El Salvador Offers To House Violent U.S. Criminals and Deportees
Yet its penitentiary centers are already running at over 300 percent capacity.

El Salvador has extended an unprecedented offer to the United States: to take in deportees and violent criminals of any nationality. The announcement came from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Monday following a meeting with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele.
"In an act of extraordinary friendship to our county," Rubio told reporters, Bukele "has agreed to the most unprecedented, extraordinary, extraordinary migratory agreement anywhere in the world."
Under the proposed agreement, El Salvador will continue accepting its own citizens who have been deported from the United States. However, Bukele also pledged to "accept for deportation any illegal alien in the United States who is a criminal from any nationality, be they MS-13 or Tren de Agua and house them in his jails," Rubio said.
That includes "dangerous American criminals in custody in our country, including those of US citizenship and legal residents," Rubio added.
While the latter part of the proposal remains legally questionable, El Salvador could be part of a "safe third country" agreement, under which the U.S. could deport migrants to El Salvador when their home countries refuse them.
Bukele's aggressive crackdown on crime has made him a controversial yet admired figure. President Donald Trump called El Salvador an "example" for other nations in the Western Hemisphere.
Once considered one of the most dangerous nations in Central America, El Salvador has transformed into one of the region's safest under Bukele's administration.
Since declaring a state of emergency over gang violence in March 2022, the government has jailed over 81,000 alleged gang members—equivalent to 1.8 percent of the population, or three out of every 100 men. El Salvador now has the highest incarceration rate in the world.
Human rights organizations have raised concerns over the conditions within El Salvador's prison system. "Authorities have committed widespread abuses, including mass arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, torture and ill-treatment of detainees, and due process violations," reported Human Rights Watch. And prisons are "characterised by a lack of medical care, substandard basic services such as food and water," according to Amnesty International.
To accommodate its growing prison population, El Salvador constructed the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), a megaprison with the capacity to hold 40,000 inmates. But overcrowding remains an issue, with many of the country's prisons operating at over 300 percent capacity since the state of emergency began.
"Overcrowding constitutes a serious threat to prisoners' health and lives," reads the U.S. State Department's travel advisory for El Salvador. "In many facilities, provisions for sanitation, potable water, ventilation, temperature control, and lighting are inadequate or nonexistent." Reports from local organizations indicate that over 300 detainees have died in state custody since the crackdown began.
Given these conditions, it remains unclear how the country could manage an influx of additional inmates from abroad.
El Salvador's offer comes with the condition that the country is compensated in return for housing foreign criminals.
"We are willing to take in only convicted criminals (including convicted U.S. citizens) into our mega-prison (CECOT) in exchange for a fee," Bukele posted on X. "The fee would be relatively low for the U.S. but significant for us, making our entire prison system sustainable."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sounds like a Win -Win, El Salvador gets the money to construct the badly needed facilities. Everyone should applaud
But will they house the women-with-penises with the womb-having-persons?
"Please send me to Gitmo."
This is as funny as sending them to Martha's Vineyard.
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
Once again people need to see the game being played here. El Salvador prisons are a harsh place to put it nicely. But needed.
Just Having this threat out there to the feral Latin gangs gives them pause. Maybe you self deport to somewhere safer to be a menace. Maybe you lay low.
For some reason, this made me think of that cartoon Superjail. That show was a trip.
So everyone is okay with this part? That includes "dangerous AMERICAN criminals in custody in our country, including those of US citizenship and legal residents," Rubio added.
Hell no. I think that would violate a number of potential constitutional safeguards including the 8th amendment (cruel or unusual punishment), access to counsel, basic due process protections etc... It would be a litigation nightmare and likely end up costing more in the long run than just letting US inmates do their time in US facilities. The first gringo that got stabbed in El Salvador prison would be the start of the litigation tsunami.
Plus, given how many convicted US prisoners have or will have ongoing appeals getting them back to the district court/jurisdiction which heard the case for routine post trial motions or whatever would also be exorbitantly expensive.
Due to all these very foreseeable problems and high costs, I foresee little Marco pushing right on ahead with the full support of cheetolini himself.
It seems the offer was for US citizens ALREADY in custody for having committed a crime in El Salvador. Like Brittney Griner in China..
No, I'm not okay with it. You capitalized "AMERICAN" and not "CITIZENSHIP" and "LEGAL".
Do you have a problem with Americans, just want to break up black and brown immigrant families so you can lock their kids in cages, or do you think 14A doesn't apply to everyone, citizens and not, equally?
dafuq do I care if the dangerous American criminals are kept somewhere not technically in America?
Difficult to generate much sympathy.
Plus, looking at the picture, it doesn’t look too overcrowded.
purchase stock in producers of tattoo ink
It's also, once again, vague enough as to be a non-sequitur.
We kept American Citizens at Gitmo. Obama even dronesassinated one.
Are we concerned that naturalized citizens may get their citizenship revoked and deported according to due process *cough*Snowden*cough* or are we suddenly worried that the side that was beating people in the streets and burning shit might wind up on the wrong end of the wrong stick?
>>El Salvador has extended an unprecedented offer to the United States: to take in deportees and violent criminals of any nationality.
sounds like a free military for El Salvador I'd watch out if I was Guatemala and Honduras
Bukele's aggressive crackdown on crime has made him a controversial yet admired figure.
When only strong men will enforce laws, all who will be elected will be strongmen.
Wait a minute Reason. Why do they need a fee?
Aren't all these illegal immigrants just hard working assets?
You've been preaching for years that was the case.
Only those here illegally who have committed serious violent crimes. Anyone else gets deported back to their country of origin.
"El Salvador Offers To House Violent U.S. Criminals and Deportees
Yet its penitentiary centers are already running at over 300 percent capacity."
I have no problem sending murderers, rapists, child molesters, armed robbers and other violent convicted felons to El Salvador or the moon.
It would decrease the expense of paying prison personnel (not to mention securing their safety), wasting our tax dollars on rehabilitations methods that haven't worked for decades, and taxpayer paid defense lawyers making a ton of money on appeals.
You do the violent crime, you do the violent time.
Only a leftist would pee their pants over violent criminals, and no, they're not all innocent either.
Why do you think a convicted prisoner who was appealing their conviction would lose their right to appeal if they were housed in El Salvador? US taxpayers would just pay more for the flights back and forth vs if they were housed in the US prison system.
This is not going to happen for US citizens. It may happen for illegals from central america. But then you have the question of why would the US pay El Salvador to house someone deported to Ecuador? Or for someone from El Salvdador convicted of crime in the US who is deported back to El Salvador?
Yet its penitentiary centers are already running at over 300 percent capacity. "Overcrowding constitutes a serious threat to prisoners' health and lives," reads the U.S. State Department's travel advisory for El Salvador.
I don’t really care, Margaret.
Three remarkable things happened to me recently on this immigration discussion
1) Girogio Meloni's thermonuclear takedown of Macron and of Frances human rights violations in 10 African countries , fueling emigration
2) A Dutch economist's analysis of the economic and social costs of immigration (turned on to this by Aayan Hirsi Ali)
3) And Uhuru Kenyatta's short withering attack on African complaints about loss of American money
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyPKofRP00
IT all leads to "TRUMP IS 100% right in his approach to immigration."