Trump's Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum Are Bad News for American Energy
"This really is one of the dumbest things we could be doing."

After temporarily pausing tariffs on certain Mexican and Canadian products last week, President Donald Trump is going back to the well of protectionism. On Monday, he announced a global 25 percent tariff on steel and aluminum imports. "No exceptions" for these will be given to countries, according to Trump.
The U.S. is the second-largest steel importer in the world, according to the International Trade Administration. In 2023, the U.S. imported 25.6 million metric tons of steel and exported a little more than 8.2 million metric tons. About half of the aluminum used domestically is imported and by global standards, the U.S. has a very small aluminum smelting industry. Steel and aluminum imports to the U.S. were valued at nearly $50 billion in 2024, per Bloomberg.
Taxes on imports of these materials will not only hurt the economies of other nations, including Canada—which is the No. 1 provider of steel and aluminum imports to the U.S.—Brazil, and Mexico, but they will also have a demonstrable impact on several sectors of America's economy, including energy.
Steel—whose prices could increase by "$100 to $150 a short ton" because of the tariffs, according to an analysis from Citi Bank—and aluminum are used in everything from fossil fuels to green energy. Steel makes up 66 percent to 79 percent of a wind turbine's mass and the World Bank estimates aluminum accounts for more than 85 percent of most solar energy components, including panels and racking.
Carbon steel forges, meanwhile, are commonly used in oil and gas pipelines because they can withstand high temperatures and pressure levels. They are also corrosion-resistant, which makes them essential to offshore drilling operations. Aluminum, which has an optimal strength-to-weight ratio, is also used for tubular products on oil and gas rigs.
Nuclear power plants are built primarily with concrete and steel. Vogtle Unit 4, which is the most recent nuclear power plant to be built in the U.S., required 330,000 pounds of stainless steel to build its reactor core cooling system. Canada was America's largest supplier of "long products," which include stainless steel, in 2023.
Imposing levies on steel and aluminum will increase costs for domestic energy projects (which will be passed on to consumers) while hamstringing America's energy dominance. In recent years, high material costs (and burdensome regulations) have led to cancellations or price tag hikes for offshore wind energy, advanced nuclear power, and transmission line projects. Instead of building oil pipelines to the U.S., these trade barriers could also incentivize Canadian energy companies to invest in other markets, such as Japan, says Wayne Winegarden, an economist at the Pacific Research Institute, a free market think tank. "This really is one of the dumbest things we could be doing," Winegarden tells Reason.
Importantly, these tariffs won't accomplish Trump's stated goal of "making America rich again."
A study from the International Trade Commission found tariffs on steel (25 percent) and aluminum (10 percent) implemented during the first Trump administration decreased production and increased costs in downstream industries that use these materials by 0.6 percent and 0.2 percent, respectively. Total production in downstream industries was $3.5 billion less in 2021 because of these tariffs. The Tax Foundation estimates that repealing tariffs and their quotas would increase long-run gross domestic product by $3.5 billion and create thousands of jobs.
There's no telling if the tariffs will stick or be paused. However, trade wars, even the ones that never happen, hurt consumers, businesses, and America's standing in a globalized world.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
TTTRRRUUUUMMMMPPP TTTTAAARRRIIIFFFFFSSSS!
You'd think after 5 articles a day they would go past the bumper stickers. But nope.
It seems like someone higher up at Reason is pissy about losing USAID money,
Diet Koch.
I prefer Koch Zero
What does New Koch have to do to get some respect around here?
LMFAO. What is this, like the 30th article on Tarrifgate that makes no new arguments and doesn't bother the report the tradeoffs?
Memo to Reason: You're doing that thing where you call every Republican racist for 40 years. So when an actual racist comes along, nobody cares anymore.
Whatever valid economic arguments against tarrifs you could have made ONCE have been lost in a sea of TDS bullshit. Probably shouldn't have cried wolf.
"Tread all over me, Daddy Trump!!"
Lol
I pay something like 10 different types of taxes, all of which effect me more than any tariff will. It would be interesting to me if a libertarian publication would rail against some of these taxes.
No. Instead, the Reason staff votes strategically and reluctantly for politicians who will raise those taxes and add new ones.
It’d be nice if they compared/contrasted the effects of these versus other taxes/regulations.
This.
Libertarians for higher taxes!
They bitch about the small cost of the Jones Act as well sir.
Who would have thought that libertarians would hate pointless, costly regulations and taxes?
Except they don't, at least the Reason liberaltarians don't generally care as long as they can make points for the jackasses.
Like tariffs. I guess you must think they aren't taxes.
You whine that Dems bitch about the small suns found in USAID, then accept the much higher Jones Act costs.
Oh the US imports more steel and aluminum than we export and the US aluminum smelting industry is small? So it can't be expanded? We don't have huge piles of steel and aluminum waiting to be recycled? We don't have enormous untapped iron deposits?
If your argument is that getting these resources will cost more, make that argument. Not the argument that the industry is to small in the US or we get most from imports.
So it can't be expanded?
Expansions and, indeed all, forethought costs money.
Money spent on such cannot be given to executives as bonuses.
And everyone in corporate America lives, breathes and dies on short-term thinking.
Another criticism of the story. Listing imports vs exports is either deliberately misleading or very uninformed. A better number would be how much aluminum and steel utilized in the US comes from domestic sources vs non-domestic sources. That will give you a far better idea of how much slack, if any, is the system.
decreased production and increased costs in downstream industries that use these materials by 0.6 percent and 0.2 percent
If the effects are so minor, why the fuck does this rag bitch about them?
Pragmatically (the argumentation that Reason uses, opposite Principally), this is fully ignorable.
They have to bitch about small uppers that get lost in noisy data in order to continue pushing their models.
Don't forget to play with Trump's balls while you're blowing him.
Reason still wants to be in the MSM club; however, I doubt there 50th article along these lines are going to help them much, all the more so for trying to be accepted into a club that is dying for total lack of credibility.
Can anyone offer a single, rational argument that supports tariffs, especially on imports from our allies?
No, they can't. Brain-dead Trumpaloos have nothing but grade-school insults and the same lies, over and over and over again.
In the grand scheme of taxation, consumption taxes (that’s how I would classify tariffs at least) are the least bad.
That's at least an argument.
Among the arguments against tariffs is that they distort markets. Especially in Trump's case. They aren't evenly applied, like say, a sales tax. There's a lot of picking winners and losers. US steel "wins" at the expense of automakers or other consumers of steel (as an example.) They also tend to subsidize poor performers. They are anti-competitive. Why try to be efficient when you can bribe government officials to distort the market in your favor.
Like all consumption taxes they are regressive. They take higher percentages of wealth from the poor and raise the prices of consumer goods, food, etc.
Perhaps most importantly, they are bad diplomacy. Trading partners rarely go to war. Tariffed countries almost always retaliate with their own tariffs.
The US has the lowest tariff rate in the industrialized world.
https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/average%20tariffs%20US.jpg?itok=LKe09lQO
The US has the lowest cutting-off-your-nose-to-spite-your-face rate in the industrialized world. This PROVES that we need FAR more cutting-off-your-nose-to-spite-your-face!!!
What I can't really understand is how you can run primarily against inflation and then turn around and implement inflationary policies like tariffs within the first month. As if we wouldn't figure it out.
And one of the freest economies in the world. There are ways in which America shouldn't try to catch up with the rest of the world. I'm not complaining that the US has fallen behind on policing speech compared to France and the UK.
Makes no sense. Keep Nippon Steel from wanting to expand U.S. steel capacity and jobs at no cost to Americans. Then turn around and slap 25% tariffs on steel imports, some of the cost of which will be borne by Americans, in an effort to expand steel capacity and add jobs.
Tribalism (including knee-jerk nationalism) and Trumpism make no sense; yes, this!
^THIS^
I agree 100%, but in the interest of fairness, Biden (or whoever functioned as Biden’s brain) blocked the Nippon purchase.
In general Trump has better economic policies, but timing big tariffs and deporting cheap labor just after sky high inflation, its going to hurt. Also data indicate Trump1.0's tariffs cost jobs. This is likely going to be lose‐lose.
"Carbon steel forges, meanwhile"
Forges? Forgings? What 's the difference, anyway?
Only metallurgists and grammarians would care.
Calling on all carbon steel forges! Forge ahead, carbon steel forges! We have nothing to lose butt our tariff-taxes, and our Masters who gorge on forges and taxes!!!
Yes, Reason.com Leftists, we want American jobs and prosperity protected from bankruptcy and foreclosure. America First! Bitches.
Tariffs on that them thar EVIL furriners? Twat shit actually gives you is America-first KKKorporations now swill have NO cumpetition, so they will RAISE PRICES on YOU!!! And for often-inferior products! All of which YOU deserve, but WHY must YOU take away MY freedom to buy as I chose, free of excessive LEFT-TITS BIG MARXIST GOVERNMENT taxation?
...because Shipping things from all the way around the world instead of getting them next door is energy efficient????
WTF? ... LMAO.