Trump's Deportation Plan Is About Numbers, Not Safety
Once everyone is a priority, no particular group, including criminals, is singled out for enforcement.

The Trump administration's plan to arrest and deport as many undocumented immigrants as possible quickly became a numbers game as White House officials set quotas and government press officers highlighted each day's deportation tally. As president, Donald Trump is continuing his campaign-trail rhetoric by insisting federal officers are rounding up murderers, even though a deportation policy that focuses on generating impressive numbers to achieve a "mission accomplished" moment cannot also prioritize removing dangerous criminals.
In short, politics and public relations dominate the Trump deportation plan. That makes sense since economists would advocate for more immigration, not removing potentially millions of people from the U.S. labor force.
What are the key things to know about the Trump deportation effort?
The Trump administration claimed it removed and returned 7,300 undocumented immigrants in its first week. That would represent a pace of 379,600 removals in a year. That would be higher than the annual removals for the past 10 years but lower than the FY 2012, FY 2013, and FY 2014 removal totals of, respectively, 415,579, 432,334, and 405,193, published by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
After Trump became "disappointed" in the number of arrests so far, The Washington Post reported, the administration set arrest quotas, telling Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials that "each of the agency's field offices should make 75 arrests per day and managers would be held accountable for missing those targets." The Post added, "The orders significantly increase the chance that officers will engage in more indiscriminate enforcement tactics or face accusations of civil rights violations as they strain to meet quotas, according to current and former ICE officials."
The Trump administration at first denied the story about quotas until White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller went on CNN and warned ICE agents that arrest quotas are a "floor, not a ceiling." Miller said, "The goal is to arrest at least that many, but hopefully many more."
Setting numerical targets for arrests invites abuse and reduces individuals to widgets. A 2022 Virginia law sought to mitigate those risks by banning police and sheriff's departments from "establishing a formal or informal quota that requires a law-enforcement officer to make a specific number of arrests or issue a specific number of summonses within a designated period of time." Nick Sibilla of the Institute for Justice, a public-interest law firm, called it a "long-overdue reform."
Given the desire for numbers and other factors, cases of U.S. citizens being held or arrested by ICE are likely—and already happening. A U.S. military veteran from Puerto Rico was apprehended during a raid in New Jersey. (Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens.) "At least 15 Indigenous people in Arizona and New Mexico have reported being stopped at their homes and workplaces, questioned or detained by federal law enforcement and asked to produce proof of citizenship during immigration raids since Wednesday, according to Navajo Nation officials," reported CNN.
During most presidential administrations, due to limited resources, ICE focuses on people with criminal convictions. In FY 2024, ICE reported, "Over 81,312 (71.7%) of the 113,431 arrests were of noncitizens with criminal convictions or pending charges." Data obtained by NBC News showed only 52 percent of the 1,179 ICE arrests on Sunday were considered "criminal arrests." That percentage will likely trend lower as White House officials continue to press ICE agents to increase the overall number of potential deportees.
Press and social media mentions have become ends in themselves for the Trump deportation plan. CNN reported that ICE agents have been told to be "camera-ready." In Chicago, celebrity talk show host Dr. Phil accompanied agents on an enforcement operation. Trump officials chose to use more expensive but higher-profile military aircraft for some deportation flights. In New York, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem appeared on social media dressed in a flak jacket and addressed a camera.
Criminals are not the primary focus of ICE enforcement actions. The White House has directed officers to generate numbers. Once everyone is a priority, no particular group, including criminals, is singled out for enforcement.
Other policy changes, such as removing legal status from Venezuelans and others with Temporary Protected Status or those who entered the U.S. lawfully with sponsors through humanitarian parole programs, will provide more potential deportees by creating more undocumented immigrants. That appears to be a key part of the Trump plan since officials hope these individuals will be easy to find and add to the deportation tally.
