Is DOGE a 'Constitutional Crisis'?
Plus: USAID and Education Department cuts, tariff deal reached, and more...

Into the wood chipper: For the last 60 years, the U.S. Agency for International Development has doled out humanitarian assistance to the rest of the world. Its budget is roughly $50 billion.
Over the weekend, it all appeared to come to a close: the Department of Government Efficiency head honcho Elon Musk was reportedly ordered by President Donald Trump to shutter it. "U.S.A.I.D. employees were told overnight not to report to work on Monday….But not all employees were able to read the [emailed note], as many had already been locked out of their accounts," per The New York Times. "Hundreds of contractors, who make up the bulk of the staff in field offices, lost access to their official emails and systems over the weekend, according to five people with knowledge of the changes." Musk has apparently already fired half of the agency's global health arm, tweeting out "spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper."
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Want articles just like this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Reason Roundup. It's free and you can unsubscribe any time.
Employees started protesting outside of the agency's headquarters after news of their termination became public. Some Democratic members of Congress joined in. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that he's now the acting administrator of the agency and that some of the existing programs would continue under the State Department, but that the agency itself had to be shuttered because of workers' "rank insubordination."
"They don't consider that they work for the U.S.," Rubio told Fox. "They just think they're a global entity and that their master is the globe and not the United States, and that's not what the statute says, and that's not sustainable."
Their union—because of course they have a union—responded: "The American Foreign Service Association (AFSA) strongly objects to the administration's decision to dismantle the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This will undermine U.S. national security, may subvert Congressional authority, and demonstrates a lack of respect for the dedication of the development professionals who serve America's interests abroad."
Some have criticized Musk and Trump's move by noting that USAID's funds make up less than 1 percent of the federal budget. Others have called this a "constitutional crisis," saying that this must be done by Congress, not by executive decree—something the union gestured at when they mentioned that DOGE's move "may subvert Congressional authority."
It is absolutely a constitutional crisis. The president has zero legal authority to "shut down," defund, or otherwise cripple a $50 billion agency.
Audit it, identify unnecessary expenditures, draft reform or rescission proposals, and then go to Congress to PASS A LAW. https://t.co/cRvHigoW66
— Brian Riedl ???? ???????? (@Brian_Riedl) February 3, 2025
"Any effort to merge or fold USAID into the Department of State should be, and by law must be, previewed, discussed, and approved by Congress," Senate Democrats wrote in a letter to Rubio.
DOE might be DONE: "President Donald Trump is preparing an executive order aimed at eventually closing the Education Department and, in the short term, dismantling it from within," reports The Washington Post in what will surely be welcome news for libertarians. This executive order at least reportedly acknowledges that only an act of Congress can actually abolish the department but attempts to make headway on the goal by getting the department to winnow its size down.
"At least some DOGE staffers have gained access to multiple sensitive internal systems, the people said, including a financial aid dataset that contains the personal information for millions of students enrolled in the federal student aid program," notes the Post.
This whole saga, with both the USAID and the Department of Education, feels very Trumpian: He is directionally correct that the massive, overgrown federal bureaucracy needs to be cut down in a major way, but his lack of attention to the details and the specific mechanisms by which this must happen is leading to possible privacy violations and, more worrisome, possible overstepping of his constitutional authority as executive.
That said, there's also the open question of what an executive should do when faced with a ballooning national debt, far too many federal outlays, and a Congress that would most likely be hesitant to take the drastic action required to get our nation's fiscal health under control.
From the department of government waste: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed that USAID was wasting taxpayers' money, spending $1.5 million to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in workplaces in Serbia; $70,000 for a DEI musical in Ireland; $47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia; and $32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru. (Full comments here.) I looked into some of these: The Serbian DEI thing appears to be true as does the Peru grant (though possibly administered via the State Department, not via USAID). I could not find information about a Colombian "transgender opera."
Never mind the tariffs: I reported yesterday that Trump would be slapping big fat tariffs on goods imported from Canada, Mexico, and China. Both Canada and Mexico struck 11th-hour deals that delay the imposition of such tariffs (or possibly mitigate them altogether?) and placate Trump by improving border security measures. Meanwhile, the 10 percent tariffs on Chinese imports have gone into effect—on top of the already-existing ones—and Beijing has already "struck back with tariffs on U.S. coal, gas and other goods, restrictions on exports of some minerals and an antimonopoly investigation into Google," reports The New York Times.
Amusingly, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau didn't have to do something different, per se, to win Trump's favor; he merely had to remind him of the already-announced initiative decided on by the Canadian government in December to devote some $900 million to heightened border security and to appoint a "fentanyl czar." Sometimes you must simply say the same thing in a slightly different way to stave off a massively destructive trade war. Diplomacy!
Scenes from New York: Follow up from yesterday: "The New York attorney general, Letitia James, has warned New York hospitals that complying with the White House's executive order that seeks to end gender-affirming medical care for transgender young people could well violate state law," reports The New York Times. "The warning, in a letter the attorney general's office sent Monday morning to health care providers and other organizations, puts hospitals at the center of a conflict between the federal government and state authorities." As I wrote yesterday, a New York City hospital system canceled two scheduled procedures to implant devices in 12-year-olds that would dispense puberty blockers. James apparently believes this to be a denial of care possibly in violation of state antidiscrimination laws.
"Regardless of the availability of federal funding, we write to further remind you of your obligations to comply with New York State laws," states James in her letter.
QUICK HITS
- The formerly tech-appreciating publication Wired has decided to publish a big huge investigation into the young dude staffers of the Department of Government Efficiency, seemingly mad at them for not having experience in government and also for being weird young prodigies. One of the engineers working for Musk happens to be Luke Farritor, a literal boy genius. He's a Latin scholar/computer science geek who previously garnered media coverage for his work deciphering a 2,000-year-old scroll via an AI program he designed.
- "The US began deporting the first batch of undocumented Indian migrants since President Donald Trump returned to office threatening trade action against countries who didn't comply with his immigration policies," reports Bloomberg. "An aircraft with around 200 people residing illegally in the US will land on Wednesday in Amritsar in India's northern state of Punjab, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because the details aren't public."
- The era of buyouts:
In an email to staff shared with me, the LA Times says it's offering voluntary buyouts to all staff who have been there for more than two years. pic.twitter.com/3KzjbtgCVL
— Max Tani (@maxwelltani) February 4, 2025
- More:
About 20,000 federal workers have accepted the "buyout" offer put forward by the Trump administration last week, a senior administration official tells Axios. https://t.co/YwisqwfmCZ
— Axios (@axios) February 4, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is DOGE a 'Constitutional Crisis'?
Yes, but all Trump has to do is add it to the Constitution through a Truth Social post.
Or one of his aides can.
There's gotta be some kind of loophole. Congress allocates the funding, but the employees are executive branch agency employees. (I'm pretty sure)
Trump has hire/fire power; fire everyone and look, wow, the agency ran a $50 billion surplus this year, crazy.
Admittedly, from a Wikipedia article, but:
USAID was subsequently established by the executive order of President John F. Kennedy, who sought to unite several existing foreign assistance organizations and programs under one agency.
Though, Kennedy was a Democrat, so maybe that was one of those super executive orders that subsequent presidents aren't allowed to undo.
Democrats did it first, so it’s ok.
Chuckle.
LMFAO!
People keep saying that it subverts congressional authority, but I've also read that JFK created the agency through executive order. So, which is it?
Yeah, seems like unless congress specified that the agency has to be created and managed in a specific way, the executive has discretion to rearrange things like Trump is doing.
William Galston has a column in today’s WSJ where he indicates Congress did take action to create it in a 1998 law that “establish[ed] USAID as a distinct entity within the executive branch and distinguishing between its functions and those of the State Department.”
He also wrote “the 2024 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act explicitly prohibited a reorganization, redesign or elimination of USAID without congressional participation.”
He doesn’t cite the name of the 1998 law.
Sounds like someone was trying to fortify that gravy train.
"He doesn’t cite the name of the 1998 law."
It would be a whole lot more convincing if he did.
Such a clever bleat.
U.S.A.I.D. employees were told overnight not to report to work on Monday...
NOW HOW ARE OUR LEADERS SUPPOSED TO LAUNDER TAX DOLLARS???
Through the mafia, like normal people?
SO - through subcontractors?
"Nice reindeer game you got here."
Domestic grifting.
$Trump coin. And when the grift isn't quite grifty enough... $Melania coin.
Just straight up scamming MAGA. You love to see it.
I am sure the Sup Ct will find that the decision to create a literal 'shit coin' is part of the official acts of a president and hence, Immunity applies to all rug pulls and blatant theft and fraud. IT DOES provide an easy back door for some under the table Saudi or Israeli 'donations.'
Wow, what a load of gibberish. You do realize that that was completely illiterate bilge wash, don't you? Or did you actually believe you were clever? If so, seek help and put on a safety helmet until arrives.
I've encountered several of these lately; not sure if they're Lazarus versions of old discredited commentors, or just some new troll. Either way they contribute zilch so I just mute on move on.
Poor guy that’s totally not an attorney.
As they say, "good lawyers aren't cheap and cheap lawyers aren't good."
Did Trump create a $Trump cryptocurrency coin or not? Did he do it on the Solana shit-coin blockchain network or not? Did him and his cronies then release a corresponding $Melania coin on the same network a couple days later or not? Did the release of $Melania coin tank the value of $Trump coin or not?
Are cryptocurrency transactions anonymous or not? Can anybody from anywhere buy $Trump coins on the blockchain or not? Could somebody, from anywhere, if they wished, give Trump a million dollars by simply buying enough of his $Trump coin or not?
Just because you boomer fools don't know shit doesn't mean that Trump isn't a convicted felon scam artist who has quite literally grifted his followers for a solid decade straight! Don't be mad at me that you didn't get in on his very limited edition $100,000 watch. Or his bibles. Or his shoes. Or his homoerotic NFT's. Or any of the huge number of other scams or overpriced garbage he sells like he is the homeless guy outside the nearest subway exit.
TDS must be a real bitch to have.
Shame it's not fatal.
But not all employees were able to read the [emailed note], as many had already been locked out of their accounts...
That certainly puts the government in government efficiency.
"That's some catch, that Catch 22."
"Everyone gets a share" -Milo Minderbinder
After yesterdays debacle (for Reason that won’t be acknowledged here), I dug this up
But SkyNet is a Private Company 1 month ago
I got more intelligent discussion on Tarrifs in 8minutes of the fvckin Glenn Beck show last week than in 8 years of Reason articles.
Basically - Of course tarrifs in isolation are generally negative, they are bad for the country being imposed on as well as for the country imposing them.
The question is: is there another externality where there is a benefit to tarrifs that outweighs the limited economic harm? Is there a greater purpose they can serve? Is there a vital national security issue? can they be used as a tool toward a greater end? Are they used to send a signal that another country’s bad behavior can’t be tolerated because we incur even greater costs because of said bad behavior?
And are tarrifs even a given? Trump is a master negotiator who plays hardball. By announcing punitive tarrifs are inbound, is he more likely to get other countries to the table, or to back off previous intransigent stances?
All of this should be obvious to intelligent people, instead all we get here at Teen Teason is a steady stream of “Tarrifs are bad,,mmmKay?” It’s pathetic.
Be fair. Most of the Reason staff is still coping with the November election results.
Still in the puppy room, are they?
"Who told the Haitians about the puppies?!?"
All of this should be obvious to intelligent people, instead all we get here at Teen Teason is a steady stream of “Tarrifs are bad,,mmmKay?” It’s pathetic.
Again, as I pointed out, for all the "Tariffs are just a tax on American citizens." it really is weird that all of these foreign countries keep capitulating to the threat of an American President merely taxing his citizens. It's almost like the entire world doesn't understand how tariffs work... except Reason.
China would like a word.
Well of course China isn't going to give up on their Opium War Revenge immediately. But pointing out a single counterexample doesn't exactly refute the point that many countries are backing down.
Ive said this elsewhere but Trump himself has accused the Mexican government of being a corrupt narco-state. So follow the logic. The leader of the corrupt narco-state has pledged to send 10k Mexican troops to the northern border to help stem the flow of fentanyl/immigrants and in exchange for this pledge, the tariffs he announced were paused/removed/stopped.
Total victory! The lucrative fentanyl trade is going to vanish any second.
Canada promises to do something they already previously pledged to do. Total Trump victory.
You remember the story about the boy who cried wolf? How many times do you think Trump is going to threaten tariffs on any country for whatever reason before it doesn't work anymore? He has already threatened the EU. Brics. Mexico. Canada. The UK. Taiwan. China. Signed orders for 3 on this list and rescinded 2 on this list. Its been like two weeks. And I think I forgot Colombia and Panama. One trick pony clown show.
"Total victory! The lucrative fentanyl trade is going to vanish any second."
I bet this tactic is super successful in the courtroom.
😉
Mitch McConnel seems to have been left out of the loop and also seemingly incapable of seeing the tariff threats as--just perhaps--bargaining tools...
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) questioned the logic of Donald Trump’s tariffs on allies, stating that the measures will raise prices for American consumers.
“It will drive the cost of everything up. In other words, it will be paid for by American consumers. I mean, why would you want to get in a fight with your allies over this?” McConnell told CBS News’ Lesley Stahl in a “60 Minutes” interview that aired on Sunday.
President Trump on Saturday announced a decision to impose tariffs of 25% on Mexico and Canada after threatening to do so during his campaign. He also announced duties of 10% on imports from China. Experts predict that the move could increase prices in a range of products for American consumers, and Canada and Mexico have ordered retaliatory tariffs.
