaching trial date and an unrelenting city attorney threatening to force Polizzi to pay court costs and legal fees, he could no longer justify the increasing costs of fighting to keep the tree house—even with the 6,000 neighbors rallying in support. Polizzi ultimately decided to pay to have the tree house taken down on March 9 and "stop the bleeding."
"It's been up 24 years, never had an incident once. So, it's just sad," Polizzi said during an interview with NBCLA hours before the demolition crew arrived. "It's a shame that a city built on creativity can't make some concessions."
Polizzi tells Reason that since the tree house was taken down, he's gotten a lot of media attention. "I didn't want all this attention," he says, "I just wanted to keep the tree house I built for my daughters. But I guess this has really struck a nerve with people about government overreach." Once this chapter is finally closed, Polizzi says he plans to leave California and may even take Boney Island with him. "I want nothing to do with this city anymore."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And wherever he moves, he'll vote in the same type of oppressive government and teach his daughters to do the same
It's guaranteed, since he conflates society with government.
A better version would be
"soil reports, structural designs, Americans With Disabilities Act compliance, and all this stuff that is just kind of absurd" for an existing treehouse that has stood for 25 years with no safety incidences, Paige Gosney, Polizzi's attorney, told The Los Angeles Times. According to Polizzi, meeting the ADU demands would've cost another $50,000 to $80,000 on top of what he had already spent. "It's felt like a strong-arm tactic meant to get me to buckle."
Do I have to go to Polizzi's twitter to find out how he generally votes in California elections?
Prolly against Twitler and Musk, the way his grandpappy voted against Bert Hoover and Harry Anslinger. But tell me, Two-Dogs-Fucking, why do you ask these questions?
Oh, I meant to congratulate you on your court victory against Sall Grover.
Shame on Reason for complaining about a Democrat being "wronged." He deserves it because of who he voted for.
If he was a Republican and a Trump supporter then this would be an outrageous injustice. But he's not, so it's not.
Shame on you for swallowing the codswallop that "city" and "society" are equivalent, and for not understanding that he got exactly the out of control government he's been voting for.
Except that's not what I said, Jesse Jr.
My point is that you Trump defenders judge right and wrong based upon who, not what. You would have been outraged if he had a MAGA flag waving over the treehouse. Then this would have been an injustice of the highest order. But because he's not a Trump supporter you celebrate what happened. You have no principles whatsoever. None. Which is par for the course where Trump defenders are concerned.
because he's not a Trump supporter you celebrate what happened.
Saying "Well he pretty much got what he voted for." is not celebrating it.
True facts. Long before Orango-geezer interviewed McArdle, the Original Blond Aryan Hitler interviewed Leni Riefenstahl, who filmed "Victory of Faith" staring der Fuhrer hissef! Thousands of Bund and Klan marches Stateside, and Workers' Partei goosesteppings for Jesus later, Leni got to film the YUGE "Triumph of the Will" extravaganza. "It was, like, this glorious miracle, where the stars all lined up," Leni told excited fans, as the Faithful lined up at the box office for an encore.
"It's a shame that a city built on creativity can't make some concessions."
...said Polizzi, waking up from his 24 year long nap.
You (the 'voters' of LA city and county) have exactly what you voted for the last 40 or so years. Given that I escaped the summer of '22, I got nothing for you.
Maybe, just maybe there is a snowballs chance in hell to correct the absolutely destroyed political system in that state. My money is on NO.
Let it burn.
Let it burn.
And eventually, it literally burns. I don't know anything about Polizzi's voting habits, but if he's in L.A. entertainment, there's probably around a 90% chance that he literally voted for the pan-bureaucratic regime that's hammering him now.
It's unfortunate but it takes directly getting smacked in the forehead with the 2x4 of consequences. In Polizzi's type of case, those are too rare and too individualized to cause any mass change- and often seen as one-offs. But when say, an easily managed wildfire races through an entire section of the city and wipes out thousands of houses...that has a tendency to open some eyes.
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
>>In 2017, a neighbor complained about the large crowds of children accumulating during the 10-day Halloween event.
I thought witches wanted kids around to eat them.
There's always a Karen.
The LA Building inspector also ruled the tree lacked the structural integrity nexessary to string up the City Council an LADBS staff from its limbs. But I hear Polizzi is now looking at donating the structure to the Homeless Community encircling LA City Hall for use as a public outhouse.
"Government Goons Destroy Tree House."
Another sterling example of petty bureaucrats in a nanny state trying to be relevant.
AM I NOT MERCIFUL?!?!
- Love, the Benevolent State
Is it really his tree house?
Nope. He rents his property from the local government. If he fails to pay his rent they can take the whole thing. If he modifies or adds anything without their permission they will make him destroy it. And that's how it is everywhere in the country.
In 2017, a neighbor complained
yeah but it is the cities fault
They ignored it for 17 years
Yes, it's the city's fault because the city passed a stupid law and is enforcing it maliciously. Yes, the neighbor is also a jerk but city enforcement officials ignore unhappy neighbors all the time when it suits them.
Too late now, but maybe he should have tried having it declared a historical monument? One branch of intractable law might have blocked another branch of untraceable law.
What a whiny cunt.
All he had to do was build a three-story wheelchair ramp, install a wood stove and an aerial sewage drain. And maybe......maybe, put in a day spa for city inspectors.
Meanwhile, swaths of property in LA that met code are lying in heaps of ash.