Germany's New Political Leaders Face Big Problems of Their Own Making
Regulations, taxes, bad energy policy, and a lack of entrepreneurial spirit hold the country back.

Economically troubled Germany just held elections and will soon have a new government. The conservative Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) is likely to create a coalition with the Social Democratic Party (SDP), which was the dominant force in the last coalition. A government formed by the country's two traditionally dominant parties is usually termed a "grand coalition," but the arrangement hardly rates that name now that support for the SDP has plummeted behind that for the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD). That leaves the country's future uncertain since Germany's troubles are largely the result of decisions made by the SDP and the CDU/CSU in past governments.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
The Collapse of a Coalition Leaves Limited Options
Germany's outgoing government was a "traffic light coalition" of the SDP (red), the classical liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP, yellow), and the Greens (green). It was an ideologically incoherent arrangement that presided over several years of economic doldrums, dithering over the response to the war in Ukraine, and terrible energy policies. It fell apart when the FDP had enough of fighting with its partners and withdrew from the coalition.
But the FDP—which with its market-oriented views is usually considered a natural partner for the CDU/CSU—was punished by voters. All the coalition participants lost support, but the FDP fell below the 5 percent threshold for participation in the Bundestag, the lower house of parliament. That left the CDU/CSU as the election's winner with 28.6 percent of the vote and a choice of forming a coalition with either the anti-immigration AfD, which too often flirts with the country's Nazi past and drew 20.8 percent, or parties to the left including the Left Party, the descendant of East Germany's totalitarian ruling regime, which pulled almost 9 percent of votes. Having ruled out the AfD—which is considered untouchable in German politics by everybody but, it seems, voters—that leaves the SDP, with 16.4 percent of the vote, as the only viable partner for cleaning up the country's mess.
Unfortunately, that mess was largely the handiwork of the two parties which will make up the new government.
Germany's Self-Inflicted Economic Woes
"A decade ago, Germany was the model nation," Bertrand Benoit wrote February 21 for The Wall Street Journal. "Today, Germany has gone from paragon to pariah. Its economic model is broken, its self-confidence shattered and its political landscape fractured."
Much of this has to do with the country's famous bureaucracy and crippling regulations. Last year, the International Monetary Fund called out the country's red tape as a major reason "Germany is struggling." Even The New York Times, not known for enthusiasm over limiting the reach of government, noted that "companies in Germany complain that the demands of bureaucracy are costing them time and money that would be better spent building their businesses." One executive told the paper that the German government regulates sharing business cards at meetings.
"This is not a country for entrepreneurs, and this has to do with costs, taxes, and bureaucracy," Johns Hopkins University political scientist Yascha Mounck wrote last week of his native Germany.
Germany's various governments have also long committed themselves to a policy of Energiewende, or energy transition, "moving away from nuclear and fossil fuels towards renewables and better energy efficiency," in the words of the country's Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action.
But the government has stubbornly adhered to that policy as conditions changed. It did so even as flows of natural gas from Russia on which the country's energy production heavily relied choked off after that country's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and subsequent tensions with the West. In 2023, Germany closed its last nuclear power plants, committing to a future powered by wind, solar—and a lot of coal when renewable sources turned out to be unreliable. That means much higher energy prices.
The result has been deindustrialization, as many companies leave the country. Two years ago, when the traffic light coalition was in full swing, Politico's Matthew Karnitschnig reported that "confronted by a toxic cocktail of high energy costs, worker shortages and reams of red tape, many of Germany's biggest companies—from giants like Volkswagen and Siemens to a host of lesser-known, smaller ones—are experiencing a rude awakening and scrambling for greener pastures in North America and Asia."
Overseeing all these policy choices have been the CDU/CSU and SDP, which have led every German government since the Second World War—sometimes together in "grand coalition" governments. To set Germany on a better course, leaders of the two parties will have to repudiate what they've done in the decades leading to this moment.
Weighed Down by Culture and Consensus
But it's not just political choices. As Mounck added in his commentary on Germany, "it's also cultural, because it's not that cool in Germany to be an entrepreneur. Society doesn't reward you. It doesn't reward failure. If you're in the EU and you want to set up a company, you go to Luxembourg or Belgium, as they are much more business friendly."
Mounck spoke with Wolfgang Münchau, a political analyst and author of the timely book, Kaput: The End of the German Miracle. Münchau described Germany as a "consensus society" where everything is done by compromise and mutual agreement.
"The trouble with consensus societies like Germany is that when the consensus is wrong, you don't have corrective forces," he told Mounck. He contrasted this with the United States where "correction shifts in politics almost happen unexpectedly" and political and economic entrepreneurs can challenge and potentially displace the status quo.
That's fascinating stuff. But it also poses a much bigger problem for Germany and its new coalition government than the bad policies of recent decades. It's one thing to admit that past governments were mistaken, repeal old laws, and try something different. It's quite another to challenge an entire country's cultural complacency and its discomfort with breaking away from a previous course and group mindset. How can that even be done?
