Trump's ICE Detains Afghans Who Helped U.S. Forces
A former Afghan intelligence officer who worked alongside U.S. forces sought safety in America. Now, under the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, his parole has been revoked, and he’s been detained without explanation.

In his first month back in office, President Donald Trump has raised alarms for Afghan allies in the U.S. who have spent years unsuccessfully seeking asylum or permanent residency after the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan. The BBC has reported that Afghans have already been deported, and are among the 299 migrants living in a Panamanian hotel without access to legal representation.
Nasib, a former Afghan intelligence officer, was detained two weeks ago during a regular check-in with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). I spoke with Susan, the immigration lawyer representing Nasib. (Pseudonyms are being used to protect both against retribution.)
In her practice, Susan has helped hundreds of Afghans seek safety in the U.S. Nasib became her client in February 2024, just weeks after he claimed asylum at the border with Mexico and was paroled into the U.S.
Nasib served 13 years in Afghan military intelligence, training alongside American personnel and working closely with international partners. According to Susan, he saved many American lives. In a letter of recommendation shared with Reason, a U.S. intelligence professional assigned to mentor Nasib praised his vital work and called him "trustworthy and loyal."
Nasib's work put him squarely in the sights of the Taliban, who began targeting their enemies while seizing control of the country in the summer of 2021 and have continued their campaign of reprisal unimpeded.
To avoid a gruesome death, Nasib and his brother attempted to flee the country through Kabul's Hamid Karzai International Airport in August 2021. They were outside Abbey Gate on August 26 when an ISIS-K suicide bomber detonated explosives, killing 13 U.S. service members and 170 Afghans. Nasib's brother lost an arm, was hit by shrapnel in his neck, and now requires surgery that can only be performed outside the country.
Fearing that the Taliban would find and kill him, Nasib had to stay away from his family home, staying with relatives and friends for several days at a time to avoid capture. During his absence, the Taliban visited Nasib's wife and children, demanding to know his whereabouts.
Nasib applied to the Special Immigrant Visa program but was ineligible because he was an employee of the Afghan government. Nasib qualified for the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), which is currently suspended as the result of Trump's January 20th executive order. Without a former U.S. government employee to refer him to the USRAP, Nasib saw only one route to safety in the U.S. He applied for a visa to Brazil and became one of more than 8,100 Afghans who traveled through Central America between 2021 and mid-2024 to gain access to the U.S. border.
When he arrived in Mexico City in late 2023, Nasib applied for an appointment to request asylum with U.S. Customs and Border Protection using the now-defunct CBP One mobile app. Three months later, he presented himself at the border at the appointed time and was allowed into the U.S. on two years of parole.
Nasib settled into American life, finding a job at a distribution center that allowed him to send money home to his mother, brother, sisters, wife, and two children. At the end of 2024, he requested asylum at his master calendar hearing and included his wife and children as derivative applicants on his petition. Given an asylum hearing date in the spring of 2025, Nasib was told in the interim to go to his scheduled annual check-in with ICE in February.
With news of the Trump administration carrying out mass deportations of migrants, Susan insisted on accompanying Nasib to his ICE appointment. "I've gone to ICE check-ins before," Susan said, explaining that officers typically examine an applicant's papers and tell them to return the following year. During Nasib's appointment, Susan said she only saw two individuals brought into the facility and subsequently allowed to leave.
When Nasib was called, Susan was not allowed to accompany him. Later, Nasib recounted that ICE agents confiscated his wallet, shoes, and belt before arresting him without explanation. The agent did not respond to Nasib's request that he loosen Nasib's painfully tight handcuffs.
An agent told Susan that her client had been detained. When she asked why, the agent replied, "Well, new administration." Susan told the agent that Nasib had parole but was told in response that "parole is revoked." She asked again what the reason was for detaining Nasib and received the same answer: "new administration."
As his family's only wage earner, Nasib is concerned about them while he remains in detention—but Susan is fearful for her client. For 14 years, Nasib has been taking antidepressants, which ICE refuses to provide. Nasib was recently told that he could get counseling, but not for at least 20 days. Without his medication, he "is crying all the time," Susan says.
Nasib also cannot access halal meat or a copy of the Quran, which as a practicing Muslim, he is required to read throughout the coming month of Ramadan. Susan says it is unclear how the ICE facility will manage religious detainees' fasting requirements during Ramadan.
Susan is determined to do what she can for her client. "Now that he's in detention, it's up to me to try my best to get him out," she said. "It is very unjust." As an Afghan ally with no record, Susan insists that Nasib shouldn't be there. "He should never have been detained."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Did Beth Bailey aak for a comment from ICE?
Beth Bailey is afraid to "aak" for a comment from ICE... That could be VERY aakwkward, and could lead to her and her family being sued, arrested, detained, being deprived of their medicines, being turned into sex slaves, and then deported! "New administration"... The Trump machine needs victims and scapegoats, and shit needs them NOW!!!
