Does Trump Want Lower Gas Prices or Oil Sanctions on Iran?
The Trump administration’s math on Middle Eastern energy supplies just doesn’t add up.

The law of supply and demand is the most basic insight in economics. When there's more of a good available for sale than people who want to buy it, the price goes down, and when more people want to buy the good than is available, the price goes up. As progressives have learned the hard way with housing, there is no magical government intervention to get around this.
That law presents a bit of a problem for President Donald Trump's agenda on oil. On one hand, Trump ran on criticisms of Biden-era inflation, including high gas prices. He also wants to drive down oil prices to pressure Russia. On the other hand, Trump wants to cut off Iranian oil exports in order to "bankrupt" the country and build leverage in negotiations.
In other words, he's trying to both increase and reduce the oil supply at the same time.
Last week, the Trump administration claimed that it found a way to square the circle. The government of Iraq suddenly announced last Monday that it would resume exporting Kurdish oil after resolving a years-long revenue-sharing dispute with the autonomous region of Kurdistan. Several Iraqi and U.S. officials told Reuters on Friday that the announcement was actually part of the pressure campaign against Iran.
The Trump administration had threatened to add Iraq as a sanctions target unless it increased oil exports to offset the expected drop in Iranian exports, the officials claimed. "It's not only important for regional security that our Kurdish partners be allowed to export their own oil but also help keep the price of gas low," a White House official told Reuters.
But the math doesn't add up. The Trump administration is expecting to cut Iranian oil exports by 90 percent, from 1.5 million barrels per day to 100,000 barrels per day, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says. Iraqi Kurdish oil exports are expected to be only 185,000 barrels per day, according to Iraq's oil ministry. Even by the official numbers, that's a 1.2 million barrel per day supply cut.
The real gap may be larger. Iran is now exporting 1.74 million barrels a day to China alone, Bloomberg reported last week, citing data from the market intelligence firm Kpler. And although Kurdish oil exports were officially shut down, some of the oil was already reaching international markets illegally. Reuters reported in July 2024 that around 200,000 barrels of Kurdish oil per day were being smuggled into Iran and Turkey by truck.
Of course, Kurdistan is not the only other place in the world that exports oil, and it's possible that other supply increases make up the gap. During the extreme tensions of the first Trump administration, when the United States started seizing Iranian oil tankers and Iran began sabotaging Arab oil infrastructure, oil prices didn't budge by much. The shale oil boom in North America has made Middle Eastern oil far less relevant, and Trump has promised to "unleash" American oil and gas production.
But the Trump administration's foreign policy is aggressively threatening oil supplies from elsewhere. Last month, Trump threatened 10 percent tariffs on Canadian oil and gas. Canada currently exports over 4 million barrels of crude oil per day to the United States alone. If he followed through on that threat, gas prices could have increased by 10 to 30 cents per gallon, Nick Loris of the energy think tank C3 Solutions told Reason.
It's also possible that U.S. sanctions are less effective at cutting Iranian exports than the Trump administration expected. Bessent based his prediction of a 90 percent export reduction on the first Trump era. Since then, Iranian oil dealers have gotten much better at avoiding U.S. sanctions. And while Chinese companies have tried to obey U.S. sanctions in public—in order to keep their access to American markets open—they've also been happy to deal with sanctioned oil under the table.
For example, the Chinese port of Shandong officially banned all sanctioned vessels in January, then told oil importers that "it expects the shipping ban to have a limited impact on independent refiners as most of the sanctioned oil is being carried on non-sanctioned tankers," according to documents obtained by Reuters. (Chinese buyers often use a complex system of ship-to-ship transfers and "ghost ships" to hide the origin of their oil.) Meanwhile, other Chinese ports have started taking in Iranian vessels, Kpler reported last month.
Trump himself admitted on the campaign trail that U.S. sanctions simply aren't as effective as they used to be. He may be satisfied with a sanctions campaign that looks tough on paper—and allows him to save face while pursuing diplomacy with Iran—but doesn't actually affect the oil market on the ground. After all, Trump backed down on his tariff threat against Canada. He is skilled at being all things to all men.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is a dumb hill to die on.
did the Author have a stroke. We can increase oil without Irans help.
Wright anything to satiate Reason's TDS
This is a recurring theme from leftist Reason propagandists. Either we capitulate to our enemies in a massive show of weakness, or our economy will collapse.
It’s the sort of bullshit I expect from, the JeffSarc, or Kiddie Raper.
Petti, if you knew anything about oil an actually decent criticism would be that oil is fungible - less oil we buy from Iran is just more oil we buy from a other producer and someone else buys Iran's oil.