When asked about his relationship with Trump, McConnell told Stahl, “We haven’t spoken for quite a while. I was very upset about what happened January 6.”
Mitch thinks it’s January 7th, 2021.
I have a question, does the executive branch have any recourse to investigate and or act to remove a senile senator? Obviously McConnel has gone past Biden in the dementia zone and needs to be removed and replaced.
That seems like it would violate the separation of powers. That said, it is the Legislative Branch that performs impeachments, so I could also be wrong.
No, the only mechanisms to remove a senator are in the legislature.
Saved $50 billion , and no more 10% to the big guy.
But we could offer 10% bounties to all federal employees for any and all budget reductions.
It is only $50 billion so why bother. - this message brought to you by actblue.
ActBlue, the donation vessel of choice for all good conservatives!
This talking point really pisses me off. Okay, it's only 1% of the budget or it's only $50 billion (both of which are far, exponentially larger sums than the average taxpayer will ever see in their lifetime combined), but, once you start cutting 1% here, and 1% there, etc, it starts to add up. When we need to cut back, rent (by far our largest expense) isn't where we start cutting, but the small things that are not essential, like how many streaming services do we need, how many night out do we really need, etc. I'm not saying ignore the big shit, but the small shit is largely not even close to being essential and tends not to even help Americans (as the case with foreign aid).
it's only 1% of the budget
Imagine if DOGE's goal was to cut 1% of the 2025 federal budget each month of Trump's four years. At the end of his term the budget would be halved.
In addition to the earth teetering off its axis we would be back to the spending level of the dark ages of 2008. Everybody remembers how small the federal government and Washington D.C. were then.
I don't even need it to be millions or billions.
the $32k cited for the transgender comic book in peru is pretty much the same amount as my HH paid in federal income taxes last year. like great, we worked all year to pay for that horseshit?
cut it, then cut it some more.
This is the reason I think the Democrats are going to lose this battle. They don't seem to get that people are pissed about this kind of shit. No, you can't cover citizens who are victims of hurricanes and toxic railroad accidents but you can pay for a useless comic book in Peru. Fuck you.
You are sounding like the "great communicator" [RR] explaining that a federal budget works along the same economic principles as our personal finances; however, according to the magic money tree theory [aka MMT] this is just so not the case. You see the government can just print all the money it needs and the Fed can set the interest rate and the government can tax us, so they never ever ever have to pay their debts and can run up a deficit with no limits. This way politicians never have to make difficult decisions and can jus keep running on false promises until they die or retire.
The wood chipper is literally too good for them.
but that the agency itself had to be shuttered because of workers' "rank insubordination."
This is exactly what I voted for.
Me too. I’ve been loving these past two weeks. Never thought they’d get so much done already. Granted, there’s a shitload left to go, but so far, this is awesome.
One would think the dismantling of agencies like USAID would be something most Reason writers would be happy with. A libertarian wet dream, if you will.
Don't forget, Reason cheered Milei until he started dismantling he deep state. A year later they are forced to accept Milei's plan is working.
Unfortunately, the "editors" and a handful of commenters suffer from TDS so badly, they will never admit the prosperity we will enjoy 1-4 years from now ever had anything to do with Trump's policies.
I think many "libertarians" are really just contrarians.
Likely, especially the ones who wear the libertarianism on their sleeves.
Am not!
When all the policies and D.C. contingents are crap, contrary is a good starting position.
Corporate tools, which includes all paid Reason writers, exist only to push Koch's agenda.
And his agenda is at odds with right-wing success stories.
If the plan is prosperity for the American people you might have a point. If the plan is simply "cut X percent of the budget' but then "reduce income taxes on the .01 percent' then all you are doing is shuffling numbers around.
The deficit doesn't change, debt doesn't change, the government spends a little less but collects less so its a wash.
So far, I am seeing tariffs and DOGE cuts being the justification for the incoming tax relief on our needy billionaires. So f that. Most of them get huge govt subsidies or contracts anyway and already take advantage of a pretty fkd up tax system tailor built by and for their benefit.
Fuck, you do realize that he cut taxes on everyone last time don't you? Yes you do, but you won't admit it because you're a partisan,leftist lying sack of shit.
Actually, a sack of shit has more utility than you. Didn't mean to insult shit.
The first 5 letters of your handle are the only accurate part of your posts.
Haha. You are such a resentful little bitch, windbag.
Keep going. This is great fun.
Personally, I'm still holding out for "federal employees fired and agency shuttered because of uppity attitudes and snide backtalk".
When people are getting cut from the payroll for lack of "harumphs", maybe it's gone too far. Maybe.
Ditto. Trump has done MORE than I thought he'd do and I'm pleasantly thrilled by it.
Yeah, he’s actually draining the swamp this time, and he’s done it so quickly and efficiently he’s got then on the backfoot.
Seems that he learned from last time. You can't drain the swamp with a leaky bucket. You have to bulldoze the whole thing over with fresh dirt and no second guessing or hesitation. The only question would be, how fast will the Left be able to swamp it back up?
That will depend on whether there are enough DEI loving imbeciles to vote them into office.
Trump is far more effective in 2 weeks of 2025 than he woulda been in 4 years had the 2020 election not been “fortified”.
That’s the best part about all of this. I don’t think the word “backfired” begins to cover the demolition of the dems right now. Having 4 years off to draw up a game plan is the worst thing that could ever happen to the dems, the globalists, and hopefully the deep state.
Love it.
"Audit it, identify unnecessary expenditures, draft reform or rescission proposals"
Ya! Why cant he go through 50 govt imposed hoops that will entail hiring 50 more govt inspection agencies to inspect themselves, wasting years and a ton of time for an inconclusive "well we found out some stuff, but we are certain *every* expenditure is absolutely vital anyways" report?
Milei has the right idea. Fucking 'afuera' to them all
At this point, the best thing Trump can do is exactly what he's doing. He has made the media report on this stuff, and he has opened the public's eyes to the corruption and waste of our government.
Even if he can't get some of this done, he is now putting pressure on Congress to finish what the public wants. This would be the perfect time for another Tea Party-like organization to spring up to add more pressure to Congress: "It seems like a good idea end some of these things, Congresscritter, if you're interested in keeping your seat, that is.
Reason staffers still cream their jorts for Milei, but Trump's similar actions don't seem to be inspiring the same enthusiasm. Is it the big letters next to their names (L vs R) or just classic TDS?
Maybe actual liberty is just a bridge too far.
Is it the big letters next to their names (L vs R) or just classic TDS?
Is explicit or implicit Anti-Americanism and/or anti-White (the wrong kind, you know, the kind that a S. American like Milei isn't) racial animus not an option?
You can inform me otherwise, but among the weaknesses of writers here, identity politics does not seem to be one of them.
Right. To be sure.
Well Shikha is gone, so you might be right.
I'll disagree based on their choices for policing articles and journalists under attack articles.
ENB also had a focus on it.
Wait, he was serious?
Reason "Learn To Code" Magazine? Reason "We fired Shikha Dalmia and replaced her with Fiona Harrigan" Magazine? Reason "Let's go Jo!" Magazine? Reason "They're separating foreign criminals from their children!" Magazine? Reason "Mostly peaceful" Magazine? Reason "Martha's Vineyard was an underhanded stunt." Magazine? Reason "Fuck the Mises caucas" Magazine? Reason "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there" Magazine? Reason "Red Wedding" Magazine?
It's like weekly that Reason will restate the exact same "Who will mow our lawns?" faux pas from their own mouths. The whole "to be sure" stems from Robby(!) halcyon days when government encroachments on free speech were bad but white racism is also bad, to be sure.
They aren't as rabidly racist as somebody like mtrueman or Ibrahim X. Kendi or anyone at MSNBC, but that's an exceedingly low bar and, they sure as shit view Americans and/or certain kinds of Americans as deplorable.
I thought Randy was being sarcastic.
My favorite:
Reason "I wear a mask outside so my neighbors don't think I'm a Republican" Magazine.
I’m becoming more and more convinced that people in Cato/Reason, if not some of the writers themselves (looking at you Sullum) are going to get exposed for being connected to this stuff.
Or that it's a massive Potemkin Village and, e.g. Sullum or Brown are more literally nameplate and paycheck rather than actual journalists.
To be fair, Trump hasn't really done all that much yet other than firing a bunch of upper-level managers and reorganization announcements. Millei actually shut down AND eliminated about a dozen offices and branches within the first 48 hours of his term.
To be fair, Trump has a larger government to pare down and more vocal opposition.
I know next to nothing about the Argentinian system and constitution, but I'd imagine the US President also has more impediments to unilateral executive action than that of Argentina.
Somebody get Trump an actual chainsaw.
"They don't consider that they work for the U.S.," Rubio told Fox. "They just think they're a global entity and that their master is the globe and not the United States, and that's not what the statute says, and that's not sustainable."
And now the DOE is next up on the chopping block. Merry Christmas in February.
Anyone who has worked with academics, anywhere on earth, knows the truth of this.
Waiting for the usual suspects to tell us why this isn't exactly what they've been telling us needs to be done for years now.
Both Canada and Mexico struck 11th-hour deals that delay the imposition of such tariffs (or possibly mitigate them altogether?)
It’s funny so few people saw that coming,
TDS induces blind rage.
Yes, it does. All one has to do is read a jeffsarc comment here to see the rage up close.
Or SullumBoehm article
Media going out of its way to paint this as some sort of Trump failure, instead of accepting that this was the play the whole time.
WSJ: Trump Blinks on North American Tariffs
WSJ: Inside the Chaotic Run-Up to Trump’s Tariff U-Turn on Canada and Mexico
Catherine Rampell: Trump got rolled by Mexico and Canada
Jimmy Fallon Answers The Big Question About Trump's Tariff Fiasco
Only an occasional hat-tip to what seems to be the real game:
Forbes: Brinkmanship In Negotiation: Examining The Pros And Cons After Trump’s Tariff Threat
Superiority complex + Dunning-Kruger + left wing bias + November 2024 coping = modern media
Jimmy Fallon Answers The Big Question About Trump's Tariff Fiasco
WTF? The guy that shows up when I really need Jake from State Farm?
Well that's fucking retarded. He explicitly stated that the tariffs were for that purpose. So... he got what he wanted, and put the big stick down.
Only like 3/4 of the comments community yesterday, the ones not to busy crying about 'muh tariffs' and 'muh free markets'.
Employees started protesting outside of the agency's headquarters after news of their termination became public. Some Democratic members of Congress joined in.
Both groups are losing money from this shutdown.
January 2021 through January 2025: unknown and unelected rich and powerful people in the shadows ran the US government, and Democrats cheered and demanded more.
January 2025 through February 2025: known people, elected and unelected, are in the spotlight and trying to run the US government, and Democrats declare a Constitutional (and existential) crisis.
Other problem with this crisis:
We have now, apparently, lived through at least 10 'constitutional crises', had 2 ceremonial impeachments, lived through Trump stealing nuclear secrets he was sharing with the Saudis and hiding that classified intel at Maralago, and truly endured fascism greater than ever before seen in history...
Its not even a boy who cried wolf, chicken little thing anymore, these people are willing to set off the nuclear sirens almost daily at this point.
Crisis porn addiction.
Humanitarian Assistance huh? Hey Liz do a little research on the USAID/CIA connection.
And to add to that, USAID may look like it has “aid” in the name (and they try to fool people with the logo), but it’s anything but aid. We should use the full name more often: United States Agency for International Development, made for adding to and maintaining the Empire.
What is USAID? Watch: https://x.com/benz_pilled/status/1869791109716815931?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Powerleveling myself a bit here, but I was deployed to the desert during the time that ISIS was running roughshod through the MERV, and had genocided that enclave of Iraqi Christians and trapped a bunch of them on Sinjar. When the planning was going on to try and figure out how to rescue these people, a dude from USAID showed up for the planning meetings.
I remember thinking at the time that it was kind of weird that an organization I'd only known at the time for coordinating deliveries of medicine, food, and water in Somalia during Operation Restore Hope was being included on planning for what amounted to a mass evac combat operation. It wasn't until much later on that I found out about them being a CIA front, and that guy was probably there specifically because their people in Iraq were sending intel reports.
Agency for International Development
No nation-building is why I voted against Bush in '04.
Problem is, John Kerry was just as bad in that department.
Funny how I've been pointing this out for a while now, and not only does that rat-faced moog Jamie Raskin all but admit it during the Democrats' spazz-out in front of their HQ yesterday, suddenly a bunch of receipts get aggregated that shows they were responsible for fomenting various color revolutions under the guise of social engineering and medicine delivery programs. Not to mention it being a giant money-laundering operation for various left-wing NGOs.
And the funniest part is, as Greenwald pointed out, the left has been complaining for DECADES that USAID was a CIA front group that caused a fuck ton of international instability. It only stopped being an issue after Obama took office and filled all these bureaucracies with his swamp creatures and Millennial idealists that flocked to DC to say they worked for "the First Black American President." The guy who got narc'ed out by O'Keefe yesterday even admitted that they do whatever the fuck they feel like.
No anymore, bitches.
It is that the politicians all receive this graft to assist NGOs for family members. There's some quantum networking being done to expose all the connections. It is all graft.
Remember: Zelensky's predecessor was popularly elected to his office. Unlike Iran, it was not "bad" for us to depose him for Zelensky.
Weird how that works.
And this is why the majority of countries won't even allow USAID to operate in their country.