(I DARE you to "aak" ICE for comments!!!)
(I DARE you to "aak" ICE for comments!!!)
Bill the Cat did.
It's interesting that Beth Bailey thinks changing names will hide both the lawyer and the Afghani from retaliation, considering all the detail provided. 13 years? Check. Afghan government employee, not American? Check. Hearing and arrest in February? Check. Anti-depressant medicine? Check. Wife and children on application? Check. Job at a distribution center? Check.
One could wonder how much of that is changed to protect identities, which leads to wondering how much was dreamed up for a better story. One can imagine the X defense in a year when it turns out to be wholly fabricated. "I had to make it up to draw attention to how evil this administration might have been!"
I'm sure the Trump defenders will justify this, probably by attacking the author.
I read through the article, and Beth Bailey failed to mention seeking comment from ICE.
I read through your comment, and Michael Ejercito also failed to mention seeking comment from ICE. Michael Ejercito (worse yet) FAILED to mention Saint Babbitt!!! Michael Ejercito is a MARX-TIT-LEFT-TIT, people!!!!
UIs Beth Bailey, in fact, Emma Camp?
Blames Trump in the very first sentence. Never even mentions Biden botching the withdrawal and refusing to recognize his status for almost four years. Emphasizes New administration, forgets to mention Old administration.
I hate to give sarc any credit, but at least he would say "Democrats did it first, so that's ok."
Very unbiased.
ETA: All invaders betray their collaborators. It's beyond me why collaborators still expect the opposite.
Attack the author and blame Democrats, very good. All that's left is renounce economics as leftist and you'll be a true Trump defender.
If only Biden had kept us involved in saving all of the denizens of all of the Stanstanstainstainstainististans from themselves, or at the VERY least, if only Beth Bailey had written a MUCH better article, then all of Trump's tariff-taxes would be working for us, and we'd ALL be rich, because of these WONDERFUL tariff-taxes!
Answer the dilemma posed, why doncha? Either all that detail is made up to disguise the refugee and lawyer, or it's true and the refugee is either not in danger or the lawyer doesn't give a shit as long as she can stir up useful idiots like you.
The only people I see who are stirred up by this are partisans who have an emotional reaction to anything Trump which forces them to reflexively attack the author and blame Democrats. You're 90% there. You just need to denounce economics and economists as leftist and embrace import taxes as the path to prosperity.
There you go again. Change the subject to one of your old tired abused diatribes instead of simply answering the basic dilemma posed. And yet you claim no one wants a serious conversation.
Did you attack the author and blame Democrats? Why yes, yes you did. You might call that an attempt at a serious conversation, but all I see is virtue signaling to other Trump defenders.
Idiot.
You really do not seem able to answer questions. Bloviate, yeah, you can do that (poorly) but answering questions is not one of your gifts.
Biden was not denying legal representation and deporting those who helped us to third-party countries.
He was not deporting much of anybody.
He WAS, however, giving Social Security benefits to illegals.
Undocumented immigrants are not eligible for SS benefits. Biden did not change that. Also go look at Biden's deportation numbers rose to match Trump's and Obama was higher than Trump.
Undocumented aliens wouldn't use false addresses and identities to collect benefits, would they? Surely they wouldn't.
Most of Obama's deportations occurred near the border. They were caught, sent back, and kept coming back. Remember, he built those cages.
Biden decided he wouldn't even do that. His deportations figures don't even matter, because a gazillion people entered the country and disappeared.
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/verify/social-security-verify/undocumented-immigrants-not-eligible-social-security-medicare-fact-check/536-a66501f7-adc6-4232-a326-8662d59ce3d1
No, undocumented immigrants aren’t eligible for Social Security and Medicare
Former President Trump suggested during a debate that people in the U.S. illegally are eligible for Social Security and Medicare benefits. That’s false.
Panties on fire!!!!!
Ni, he was just getting them and their families tortured and murdered by abandoning them in the worst pullout in US history. But don't let facts get in the way of your politics.
The point is Trump is deporting those same people and abandoning them himself.
Like everything else Biden touched, the vetting of afghans after the withdrawal was not done properly. And since we've seen many pedophiles, sexual assaults, assaults in general, etc.
For two decades, thousands of Afghans fought loyally alongside American troops as translators and soldiers. We owe these Afghans a great debt for their service and ought to do what we can to help them escape to safety from the Taliban. By and large, these are not the people that the Biden administration brought to the United States.
President Biden’s much-vaunted "airlift" evacuated fewer than half of approved Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders – Afghans who served alongside American troops. In fact, fewer than half of the 120,000 people that the United States evacuated from Afghanistan were American citizens, green-card holders or allies.
...