The lack of detention capacity could limit the Trump team's ability to lock up and deport undocumented immigrants. In January 2025, the average daily population of individuals in ICE detention facilities was 40,099. That means ICE likely does not have space to add tens of thousands more detainees. ICE hopes to expand its detention capacity via appropriations in a reconciliation bill, but that could take time. On January 29, Trump ordered the construction of a facility to detain up to 30,000 migrants at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, but questions abound on the legality, practicality, and appropriateness of the plan.
Countries cannot be forced to take back citizens the U.S. government wishes to deport. The U.S. government can threaten a "recalcitrant" country with visa sanctions or other actions, as Trump did recently with Colombia. Cuba and Venezuela are two countries with citizens in the U.S. that generally have refused to accept deportees.
Trump officials will likely seek to overcome problems with countries and deportees in a few ways. First, they may detain people long-term in miserable conditions to compel them to depart voluntarily. Administration officials can attempt that against Cubans and Venezuelans but also with people whose pending asylum claims may take years to adjudicate. The U.S.-recognized president-elect of Venezuela, Edmundo González, fears Trump will cut a deportation deal with Nicolás Maduro that would let the authoritarian ruler "use returning Venezuelans to his political advantage."
Second, the administration has floated arranging with a third country, such as El Salvador, to accept non-Salvadoran deportees. Once the individuals leave the U.S., Trump officials are unlikely to worry about the fate of families and individuals from Venezuela or elsewhere deposited in an unfamiliar country.
The Trump administration, by design, has not provided a specific number of deportations that will be hailed as a success if reached. Trump and his allies will likely boast about any number of people they manage to remove from the country in year one and devote more resources to deporting more people in years two, three, and four. Considering the vast majority of deportees will not be criminals but men, women, and children who lived and worked in the U.S. peacefully for years, Americans will decide if the number hailed by government officials is cause for celebration.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
300k only undoes a couple months of Biden. This is before considering anchor baby problems, those who still sneak through, and special circumstances. I agree with Trump that the pace needs to be faster just to undo recent damage.
1500 criminals so far. Not about safety though.
Only 500 of them were murderers thus we're not safer that 1,500 are gone!!111!!!11!!!!
Some of the deported rapists probably said sorry.
The Trump administration, by design, has not provided a specific number of deportations that will be hailed as a success if reached.
But they are preparing the Mission Accomplished banner and looking for a suitable site for the photo op.
Nope. He’s going to deport all your help.
Indeed. I don't care about the safety. Millions of illegals are in this country and should be repatriated to their home countries immediately. Want to come here? Apply and stand in line, sorry your country is a shithole but it's not our fault and you have no right to come here
It is absolutely our fault that they are not allowed to seek sanctuary, Congress makes laws, not the legislature or dictator of foreign nations. They have no say in the policies enacted by the US that have existed since 1882 in a continuous manner with some language having never been changed. Whether we let someone in or not is entirely a domestic issue and just because one cannot appeal consular decisions does not make the scheme that enabled such a policy a matter dictated by foreign powers. Unless you know a way to pre-determine the circumstances and place of your birth ahead of time, in which case why aren't you out monetizing the shit out of this miraculous device, nobody chose the circumstances and situation they found themselves in and can do little to stop it. And quite a bit of it is our fault, America still acts as if it's the indispensable nation in the world - which by the way is a great stance to take if you want to prop up say the Chinese Communist Party whose raison d'etre is anti-imperialist in rhetoric even today. And Iran, North Korea, and Russia can tweak their propaganda machine just a tiny bit and simply show what America has done (not to them, by large, but we also don't own a patent to agitprop).