The fact that it enabled that commie bulbhead Ihlan Omar to come here is reason enough to shut it down.
No more than student loan forgiveness, etc.. Both sides shamelessly play both sides of every issue. I would have thought Reason would support anything that reduced gov't expenditure, especially foreign "aid" (very loosely defined).
" For the last 60 years, the U.S. Agency for International Development has doled out humanitarian assistance to the rest of the world."
OR
For the last 60 years, the U.S. Agency for International Development has funded more graft than any organization except the UN.
"Others have called this a "constitutional crisis," saying that this must be done by Congress, not by executive decree—something the union gestured at when they mentioned that DOGE's move "may subvert Congressional authority."
It was created by executive action, it can be ended by executive action. No constitutional crisis at all.
This is unusual only in that an elected president is doing exactly what he said he would do, and the left "can't handle the truth".
I saw somewhere on X to remember that the same people terrified of DOGE are the same ones who wanted to hire 80,000 IRS agents to audit you.
But it is fun seeing how many Democrats and other swamp creatures have re-discovered Constitutional limits on executive authority, and the balance of power in Congress.
^This
More importantly it is Congress showing they own the spending and are willing to use courts to keep it going ruining the narratives pushed here for years.
Some have criticized Musk and Trump's move by noting that USAID's funds make up less than 1 percent of the federal budget.
I don't understand the criticism. Gotta start somewhere, it's been two week more will come.
"Some" will criticize because it's a tiny amount, and I'm guessing those same "some" would criticize other cuts because they're too big. Those "some" are going to criticize any cuts.
$50 billion here, $50 billion there, pretty soon you're talking real money.
You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you?
It's much easier to balloon budgets and scam government on bigger items. Does a fighter jet cost $2 million or $20 million? Your average citizen doesn't know. He does know what a hammer costs.
"One death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic." Pretty much the same with federal budgets.
That is the single most irritating complaint about this stuff.
Moron: "It's only a tiny bit of the budget"
Non Moron: "Yeah, and you're BITCHING about it. How the hell can we cut ANYTHING if somebody insignificant is, suddenly, sacrosanct to you?"
Yeah, this is 'you can't cut it unless it's 25% of the total budget!'?
Happy horse shit...
He is directionally correct that the massive, overgrown federal bureaucracy needs to be cut down in a major way, but his lack of attention to the details and the specific mechanisms by which this must happen is leading to possible privacy violations and, more worrisome, possible overstepping of his constitutional authority as executive.
The next month is going to be hell on the Reasonistas, as they try to orangemanbad while still pretending to be libertarian.
The take I've seen thus far is he's cutting things too quickly and there need to be government committees and reports and votes in the House, and votes in the Senate before you cut government.
If he doesn’t move fast, he risks the deep state doing to him what they did in 2017. Trump and company need to keep moving fast and keep the deep state assholes on their heels. Keep the off balance and off guard. Keep them on the defensive and never let up.
Yup.
And by the way, how about this weather in northern Illinois? 50 degrees and no snow on the ground in February? God I love climate change.
It’s supposed to change tomorrow with snow and ice. You’ll see the snow, I’ll probably see mostly ice.
Does that mean you also approve the climate change that removed the mile-thick ice sheet that used to cover your house?
Well yeah but the basement flooded so...
Nah, winter sucks when there's no snow. It's just dark and gray and nothing fun to do outside.
Someday I'll find something I disagree with you about, but not today.
Shock and awe; and don't stop till it's done.
God, I just love complimentary football. Haha.
Reason is actually all in with the technocrats, bureaucrats, and think tankers who impose their will on the poles. Virtually every article relies on statist appeal to authority. Any thing outside of the proscribed "process" makes them nervous because they are complicit in and profit from the system they claim to oppose. Trump is delivering on the "abolish" agenda that Reason purportedly favors but so far all we get here is pearl clutching. The Court will ultimately decide the constitutionality of his actions but in the meantime he's accomplishing more than any president in my lifetime.
Intentionally or not, Reason staff are too vested in the opinion that "democracy" is not a bunch of ideals derived from liberty, but instead is a set of institutions, virtual and physical. And if protecting these institutions curtails liberty, so be it.
That’s what happens when you are located in the belly of the beast.
But the cocktail parties!
Very interesting observation. That would explain why Welch is so Pro Nato.
Lol, I didn’t realize he did, but it doesn’t even surprise me.
It’s going to be a real litmus test. Not as informative as sarc’s online survey but still…
Well, there is some tension there with constitutional balance of powers. But if we are talking about constitutional crisis, I'd argue we've been in constitutional crisis for over 80 years so it's not like sticking with the status quo is proper constitutional order.
At least since Wickard v. Filburn and FDR's threat against SCOTUS.
President Donald Trump is preparing an executive order aimed at eventually closing the Education Department...
Democrats are losing money left and right.
Isn’t this what libertarians have dreamt of for a very long time? Ridding ourselves of the fucking Department of Education? One would think the leading libertarian magazine would be ecstatic.
A real puzzler there, huh? All of a sudden they seem very concerned about process.
See my comment regarding the institutional model of "democracy" above.
Any outlet that publishes Jacob Sullum can't be described as libertarian.
But the wrong people are doing it the wrong way so we can't support it. -Reason
'That said, there's also the open question of what an executive should do when faced with a ballooning national debt, far too many federal outlays, and a Congress that would most likely be hesitant to take the drastic action required to get our nation's fiscal health under control.'
Invade Poland?
Invade
Poland?Panama.Invade
Poland?Panama.Greenland.Definitely don't invade Russia, it didn't work for Sweden, France or Germany.
Annex Canada?
The moral equivalent of invading Poland, or crossing the Rubicon. Either way the die is cast and there's no turning back.
I like to think we are living at a pivotal moment here; the day much of the useless as tits on a boar hog government died; and no one but bureaucrats and grifters suffered.
Dear gods no. I don't want a bunch of Canadians voting in my elections. I'd rather let all those northeastern states that threatened to seceded and join Canada go. Seems like an excellent method of getting rid of a giant pile of lefty shits.
Ever wonder more about David Hogg and what his former classmates actually think about him?
https://x.com/_opencv_/status/1886330032727228534?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Not really. I don't tend to think of David Hogg at all, most of the time.
The Serbian DEI thing appears to be true as does the Peru grant...
This is why you audit, so you don't put yourself out of business. USAID's hubris did them in.
"The New York attorney general, Letitia James, has warned New York hospitals that complying with the White House's executive order that seeks to end gender-affirming medical care for transgender young people could well violate state law,"
So, we get to find out of a presidential executive order trumps state law. Could set quite a precedent.
They could still do it, but not get paid.
In other words, the state is trying to force people to work for no money.
There’s a word for that……
Equity?
Voluntold?
Or perhaps they could seek reimbursement for the treatment from the State of New York if the patient can't pay for it?
Oh, so you support tax payers footing the bill for the elective surgeries of a fraction of a percent of people? Yeah, that figures.
You should identify as the Headless Horseman.
This is entrenched corruption being fought Liz. Play by the rules they created to protect themselves and you'll get nowhere but throw out their protections and expose them to the light of day and it becomes much more possible for real change to happen. Now if only we had a media in general, or a Libertarian magazine in specific, that could stomach holding these parasites accountable.
Not sure why, but I'm suddenly reminded of this scene:
Priest Vito Cornelius: I don't know. And even if I did know, I wouldn't tell someone like you.
Zorg: Why? What's wrong with me?
Priest Vito Cornelius: I try to serve life. And you seem to want to destroy it.
Zorg: Oh, Father. You're so wrong. Let me explain.
[Puts and empty water glass on his desk]
Zorg: Life, which you so nobly serve, comes from destruction, disorder and chaos. Now take this empty glass. Here it is: peaceful, serene, boring. But if it is destroyed
[Pushes the glass off the table. It shatters on the floor, and several small machines come out to clean it up]
Zorg: Look at all these little things! So busy now! Notice how each one is useful. A lovely ballet ensues, so full of form and color. Now, think about all those people that created them. Technicians, engineers, hundreds of people, who will be able to feed their children tonight, so those children can grow up big and strong and have little teeny children of their own, and so on and so forth. Thus, adding to the great chain of life. You see, father, by causing a little destruction, I am in fact encouraging life. In reality, you and I are in the same business.
I'm somehow reminded of Bastiat's broken window. Or of people getting paid to dig holes and fill them back in again.
'Sometimes you must simply say the same thing in a slightly different way to stave off a massively destructive trade war. Diplomacy!'
And sometimes far more substantial changes occurred away from the cameras and not included in government press releases?
Forty-three paragraphs into the NYT's latest hit piece on @elonmusk, the six (!) by-lined reporters reveal that the federal government lost $236 billion to apparent fraud ("improper payments") in 2023 alone.
Maybe this isn't the dunk you guys thought it was?
RE: six reporters. It takes a village.
Full of idiots.
Perhaps the NYT needs to cut staff further if it took six reporters to write a terrible piece like that.
Back when I was a kid, you only needed ONE reporter to write absolute bullshit.
And back when you were a kid you didn't have AI to help. It should only take about one-third of a reporter now.
Both Canada and Mexico struck 11th-hour deals that delay the imposition of such tariffs...
FROM WHINING TO WINNING.
Sarcasmic hardest hit. Thoughts and prayers.
He will be along later to malappropriate ad hominem.
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1886477436054802499
Do they really think this makes them look anything but mentally unstable?
"The New York attorney general, Letitia James, has warned New York hospitals that complying with the White House's executive order that seeks to end gender-affirming medical care for transgender young people could well violate state law"
Why does this sound like New York wants to mandate sex changes?
The stick that the Feds have is funding. They don’t want Medicaid money (etc), then fine. It’s their choice. Of course, that means blowing up their budget. But they have the choice.
Basically the same sort of choice people had about the jab a few years ago, and leftist control freaks said "We gave you a choice! Get the jab or lose your job, now choose!"
Sarc: It's okay, Democrats did it first.
Like Sophie made a choice, too.
That said, there's also the open question of what an executive should do when faced with a ballooning national debt, far too many federal outlays, and a Congress that would most likely be hesitant to take the drastic action required to get our nation's fiscal health under control.
Gosh, I don't know...maybe...veto a spending bill?
The New York attorney general, Letitia James, has warned New York hospitals that complying with the White House's executive order that seeks to end gender-affirming medical care for transgender young people could well violate state law...
They really want to mutilate them kids.
Saw on X yesterday:
I'll gladly pay $10 a fucking egg to watch Donald J. Trump take a blow torch to this whole diseased temple of thieves, traitors, child mutilators & pedos, burn it to the ground and piss on the ashes.
1. People elect Trump 2.0.
2. Progs respond by progging harder.
3. ???
You're welcome to spend above market-rate purchasing your own eggs. You're not welcome to require everyone suffer because they can't afford eggs anymore just to get your desired vengeance.
Ow, you made me roll my eyes too hard.
Yeah, all the state laws by dems forcing cage free chickens is bullshit.
Was this meant to be sarcasm? You don't really think eggs are going to reach $10 bucks apiece or that Trump's scary tariffs have anything to do with the price increase? I think ML's point went over your head.
What about EVs? Solar panels? Minimum wages for burger flippers? Did you complain about "You can pay over market rate for your burgers" or did you support $20 minimum wages to force increased costs for everyone?
Sarc: It's okay, Democrats did it first.
What are you blathering about? Do you really think we import eggs? Really?
Hell, we don't even import chicken feed, we produce more than adequate amounts of corn and soybeans domestically to meet demand with surplus to spare.
Mrs Oblongata recently told me our current cost for the eggs from our chickens is about 18 cents per (about $2.15/dozen), but we're still amortizing some of the fixed costs like the chicken coop/tractor.
Thank you for that [damn that is good]!
We don't need no mutilation
We don't need no thought control
No dark changes in the exam room
Doctor, leave them kids alone
Hey! Doctor! Leave them kids alone!
Kulak!
The formerly tech-appreciating publication Wired has decided to publish a big huge investigation into the young dude staffers of the Department of Government Efficiency...
The locusts came for Wired.
She seemed to misspell doxxing a bit there.
They are "special government employees." (A term that didn't exist in common usage until now?) They don't have security clearances and are not CIA operatives. Why should they be hidden? Why would it be preferable that they remain secret?
Are they not proud of the work they are doing in the DOGE/MAGA movement? They brought sleeping bags to sleep on the floor of Twitter for fks sake! They have truly shown their allegiance to vice president Musk. The statutes in their honor aren't going to build themselves if they remain anonymous.
You support doxxing. Got it.
I tend to agree. If they are actually employed by the government, then their names should be public. Should apply to all government employees.
So, you would have no problems if Fox News ran the names and photos of everyone employed at IRS or HHS?
I would support that, actually. DEA and ATF as well.
Me too, but I'm betting Tony would stroke out over it.
The US began deporting the first batch of undocumented Indian migrants since President Donald Trump returned to office...
You know who else marched Indians out of US territory?
The Italian restaurant/mob front across from the 7/11?
The Village People World Tour?
Democrats did it first!
To be more specific - Andrew Jackson.
Kit Carson? (ouch)
Sitting Bull?
'The formerly tech-appreciating publication Wired has decided to publish a big huge investigation into the young dude staffers of the Department of Government Efficiency, seemingly mad at them for not having experience in government and also for being weird young prodigies. One of the engineers working for Musk happens to be Luke Farritor, a literal boy genius.'
Or, just maybe, the prog-adjacent hipsters at Wired are mad at young dudes who are threatening Democracy! (TM).