Setting aside the question of cost, there is still the more basic question of trust. There is no doubt that we can’t trust some of the people who made it on evacuation flights in the chaos, despite President Biden’s promise that we would rigorously vet every Afghan before letting them set foot on American soil.
Proper vetting takes months. Vetting during the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan took place over hours, days or weeks; in some cases, it didn’t happen at all. This is an entirely inadequate and reckless way to screen people from a country with poor recordkeeping and a long history of extremism and terrorism.
There is a very real risk that terrorists and other criminals are hiding in the crowd. We know for a fact that dozens of Afghans "refugees" have been flagged as potential terrorist threats. Some made it onto U.S. soil before being discovered. It would be naïve to think that a slapdash vetting process was able to uncover all such threats.
Just as concerning, several Afghans housed on military bases across the country have already been indicted for crimes, including crimes against children and against American service members.
At Fort Bliss in New Mexico, a "small group of male evacuees" assaulted a female service member. At Fort McCoy in Wisconsin, one man was charged with trying to rape minors on the base – allegedly on three separate occasions. Another man at the same base was indicted for strangling and suffocating his wife. There have also been numerous reports of adult male evacuees bringing child brides with them to the United States, apparently including young women who had no relationship with these older men until they came to the airport in Kabul for evacuation.
https://www.cotton.senate.gov/news/op-eds/bidens-afghan-refugee-blunders_improper-vetting-creates-host-of-problems-for-us
I know sarc is fine with illegals raping and committing crimes. But at some point they need to be properly vetted.
If Biden had done properly vetting, maybe this wouldn't be an issue.
Some other stories.
https://www.borderreport.com/immigration/border-crime/afghan-refugee-convicted-of-murder-in-a-case-that-shocked-albuquerques-muslim-community/
https://nypost.com/2021/09/23/afghan-refugees-bahrullah-noori-and-mohammad-haroon-imaad-indicted/
https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdwi/pr/grand-jury-returns-indictments-charging-afghan-evacuees-crimes-while-fort-mccoy
I get some of you democrats don't want to recognize reality, but letting in unvetted foreigners, giving them many benefits (yes the Afghanistan refugees were almost immediately put on the dole), and not tracking who crosses is not a good thing.
And Jeff is okay with it so long as they're sorry about it. Or if they just jerk off instead of penetrating.
Isn't Fort Bliss in El Paso, TX and not nearby New Mexico?
It is VERY Nearby New Mexico.
Edit: But yes, correct, the article places ft bliss IN New Mexico which is wrong. About 10 miles from the NM border.
As per usual we get a single side of the issue and this one is filtered through a lawyer representing the person we're told to be sympathetic towards. If everything presented here is true, then I have questions for ICE to clarify the situation since he pretty much sounds like the sort of person these programs are made for.
I do have a hang-up regarding how he got into the country. If he already had a solid claim then why is he shipping off to a separate continent to enter through the southern border? Why would he not file the correct paperwork at the nearest safe country and fly to the interior? Why is so much space in this article dedicated to how he isn't being given everything he wants?
If the writer wants me to sympathize and advocate for change then I want an honest account of things.
If the writer wants me to sympathize and advocate for change then I want an honest account of things.
In/after the Age of Reason, even having to ask should be regarded as a warning before being hit with a bat.
An agent told Susan that her client had been detained. When she asked why, the agent replied, "Well, new administration." Susan told the agent that Nasib had parole but was told in response that "parole is revoked." She asked again what the reason was for detaining Nasib and received the same answer: "new administration."
Thus ends the story. He lost the cosmic lottery.
Tough shit.
We all need scapegoats. SOMEONE needs to be the scapegoat! Someday shit will be Nobartium of the No-Smartie-um... Then all of the scapegoaters will say, "Tough shit!"
"Nasib qualified for the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), which is currently suspended as the result of Trump's January 20th executive order."
Oh, so it's Trump's fault. But wait...
"When he arrived in Mexico City in late 2023, Nasib applied for an appointment to request asylum..."
So... The fuckwhit who caused all of this by the way he (or his handler) botched the pullout also didn't make sure every one of these people was cleared to enter via USRAP. Which, of course, they wouldn't have needed if these people were removed BEFORE we pulled out, like a non-retard would do. But the real bad guy here is Trump for ending programs that failed to get these people out of Afghanistan for 4 years. Gotcha.
Orange Man So Bad He Made Biden Do Terrible Things.
Biden MADE the Trump Administration put Nasib in jail and deprive him of his medicines? HOW did Biden DO that? Does Biden use Mind Cuntrol, or does he have the Lizard People use Mind Cuntrol on Biden's behalf? Is Mind Cuntrol ALSO the root cause of Trump fucking Queen Spermy Daniels, lying about where the money came from for paying her off, and then blessing "Hang Mike Pence"?
One more TDS-addled steaming pile of shit - Sullum under a fake by-line?
