Review: Armored MMA Is Like UFC but With Medieval Weapons
A bizarre new sport is reaching audiences online, a testament to the value of social media.

Mixed martial arts (MMA) is on the rise in the United States. In 2023, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC)—MMA's largest fight organizer—generated a record $1.3 billion in revenue. The UFC's popularity has given MMA a cultlike following and created innovative spinoff sports, such as Armored MMA.
Armored MMA combines MMA's rules and hand-to-hand combat format with the weapons and plated armor of medieval knights. Each match comprises three rounds, two minutes each, fought with shields, swords, or battle axes. The league tours different cities, featuring fighters in eight different weight classes. It thrillingly takes medieval hand-to-hand combat off the jousting fields of Renaissance faires and into a cage match—and then, thanks to the modern-day miracle of apps, into your living room.
While still undoubtedly a niche sport, Armored MMA's growth has been made possible by the broad internet freedoms enjoyed in the United States. I discovered the sport while scrolling my "For You" page on TikTok. Other spectators have found Armored MMA on YouTube, Facebook, or X. This combination of ideas and algorithms competing in a free market benefits both viewers and sports trying to attract new audiences. Restricting competition—which Congress has done by banning TikTok (a move up for Supreme Court review as this goes to press)—hurts consumers and businesses, and, worse, hinders the grand cause of bizarrely cool new competitive sports.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
hurts consumers and businesses, and, worse, hinders the grand cause of bizarrely cool new competitive sports.
If your sport requires Chinese spyware in order to achieve
broadniche appeal, it's not a sport. It's propaganda.Like the NBA.
I refer you to Dequitem on youtube.
His armored battles are indeed to the (simulated) death.
It is insane!
It seems like most fights start with pole arms, half swords, maces and axes.
Sometimes with shields, more often bucklers as an armored knight does not need a shield.
It usually ends with grappling and both knights drawing daggers trying to find a chink in the others armor.
The one where the standing knight was struck by a lance wielded by a knight on horseback was unbelievable!
And he went on to win the fight!
How do these guys survive full contact warfare?
And the 3 armed but unarmored militia men fighting the knight was amazing!!
They had a polearm with a U shaped head that kept the knight out of reach as they tried to find a gap in the armor.
Dequitem is great and the settings, in forests, by rivers, on beaches are awesome
Soon: More weapons, less armor.
Fights to the death!
I had thought that, properly marketed, Rugby 7s could become the US's favourite sport. I was wrong. Medieval Martial Arts is clearly the way forward.
I'm curious how deadly the swords etc are; the book The Last Duel ended with one knight trying to jam his knife (or sword, been too long since I read it) into the other knight's visor while sitting on him.
Not curious enough to investigate, and if it really is an up and coming thing, I'll find out soon anyway.
Isn't this called HEMA?
Scratch a medievalist...