Apply and stand in line? Apply where? What line? The most in-demand visa category literally runs a lottery like it's some MegaMillions drawing or seeing which pro sports team that tanked the hardest will get the first pick in the draft next season. Because immigration law is effectively stuck in a state that is more Frankenstein's Monster than anything else. Why do we give priority to 2 countries that doesn't have the population to fill a quota that for every other country have to hope they hit a lottery? Why do people who according to black letter law qualify for an immigrant visa stuck waiting decades for a spot to open up? Why do you insult the intelligence of everyone who reads this by acting like everyone is too dumb to know that the 'wait in line' argument can't be made good faith since there's no visa category for most people, categorically, full stop? Do you stand outside of the Super Bowl waiting for a line to form and think eventually you'll get in? Go try it, if you can dish it but can't actually do the equivalently nonsensical act, then congrats, at least Randy Newman wrote some lyrics about you.
The line of people who want to live in a mansion in Beverly Hills is also far longer than we can accommodate. Other than winning a lottery, it's beyond the reach of most Americans. Is that the fault of Beverly Hills?
The US already takes in over 1 million legal immigrants per year, more than any other country in the world by a wide margin. And that number does not even include the 3x as many who have been arriving the past few years claiming asylum or entering illegally. We have been beyond generous, to a fault.
That's a whole lot of words to say you'd prefer we all pay for them. No. Hell no.
$59 million spent in one week to house illegal aliens in luxury hotels in N.Y. City should be enough to enrage anyone.
Thank you Elon Musk for DOGE!
Laken Riley and A.J. Wise unavailable for comment.
As president, Donald Trump is continuing his campaign-trail rhetoric by insisting federal officers are rounding up murderers, even though a deportation policy that focuses on generating impressive numbers to achieve a "mission accomplished" moment cannot also prioritize removing dangerous criminals.
I don't think your "In rush to deport illegal immigrants, Trump screws up priorities, deports some rapists ahead of murderers." argument has the legs you think it has.
More TDS from Koch funded open border propagandists at Reason.
Trump will be lucky (due to opposition by Trump haters and other open borders advocates) if can deport 1 million illegal aliens (just 5% of the estimated 20 million illegal immigrants), but at least he's sharply reduced (by about 90%) the number of new arrivals.
Reason has been wrong to advocate for open borders during the past decade (due primarily to Koch funding).
The Trump administration claimed it removed and returned 7,300 undocumented immigrants in its first week. That would represent a pace of 379,600 removals in a year.
Gonna take a long time to round up millions of vermin at that rate. Step up the pace!
Do you ever say something that isn't a retarded MSNBC talking point?
Here the honest hardworking immigrants you are crying over sarc.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trumps-ice-racks-up-hundreds-arrests-including-illegal-immigrants-arrested-horror-crimes
To think you once lied and said you supported deporting criminals lol.
Is that what the voices tell you? Interesting. You can keep arguing with them. I'll stay out of it.
You seem stuck on this retarded response. How's it working for you? I see many people continuing to call you a retard. Seems to not be working.
I see many people continuing to call you a retard.
I don't. Must be the idiots I keep on mute.
Tell you what. You stop shrieking at the voices in your head and claiming they're me, and I'll stop pointing it out. Deal?
Post the list!
Also, I'm pretty sure even Jeffy and Shrike think you're a gullible retard. They're just not complaining about it.
There’s no list. Also, he’s hardly here anymore.
True.
YOU aren't thinking through what you say. Too fast and then run for cover, just fast enough and they leave without being told to leave.
Good, the number of illegals should be 0.
The U.S. government can threaten a "recalcitrant" country with visa sanctions or other actions, as Trump did recently with Colombia.
And it did indeed work.
Tough days ahead for Koch and Chamber of Commerce.
And it did indeed work.
And if it did work, this time?
Do you think that the U.S. will always have the superior bargaining position and be able to cause more damage to them than they can cause to us in a political or trade dispute? And is that even the wisest way to deal with it if is true? Since we could still be damaged if they remained recalcitrant or escalated the dispute instead of caving?
Diplomacy is the art of persuading other countries to do what is in our interest. But they are no different than us in that they will only want to do what is in their interest. A country that bends to what we want because we threaten them is only going to keep doing that as long as they believe the threats and that bending will cost them less in the long run that taking a stand for themselves.