Germany's new political leaders face some serious challenges in reviving what was once a vibrant and prosperous country. Prominent among those challenges is admitting that some of their past policies regarding regulation, taxes, and energy were terrible ideas. But they also must somehow breathe entrepreneurial spirit into a country that has too long been resistant to encouraging people to go their own way and take entrepreneurial risks.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wonder when Mohammed will be the most popular baby name in Germany?
In 2024 it ranked # 17 for boys names, ahead of Jakob, Maximillian, Karl, and Max.
https://nameberry.com/popular-names/germany
Johannes and Frederick are still the most popular?
I expect Adolf will be making a comeback.
Fascism has already made a comeback in Germany with all its repression of free speech.
I've read where Mohammed is the most popular name in Ireland some time ago.
Ireland!
I wonder what Saint Patrick would say?
Nothing about the near daily mass murders committed by the mostly peaceful immigrants?
That'll be for an article with such coverage, this one's about their economic problems.
The immigrants were brought in under the guise of improving the economy by relieving the labor shortage.
Doing the rapes Germans won't do.
Failure to mention [put hobby horse here] means someone supports/opposes [put strawman here] which makes them a dirty leftist.
And in doing so, Sarc, you posted a strawman on your favorite hobby horse. Good way to demonstrate it, dudette.
...
How, by agreeing with them that water is wet?
Is there a quota of inuendo you're required to fill in an otherwise good article?
Guilt by association [if only in writing]. I do wonder will the day come that things get bad enough that a plurality of Germans give the AfD a stake that cannot be ignored. I suppose that nullification option would then be exercised, you know, to "protect democracy" from a majority of voters.
Actual democracy, like most liberty, is just too dangerous. Can you imagine how terrible the world would be if people could do want they want, instead of following the directions of our noble elites?
Sure, just ask them [the noble elites]. They're going to protect the status quo no matter how much damage it causes.
It's going to have to fail with painful consequences before it gets any better.
"Flirt" doesn't mean "agree with wholeheartedly". It means waving to the hos in their short shorts and lacy bras, not marrying them.
Yes, the AfD flirts with Germany's Nazi past. Banning immigrants is a big part of the platform and appeal, and it certainly mattered to Nazis too. It doesn't make the AfD Nazis. It does explain part of why the other parties do their best to shun them, and that is part of this story.
Pretending there is nothing in common is no better than hiding under a blanket and pretending the monsters under the bed can't see you.
What does AFD have in common with Nazis?
So far, the only policy they support that I have heard or read being called "far right" was their stance on immigration.
Hey, anyone who opposes the far left is far right.
Yes, but those are two separate points. No, the AfD is not far right; and yes, they oppose unchecked immigration in the same manner as Nazis. But a whole lot of other organizations and people oppose unchecked immigration too.
Claiming that this flirtation makes them the same is like claiming that eating bread or drinking water makes them the same.
When was immigration a prominent Nazi issue?
Gee, I dunno, something about Lebensraum, ethnic cleansing, that whole Holocaust thing. Gosh, do you think they actually wanted millions of Muslim immigrants but were just too shy to ask?
Ein volk, ein Reich, ein Führer, you know, that kind of thing. But maybe that's not relevant. I could be wrong. I probably am. I bow to your superior wisdom.
See... this is what makes the US such an exceptional nation. What you are ascribing to the Nazis could be considered a cultural conservatism - IFF it weren't based on race as much as the values of that race. The content of mind rather than melanin or purity of bloodlines.
The US was founded on the concept of inalienable rights. These could be shared with any race color or creed coming in to America. The culture that people and parties would want to conserve would be fealty to the concepts in the declaration of independence and the constitution. Now that the Dems want to substitute out adherence to those principles for social engineering dogma which includes open borders without assimilating - without buying in to the American ethos - true cultural conservatives want this process halted till the system can be fixed to assure those values are protected properly. That is not Nazi cultural conservatism.
"Regulations, taxes, bad energy policy, and a lack of entrepreneurial spirit hold the country back."
Not to mention the millions of Muslim immigrants holding nothing but contempt for the culture of their 'adopted' country. Doesn't help that their backwards religious and cultural belief system seems to make them much more prone to rape, murder, and other violent acts, either.
Germany's various governments have also long committed themselves to a policy of Energiewende, or energy transition, "moving away from nuclear and fossil fuels towards renewables and better energy efficiency," in the words of the country's Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action.
To be known as the great [ad populum] fallacy of the 21st Century.
Musk was right when he said the AfD is the only hope for Germany.
"Münchau described Germany as a 'consensus society' where everything is done by compromise and mutual agreement...The trouble with consensus societies like Germany is that when the consensus is wrong, you don't have corrective forces," he told Mounck.
