Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Baby

The Government Named This Baby 'Unakite Thirteen Hotel.' Years Later, Her Father Still Can't Change It.

He also can't get a birth certificate or Social Security number for his daughter.

Emma Camp | 2.28.2025 12:40 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Baby social security card | Illustration: Lex Villena; Alexander Oganezov,  BrightonGranny | Dreamstime.com
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Alexander Oganezov, BrightonGranny | Dreamstime.com)

A Nebraska man is struggling to get a birth certificate and Social Security number for his toddler daughter after a bureaucratic mishap left her with the nonsensical name "Unakite Thirteen Hotel" in medical records.

The girl's mother—who had struggled with drug problems, according to an NBC News story about the case—had relinquished her to the state immediately after she was born at a house in Iowa in November 2022. When the girl was handed over to foster parents, she was issued a "certificate of live birth," a provisional document that hospitals use to start the process of issuing a birth certificate. Bizarrely, the girl was given a computer-generated placeholder name: "Unakite Thirteen Hotel."

When 49-year-old Jason Kilburn—who says he had dated the girl's mother periodically over several years—learned about the baby, he took a DNA test that proved he was her biological father. When he gained custody of the girl, whom he named "Caroline Elizabeth," he learned that she didn't have a birth certificate or a Social Security number. When he called the hospital that issued Caroline's certificate of live birth, he says he received little guidance on how to get government documents for his daughter. 

A convoluted bureaucratic nightmare followed. According to NBC, The Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services filed a motion in juvenile court asking for an order allowing the agency "to establish a legal name for the above-named minor child as Unakite Thirteen Hotel," so they could use Caroline's computer-generated name to get a birth certificate and Social Security number.

Kilburn says he received a birth certificate with the incorrect name, but it said "for government use only." Plus, the agency never issued Caroline a Social Security number. When Kilburn's lawyer filed a motion attempting to re-open the issue, the court denied it. As a result, Kilburn hasn't been able to get Medicaid or other government benefits for his daughter. Kilburn told NBC that a recent check-up for Caroline cost him $700.

"Three or four weeks ago, she was sick. She had a fever and she was throwing up, and I had to weigh my options about what I was going to do," he said. "It really sucks to sit here and watch her suffer when there's health care out there that I can't get because of this."

"It's like she's a ghost," he told NBC. "It's been very, very taxing."

Unfortunately, Kilburn isn't the only parent who has struggled to get their child basic government paperwork after an unusual birth. In 2022, a Washington, D.C., couple chose to have an unassisted home birth and, years later, were still struggling to obtain a birth certificate for their son after the city denied their application.

"It feels like I am an absentee father even though I am here," the boy's father told The Washington Post. "I can't physically show that my son belongs to me because I have no document. And I might now have to go to court to prove my fathership to my child. And I have been here since day one. I haven't left."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: NATO Could Effectively Die This June

Emma Camp was an associate editor at Reason.

BabySocial SecurityBig GovernmentGovernmentChildrenChildren's RightsMedicaidNebraska
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (28)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Eeyore   10 months ago

    DOGE couldn't cut deep enough at the SSA if they tried.

    Also a reminder that city governments suck. Local doesn't make it better - it just makes it suck for fewer people.

    1. Rossami   10 months ago

      re: "Local doesn't make it better ..."

      That is very well put. Thank you.

      1. TJJ2000   10 months ago

        "Local doesn't make it better"
        First; Medicaid and SS isn't Local.
        Second; Maybe taking others $ isn't suppose to be easy.

        1. CE   10 months ago

          Just call her Eunice for short.

    2. MollyGodiva   10 months ago

      This mess up with with Nebraska state officals. Cutting SSA staff would make it even harder to resolve these types of errors.

      I think he should keep the name. Unakite is a mineral that is said to have spiritual properties.

      1. Eeyore   10 months ago

        I like the first name personally. The middle and last name not so much.

        1. mad.casual   10 months ago

          I was actually the other way. Like she's 1st platoon 3rd member of H company on the battlefield.

          Unakite: Quit ruining my life... Jason!
          Jason: Young lady, I am your father and in this house you will refer to me as Hotel Six Actual!

          1. Eeyore   10 months ago

            Lol

        2. JohnZ   10 months ago

          Ahmed, Dweezel and Moon Zappa.

          1. Wizard4169   10 months ago

            What about Diva?

  2. Uncle Jay   10 months ago

    "He also can't get a birth certificate or Social Security number for his daughter."