On top of all of that, the U.S. isn't the only country that they could be dealing with. Another country that offers them a better deal with honey, rather than vinegar, could end up backing them up against us, and then where will we be?
The ultimate lesson here is that you don't fucking threaten allies and countries you want to be allies as if that is a normal negotiating tactic. Having countries that trust that you will work with them and compromise and not turn on them as soon as you think you can "re-negotiate" from a stronger position than you had a few years ago is more valuable than whatever short-term domestic political gains you can squeeze out of them by being the bully.
Trump is trashing our reputation again, even worse than he did before. No one is going to trust us or want to ally with us unless they really do have no other choice.
Do you think Colombia was persuaded? Because, as the ex Kenyan president pointed out, the other countries seem to just expect free shit from us. A one way streets.
How much do you actually know about what countries get "free shit" from us? And compare that to how much the U.S. has extracted from 'third-world' countries since post-WWII years.
Don't pretend that this is some moral play to make other countries play "fair" or pay their fair share in NATO defense or whatever. Fair, in the mind of people like Trump, is them winning. That is why Trump didn't raise his hand in 2015 when asked at an early GOP primary debate to pledge to support whoever the GOP nominee was. He said it would depend on whether he was treated "fairly". Translation, it would only be fair if he won, so why bother pledging to support someone else as the GOP nominee when they could only beat him if he wasn't treated fairly?
^ This assholic steaming pile of lefty shit justifies murder if it keeps proles from putting feet on desks:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
get reamed with a barb-wire wrapped broomstick and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
Nevermind. Sevo is a lost cause and proudly proclaims exactly who he is. He doesn't need my help to make it clear to everyone that he is the embarrassment that he admits to being.
^ This assholic steaming pile of lefty shit justifies murder if it keeps proles from putting feet on desks:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
Since we could still be damaged if they remained recalcitrant or escalated the dispute instead of caving?
What was Colombia going to to?
Declare war? Make my fucking day.
and countries you want to be allies
All of South and Central should be treated as enemies until they prove otherwise.
What was Colombia going to to?
Declare war? Make my fucking day.
I can see why you like Trump so much. You think that the only thing that matters is how tough you look and whether you can make the other guys look weak in comparison. How do you function in your daily life if you treat everyone you work with or deal with like that? The answer is, you don't treat other people that way, unless you're actually a sociopath. Or maybe you're a "successful" businessperson in the same way that Trump has been throughout his life. Maybe he'll make America successful in the same way. We'll look all rich and tough on paper, but no one will really want to do business with us if they have other options.
And they will have other, better options, and then, when we're losing even more massive amounts of money than we already are, we'll find a way to just write off our losses and not pay income taxes for over a decade because of how much we lost. And the only places that will take any financial risk on us are the ones that have their own history of shady practices and a reputation for corruption.
How do you function in your daily life if you treat everyone you work with or deal with like that?
All of South and Central should be treated as enemies until they prove otherwise.
The US isn't located in either.
Hope that helps.
^ This steaming pile of lefty shit justifies murder if it keeps proles from putting feet on desks:
This assholeic slimy pile of lefty shit supports murder as a preventative, for, well as an asshole, he's not really sure:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
get reamed with a barb-wire wrapped broomstick and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
BTW, JasonT20, get reamed with a barbwire-wrapped broomstick and then make your family proud by dying as a result.
They deserve to be free or your pathetic existence.
^ This steaming pile of lefty shit justifies murder if it keeps proles from putting feet on desks:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
Let's talk like normal folk over a beer. You think Trudeau is a dependable allie? Trading bracelets with teen girls at the Taylor Swift concert. An allly
An Mexico? Importing drugs and crime lords by the thousands. Maybe Venezuela is dependable, maybe we could use some Tren de Aragua demons for something.