The USA can't buy less. We don't buy any. Sanctions are to try to force China and others to stop buying or potentially lose access to America's market. Most likely they will get around by smuggling but that hurts Iranian since they'll likely have to discount the sale of oil to offset the smuggling cost. Same thing happened with Russian oil sanctions.
Then someone who doesn't care about America's market will buy it.
The law of supply and demand is the most basic insight in economics.
Economics is leftist, and anyone who uses economic arguments is a leftist.
International socialists are leftists by their own admission. National socialists--who differ from the others only in their passionate necrophiliac love for a rabbi supposedly lynched by Romans twoscore centuries ago--are soi-disant rightists. Both claim to occupy the same imaginary, dimensionless, horizontal monofilament. By what standard are these positions definable? What units measure the differences?
What happens when one total retard replies to another total retard?
It's retards all the way down.
You get HankSarc.
Someone explain to Petti that nuclear reactors in places like France produce electricity decade after decade without burning oil. America invented reactors, but half the looter kleptocracy is bent on making electricity--especially nuclear electricity--illegal. This is because warmunist sharknados are the only alternative to banning oil, coal and uranium. Ask any member of Kamala's, Obama's or Biden's party if you sense this is some sort of overstatement or exaggeration.
You can thank your democrat friends for that, you senile retard.
At least we can open up new oil and gas fields for the simple reason of lowering energy costs. It also helps to promote energy independence.
The last thing the nation needs is for energy costs to continue to rise.
It is also time to stop waging a war against Iran. This has been ongoing since 1953 and the feud needs to come to an end. Washington needs to admit what it did back then and apologize for it.
or maybe just a truce in paper form but keeping the CIA from meddeling around will be almost impossible
Nope. Fuck the Iranian regime. We should be doing everything reasonably possible to destabilize the regime so the Iranian people overthrow it.
But Trump is right that Iran simply cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Should that become imminent, direct action will be required. That's what Israel is for.
Not an either-or, as you damn well know.
(hint 1: the US is capable of producing oil; we don't have to buy it from anyone)
It doesn't matter. Any way you slice it, less oil on the market drives prices up. The US could produce enough oil to offset the putative sanctioned Iranian oil whether or not the sanctions are in place.
If the price difference would be noticeable, I don't know however.
Why not both? We can increase our own supply and sink theirs at the same time.
"The Trump administration’s math on Middle Eastern energy supplies just doesn’t add up."
I see no reason to do business with a well-known terrorist and totalitarian state like Iran.
Besides, Trump has approved offshore drilling which will further reduce our dependency on foreign oil.
Sometimes, I wonder if I'm not reading articles from Slate, the NYT or the Washington Post instead of Reason.
No state has created more terrorism than the U.S.
Iran would like to have a word with you.
Just heard an interesting statistic: China is no longer the most populace nation, it has been replaced by India.
Birth rates in India are down by 20%
India is going to peak similarly to the way China already has, following a similar trajectory.
What about birth rates of Indians on temporary visas in the US?
Yup. One child policy did wonders, no woman and lots of dudes. Plus the industrialization of any nation tends to reduce child births and they supersized that. Their local governors also over counted children to get those sweet education dollars, meaning they didn't reverse course quick enough. And then Full Covid lockdowns didn't help.
Everytime a nation has a large excess of single military aged men, it goes to war.
China would have no problem with simply killing excess men, without the expense of a war.
The smart parent were going for a daughter. A hot one would likely have lots of competition from prominent males.
Speaking of China, will neocons and libertarians ever admit that their "If we trade with China, they will liberalize and open up" policy was as massive a failure as could possibly occur?
we must purchase all Iran's oil so China does not!
I remember a bygone era when oil prices were lower while there were aggressive sanctions in place on Iran.
I wish I could remember who was POTUS then
Petti is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit who should fuck off and die, ain't he?
In the land of helpless dependents America that cannot even produce a barrel of oil for themselves.
That law presents a bit of a problem for President Donald Trump's agenda on oil. On one hand, Trump ran on criticisms of Biden-era inflation, including high gas prices. He also wants to drive down oil prices to pressure Russia. On the other hand, Trump wants to cut off Iranian oil exports in order to "bankrupt" the country and build leverage in negotiations.
In other words, he's trying to both increase and reduce the oil supply at the same time.
Odd that you'd leave you "increase domestic oil production to reduce/eliminate foreign dependency" from that calculation.
But then, I guess you wouldn't have gotten the answer you wanted had you included it, would you fake news.