Sadly, I'm sure they have no shortage of them, to need to resort to letting Jacobin Sullivan use a pen name.
parole has been revoked
I wonder, do you think that if I go back through the Reason archives searching on the keyword 'parole' or 'parole revoked', do you think I'll get an ~50% split between parole being revoked for immigrants and parole being revoked for natives, which would still be a grossly disproportionate representation, or do you think it will be more like 90/10 in favor of immigrants?
If only we would give immigrants citizenship, imprison them, and *then* violate their parole agreements it would all be hunky dory.
Fucking retards.
Of course, to do an apples to apples comparison, you would have to adjust those numbers for the much smaller immigrant population vs the much larger native population. Which would make your example more like a statistical 100% to 0%. It's almost like there's an agenda at work here.
Of course, to do an apples to apples comparison, you would have to adjust those numbers for the much smaller immigrant population vs the much larger native population.
That's what I meant, even if it were 50/50 natives/immigrants there are something like 6X as many immigrants as natives meaning the reporting would/could still be grossly disproportionate despite being 1:1.
Well I'm certainly convinced. /s
"Open-Borders!" ... so the Taliban can just come into the USA and get Nasib./s
Isn't that exactly the desired push of this whole single-item story that tries to blame Trumps border control with the plethora of other Reason takes on having a border at all?
No need to run refugees!!! Your enemies are invited too!!!!
OPEN-BoARDDRE#EERS for the WIN! /s
As others have mentioned, I don't trust this writer is giving me the whole picture, as it's written only from the perspective of the Afghan and his lawyer (and the track record of Reason's bias when it comes to immigration).
I noticed in the article that he got a visa for Brazil. It doesn't mention what kind of visa. If he were able to stay in Brazil, but decided to travel all the way up to the US, that's not an asylum claim, as he had asylum in Brazil.
IF it's true that they are depriving him of a Quran and withholding medication prescribed to him, I find that needlessly fucked up. I do wonder why the usual suspects here who are railing against this for being inhumane casually accepted or outright cheered on the treatment of J-6ers in even worse conditions for much longer.
That's because you appear to share my level of respect (i.e. little to none) for the three parties involved here: Team D, Team R, and Team Reason. And like it or not, only one of those has actually brought large swaths of libertarian policies to Washington.
Yup. I expected this Trump administration to be moderately better than the last (which, while certainly better than a Hillary admin would have been, was quite disappointing in regards to many of the issues I care about), but so far I'm loving this, calls to annex Gaza aside.
As a libertarian, I don't think I could have expected a better start to a presidency (for one of the two major parties) than I'm getting now. Just exposing so much of the WFA and making it a major story that resonates with ordinary folks is a win for libertarianism.
Gee, wonder if there is more to this story? Gee, wonder if a legitimate journalist would ask ICE for comment? Gee.
A legitimate journalist might do that, AND SNOT BOTHER TO REPORT THAT SHE ASKED, when, ass expected, our Serpents and Masters do SNOT bother to answer questions from peons!!! HELLO?!?!?
(She may have also donned her magic Tinfoil Hate-Hate and asked LIETELLER1 about the price of tea in China, after endless stupid trade wars. Is THAT also worth reporting?)
Whoa, for just once, Wizzle Bizzle told NO hateful and evil lies!!!
Wow, and I thought Trump was fortunate in his enemies. I must be doing something right.
You were doing something right when you wrote NOTHING! Now ye are blowing it!
Is Reason any different than Breitbart at this point? They ignore literally thousands of known criminals (who were already ordered deported by courts) being deported everyday, but they'll highlight any seeming outliers.
Where was Reason's sympathy when domestic terrorists doxxed ICE agents on public posters? What do you think Trump is going to do to this person? Order him executed? Instead of maybe streamlining the process to spare certain individuals from deportation? How's anyone going to help this man if you don't use his real name?
Need the other side of the story.
Good. Maybe next they will deport the folks who betrayed their Latin American countrymen to DEA and SOCOM invaders, bribers and hidden persuaders. At the close of WW2 there was a treaty to judge SS Christian National Socialists where they committed their crimes. The USA welshed on that one and paranoid communists took that as a declaration of Cold War. Someday Europeans will understand the events of 13 July 1931, and see the invasion of Panama in proper context.
17/53 Greybox Breakdown
SQRLSY
sarcasmic
MollyGodiva
TJJ2000
sarc and SQR were posting back-to-back there for a while. Coordination?
Trump has also suspended the Afghan SIV program, locking out American allies who have been waiting since the Kabul NEO to be safely evacuated from Afghanistan. Write whitehouse.gov/contact and your Congresscritters and demand that these people be treated as, well, people.
Were there Taliban who snuck in to the US during the debacle that was the Kabul NEO? Yes, undeniably. Should others pay for that?
The answer is a resounding, "No!"