Trump Praised His A.G. Pick for Reducing Opioid Overdoses. In Reality, Drug Deaths Surged Under Her Watch.
Pam Bondi cracked down on "pill mills" in Florida. The result was increased consumption of black-market alternatives.

When President Donald Trump announced his nomination of Pam Bondi as attorney general, he extolled her "incredible job" in "work[ing] to stop the trafficking of deadly drugs and reduc[ing] the tragedy of Fentanyl Overdose Deaths." Yet those deaths exploded on Bondi's watch as Florida's attorney general.
According to data from the Florida Department of Health, the age-adjusted rate of "deaths from drug poisoning" did fall a bit after Bondi took office, from 13.7 per 100,000 residents in 2011 to 12.1 in 2013. But then it resumed its upward trajectory, reaching 25.1—nearly double the 2011 rate—by the time Bondi left office in 2019. The death rate rose sharply in 2020 (as it did across the country), rose again in 2021, and declined in 2022 and 2023, when it was 30.8 per 100,000.
In 2019, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Florida ranked 20th on the list of states with the highest drug death rates, down from 15th in 2011. But despite that relative improvement, Florida's rate as reported by the CDC rose by 66 percent during that period. In absolute terms, the annual number of drug deaths rose by more than 80 percent.
Bondi's fans praised her for cracking down on "pill mills," which may have made it harder for nonmedical drug consumers (as well as bona fide patients) to obtain prescription opioids such as hydrocodone and oxycodone. But the result was increased consumption of black market alternatives, which are much more dangerous because their quality and potency are highly variable and unpredictable. That hazard was magnified by the simultaneous proliferation of illicit fentanyl as a heroin booster and substitute—a development that likewise was driven by prohibition, which favors more potent drugs that are easier to conceal and smuggle.
The correlation of aggressive drug law enforcement with escalating drug-related deaths is by no means limited to Florida. But Bondi's approach epitomized what went wrong across the country. Nationally, restrictions on pain medication succeeded in reducing opioid prescriptions, which fell by more than half from 2010 to 2022. But that reduction did not slow, let alone reverse, the upward trend in opioid-related deaths, which instead accelerated.
That lesson seems to be lost on Bondi. Fox News reported that her former colleagues in Florida "expect she will bring the same playbook to Washington."
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Florida Drug Deaths Surged on Pam Bondi's Watch."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
JS;dr
^ "I'm an oversocialized little bitch"
^ "I'm a TDS-addled steaming pile of shit"
Poor Scottie.
We know you’re a retarded bitch. You don’t need to prove it to us.
JS;dr
JS & RD (Reason on Drugs); extra dr
Reason just can't help but to attack Trump. Don't they understand that his tariffs will force Canada and Mexico to win the War on Drugs? Pretty soon stories like this won't exist because there won't be any more illegal drugs, thanks to Trump and his dreamy tariffs.
More ideas™ !
Mexico already caved in this morning. One down, one to go.
They forced Mexico to the table to negotiate. Trump wins again. He'll get some kind of accommodation; something is better than nothing, which is all Donkeys like JS have.
Suck it, JS!
Just so were clear... the Mexican government, which Trump claims is a criminal syndicate in league with the drug traffickers... agreed to send 10k troops to the northern border and Trump 'won' and cancelled the tariffs.
Hahhahahaahahahhaaha.
Perhaps Trump saw the DOW futures projected 600pt loss and won a worthless concession from Mexico so he can claim victory to his low IQ base? Nah. The Mexican Army is going to win the war on drugs any day now. Just you wait!
Delayed the tariffs for 30 days to see if Mexico actually does what it agreed to.
The death rate rose sharply in 2020 (as it did across the country), rose again in 2021, and declined in 2022 and 2023, when it was 30.8 per 100,000.
If Bondi wasn't in office, why does this matter?
It ceased being her responsibility.
The fact that her policies don't work is irrelevant... Now that SHE is empowered again, they will be SURE to suddenly start working!!! 'Cause Trump Magic!!!
Spastic asshole makes an asshole of himself again!
"If Bondi wasn't in office, why does this matter?"
Because the TDS-addled shit-pile Sullum could make some connections with Trump.
He really does need to get reamed with a barb-wire-wrapped broomstick and then fuck off and die, don't he?
Didn't JS write an article literally last week saying Portland delegalizing drugs wasn't responsible for drug death decreasing?
During Prohibition the production, sale, and distribution of alcohol was illegal. Consumption and possession was not.
Decriminalization means they don't bust people for possession and consumption. Production, sale and distribution are still illegal.
Was alcohol legal during Prohibition? No? Then why do you say drugs are legal in places where it's decriminalized?
Idiot.
Decriminalization means they don't bust people for possession and consumption. Production, sale and distribution are still illegal.
Yeah, no. Try again.
Oregon (D)
Florida (R)
So, yes, it is very different to TDS sufferers.
So the opioid causes was perceived as an overptescription of highly addictive painkillers. The restrictions on prescriptions of such drugs reduced deaths by prescription drugs, which are more the tesponsibility of legitimate markets and their regulators. If deaths from black market sources increased, is that the responsibility of the state, or the users? Is the user in anyway responsible for their own condition?
^THIS +100000000000 Well said
"Is the user in anyway responsible for their own condition?"
Oh heavens no. /s Commie is all about nobody being individually responsible for anything. Everything under the sun is all 'Gov-Gods with Guns' responsibility/s; even the weather.
Legalize them all, enforce existing laws regarding theft, DUI, child support, etc., and then let Darwin sort it out.
^THIS +1000000000.
Criminalizing preemptively the "belief they'll commit a crime against someone" is the very roots of a nanny state.
Also, eliminate any special protections for addict tenants, and being intoxicated is no longer a mitigating factor in criminal charges or sentencing, but a mulitpier.
Legalize them, but make sure sales are recorded and batches are marked in such a way that when some 14-yr old dies whomever bought that batch for him gets a nice long prison sentence.
Trump Praised His A.G. Pick for Reducing Opioid Overdoses. In Reality, Drug Deaths Surged Under Her Watch.
These two statements aren't mutually exclusive and/or don't contradict.
And I am no fan of Pam Bondi's. Quite the opposite. Jacob Sullum sucks as a journalist, can we please get someone better to provide some sort of legitimate opposition rather than just more shrieking Trump Derangement Syndrome? YouTube and other venues are full of content creators that provide more solid opposition to Bondi across a number of topics. Why would anyone continue to read Sullum's rabid frothing?
The result was increased consumption of black-market alternatives.
No, the result was a demographic of morons who would rather needlessly accept a highly increased risk to chase their recreational high.
Screw 'em. This is a win. And Pam is right. Opioid deaths were reduced. The only thing that "surged" were Darwin Award recipients. You don't get to blame the State for the foolish/fatal actions of addicts.
They made their choice.
Is fentanyl an opioid or not? What about heroin?
If 100 people die from oxycodone in one year; and the next year 30 people die from oxycodone but 1100 die from heroin ... in what universe is the statement 'opioid deaths were reduced' make any sense?? Unless one is being deliberately obtuse it doesn't make sense.
I think you will find that opioids as a class include natural, semi-synthetic and fully synthetic drugs. All varieties of which are opioids and act in a similar manner in the human body and are sought for the same effects by its users.
If 100 people die from oxycodone in one year; and the next year 30 people die from oxycodone but 1100 die from heroin ... in what universe is the statement 'opioid deaths were reduced' make any sense??
It doesn't make sense in the first place because it's intentionally ambiguous. What's happening here is that Jakey Jakey News Is Fakey is (as you are) taking advantage of that ambiguity to run his narrative.
Bondi cracked down on "pill mills" and in doing so resulted in less opioid deaths. Fact. Addicts turned to the black market instead, which increased death rates for them. Fact.
Bondi had nothing to do with that second fact. Nothing whatsoever. That was 100% on the addicts.
But here's Fakey's headline: Trump Praised His A.G. Pick for Reducing Opioid Overdoses. In Reality, Drug Deaths Surged Under Her Watch.
No, they didn't surge under her watch. They surged in the black market. That's not her watch. She has no control over the black market. She doesn't supervise it. She can't establish policy there.
Let's apply your numbers. 100 people die from oxy obtained from pill mills. Bondi does things. Now only 30 people die from oxy obtained from pill mills. Yay! The opioid deaths WERE REDUCED. What 1100 people do on the black market in the meantime is 100% irrelevant to that.
Jakey Fakey is blaming Bondi for the actions of criminal addicts, and he's doing so by conflating legal obtaining of prescription drugs with black market street crime. Now, if he (or you) want to make the argument that Bondi's actions caused the black market street crime, you can - but I'd caution you not to, because that's retarded.
It's like saying, "Pam took away her kid's keys, therefore it's her fault he stole the car." No. That's retarded. Because that's 100% on the kid.
Just like black market opioid deaths - see how I accurately qualified the term to remove ambiguity - in Florida are 100% on the junkie addict criminals. And you know it (but Jakey might actually not because he's legit retarded).
The attorney general of FL has no control over law enforcement in the state of Florida? Odd take.
And yes, a very large portion of the illegal black market opioid users started on and became addicted to opioids from the legal market. Its quite a familiar story for anyone who knows anything about opioid addiction. The crack down on pills took away one source of opioids but didn't do shit to address the underlying addiction. The end result is rather predictable if not guaranteed.
Same as heroin being cut with fentanyl and now people just going straight to fentanyl; dealers fucking up the dose/strength and people accidentally OD'ing. All of it is predictable if you care about objective reality and the world as it exists not some fantasy land that doesn't.
You want to blame the construction worker who fell off a roof and broke 3 vertebrae for taking powerful prescribed meds and becoming addicted to a pain killer?? That's on you bro.
The attorney general of FL has no control over law enforcement in the state of Florida? Odd take.
I didn't say she had no control over law enforcement. I said she had no control over the development of black markets and the people who seek them out. The doing so of both being already illegal.
And let's be real - if we're going to prioritize police resources, it should be for actual victims of actual crime. Not willing victims who go seeking out crime for the exclusive purpose of their own detriment and self-destruction. I mean, if we can get to them great - but go stop the robbery in progress because you deal with the unresponsive guy in the alley with a needle in his arm.
You want to blame the construction worker who fell off a roof and broke 3 vertebrae for taking powerful prescribed meds and becoming addicted to a pain killer?? That's on you bro.
No, it's actually on them. I mean, where's your integrity.
"30.8 per 100,000"
Yea, they all hardworking taxpaying 8-5 family guys with 2.5 kids and a golden retriever who all "fell off a roof" and broke their backs. Sure. Right. 😉
Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining, Windy.
"You don't get to blame the State for the foolish/fatal actions of addicts."
Right. But isn't that exactly what 'State' drug prohibition is?
Blaming all the addicts you see on the State.
So you agree that cracking down on drug mills was a mistake.
Yes. I'm against Government trying to regulate PERSONAL lives.
Gov - 'Guns' are there to ensure Individual Liberty and Justice for all.
Not to try and babysit (Gun-Dictate) the population under what they believe is a better way to live one's own life.
I don't know, because that's not an argument I made.
Try real hard Sullum.
As-if pharmaceutical didn't have a big enough monopoly with little pills costing as high as $500/each. Only MORE 'Guns' will save the people from their own Liberty. /s
What should the government do about these high prices?
Only the Gov-Gods with 'Guns' can prevent high prices?
Or *STOP* using Gov - 'Guns' to monopolize drugs under the mega-horn crusade of saving 1 in 4,000 from their own self-destruction.
Bondi may be a corrupt - and in this instance, incompetent - sleaze, but at least she genuinely has the qualifications and experience for the AG position, so we should be thankful for small mercies.
I'm sure the argument is that that drug deaths would have been even higher had she not been at the helm.
Wow. Trump lied. It must be a day that ends in "y".
Meh. Bondi's a swamp creature, but no more so than most of Trump's nominees, and she's at least formally "qualified" for the position.
I'd rather have her 800 miles away in DC than here in Florida.
You mistake both sides of the argument
On the one side
92% of fatal drug overdoses are accidental.
4% are suicides.
But on the other
84% involve illicit drugs like fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and meth.
Still the author does not say Pam is doing X wrong because his premise is "Doing anything is wrong"