We need Netherlands, Italy, Hungary --- the Mensch
What we can do, and what we should do, is stop issuing visas to any country that refuses to take back their own citizens.
It's about enforcing the law: The Executive's job.
I'm reminded of Frank Dikotter's description of Mao's great leap forward, in which quotas of counterrevolutionaries were assigned top down. At each further layer of descent there developed competition to outdo the others in exceeding the quota.
Let's hear it for Mao!
How many refugees does China take in?
Or, let's hear it for DAVEH strawman! Did you drag it all the way from home, or find it on the way here?
Sweden: 79% of ‘refugees’ have vacationed in the country from which they supposedly fled for their lives
https://jihadwatch.org/2022/09/sweden-79-of-refugees-have-vacationed-in-the-country-from-which-they-supposedly-fled-for-their-lives
Amazing, isn't it.
Strange how a certain libertarian magazine has no interest in reporting on people abusing a government program.
This is the good type of fraud.
Like Mooly G defends a good type of racism!
Holy Fuck!
Hey Reason, you want Crusades? Because this is how you get Crusades!
Sweden seeing an average of one explosion per day after an Iraqi refugee who burned a Koran was murdered, potentially executed by foreign agents.
You’re going to hurt their little fee fees.
Stop getting riled up by cultural bombings. Who are we to judge their culture.
Yeah, someone from Sweden recently posted that fact on a Substack I read and I nearly lost it. That's fucking insane. And yet so many Swedes would probably insist that the US is a dangerous place because it permits civilian firearm ownership. But if I were to guess how many bombings there had been in the US since the New Year, my guess would be "zero".
The citizens of Austria would like a word or two:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14406583/Migrant-laughed-stabbed-14-year-old-boy-death-Austrian-knife-rampage-applied-asylum-avoid-drafted-Syrian-military.html
Sweden is disastrous
‘No control’: Sweden grapples with bomb violence wave
Sweden saw 27 bombings in 27 days to begin 2025.
I’m deporting all the rodents from my attic, not just the ones who chew the wires to the light fixtures and the hVAc ducts, all of them poop though
I assume we can all agree that any US citizen who is physically in the process of being mistakenly deported is entitled to use such force as is reasonably necessary to prevent the deportation.
Boy, you sure latched on to that faint possibility, huh?
Would probably be a lot less mistakes being made if they had cracked down on the rampant identification fraud from illegals.
I doubt it will happen that often, but it will definitely happen, so the question is what should the citizen do. What's an acceptable error rate, btw?
VD thinks that producing some ID is sufficient, but that is of course naive.
As much force as it takes to pull your ID out of your wallet.
Yes, they absolutely are justified to defend themselves in that situation. Though it's likely ill advised.
Yes.
We all agree on that. Just as we agree on that for any other crime.
We don't agree that that is always *the best option in the circumstances* - but we all agree that we can use appropriate force against the agents of the state to prevent illegal imprisonment.
We are, after all, libertarians.
I assume we can all agree that that SRG is a slimy pile of smug assholery.
But , no, YOU are defining 'mistakenly' and you aren't even there 🙂
Fly the Cuban illegals to Guantanamo and then shove them through the perimeter fence. Problem solved.
Very few Cubans are here illegally due to the special treatments they have received.
Not really the point though.
Shove them through the fence - wherever they came from - now they're refugees and Cuba is morally and legally obligated to take care of them for the rest of their lives. That's how we're told it works for the US.
Interesting though - Mexico is beefing up its southern border security in the wake of the 'stay in Mexico' policy. Its almost like they don't feel they have an obligation to take care of Hondurans just seeking to be free.
There is only one group; those who crossed the border illegally.
And that group is entirely made up of criminals.
As are most citizens of the US if you dig deep enough into federal laws.
Illegal trespassing is Illegal.
Are you trying to pretend Trump is deporting someone who hasn't broken the law?
Yes, they're pretending that. See SRG2's comment above.