...the LA Times says it's offering voluntary buyouts to all staff who have been there for more than two years.
Imagine having to pay the rats to leave the sinking ship.
Gotta spend money to make money!
For real, imagine the owner actually paying attention to market signals rather than a political ideology. Maybe this is an attempt to force some change and head in the direction of journalism.
About 20,000 federal workers have accepted the "buyout" offer put forward by the Trump administration last week...
They're Twitterizing the federal government!
And what a fine establishment Twitter has become.
It's certainly more ideologically balanced now than the ratty blue ghetto it was before, shitlib.
I just see miles of Elon Musk’s Nazi propaganda these days.
Cite, motherfucker?
"Anyone who disagrees with me is a nazi."
What will Tony do when he needs to cope harder? What comes after "Nazi!"?
Which is totally weird because 90% of what Tony advocates the SA would nod along to.
Which is why I’ve been calling him a Nazi. If the shit fits, Tony should wear the fucking brown shirt.
Well he and Ernst Rohm do have a bit in common...
Yes, to marxists, anyone who resists their stupid political theology is a fascist.
The hilarious part is that you're just ass-mad that you're not able to exercise your "liberating tolerance" on the platform anymore. That you see ideological balance as "fascism" is the biggest tell of all.
Indeed, my rule of thumb is that anyone who calls their opponents a “Fascist” (or “Nazi”) gives away that they are themselves a Marxist. And, indeed, maybe 95 years ago, they were. The Nazi party was founded, in part, in opposition to communism, and its Russian variant Leninism. Marxist AntiFA and Nazi Brown Shirts battled in the streets of German cities for the heart and soul of German socialism. And that is why Fascism or Naziism are such derogatory words for them - because they identify with the Marxist in that fight.
I need to see a cite of this bullshit.
I can always point to BlueSky permitting doxxing and death threats against people disliked by their oh-so-lovely community of sociopaths.
I love that the idiot left's response is to double down yet again. They don't yet realize their own institutions are next so they think they can continue attacking the right from their protected positions.
They aren't capable of learning.
Honk honk!
You don't believe that. A lot of people will tell me I'm wrong, but I don't think you are that stupid.
No, he’s not that stupid. He’s a typical leftist that has no moral objection to lying for political purposes.
Tony’s bitterness is genuine. The stupidity part is debatable. Brainwashed might be a better description.
Hahaha Tony, no one cares about your whining. Go suck your thumb somewhere else.
Yes, Tony, it’s a hell of a lot better now without censorship.
"But free speech is a danger to (D)emocracy!!!"
But it censors relentlessly. Much more than it did before.
And your evidence for this, Nazi?
The left wing process: identify what would be most helpful to your position and assert it. Don't even consider irrelevant factors such as truth.
Lol.
Man you're guys willingly lie about anything.
But it censors relentlessly. Much more than it did before.
I'd be interested to see your cite on this. I remember something about Musk having post with a MAP flag deleted, and saying something like "not tolerated on this platform".
Is that what you mean??
Well, it’s been documented here that Tony is just like Jeffy in regards to pederastry.
Twitter is the free speech wing of the free speech party.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/11/22/bluesky-is-hell-on-earth/
So, how are things over the wall, in the place where the skies are blue? Well, the sudden surge of users on Bluesky (though we must remember that X is also reporting all-time usage highs) hasn’t quite created the promised paradise. It turns out that snitchers love to snitch, wherever they go. Simple statements of fact like ‘sex is not a spectrum’ are, on Bluesky, swiftly labelled with the single warning word: ‘Intolerance.’ Intolerance of what, exactly? Delusion?
The sofa Stasi are certainly busy over there. ‘In the past 24 hours’, the Bluesky safety team posted last week, ‘we have received more than 42,000 reports (an all-time high for one day). We’re receiving about 3,000 reports [per] hour. To put that into context, in all of 2023, we received 360,000 reports.’ Then, in marvellously pompous language, they added: ‘We’re triaging this large queue so the most harmful content such as CSAM [child sexual abuse material] is removed quickly.’
What a great advert for your own site – the place is full of informers and child molesters.
They're all losing it; their modus operandi [social ostracism] has been neutered, their emperor has no clothes, and the gorilla in the room just threw a big pile of steaming shit at them.
It is certainly simpler to take the food away from faceless foreigners and claim some kind of fiscal efficiency victory than it would be to touch one of the actual sources of government expenditures like Social Security, Medicare, or defense.
The funny thing is there have been much less recklessly authoritarian Republicans willing to gut Social Security, but I guess Trump has no principles and got the memo on the popularity of that idea.
Nevertheless the playbook remains. Governing by ruining people’s lives for no reason. It’s all they got.
Yes, we should go feed others, but not ourselves.
USAID’s budget is $50 billion, and technically that doesn’t even come out of our pockets. We’re all taxed every two weeks for the $3 trillion for Social Security.
Anything that’s not Social Security, Medicare, or the Pentagon (or raising taxes) is ideological masturbation and not fiscal prudence. But we all know that.
So if it's nothing, why all the hyperventilating about it?
I didn’t say it wasn’t important. I said it was a drop in the bucket of federal outlays. Many things the federal government spends peanuts on is extremely important. Like the basic scientific research that enabled you to come to the internet and say stupid shit.
I didn’t say it wasn’t important. I said it was a drop in the bucket of federal outlays.
Then it won't be missed if it's gone.
Are you illiterate or something? Do you even know why you hate it, or did you just come to this strong opinion on USAID the moment some orange drag queen and his lesbian friend had a brain fart?
More misdirection. You're clearly just butt-blasted that your fellow commie ideologues got kicked out of the office and your fellow commie NGO funding got cut off.
It’s hardly the most of my worries, but you’ll come around soon enough to understanding why it was a bad idea to put an insane psychopathic moron in charge of the largest organizations on earth.
That’s why we voted the Democrats out of office, Nazi, to get rid of the sociopaths.
LOL, right, it's why you're here throwing a bitch fit with the most engagement we've seen from you in four years.
Talk about someone doth protesting too much.
Keep crying bitch.
Hate the spending, not the people.
If the people are anything like 70+% of the DoD civilians I dealt with at CIF, Travel or Finance when I was in, I hate them too. With a passion.
If its a drop in the bucket, you should be able to pool your own money with sarcjeff and all the shrike socks to replace this extremely important program.
"I said it was a drop in the bucket of federal outlays."
Netflix monthly subscription fees are drop in the bucket of a household budget, but it would be first to go in a time of financial crisis.
Seriously, where are you people going with this line of reasoning? That 50 billion is ONLY 1% of the federal budget is an indictment of the overall spending, not an argument against cutting it.
USAID was spending 20 mil on puppet shows in Iraq. Please, tell us why libertarians should be against cutting this kind of waste.
So why so mad, Tony? It’s only a small part of the budget? Why get so pissy over getting rid of it?
Cuz some people get their jollies from re-directing your wealth to support their ideological fetishes. You know, "democracy".
"USAID’s budget is $50 billion, and technically that doesn’t even come out of our pockets."
Can you explain this?
Magic beans?
The federal government prints its own money. You are not billed for individual expenditures. Except Social Security, in a sense, for reasons that are arguably silly and also arguably prudent.
You might have noticed the cosmically sized budget deficit Republicans caused. Still waiting for that to actually be a problem in our lives.
So Tony has indeed confirmed: it is magic beans.
"Inflation has no down-side"
Inflation is profit!
sarcasmic's hobby horse is pointing out economic ignorance... Why doesn't he reply to Tony's magical thinking about inflation?
Didn’t say that. Runaway inflation is of course bad, but it’s always the result of some catastrophically bad policy and has never happened in the US outside the Confederacy.
Too much normal inflation is bad because wages are stickier than prices. But no inflation is worse since it causes vicious cycles of shit.
Actually, Dr Friedman argued that a slightly deflationary monetary policy is optimal. For a half century, the Fed tried to match money supply growth to GDP growth. And, of course, inflation was minimal (MV=PQ, with M ≈ Q, V weakly correlated to P, so P ≈ 1). Then the Dems raided the piggy bank under Biden, spending money like drunken sailors, and financed everything through borrowing. But when no one wanted all that US debt, the Federal Reserve had to print money (M) to buy the Treasury notes financing that debt. Thus, M↑ ⇒ P↑.
Well, this is/was from usaid.gov: "USAID is funded by the American people."
So maybe they have/had it wrong?
As for the deficit, I think that's the point of making cuts.
Taxes paying for stuff is a Plato’s shadow on the cave wall. The federal government having a budget is, far as I can tell, a collective delusion politicians have convinced themselves they must perpetuate. Meanwhile this supposed budget is so far in the red thanks to Republican policy that you could never balance it without tax policy so confiscatory that it would destroy the economy anyway.
Thus, the cuts that are needed.
Taxes paying for stuff is a Plato’s shadow on the cave wall
Why is it that the people like tony, who invoke plato, and fancy themselves the philosopher kings who've emerged from the cave, are always the dumbest fucks in the room?
They repeat. They don't understand. Bumper sticker theorists.
Are you saying there should be no limit to the amount of money the government spends?
Also, what's the point of taxes if, as you say, the government can just print money and the budget is a delusion anyway?
Yes, yes he is, and he will also insist that things will be better when the rich pay the fair share (even despite the fact the richest 5% already pay half of all taxes). That's because he is a very shallow thinker that just repeats the last thing he heard on MSNBC.
"USAID’s budget is $50 billion"
...so, you'd be OK cutting trillions, but this "Tiny" $50B is just too much?
Really?
Do you know how utterly full of shit you are?
It’s amazing how you people can so thoroughly take the opposite of a point.
It is not a lot of money in the grand scheme. Yet the program pays dividends in not only human welfare but US soft power.
The only reason we’re cutting it is because we are currently ruled by the dumbest morherfuckers on the planet who smoke weed with Joe Rogan and believe everything they read on Jewsarebad.net.
Funny, we've just had 4 years of the world turning to shit because of the US being run by a bunch of fucking morons.
USAID did not do jackshit there. Sure, it overthrew leaders, which has NEVER ended up being a bad thing. Those people's faults for not asking the State Dept who they should vote for.
You cannot point to ANY successes.
I love that the government NOW is run by morons. Not for the last four years when the WH could not adequately manage bowel movements, much less anything of significance.
You’ll find that the last four years were an era of remarkable calm sandwiched between a global calamity and probably another global calamity.
But you may very well convince yourself that said calamities were actually good times and the period of calm and prosperity was the calamity. The brain is not a rational machine. It has to be trained to be and is vulnerable to things like propagandistic algorithms.
Yes. Why all the wars happened during the calm.
Biden literally ended all our wars, and Trump has resumed his policy of indiscriminate bombing of other countries.
But to repeat myself, you have the luxury of not knowing any facts.
Biden literally ended all our wars
Was there anything happening in the red sea during 2024?
Biden literally ended all our wars
You mean he finished the process that Trump actually started and had wanted to accelerate if it hadn't been blocked by Liz Cheney and Jason Crow, tried to extend the withdrawal past the April deadline to get his 20-year photo op, and got caught flat-footed by the annual fighting season that forced him to try and get out everyone in August, only to have that literally blow up in everyone's face in the process?
That's not the dunk you think it is, shitlib.
Ukraine on line 2….
What the fuck are you smoking, dipshit, to cause such delusional thinking?
Haha, keep spouting bullshit. It amuses me.
"You’ll find that the last four years were an era of remarkable calm sandwiched between a global calamity and probably another global calamity."
Weird thing about all of the wars that popped up.
Didn't those wars know it was a time of remarkable peace?
The US president doesn’t control when the authoritarian shitheads controlling other countries start wars.
Do we also need to go over the relationship between water and wetness?
Then how, precisely, was it an era of remarkable peace? You know, with all of the wars and all.
You called it that.
Did they attack the US? If not, then why the fuck should we care?
Two wars broke out over the last four years. How is that calm?
It is not a lot of money in the grand scheme
Again - Pool your money with chemsarc and fill in the gap. Feed those hungry mouths aroud the world, tony.
What the government does is at the discretion of elected officials. If Republicans win, they are entitled to continue their never-ending quest to ruin the country via stupidity and line their own pockets along the way. It’s no skin off my dick.
It would be nice if the American voter had more than the memory of a tadpole and realized that nothing Republicans ever do is ever good for them, but c’est la vie.
Translation: "I'm ass mad that my side isn't getting to line its pockets anymore, that's why I'm here for the first time in four years having a thread-long limpout."
It is kinda weird he showed up out of nowhere after all these years spouting pure nonsense.
This whole time I thought the AIDS got him. Sigh.
These people always end up telling on themselves.
What the government does is at the discretion of elected officials. If Republicans win, they are entitled to continue their never-ending quest to ruin the country via stupidity and line their own pockets along the way. It’s no skin off my dick.
So then complaining about anything they do is pointless.
Thanks for confirming that you have no purpose.
He admitted that his purpose it to get off on being humiliated.
I muted the dipshit when the option first appeared, but I always suspected as much. I think he's a masochist who gets off on being beaten [viz. beaten off].
"...and technically that doesn’t even come out of our pockets...."
Shit-for-brains here thinks there's a Jackson orchard someplace. Not real bright, but that's been obvious for a long time.
It is certainly simpler to take the food away from faceless foreigners and claim some kind of fiscal efficiency victory than it would be to touch one of the actual sources of government expenditures like Social Security, Medicare, or defense.