In the natural world, organisms that do not adapt and change course become extinct. If Germany is so entrenched in it's ways that it will not make the necessary corrections, then another group will with no guarantees that it will do so considerately. It's as though they are blindly setting themselves up for this.
In 1945, that "another group" was the Allied invaders.
Not this time around
the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD)
You're supposed to call them "right wing" or "neo-Nazi". Check your style book.
What neo-Nazi positions do they hold?
That's what they get for electing Democrats.
Just stop. You’re trying to be funny, but it fails constantly.
So, the establishment state ensures the primacy of the establishment state, by making sure that "national interests" come before democracy (the kind where citizens choose their own government). If they keep it up, AfD will soon achieve an outright majority--unless the state starts rounding up undesirable people and putting them in camps.
"...unless the state starts rounding up undesirable people and putting them in camps."
Not beyond the pale. If AfD gets any stronger it will be nullified and outlawed; the result of which will be a plurality of people being disenfranchised, whose only option will be protests that will likely escalate into resistance. As the country maintains its status quo it will only get worse.
You know who else put people in camps?
FEMA?
Allan Sherman?
Ha!
The Chicago Cubs?
And these national interests are restraints on what government may do, right?
Germany's threats are existential, not merely problems to be solved.
Christian *Democratic* Union/Christian *Social* Union (CDU/CSU) is likely to create a coalition with the *Social* Democratic Party (SDP).
Religious [Na]tional So[zi]alist Democracy......
I can't figure out why it's so bloody hard for humans to LEARN from their past genocidal level mistakes. 'Guns' don't make sh*t and the 'Gun' is the only tool that sets 'government' apart. Is that really so hard to comprehend? They are there to curb human violation (defensive) not to create them (aggressive).
I recall being told by a German customer that ~60% of the pages of tax law in the world were in Germany. And we thought we had it bad.
Another myth is a lot of that "German ingenuity" was nothing more than to avoid the high costs of hiring people. If you can automate and eliminate positions (politely called being "made redundant"), you can fire people. Else, you basically own them for life.
Yes, most of the small businesses are old family businesses in the third or fourth generation, many of them in "company towns" supporting the local populace in partnership with local govt to supply workers, mid-level managers and executives from the various educational institutions. In this hierarchy, upward mobility is pretty much non-existent and risk taking is frowned upon.
For a few generations, they had (1) socialist Europe which needed their products, as they legislated, regulated and taxed manufacturing out of existence and (2) rising China which loved the snob appeal of the brands. The Chinese are filling the void in Europe and are no longer enamored with the mystique of German products. Bad portents for the future.
The Mittelstand - those small often family-owned companies - are not the ones 'failing' from that article. Yes they are dramatically different from the American model of putting 'entrepreneurs' on an individual pedestal looking for a monster cash out for going public. They are more like family-owned companies here in the US - very paternalistic towards employees, privately owned, self-financed (out of profits). They prefer setting up in small towns and rural areas. The 1 million or so of those companies employ well over half of all Germans
Very much like the original Rust Belt actually. Which became a mass manufacturing hub via a huge network of small suppliers and subcontractors who were a significant employer in small towns with a local college supplying/training the work force. Those businesses were how farmers kids left the farm. Those are precisely the sort of places/companies that are gutted by the current US system where a successful entrepreneur sells out, moves all the HQ jobs to the big city, and all that's left in the small town is WalMart and opioids.
The last time I was in Frankfurt in 2021 I heard a local arbeiterklasse go on an unbelievable racist rant in a kneipe. Was he met with derision from his fellow patrons? No, he was met with cheers.
I think maybe what we are shown, and what is, may be divergent.
He would probably be arrested and thrown in jail now.
"How can that even be done?"
This is an example of a self-answering question. Obviously, the entire article is about how it cannot be "done" so the obvious answer is that the correction will be "done to" them. In America, since the Congress cannot cut spending in time to head off catastrophic failure, catastrophic failure in the form of an economic crash will be "done to" us. Unless, of course, Wrecking Ball "Donald" can pull off a miracle chainsaw this year and decimate the Federal workfarce back to Constitutional limits, delete the Code of Federal Regulations and cut Federal deficit spending dramatically.
an entire article on Germany’s economic woes made no mention of mass Muslim immigration?
They are all on welfare and the taxpayers are being bled dry supporting a mostly criminal class
unless they co-op a FD‘s anti-immigration policy, Germany will be a Muslim majority country in one generation
Not quite true. The German political party that Trump backed was specifically mentioned as the anti-immigration party.
"Regulations, taxes, bad energy policy, and a lack of entrepreneurial spirit hold the country back."
TRANSLATION: Socialism holds Germany back.
"...moving away from nuclear and fossil fuels towards renewables and better energy efficiency..."
Renewables =/= efficiency. Germany has simply outsourced their energy to foreign fossil-fuel suppliers.