    "We're from the government, and we're here to fuck you."

  3. AT   10 months ago

    As a result, Kilburn hasn't been able to get Medicaid or other government benefits for his daughter. Kilburn told NBC that a recent check-up for Caroline cost him $700.

    Emma Camp everyone. A weird story about some bureaucratic goofiness, ultimately just a pretext lamenting the fact that someone can't get Big Government handouts.

    Marxistarian.

    1. TJJ2000   10 months ago

      ^THIS. +100000000
      "pretext lamenting the fact that someone can't get Big Government handouts. "

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   10 months ago

      Wait til the kid tries to get that sweet FAFSA cash.

    3. Zeb   10 months ago

      To be fair, a checkup for a baby wouldn't cost $700 without a lot of government fuckery in the medical and insurance markets.

  4. Rick James   10 months ago

    Is this an institution we want to preserve or one we want to delete? This Glibertarian would like to know!

  5. Rick James   10 months ago

    "to establish a legal name for the above-named minor child as Unakite Thirteen Hotel," so they could use Caroline's computer-generated name to get a birth certificate and Social Security number.

    Is this the kind of AI technology we celebrate or the kind that makes us groan? This Glibertarian would like to know!

    1. mad.casual   10 months ago

      Just name the next kid - Jennifer');delete from table live_births where firstname like 'Unak%';

      If that doesn't work, name the next kid after that "This Social Security Card belongs to Unakite Thirteen Hotel".

      All with purely business-transactional surrogates of course.

  6. TJJ2000   10 months ago

    "recent check-up for Caroline cost him $700"

    That's just because you had to pay for everyone else's regulatory wish-list and visits (which you also seem to want the free pony ride).

    And that is EXACTLY why socialism fails every-time. Governments 'armed' theft / demand is always a net negative to prosperity. At the end of the socialist tracks is nothing but 'Guns' (politics) fighting over the last twinkie as-is so well on display in today's political atmosphere.

    You can 'Gun' demand all you want. Your 'Guns' aren't going to make sh*t for you and sooner or later there is nothing left but DEATH over the last twinkie.

    1. TJJ2000   10 months ago

      Ironically... Government is suppose to defend you (ensure Liberty & Justice) against such *greedy* 'Gun' Demands not be the very tool that commits those crimes. In every way Socialism is all about turning Government criminal against you.

      1. CE   10 months ago

        Government is to supposed to take your money twice a month, just in case someone takes some of your money once every few years.

    2. Eeyore   10 months ago

      I'm still waiting for my free pony.

  7. TangoDelta   10 months ago

    Not having a SSN isn't a deal breaker and it is optional after all. Sure, dad doesn't get a dependent deduction for the kid, yes it will be harder to get a bank account but the kid won't have to pay into So-so Security either so that's a potentially huge win. Doubly so if self employed since that's an extra 12.4% of her own income that she'll get to keep.

  8. JohnZ   10 months ago

    Your friendly government (unelected bureaucrats) in action. After all ,they know what's best for you and your family.

  9. CE   10 months ago

    On the plus side, she'll be easy to find on social media and in Google searches.

  10. I am not paying for your stinkin' subscription   10 months ago

    There's lots of stories about kids whose parents were too dumb, too crazy (not even kidding insane), or too anarchist to get a Social security card. One of my neighbors had to get a special court ruling to get one so be could get banking, driver's licenses, all the stuff you need. It's a mess when they can't even get it while she's a child.

  11. diver64   10 months ago

    I don't get this. If he has an official government birth certificate then why can't he apply to the SS himself and get the number? The certificate has "official government use only" stamped on it but isn't the SSA a government department? Then, after getting the number he can officially change her name. Something is missing in this story.

    1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   10 months ago

      No, it's just buried in there under the fact that he was dumb enough to fuck the birth mother without protection.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Cool Down

Charles Oliver | 12.24.2025 4:00 AM

Why College Students Prefer Socialism—and Why They're Wrong

John Stossel | 12.24.2025 12:30 AM

Trump's Marijuana Order Vindicates Longstanding Criticism of the Plant's Legal Classification

Jacob Sullum | 12.24.2025 12:01 AM

Another New Mexico Cop Lauded for Nabbing Drunk Drivers Admits Taking Bribes To Let Them Off the Hook

Jacob Sullum | 12.23.2025 4:45 PM

The Data Center Price Myth

Marc Oestreich | 12.23.2025 4:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks