Archives: March 2025
Excerpts from Reason's vaults

30 years ago
March 1995
"The new Republican-led Congress promises major changes in 'welfare'—giveaways to the relatively destitute. But the federal government is equally adept at throwing other people's money at those who haven't even a surface excuse for needing it. The recent 'Mexican bailout,' $25 billion in U.S. loan guarantees to help keep Mexico solvent so it can eventually pay off its debt, is a good example. In essence, that move aided American banks improvident enough to toss good money after bad at the Mexican government. If the new congressional regime wants to prove that they mean an end to business-as-usual, they must cut off federal cash flow to the influential as well as the marginal. But contrary to [Labor Secretary] Robert Reich, who has taken to railing against 'corporate welfare,' letting corporations keep their earnings isn't 'welfare'; giving them other taxpayers' money is."
Brian Doherty
"Bad Influence"
35 years ago
March 1990
"Too many of freedom's defenders are uncomfortable with earthbound humanity. They are afraid the stuff that dreams are made of can be had too easily at K Mart or Bloomingdale's. They find those dreams banal. But human life and human longings are precious. And, contrary to the caricature of liberal capitalism retailed on the nation's opinion pages, those longings include more than the desire for blue jeans and consumer electronics. Man does not, in fact, live by bread alone—at least when allowed to choose how to live. Religion, art, and science flourish best in a free society."
Virginia Postrel
"The Banality of Freedom?"
"One of the hottest ideas in Washington is that we should retaliate against protectionist countries by raising our own import barriers against them. We will remove our restrictions only when they remove theirs, the theory goes, forcing these countries to negotiate with us to eliminate all trade barriers. 'Retaliation' is the rallying cry of a new economic nationalism that has gained support from powerful Republicans and Democrats alike. But it doesn't work."
Jim Powell
"Forget the Crowbar"
"There is little doubt that Marxism-Leninism has long been discredited. The challenge before us is to rescue from under the rubble of its fatal misconceptions a philosophical base strong enough to see the long-mutilated nations of Central Europe emerge into Western civilization once again. For the logical leap from repudiating Marxism to defending capitalism is not apodictic."
Juliana Geran Pilon
"After the Fall"
40 years ago
March 1985
"Getting a wider range of opinion and a more-informative range of facts across the airwaves to American TV and radio audiences would be worthwhile for that audience and gratifying for those who have felt excluded from access to those media. A liberal bias does prevail, but, from an insider's standpoint, there are ways to get other viewpoints heard or seen. The most important consideration is the nature of the broadcast media bias: it is not primarily political. Instead, it is a bias in favor of action, hubbub, noise controversy, and familiarity in ideas. Kinetic excitement coupled with familiar slogans and premises warm the hearts of those who decide what does and what does not get air time. There's no point in offering ideas at a soporific press conference, when across the street a 'welfare rights' organization is demonstrating on behalf of another handout."
David Brudnoy
"How to Use the Media Before the Media Use You"
45 years ago
March 1980
"The decade has dawned with a brutal Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. With planes, tanks, 90,000 troops, and a hand-picked dictator, the Soviets are proceeding to occupy and subdue the country, despite the valiant resistance of 'rebel' groups who had been on the verge of ousting the previous Communist regime. Whatever else the invasion does, it should put to rest the naive notion of the USSR as a basically peaceful State whose foreign policy is characterized by defense of its territory and traditional sphere of interest."
Robert Poole Jr.
"Post-Afghanistan Foreign Policy"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And, contrary to the caricature of liberal capitalism retailed on the nation's opinion pages, those longings include more than the desire for blue jeans and consumer electronics.
But that is all that modern Reason gives a shit about.
They have embraced that caricature.
Don't forget weed, ass sex, and open borders.
I wonder who thought this was relevant ...
I'd have a lot more sympathy for protectionists and their damned tariffs if the revenue collected was actually transferred directly to the people who were supposedly harmed, such as here to pay the foreign country's tariffs, and were calculated directly from the claimed damage. When the tariffs go into the general fund, they are exposed as the revenue-collection device they have always been.
Does it seem to anyone else that Reason used to sound more actual libertarian?
It's obvious every time they post these archives. Makes one wonder who does the selecting, or why they're tolerated. I'd almost think it means we today are too close to the times to notice how libertarian Reason is, but every Sullum article makes me think otherwise. It also makes me wonder what Sullum will write about in 5 years, and what From the Archives will choose in 25 or 45 years.
Which part of this do you find inconsistent with today’s Reason?
The trolls in the comments section in the 80s were way less retarded.
Brian might profitably look behind that Mexican Bailout and see the fruits of the Reagan-Biden-Kerry avalanche of Drug Prohibition laws demanding the invasion of other countries by men with guns. Brazil collapsed into hyperinflation not even Germany could eclipse as laws making trade and production into fiat crimes did to their economies what earthquakes only dreamt of.