Social Security and Medicare are (mostly) paid for with their own tax revenue streams. If you want to go to war with Russia, which your side began pursuing after the OG communist utopia rejected the queer cult in the mid-2000s, that's going to require manning and materiel. Medicaid, on the other hand, is almost entirely deficit spending, to the tune of about $1.75 trillion between revenues and outlays of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
But this isn't about government efficiency, it's about finding and fumigating the marxist cockroaches from their nests. And it's certainly not about this sudden bout of lame-ass propaganda about "food from faceless foreigners" that your ideologically captured CIA front group is getting nerfed.
What's even funnier about all this is that you show up out of the blue after 4 years to start spazzing about Trump again. Talk about having a humiliation fetish.
"Humiliation fetish."
Yes, gets off to a portrait of Ernst Rohm in his swastika emblazoned brown shirt; the ultimate sugar daddy.
I do seriously wonder if the sudden return here is a relapse. If so he needs to call his psychiatrist and maybe a 1-800 crisis line.
That's why I figure the odds are high that he works for a lefty NGO that was dependent on this funding. The arch little fuck didn't show up at all for four years outside of very rare comments, including the post-election period from 2024, and then suddenly starts screechposting after the agency got clapped.
Which, if that's the case, I find it hilarious that both he and Bill Kristol lost their revenue streams. Talk about two bitches of a feather.
There are no Marxists in government. They were all purged during a previous fit of stupid rightwing hysteria.
Ah the saviors of free speech, purging institutions of ideologies like god intended.
There are no Marxists in government. They were all purged during a previous fit of stupid rightwing hysteria.
LOL, Jesus Christ, if you're going to lie, try something that's at least somewhat plausible, you commie vermin.
Ah the saviors of free speech, purging institutions of ideologies like god intended.
Not a lot of fun getting your own "liberating tolerance" fed back to you, is it? But again, it's telling that you think empirical ideological balance is "purging" ideologies, when you commie fucks have mostly voluntarily gone over to Blue(ghetto)sky anyway.
Isn’t it funny how ideological balance always translates to a gusher of Nazi propaganda. Paging Dr. Orwell.
If there are more liberals in a certain place that usually means there are simply more educated people in that place than average. We can’t have that in the government.
Isn't it funny how leftists hate anything that resists their stupid political theology and persistently calls it "nazi propaganda." Talk about paging Orwell, who was actually criticizing your side.
If there are more liberals in a certain place that usually means there are simply more educated people in that place than average. We can’t have that in the government.
LOL, please, you dumb fucks can't even figure out how to pay off your student loans.
Oh I’m pretty sure Orwell, a self-declared socialist, was attacking fascism.
I didn’t have any student loans. I was good at standardized tests and got a full ride, but that’s neither here nor there.
Orwell would’ve called the modern bureaucratic state, the Democrats, and the GOPe the fascists based on how they act and what they do. And by supporting them, Tony, that makes you a Nazi too.
Nah, sending undesirables to concentration camps is what makes a Nazi.
I seem to remember you and others (Jeffy, JFree) wanted just that during Covid, Nazi.
Ah yes, the tyranny of hygiene. You had a minor inconvenience for a few months while a million people died around you, so now we have to give the country to the stupidest fascists ever to live.
You wanted people rounded up, Nazi. No go fuck yourself.
I’m not sure I did. Maybe? What did they do?
^In which Tony pretends to ignorance.
Pretty soon you'll be going after FDR... right?
how do you square that circle? wasnt he also fighting nazis?
Oh I’m pretty sure Orwell, a self-declared socialist, was attacking fascism.
I'm prett sure Orwell, a self-declared socialist, was attacking authoritarian leftism as practiced by Stalinist Russia and his own experiences in the Spanish Civil War out of the disaffection for what the movement became.
But of course, you think anything resisting your stupid political theology is "fascism," so of course you think Orwell wasn't criticizing your side.
Authoritarianism can take many flavors. A big chunk of the world is still under so-called communist authoritarianism. America is under capitalist authoritarianism. I find these labels tedious and stupid, and I think any society hellbent on adhering to a particular ideology is doomed to mass misery.
But it’s all window dressing. All societies have elements of market and state power. There’s never been a truly socialist state and never can be.
It's interesting that in your terms, communist authoritarianism is "so-called", but capitalist authoritarianism doesn't get the "so-called" qualifier from you...
So do you categorize the PRK as "so-called communist authoritarianism" or something else? How does it compare to your "capitalist authoritarianism" of the US?
I know which one I would rather live under.
I think entirely too much space in political discourse is taken up by the assumption that these -isms mean anything. Any society has a combination of state and market forces. Use these terms in an academic sense if you wish, but I prefer to not care and pay attention to what things we want the market to handle and what things we want the state to handle. It can go haywire with too much excess either way.
^The M.O. of an ignoramus: When you don't know how to address concrete instances that invalidate your point, revert to babbling. Attempt to preserve a veneer of sophistication at all costs.
WTF is capitalist authoritarianism? Are you mad that you have to work to earn stuff? (Or are you channeling your inner Marxist stupidity?)
Thought experiment question: if you lived alone on a proverbial deserted island, would the required effort needed to sustain your life make you feel oppressed?
Labels are tedious you fucking Nazis says the language police.
Thanks for confirming you didn't actually read Orwell with that misdirection.
Gotta love left wing dipshits who thing socialism and fascism are fundamentally different.
Orwell certainly had his own contradictions, but he was an intellectual giant compared to you, tony.
Socialism and fascism are literally opposites, but I do concede that socialists have a bad habit of aiding and abetting fascists because they think they are better at upending society for their glorious revolution than those milquetoast normal social democrats. They thought it would work this time too, and I tried to warn them.
Socialism and fascism are literally opposites
There’s never been a truly socialist state and never can be.
These statements are copy/paste last refuge of all authoritarian fucks who support the most evil, murderous ideology in human history.
Nope. They are two different types of socialism. In communism, the state owns (and invariably grossly mismanages) the means of production. In fascism, the means of production remain in private hands, as long as the large corporations do what the government orders. Which is exactly what we saw under Biden. A good explanation for both can be found in Hayek’s Road to Serfdom, which was written contemporaneously with the war between the two.
Socialism and fascism are literally opposites
No, you lying-ass dog, that decades-long political psyop was always full of shit.
The opposite of socialism is anarcho-capitalism, not fascism.
You have no idea that Orwell wrote Animal Farm about the Russian Revolution or 1984 about Stalinism?
What a fvckin self-own
No shit? It’s almost as if you think that supporting a liberal democratic social welfare program is the same as supporting an authoritarian horror regime.
I’ll presume that the irony of this given our current situation is lost on you.
LOL, this is all just misdirection because Tony thinks anything that his side doesn't completely dominate is a fascist regime. A 42/43 split is "nazi censorship propaganda."
Saw some silly bitchmade marxist making the same claim on a sports blog I visit--anything on the left is the "free speech spectrum," anything on the right is not on the "free speech spectrum."
Tony and his fellow commies hate it when they can't silence anyone who isn't part of their dumb political religion. It's why they went Full Censorship in 2020.
You skimmed the wikipedia page about Orwell, saw that he called himself a socialist, and assumed from that, that he would be on your side about everything.
The irony of you declaring Socialism and Fascism as complete opposites? And saying Orwell would never criticize the Left because he was Socialist?
That isn’t irony, it’s your stupidity
Orwell’s politics were socialist, but it’s not important. The big lie that you are ironically parroting is that he was trying to say something about socialism when he was writing about authoritarianism. Any middle schooler who actually reads his work understands this.
Your economic policy approach is not relevant to this. It’s a category error. Fascists can and have called themselves socialists and capitalists and glorious butt boys of Kim Il-Sung.
The authoritarianism is the subject of the critique, and freedom is the solution, but I don’t expect a libertarian to understand such complicated things.
Orwell’s politics were socialist, but it’s not important.
LOL, right, that's why you tried to invoke him as a misdirection when he was actually criticizing your side.
"Oh I’m pretty sure Orwell, a self-declared socialist, was attacking fascism."
And you would be wrong about that. Have you actually read 1984 or what Orwell wrote about his motivation for it? Because Orwell didn't leave us to guess, he actually told us what it was about.
Have you actually read 1984 or what Orwell wrote
It's pretty clear he hasn't.
But he once watched the movie version in a Holiday Inn Express.
Actually he watched the porn version, 1969, on a scrambled channel. But he still got the gist of the plot.
He obviously hasn't read Homage to Catalonia, either.
fascism/socialism/communism are all the same thing
Fucking useless jackass. Did you buy a box of Cliff's Notes at a yard sale that happened to include ones on Plato and Orwell?
"...I didn’t have any student loans. I was good at standardized tests and got a full ride, but that’s neither here nor there..."
We know you're full of shit.
Go back to wherever the fuck you were tony.
^
"If there are more liberals in a certain place that usually means there are simply more educated people in that place than average."
The folks who believe men can become women by REALLY wanting it are, in your opinion, educated?
Do not confuse credentials with education. Progressives are, by and large, blithering morons.
Yes, there’s nothing more intellectual and sophisticated than a Trump rally. How fondly I recall all their elevated discourse on how their vaginas were open for business as Trump’s penis garages.
Having known many transgender people in my life, I can do nothing but cringe at you people’s attempts to mansplain transgenderism as if you have the remotest idea what you’re talking about.
"Yes, there’s nothing more intellectual and sophisticated than a Trump rally. How fondly I recall all their elevated discourse on how their vaginas were open for business as Trump’s penis garages."
You could watch the meeting where they voted for two inept, gender-neutral idiots as chair and co-chair of the DNC, if you long to see idiots in action.
"Having known many transgender people in my life, I can do nothing but cringe at you people’s attempts to mansplain transgenderism as if you have the remotest idea what you’re talking about."
Keep on believing that "Wanting shit" will outpace "biology". Please. You've done more to make trannies a laughingstock than anything I could have dreamt of doing.
Again with the mansplaining, as if transgender people are not intimately aware of the biology of sex.
The only problem with you people is that you don’t understand the difference between biology and gender expression, and that’s because when you were toddlers you were told that girls wear pink and boys wear blue, and that was that.
But boys used to wear pink and girls blue, so if you learn enough things once you graduate toddlerhood, you might learn that gender expression is almost totally fluid throughout cultures and time.
It’s unfortunate that Abrahamic colonists eliminated through force or indoctrination all the cultures that practiced wildly varying gender roles.
But at the end of the day you’re just the same old colonists. What you were taught when you were a young child is the only truth because you’re too stupid or lazy to learn anything new.
"Again with the mansplaining, as if transgender people are not intimately aware of the biology of sex."
They clearly are not as they believe that wanting something will change their sex. Wishful thinking is not reality, kids.
"The only problem with you people is that you don’t understand the difference between biology and gender expression"
The terms trannies use interchangeably, you mean? Got it.
"But boys used to wear pink and girls blue, so if you learn enough things once you graduate toddlerhood, you might learn that gender expression is almost totally fluid throughout cultures and time."
See, at this point, you're already so fundamentally wrong as to be laughable. And you THINK you're quite erudite, which is both hilarious and sad.
Gender expression is remarkably NON-FLUID historically. Eunuchs never thought they were women, after all.
"It’s unfortunate that Abrahamic colonists eliminated through force or indoctrination all the cultures that practiced wildly varying gender roles."
It is not super difficult to "eliminate" figments of your imagination.
"But at the end of the day you’re just the same old colonists. What you were taught when you were a young child is the only truth because you’re too stupid or lazy to learn anything new."
Tell me more about how wishing really hard will make somebody a boy or a girl. I am fascinated by this.
"mansplaining"
Unironic use of this term is further evidence that tony has shit for brains.
Again, if you can’t understand that transgender people, like by definition, understand what their biological sex is, then you are too stupid for this discussion and you should probably just default to letting people be free to do whatever the fuck they want with their clothes and bodies.
Nah, Tony, I think we'll go about rejecting your side's stupid demands to deny reality.
"Again, if you can’t understand that transgender people, like by definition, understand what their biological sex is, then you are too stupid for this discussion and you should probably just default to letting people be free to do whatever the fuck they want with their clothes and bodies."
Of the two of us, I am the only one who does understand it.
I just do not humor delusions.
I also do not call anorexics "fat", so I'm hella consistent.
Nobody’s demanding anything of you. What is this delusion that you’re constantly deluged with opportunities to misgender people and consequent social ostracism? Do you even ever go outside?
All of the people setting their ass hair on fire over transgender pronouns and such never actually participate in any situation where it could matter.
I’m so sure one of your hobbies is women’s sports. I’m sure you’ve cared about women’s sports your whole life.
I don’t understand why you stupid fucks can’t recognize a propagandistic scapegoating operation even as they’re stealing your government out from under you.
Nobody’s demanding anything of you.
LOL, again with the bullshit. The last decade-plus refutes this statement quite nicely.
"I’m so sure one of your hobbies is women’s sports. I’m sure you’ve cared about women’s sports your whole life."
I did not hate it.
Why do YOU hate it so? Why do you want it to be gone?
as they’re stealing your government out from under you
Says a guy who supported the biden puppet show of the last 4 years. "He's sharper than ever!"
Boys can wear pink and play with dolls all they want. It's just terrible and unhelpful to tell them that they might be girls because of that. Because they aren't and never will be, no matter what plastic surgery or hormone treatments they get. That's what really bugs me. People are being told a dangerous lie that you can be the other sex (and don't give me the sex and gender are distinct line again, the trans activists are deliberately blurring that distinction when it suits their purposes). Be whatever kind of freak you want. I'm fine with that. Just don't promote people's delusions that they are something they are not.
Do you imagine anyone is buying this bullshit?
"If there are more liberals in a certain place that usually means there are simply more educated people in that place than average. "
Ahhh, there it is. The liberal Dunning-Kruger self-proclaimed elite status. Smug much? (insert South Park reference here)
As the great man Thomas Sowell once said "It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance."
P.S. Trump needs to get on the stick to give Sowell the Medal of Freedom. The man is 94 and it would be awesome if he received the honor before he passes.
Sowell is a national treasure.
"There are no Marxists in government. They were all purged during a previous fit of stupid rightwing hysteria."
Shit! I missed that, when did that happen?
Typical proggie bullshit, reference McCarthyism, which happened 70+ years ago, but whine when it's pointed out the Democrats supported slavery and segregation.
McCarthy was right.
Good, fuck them all.
Your precious USAID was solely about funneling money to Democratic Party grifters.
These people are not intelligent and probably malicious foreign agents. The purpose of USAID is US soft power at the end of the day. Don’t you ever wonder why Republicans absolutely destroy the reputation of the United States every time they hold power? Do you never wonder why slack-jawed choads keep rewarding them for that?
Is it because they promised to keep transgender people out of bathrooms 2,000 miles from anywhere you’ll ever visit? Is that it?
Zero logic detected above.
Like Shrike, it appears you never seem to tire of being fully retarded.
You should know that few things make me hornier than being called stupid.
Is this why you returned?
Maybe.
I suppose you also fantasize that Trump and Elon will actually put you in a gulag and torture you? Did you buy one of those handmaiden tale outfits for the occasion?
It's sad that you think you're being clever.
Just mop up your own jizz.
You must be perpetually horny then, because I'm betting you get called stupid by anyone who has the misfortune to meet you.
So, are you arguing now that overthrowing Mossadegh in Iran in 1953 was a good thing?
Because that shit is what USAID does now.
I’ll argue it was. Because Mossadegh ran the actual coup, invalidated election results his side lost, dissolved Parliament, and installed himself as dictator - Friendly to our enemies. We put a stop to it instantly, with minimal disruption. Nothing to do with USAID.
It would be like we had taken out Castro in February 1959 with no bloodshed. Do you think that would have been a good thing? The big difference being Castro had popular support, and Mossadegh didnt
I really wish people would stop talking about Mossadegh who have no idea about Mossadegh
Oh, I think Mossadegh was useless and had no beef with putting the Shah in. I think siding with the Ayatollah, as Carter did, was an absolutely asinine move.
But by siding with Khomeini, Carter preempted a major crisis.
Oh, wait.
"Is it because they promised to keep transgender people out of bathrooms 2,000 miles from anywhere you’ll ever visit?"
I don't give a shit about them being in my bathroom, you depraved sex cult apologist.
I care about them using the same bathrooms as my mother, sisters and nieces. I can defend myself against a 250lb pervert in a skirt. They can't.
And they are fucking perverts. Every single one of them has a sexual fetish for what they're are doing.
"The purpose of USAID is US soft power at the end of the day"
What.... does this even mean? We get leverage over countries we give aid this to? Is that it?
It gives aid to revolutionary forces* who then do our bidding after we help them take power.
*we hire mercenaries to overthrow governments that stopped behaving.
to take the
foodUSAID was wasting taxpayers' money, spending $1.5 million to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in workplaces in Serbia; $70,000 for a DEI musical in Ireland; $47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia; and $32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru. away from faceless foreigners...If it makes you feel any better, check your paycheck for the USAID deduction. Oh, it’s almost as if federal expenditures and your tax liability have nothing to do with each other.
What a fucking dumbass.
It’s in the various federal tax deductions in your paycheck, dingbat, hidden so you are clueless about it. Just as clueless as you typically are, Tony.
No it’s not. The purpose of the federal income tax is to make you less wealthy. Sure, states have to play the game of balancing taxes and expenditures, but it’s all just a useless fiction.
Taxes are money that is literally destroyed. If you send cash, it gets actually shredded. That’s what the function of a tax is, to destroy money for some social end.
Then in a completely different building, money is printed and spent on whatever legislatures want to spend it on.
Now they’re going to spend it on some shitcoin for Elon Musk’s personal benefit instead of projecting American power around the world. It’s what you voted for.
Ok, lets take your premise. Less spending means less money they have to print, means less inflation. Still a positive.
Meh. Recent higher-than-prudent inflation, which the Biden government fixed, was mostly down to businesses in certain specific sectors charging more for goods because of the global calamity that started under the Trump government.
I didn’t notice my paycheck getting radically more inflated, so it wasn’t real inflation.
tony, the other ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. tony is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
tony lies; it’s what he does. tony is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Holy shit, an actual believer in modern monetary theory?
You ADMIT to buying into that nonsense?
Good lord.
Federal income tax?
"If it makes you feel any better, check your paycheck for the USAID deduction."
I didn't get "deduction for local hospitals and military" on my paychecks. Wow, healthcare and defense must be free in America!
You do have half a point - if the government taxed us directly to fund their programs, than the likes of USAID wouldn't exist. That's why they print money they don't have. Which results in inflation and debt, which we ultimately pay for.
I've been paying for Biden's "inflation reduction act" for the past 3 years. The money doesn't go directly to the government, but the money left my pocket all the same. Cause and effect.
Serbian DEI and transgender operas feed the world
Shorter Tony: "Nazi, Nazi, Nazi! See, I am smarter than you."
He got a full ride to college!!
So did Corky.
Really?
Trunp is sending the United States Army to foreign countries to take away food?
Or did he send the United States Space Force?
Kenya's Ex-President's reaction has become a favorite:
"I saw some people the other day crying that Trump has removed funding. He is not giving us any more money," he said, asking, "Why are you crying? It is not your government; it is not your country. He has no reason to give you anything. You don't pay taxes in America. He's appealing to his people."
"It is certainly simpler to take the food away from faceless foreigners and claim some kind of fiscal efficiency victory than it would be to touch one of the actual sources of government expenditures like Social Security, Medicare, or defense."
You do know USAID has nothing to do with foreign aid, right?
You’re more than welcome to give your money to all the foreigners you want commie.
USAID is not US Aid. It's International Development. As in messing with other countries' politics and economies.
Are tranny comic books considered food in Peru?
Haha. Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair, tony.
No mention of the back to back riots in LA? Protestors shutting down freeways, waiving foreign flags, attacking motorists and police?
Too local?
But if the illegal immigrant corps wants to gather on the freeways, we could encourage them to use the south-bound lanes.
Jesse, it is only bad to attack police in the Capitol.
In literally every other location in the country, it's cool.
Coverage in the Bee today: Illegal Immigrants Helpfully Wave Flags So ICE Knows Where To Send Them
*snerk!*
unusual_whales
@unusual_whales
Schumer: "This is just the beginning... If DOGE attacks the USAID today... who knows, next might be the IRS"
We can only hope, Chuckie. We can only hope.
Lois Lerner might need to self-deport to Canada the way things are going.
"I can only get so hard."
End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
BREAKING: Mexico just arrested El Ricky, a top leader of Cartel del Noreste, right after Trump pressured them to crack down on cartels.
Wall Street Journal communists:
U.S. Frackers and Saudi Officials Tell Trump They Won’t Drill More
President says lower prices will solve many of the country’s problems but finds early resistance in the oil market
Oh shit. Donnie will be angry. Another broken promise.
https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-oil/trump-oil-drilling-saudi-arabia-71c095ff?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1
The hicklib pederast trying to distract from his fellow child traffickers in USAID getting BTFO yesterday.
What happened to Drill Baby Drill?
Oh yeah, it was just a campaign slogan designed for ignorant greasy MAGA rednecks.
But it worked.
Yes, and Colombia won't be taking back their own citizens, either.
I dare you to walk into a bar in any (actual) working class neighborhood and say that.
If you believe his (not made up at all) anecdotes, he visits those kind of places all the time, and shows off his comments to the people there.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Here's something that no Trump defender can comprehend.
It is entirely possible to want to see the federal government cut, but object to it being done in an un-Constitutional manner.
We are supposed to have a government of laws, not men. Laws come from Congress, and the Executive is supposed to faithfully execute them, like it or not.
When the president becomes a one man wrecking crew, that calls into question whether or not he has Constitutional authority to do what he is doing.
Unless the end justifies the means. That doesn't always work out so well.
GFY you gaslighting boob
Why are you complaining sarc - the next democrat administration can just put all this shit back, no?
Oh better than that.... They'll Executive Order DACA and stupid SCOTUS will actually 'dishonorably' uphold the UN-Constitutional Executive Order......
It must be because protecting every State from invasion is a requirement in the US Constitution and foreign aid isn't.
If it is in the US Constitution (definition of the USA) the left HATES it. If the US Constitution forbids it; the left LOVES it. Most of what the left does fits into TREASONOUS of the USA itself.
Reminder. Sarc constantly yells cut spending, but whenever am action is taken to do so he rages.
I'm all for cutting spending, but I want it to be done legally and constitutionally, not like a monarch or dictator as you prefer.
Lol.
"USAID was established by the executive order of President John F. Kennedy"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development
LOL... Your 'Constitutional' claim appears to be 100% party-biased.
He knows that USAID was created by executive order but he doesn't care. His whole point here is shitposting and trolling.
It’s quite telling he hasn’t responded to this.
Translation : “ I want to criticize Trump for not getting anything done”.
Like he criticizes Republicans for what Democrats in Congress do.
Translation: I want Trump to be king, and if you don't like it you're a leftist!
Translation: It's wonderful when a Democratic president creates USAID, the world's premier grifting machine, by Executive Order, but totally wrong for Trump to shut it down in the same manner.
Your 'principles' are so novel and unusual, Sarckles.
And 100% ideological bias-free!
Anyone find it strange sarc is using the exact same plan as leftist government workers on Twitter saying to yell process to stop all the cuts.
No.
Huh, another comment pointing out USAID was created by the executive that sarc didn’t respond to.
I’m sure as I keep scrolling down sarc will address this inconvenient fact.
LOL, there's nothing unConstitutional about shutting down USAID. It was created by an EO and is not a Congressionally-created agency like the Department of Education. Just because the billets are funded doesn't mean Trump, or any other President can't redirect those billets any fucking where in the government he pleases.
This shit happens at even the micro level where positions in Unit Manning Documents that are actually mandated under agency or branch regulations, go unfilled so the head of the organization can move the billet to another office, or re-direct the money to other uses. This is COMMON in government. But because it's Trump doing it, the chimpouts about it are mandatory.
"It was created by an EO"
I wondered about that but was too lazy to look.....
JFK created it as part of his general "soft power" policies like the Peace Corps and Special Forces. It was actually something of a continuation of Eisenhower's practice of using clandestine operations to advance American foreign policy, like the CIA operation in Iran that led to Pahlavi taking power.
I get that. But wasn't USAID a conglomeration of existing agencies created and funded by Congress?
No.
Again. Don't sweat it, sarc. Prez Newsome 2028 can just restore it with the snap of his fingers, and then you can resume patiently waiting for congress to dissolve it.
Right?
No. It was created out of the blue by JFK by EO. And even if those agencies were originally created by Congress, the minute JFK consolidated them outside their purview via EO, those agencies ceased to exist as Congressionally created entities anyway.
How is that legal? Nothing in Article II says the president can just make shit up like that.
Nobody seemed to have a problem with it in the 1960s. JFK was fucking worshipped, to the point that he may have even literally gotten away with murder. Even the criticisms of him 60 years after the fact tend to soft-shoe everything because the Camelot propaganda distorts the reality of his entire Presidency.
FDR got away with a bunch of unConstitutional shit too. Doesn't make it ok.
No, it doesn’t. A lot of FDR’s programs need to also be dismantled and destroyed.
Isn't it OK, though, because Democrats did it first?
That's what the Trump defenders say.
I'll note anti-Trumpers are doing that here. They just are too stupid to notice.
Not commenting on you, of course.
Not a chance.
No, that’s literally what YOU say several times a day.
THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT A SUICIDE PACK!
(a throwback to what conservative Bushpigs all said when confronted about illegal spying, torture, and shitty wars)
mispelling intentional
Speak for yourself, Stupid Pedo Bushpig.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
But you are the Bushpig, Pluggo.
Those are things you support, pedo.
Then you should have no problem with USAID being dismantled as it violates the Constitution.
That's (D)ifferent.
Is sarc payed by USAID to shitpost here?
Poor sarc.
My understanding is that he can't just fire anyone on a whim. Some positions are supposed to be protected.
Some are not being fired. They’re being reassigned to positions they probably won’t like and will resign from. There’s more ways to get rid of people than outright firing. See the case of Milton in Office Space.
uhhhh ... Milton burned the place to the ground dude.
And?
Right? They stole his fucking stapler, they got what they deserved.
We talked about this yesterday. Most of the billets are being re-organized directly under the State Department and Rubio's oversight. If anyone is getting fired, it's probably a bunch of GS-13s and GS-14s that were managing these graft ops.
What I've read hasn't been specific about who was fired.
And yet you had an opinion about him being able to fire them…
Why would anybody deserve “protection” from being fired?
How can we have Democracy! without guaranteed lifetime employment of government bureaucrats?
He should test that theory.
Congress should have ZERO say on how the Executive Branch staffs itself, just as the Executive Branch has zero say on how the Legislature staffs itself.
I'd love to see SCOTUS take a look at this.
The reason why many civil servant jobs are career jobs, not serving at the whim of the president, is to prevent what Trump is trying to do, which is to weaponize the government and use its power to go after political enemies. I find that to be concerning, while Trump defenders are salivating as they shout "It's ok, Biden did it first!"
You had four years to condemn it is as a bad practice.
You, of course, did not do so.
All "civil service" has done is make the bureaucracy politically motivated to attack anybody who does not support them but ALSO make nobody accountable for their actions.
Civil service has been an abject failure.
They are executive branch employees. The executive has control over it. Congress has absolutely none. He should fire them all and let them try and fight it in court.
...or he could just send them to extremely unpleasant locations nowhere near anyplace they'd want to live. Fuck, make them border guards in South Texas.
You had four years to condemn it is as a bad practice.
Despite the lies that my hate club posted every single day for the last four years, I didn't support every lawsuit against Trump. What I said was that if he had broken the law that he should answer for it. And I never bought into the stolen election bullshit.
So do me a favor and go fuck yourself. At this point I'm not interested in anything you have to say.
"Despite the lies that my hate club posted every single day for the last four years, I didn't support every lawsuit against Trump. What I said was that if he had broken the law that he should answer for it. And I never bought into the stolen election bullshit."
You never, literally never, said that politicizing the government against foes was a terrible idea. I said it. Others said it.
You did not.
You have no place to bitch now.
You never, literally never, said that politicizing the government against foes was a terrible idea.
That's because I'm not a mentally ill Trump defender with no principles, who believes the election was stolen, that Trump's efforts to overturn it were legal, that he is above the law, and that anything he does is ok because Democrats did it first.
Meanwhile, after you condemned what you called lawfare, you jumped up and down and cheered when Trump said "I will be your retribution", and you can't wait for him to replace the federal payroll with loyalists who will use the full force of the federal government against his political enemies.
If anyone here is a hypocrite, it's you and the rest of his piece-of-shit defenders (not to be confused with supporters, they're ok).
Now please, pretty please with sugar on top, go fuck yourself.
"That's because I'm not a mentally ill Trump defender with no principles, who believes the election was stolen, that Trump's efforts to overturn it were legal, that he is above the law, and that anything he does is ok because Democrats did it first.""
Congrats on admitting you did not and trying to justify your hackery.
I opposed civil service long before Trump.
Its great watching sarc claim other people are hypocrites. Meanwhile he has literally never applied a principle to himself he used to criticize others, including this one. In fact he ridiculed the idea hypocrisy was meaningful when applied to him.
Its great watching our left wingers devolve into psychotic breaks because they no.longer get to unilaterally crush their enemies. Its a funny thing. You treat people like enemies for decades.and eventually they're going to return the favor.
Sarc is a pathalogical liar.
I can provide the links, but he will lie about them. Again.
But if he wants to be shown to be pathalogical yet again I can.
Awe, poor sarc. Why is everyone so mean to him? He’s just here to discuss ideas.
That may have been an original intent, but it failed spectacularly. Instead we ended up with a bureaucracy permanently weapon used on behalf of the left, which is why sarc defense it.
Ending the weaponization of government is not just acceptable but the appropriate action for those who desire a non idea pink sec government which is how we know sarc wants the government weaponized.
You have zero credibility on this topic sarc.
So you have your panties in a major bunch because Trump is being mean to corrupt bureaucrats who inhabit an agency created by executive fiat? Take your gaslighting elsewhere.
""Here's something that no Trump defender can comprehend.""
You pretend to be on higher intellectual grounds but you keep proving otherwise.
YOU could not comprehend Trump using tariffs as a negotiating tactic despite other people pointing that out.
No, I recognize the willful deliberate ignorance and cognitive dissonance raging within the minds of the Cult of Trump. Those people are beyond help.
Trump supporters are a different matter. They can be reasoned with.
But his defenders are mentally ill.
Speak for yourself, Sarc. We’re not the ones obsessed with Trump. You on the other hand, probably masturbate to a photo of the man as you’re so obsessed.
Weird how pretty much all Trump voters noted that it was a negotiating tactic and the clearly much more intelligent Trump haters seemed to miss that.
It was probably just a lucky guess by millions...
Us conspiracy theorists hate being right all the time.
Facts changed.
"It is entirely possible to want to see the federal government cut, but object to it being done in an un-Constitutional manner."
You missed an important point here: since the part of the federal government being cut was implemented in violation of the Constitution, refusing to implement an unconstitutional program is not un-Constitutional in any way. The fastest way to get a Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the Trump Administration's actions is to take the actions, forcing the Progressivist Socialists who were guilty of implementing those programs to appeal to the Judicial Branch.
since the part of the federal government being cut was implemented in violation of the Constitution, refusing to implement an unconstitutional program is not un-Constitutional in any way.
I can buy that.
An honorable take deserving credit. +10000000.
He gets about 1 out of 10,000 posts right. Better record than some here, I suppose (shrike).
"He's Hollowing out [OUR] public (i.e. [Na]tional So[zi]alist) Institutions (i.e. Empire)!!!!", direct quote from the DNC platform.
HURRAY... The Nazi-Witch/Empire is dying!
It's humorous they're pretending anything in the US Constitution requires foreign aid when the US Constitution actually forbids it (it is NOT an enumerated power). They may claim the executive is over-riding congress (if that even be the case) but if the power is forbidden in the first place an honorable SCOTUS would chuck it anyways.
Brian Riedl...
UF,DR (Ukraine Flag, Didn't Read).
I could not find information about a Colombian "transgender opera."
Asked all three of the Opera Afficianados, even the transgender one, in Columbia and got no answer. Understood.
We can still be outraged out by the attempts at social engineering children via state-funded comic books, right?
https://caracol.com.co/2025/02/03/cual-es-la-opera-trans-que-usaid-financio-en-colombia-y-que-critica-la-casa-blanca/
[google translated]
International
What is the trans opera that USAID financed in Colombia and that the White House criticizes?
The White House criticized the fact that among the disbursement of resources, 47,000 dollars were invested in the trans opera 'As One' that premiered in Bogotá. We tell you the details.
The work: As One
On March 16, 2022 at 8 p.m., the play "As One" premiered at the Teatro Libre Chapinero, an opera composed by Laura Kaminsky based on the script by Mark Campbell and Kymberly Reed narrating the life of a transgender woman.
The play focuses on the process of discovery of Hanna, the protagonist, and her place in the world without falling into "hackneyed stereotypes".
This work was also part of Ópera al Parque in 2022, it was presented virtually on October 23 at 11AM and then at 3PM under the promotion of the Universidad de Los Andes.
https://www.infobae.com/colombia/2025/02/04/como-uno-esta-fue-la-opera-trans-que-produjeron-en-colombia-y-desato-la-ira-de-la-administracion-de-donald-trump-no-quiero-que-mis-impuestos-se-destinen-a-esta-basura/
[google translated]
The staging of "As One" in Colombia was possible thanks to the opera, zarzuela and operetta creation grant granted by the Bogotá Philharmonic Orchestra in 2021. In addition, the project received the support of the Smalls Grants Program of the United States Embassy, which allowed its premiere in the country. According to Scherzo, this production also had the support of organizations such as Colombia Diversa and the Universidad de los Andes, reaffirming their commitment to diversity and inclusion.
Only Gov - 'Gun' THEFT of your US neighbors can do International Development.... /s
Another case where "the people" are forgetting what "only tool" government has in its toolbox.
'Guns' don't make shit. Nor do they 'develop' internationally.
They're there for the common (national) defense and to ensure Individual Liberty and Justice for all.
"complying with the White House's executive order that seeks to end gender-affirming medical care for transgender young people could well violate state law"
Because it's ALWAYS wise to put healthcare providers in the position of "criminal if you comply and criminal if you do not comply" during a battle of the governments crossfire ...
Supremacy clause
Somewhat cryptic, but if you mean that medical professionals should somehow be expected to make complex legal decisions on the fly that could end up destroying their professional careers, you're not helping here.
Florida has lots of old folks, we can always use doctors if they know other things than child mutilation.
They could, you know, eschew the federal funding...
"young dude staffers of the Department of Government Efficiency, seemingly mad at them for not having experience in government and also for being weird young prodigies"
As if all the tech wizards running Obama's campaign and administration and the young "handlers" of Biden administration were all long-term entrenched government wonks?
Sarc: It's okay because Democrats did it first.
At the very least, Musk's n00b tech wizards are familiar with what dementia looks like.
Moreover, it sounds like more than a couple of them are completely capable of finding their own jobs otherwise.
Wonder if they'll settle now, like CBS and Meta? Giving Trump discovery processes into the media's efforts seems to be the trigger for settlements...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-scores-big-legal-win-against-pulitzer-prize-board-as-lawsuit-moves-to-discovery/ar-AA1ymrxc
Trump scored a significant legal win Monday in his lawsuit against the members of the Pulitzer Prize Board, paving the way towards the discovery phase in their courtroom battle.
Last week, the board members filed a motion for Protective Order Governing Discovery in hopes of shielding their internal communications involving the decision to award The New York Times and The Washington Post a Pulitzer Prize for their reporting on Russiagate during Trump's first term in office.
Judge Robert L. Pegg of the 19th Judicial Circuit Court in Okeechobee County, Florida, stuck down their motion.
In 2022, Trump filed a defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board over the 2018 National Reporting prizes given to the Times and Post for coverage of the "now-debunked theory" of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
The lawsuit states that a "demonstrably false connection was and remains the stated basis" for the coverage that received the prestigious award.
The staff of the Times and Post shared the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting for "deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration," according to the Pulitzer website.
'"now-debunked theory" of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.'
Whaaaaattttt?
BTW, this news never reached the faculty lounge.
Another W!
Musk has control over OPM (personnel), GSA (real estate/offices), and the Treasury Department. He has direct control over the system that processes all the money the government spends. He has demanded access to highly classified information for people without clearances. All of this is illegal.
If Musk gets DoJ or DoD, it is game over.
So ya, this is a massive Constitutional crisis, and the Constitution is losing badly.
But two dozen transgender people might get harassed on the way to the bathroom, so worth it.
Fuck off and die, shit-for-brains.
Two retarded idiots in a row, and one of them is a fucking Nazi.
"Harassed"? Does that mean not celebrated and told how brave and noble they are?
Fuck off.
Nobody asked you to compliment anyone, especially not people who were unlikely to frequent the carved out sitting hole in your hoarder house.
An entire political worldview based on the discomfort of thinking thoughts that challenge the things you were taught as a young child and that don’t concern anything about your life whatsoever. Well done.
Nobody asked you to compliment anyone, especially not people who were unlikely to frequent the carved out sitting hole in your hoarder house.
A particularly hilarious claim given the fate of the Tenacious Unicorn Ranch and the general nastiness of the average troon domicile.
Go fuck yourself, you postmodernist Nazi.
Lol. “My retarded ideology is too challenging for you!”
Lol. Goddamn tony, nobody matches you in deluded self importance, I’ll give ya that. You are without peer.
I sure hope so. No man LARPing as a woman needs to pee with kids and vulnerable women. Creepy fucking perverts.
How very thoughtful of you to acquiesce to the destruction of the United States over a supposed problem that had already been the purview of law enforcement anyway.
Scream fascist some more tony.
Nobody's destroying the United States anymore. They're stopping YOU from doing that.
You're the cancer, Tony. Not the doctors cutting you out.
"He has direct control over the system that processes all the money the government spends."
That, of course, is a lie. I know "MollyGodiva" is usually proof enough of that, but it is.
And given that the government slugs never once rejected a payment, even for known fraudulent groups...I wish he was in charge of it.
Source ?
Oh, Elon said it ... so it must be true ?
Is this some sort of false equivalence, or simply abysmal stupidity?
Why can’t it be both?
Yes.
Elon is only AUDITING these groups. He has zero control over the payments. You freaking out over AUDITS speaks volumes.
There's also this, fuckwit.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bessent-tells-lawmakers-musks-doge-does-not-control-treasury-payments-system/ar-AA1ymwCJ?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Look at that, both the lefty whores show up to drop their stupidity while Tony's having a massive bitchfit over the funding getting cut off for his NGO.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/elon-musks-task-force-has-gained-access-to-sensitive-treasury-payment-systems-sources-say
Musk on Saturday responded to a post on his social media platform X about the departure of Lebryk: “The @DOGE team discovered, among other things, that payment approval officers at Treasury were instructed always to approve payments, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups. They literally never denied a payment in their entire career. Not even once.”
He did not provide proof of this claim.
For a group of Libertarians who are supposed to be skeptical, y'all are sure taking Elon's word hook, line, & sinker.
LOL, I'm sure anyone not on the left side of spectrum didn't get what they asked for. That's how your side's "liberating tolerance" works, after all.
And you're clearly still butt-blasted that your favored lefty groups got their funding pipelines blocked.
For a supposedly sentient human being, you sure are a blithering worthless pile of shit.
“supposedly sentient human being”
Cite?
If you leftists weren’t complete scum I’d feel bad for what is happening to you.
Hey, fuck-twat, who was "illegally" in control of the executive branch for the past four years?
He has demanded access to highly classified information for people without clearances.
LOL, this is nuclear-grade propaganda.
PII is not "highly classified," you lying-ass whore, nor are the annual appraisals or property lists. At the most, they're CUI, with PA caveats that simply mean the latter can't be released for public consumption.
Even at the facility I work at that deal with actual classified information, PII is considered separate from CUI. And certainly not classified.
This flailing is glorious.
Also, the transgender opera is "As One". Opened at Teatro Libre Chapinero in Bogota on March 16, 2022.
https://caracol.com.co/2025/02/03/cual-es-la-opera-trans-que-usaid-financio-en-colombia-y-que-critica-la-casa-blanca/
That actually took me about three minutes to find the info on.
I had the same link above. Was literally the first non-news link DuckDuckGo provided for search: Columbian transgender opera
Way less than 3 minutes, more like 15 seconds.
I was distracted by something doing it. Yes, it was hella quick.
"...Others have called this a "constitutional crisis," saying that this must be done by Congress, not by executive decree—something the union gestured at when they mentioned that DOGE's move "may subvert Congressional authority."..."
Is that William P. Others? Or someone else?
Either put a name on it or STFU.
Yeah, the days of anonymous sources is over. I do not believe them.
Very happy the tariffs were never deployed. I'm still not happy with the trade war brinksmanship employed, and I hope Trump doesn't decide to go all-in on tariffs in the future.
I'm also not convinced the tariffs on China are actually productive. What we need is more massive deregulation to lower production costs in the United States so we can compete with lower prices, and can actually exploit American resources instead of requiring China to mine rare earths.
Reason will oppose that.
Vehemently.
"What we need is more massive deregulation to lower production costs in the United States so we can compete with lower prices, and can actually exploit American resources instead of requiring China to mine rare earths."
100% Agreed.
Carrying a stick isn't effective unless people think you might actually use it.
Shutting down USAID was long overdue. Ron Paul was correct. USAID had nothing to do with delivering food to people but was all about stirring up regime change and funneling American taxpayer's money into stupid programs in other countries. Too much fraud and too much interventionism. USAID will no longer exist.
Why do you hate "democracy"?
Yes, an organization whose purpose is to provide poverty relief and project American soft power is a total waste of money. That money is much more useful being converted to an Elon Musk shitcoin that he can spend on more cocaine.
I can sense the nervousness behind you people’s sheeplike support of everything Trump does. You know deep down that you think these may be bad ideas.
And it’s okay. Most people are stupid and need to actually feel the pain before they react rationally. It’ll come soon enough.
"Yes, an organization whose purpose is to provide poverty relief and project American soft power is a total waste of money..."
Hey, shit-for-brains, I got controlling interest in the north anchorage of a nearby bridge which you can have at a very attractive price.
Yes, an organization whose purpose is to provide poverty relief and project American soft power
LOL, this smokescreening isn't working anymore, shitlib.
"Yes, an organization whose purpose is to provide poverty relief"
No, it is not and no it does not.
USAID is not shut down. It is being thoroughly audited and is now under control by the Sec of State, as it always should have been. If some employees lost their jobs, c'est la vie.
It is when it doesn't provide poverty relief or project soft power but instead provides money to fund shitty ' LGBTQ' media and foment rebellions and coups.
Since when do you people hate rebellions and coups?
Since your side did one on November 3, 2020.
Flailing.
I don't.
I hate paying for other people's.
"Yes, an organization whose purpose is to provide poverty relief and project American soft power"
Ya, I bet that shit works on the 2 digit IQ folks on reddit. Dont come peddling that soft shit here homie
You just keep spewing the same bullshit thinking it’ll get a different response. Are you retarded?
And with any sort of luck, the former employees will have to find real jobs.
They’re fake jobs until literally one cent of your government bennies doesn’t show up in your bank account.
End social security, medicare, medicaid, etc.
Well I was talking to Sevo, for whom there is absolutely no chance he’d still be alive without disability checks.
Bullshit - you've been saying the same shit up and down the thread, yesterday as well.
>>the U.S. Agency for International Development has doled out humanitarian assistance to the rest of the world.
you know that's not what usaid did, yes?
>>That said, there's also the open question of what an executive should do when faced with a ballooning national debt, far too many federal outlays, and a Congress that would most likely be hesitant to take the drastic action required to get our nation's fiscal health under control.
yes the machine was made to conflict with itself that's why it has a "best 2-of-3" game built into the branches.
>>The era of buyouts:
isn't freedom to contract sacrosanct around here?
>>Employees started protesting outside of the agency's headquarters after news of their termination became public.
what do we want? Global coups!
when do we want them? Now!
So by calling it a Constitutional Crises they are hoping that Congress will do something about it?
LOL.
It is weird to see members of a party that were previously anti-establishment, so in love with the establishment. Let me guess, they were against it before they were for it?
WEIRD.
Calling it a constitutional crisis is an effort to get the courts to stop it.
Got it.
I'm thinking, considering the politics of the majority of gun owners, veterans and serving military (especially the Army and Marine Corp) that wouldn't end the way they think it would.
>>The formerly tech-appreciating publication Wired has decided to publish a big huge investigation into the young dude staffers of the Department of Government Efficiency
begs who got greased @Wired and how much.
One of these guys was the dude that developed the imaging tech to read the Herculaneum scrolls a few months ago.
These are guys who literally do nothing all day but think up code to write to achieve objectives.
I love that fucking kid I can't wait for him & his genius buddies to figure out all that old shit we can't decipher
>For the last 60 years, the U.S. Agency for International Development has doled out humanitarian assistance to the rest of the world. Its budget is roughly $50 billion.
What the fucking fuck, Wolfe - it *didn't* do that. That was the fucking problem.
It did a lot of bullshit, 'humanitarian assistance' was not part of it.
>For the last 60 years, the U.S. Agency for International Development has doled out humanitarian assistance to the rest of the world. Its budget is roughly $50 billion.
James is about to discover that the leviathan she's been helping feed all her adult life will not hesitate to chew her up too.
USAID was funding NGOS & ANTIFA to so Progressives bidding and dirty work - so I’m fine with defunding them.
Important note:
The amount of leftists spurging out online, specifically over:
- deporting illegal criminals (the voter base they are trying to import)
- dismantling the race/gender hustle (the mechanism they have been using to mainstream neo marxist praxis from academia to the entire school system and all govt programs)
- dismantling USAID, which is a mix of money laundering and a cover for deepstate ops
This lets you know Trump is over the target, and its making them lose their minds.
More importantly, they are spurging out because they know a lot of these things T is doing are frankly supported by 75% of the genpop, and the combination of propaganda and gaslighting they had put in place when they were in power to give the appearance of a "consensus" on this shit is falling apart.
Step on the gas Trump, im not quite tired of winning yet
wonder what fearing the lamppost is like?
I truly didn't want the R's/Trump to go after Hunter or really anyone else, with one exception.
I am sad about the Fauci pardon. Truly a vile, horrible little man, that deserved an old fashioned drawn and quartering.
Agree. I'm not generally supporting prosecutions or investigations, either, but firing some folks from their government jobs is fine by me.
But now that Fauci is pardoned, let's put him under oath in front of Congress for some COVID-related hearings, and demand answers since he won't be "incriminating himself".
Let's hold the hearings outdoors on a golf course or near some buildings with low, gently sloped roofs.
What was his crime again? Being Trump’s point man during a pandemic? Was it that he didn’t interpret that as slobbering on Trump’s balls instead of trying to save lives?
What was his crime again?
Have you asked (Jill, probably) Biden, who pardoned him?
"...Being Trump’s point man during a pandemic?..."
No, shitstain.
He's guilty of LYING to Trump while he held a position of responsibility. He's as sleazy as you, but with better benefits, fuckface.
mho he's responsible for uncountable hiv deaths
Any blame for the republicans who decided HIV was to be propagandistically erased because it was associated with dirty gays?
Fuck you. An entire generation of people far more useful than you died of AIDS at the express order of Ronald Reagan.
Scapegoating Tony Fauci is some of the most vile shit I’ve seen in my life.
HIV was to be propagandistically erased
Did you live thru the 1980s?
You are as ignorant as you are retarded and fascist, Tony.
common knowledge whose idea it was to keep the bathhouses open and I have an uncle & seven of his friends on the quilt so I was front and center. direct your fucks elsewhere thanks.
"...Fuck you. An entire generation of people far more useful than you died of AIDS at the express order of Ronald Reagan..."
Fuck you with a barb-wire-wrapped broomstick, you lying pile of lefty shit.
USAID was wasting taxpayers' money, spending $1.5 million to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in workplaces in Serbia; $70,000 for a DEI musical in Ireland; $47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia; and $32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru.
As we've said many times, "nothing left to cut....."
Intersectionality crisis: The two illegals who murder the gay guy who called them up via Gridnr...
One of them an ICE/DHS monitoring device on his ankle during the murder.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2025/02/03/shocking-additional-facts-in-chicago-murder-scandal-n2651514
The court documents are accessible here. A few things to think about: (1) Consider the brazenness and total disregard for our laws at play here. Suspect Ubilla knew he entered the country illegally. He knew he was fitted with a monitoring device. And he showed up to rob and assault (and ultimately kill) an American, on American soil, while wearing the monitoring device, anyway. This man clearly internalized a lesson that our laws are not worthy of neither respect nor fear. He felt emboldened to commit grievous crimes as an illegal visitor to our country, almost certainly with the active knowledge that Chicago's rules are specifically designed to shield him from punishment. After all, his alleged accomplice, suspect Bello, had just been arrested for luring children, resulting in absolutely nothing. And look how quickly that escalated. Furnishing law-breakers with "sanctuaries" is intolerable and dangerous.
(2) Because the suspects apparently used a gay dating app to target this victim, they're apparently already trying to save their skins by engaging in victim blaming. They tied him up, beat him, tortured him, and robbed him because that is 'what he wanted,' suspect Ubilla reportedly told officers. Get ready for this to be part of the defense case. Police have already established a pattern that the victim had never solicited any sort of aggressive interactions previously. And it should go without saying that nobody would ask to be horribly attacked, robbed, and left for dead. The fact that the ankle-bracelet-wearing alleged murderer showed up at the victim's house with duct tape is a damning detail. So is the multi-thousand-dollar spending spree the suspects went on, using their victim's bank account, after they assaulted him and as he died. Trying to claim they were just accommodating his kinks appears to be the latest vile move from scumbag criminals with no right to even be in the country.
No word yet on whether they just jacked off while murdering the man or if they're sorry.
Selena Gomez put on notice by parents of murdered children:
Gomez shared the cringey video with over 422 million Instagram followers.
“I just want to say that I’m so sorry. All my people are getting attacked. The children, they don’t understand. I’m so sorry. I wish I could do something but I can’t. I don’t know what to do. I’ll try everything, I promise,” she said through tears.
After accruing intense backlash, Gomez deleted the video, writing: “Apparently it’s not ok to show empathy for people.”
Tammy Nobles, Patty Morin, and Alexis Nungaray offered their response to Gomez’s “crocodile tears.”
"What about our children who were brutally murdered, and raped and beat to death and left on the floor by these illegal immigrants?" Nobles asked in the video. Nobles’ daughter, Kathy Hamilton, was raped and murdered by an illegal alien from El Salvador, as Townhall previously reported.
"You don't know who you're crying for,” she said.
“It’s hard to believe that it’s actually genuine and real because she’s an actress,” Nungaray said. Her daughter, Jocelyn, was lured under a bridge and murdered by two illegal aliens from Venezuela in Texas. She was only 12 years old.
“My daughter was a child. There’s many other children whose lives were taken due to people who crossed here illegally,” she explained.
"No one has stood up except for us mothers to cry out about our children,” Morin added. Her daughter, Rachel, a mother of five, was murdered by an illegal alien in Maryland when she went for a hike in August 2023. Predictably, he is suspected of a murder in his home country, El Salvador.
“I just feel like it’s a ruse to deceive people and to garner sympathy for lawlessness,” she said.
All of these women were murdered by illegal aliens when President Joe Biden was in office.
All my people
LOL, fucking typical. The only ethnic group not permitted to show in-group solidarity is white people.
Funny thing is, in most of the world, including Mexico, Selena would be considered white.
you are more fluent in Spanish than Selena is.
"Donald Trump wins again"
[...]
"Back in 2021, Meta suspended Donald Trump from Facebook over his involvement in the January 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol. In response, Trump filed a federal lawsuit accusing the company of First Amendment violations and other claims—and it looks like he’s just secured a major win in that case.
[...]
Meta Platforms has agreed to pay roughly $25 million to settle a 2021 lawsuit that President Trump brought against the company and its CEO after the social-media platform suspended his accounts following the attack on the U.S. Capitol that year, according to people familiar with the agreement,” the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday..."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/donald-trump-wins-again/ar-AA1ynzeX?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=2fb6ccd3dd894356a068fc744979af51&ei=11
SMS Alert Text:
Islamic State media circulate poster calling for followers in Europe/US to carry out continuous attacks on Christians to avenge spilled Muslim blood.
Supplemental Info:
The poster (not included) is published by al-Azaim Media group and is now in circulation across jihadi social media accounts and discussion forums.
The main paragraph reads as follows:
"This is a call and incitement to all the supposed mujahidin in the heart of Europe and America and behind their lines: Do not consult anyone regarding your transcontinental jihad. Monitor the most substantial targets and strike relentlessly, for the blood of all Christians-from pole to pole- does not avenge a single drop of Muslims' blood spilled every day. These attacks are part of the revenge, but not all of it, so make them continuous, not limited by time or date."
So they have chosen... death.
"Make Istanbul Constantinople Again" was just something I started saying to troll people, but if they want to make it a reality...
Change things a bit: The next Democrat President appoints George Soros to reform the Federal Government.
Yeah, DOGE is a constitutional problem (if not a Crisis).
It really isn't. You just don't like the fact that DOGE is putting an end to corruption that's all over the government.