SRG is a slimy pile of lefty shit ain't s/he?
It has happened and it will happen. The other question is what is an acceptable error rate
See? They are pretending that.
Of course they have all broken the law, but illegal and criminal aren't the same thing. Focusing first on actual criminals who victimize other people for deportation seems like a no brainer and will help to keep public support for deportation of illegals high. Pretending that the guy mowing lawns is the same as the gang member or crazy rapist isn't really helpful. There is a limit to how quickly this can be done, so it makes total sense to first focus on the real public safety threats.
Sure. That is already the priority.
But sitting on your arse while waiting to find out where the next murderer on the list isn't going to fly.
Go round up some dudes mowing lawn's if you've got nothing else to do.
Theyve focused primarily on violent criminals. But they also aren't ignoring it when they find others illegally here.
As Homan has said, since sanctuary cities will not cooperate, then ICE has to find the violent criminals at home or at their job.
They are putting the "non-violent" ones at risk.
Yes, Zeb, exactly. Tren de Aragua went on just that basis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UfjyIl-CyY
We know what Sarc thinks should be done to trespassers.
Maybe, and I’m just spitballing here, the problem wouldn’t be so bad (and these measures wouldn’t be deemed necessary by a lot of the electorate) if the government hadn’t spent 20+ years half-assing one of their core responsibilities?
>Once everyone is a priority, no particular group, including criminals, is singled out for enforcement.
Stuart. Bruh. Not everyone is a priority though, are they?
Trump's prioritizing violent criminals. Sure, he'll eventually get to everyone else, but he's actually prioritizing.
*HOWEVER*, Stuart, because non-violent illegal immigrants that are swept up in these raids are also processed does not mean that the violent ones aren't the priority.
If you're trying to get all the fish in the pond out, even if you want the big ones first, you don't discard the little ones that get into your net.
>even though a deportation policy that focuses on generating impressive numbers to achieve a "mission accomplished" moment cannot also prioritize removing dangerous criminals.
Really depends on how many murderers there are, doesn't it, Stuart?
Clearly I should have read all of the comments first... *sigh*
Every illegal/undocumented immigrant is a criminal. So going after all of them is prioritizing criminals.
Trump's press (whatever) made this clear on day one. An illegal alien is a criminal, and this should not be hard to understand. She pointed out that the last administration was not concerned with enforcing the laws, but this one is.
NO
Jaywalking is not on a par with drug-related murders.
Tren de Aragua does before the guy doing the $20/hour roofing in your neighborhood. This is the Biden approach, your approach.
Duh, I think we should get out of Afghanistan. Duh, yeah, okay "GO!!!"
Odd that StuA misses the one thing spoiled in the title. Aren't electoral votes based on Average District Populations, or nosecounts? God's Own Prohibitionists clearly see that packing the commie States with noses tilts the playing field away from nazi States. So OF COURSE they seek to deport non-citizens, for few of those are dumb enough to inhabit nazi states. For similar reasons the GOP infiltrated and wrecked the LP after watching Gary draw enough votes from prohibitionist Dems to install Trump. The party that includes or hires mathematicians gets an advantage. That USED to be the LP, before the Jesus Caucus Anschluss.
Illegal is illegal and to avoid the costly, pointless, and REASON method of sifting through hundreds of thousands to find who is 'more illegal'. Trump says get em all. A truly good management approach in the non-government world. You sound to me like Wm F Buckley and that is no compliment.
You know what? I don't freaking CARE that some of the deportees weren't criminals aside from being here illegally. They're all supposed to be deported.
I also dislike the whole "They're not criminals if you excuse the crimes they committed" mentality.
Everyone seems to skip over the detainment of non-illegals. If you're innocent but in a room full of people wanted for murder and the cops come in to arrest them is it at all unreasonable for them to cuff you and check your ID and check you for warrants before letting you go? That's what they're complaining about. To my knowledge not a single citizen found in the midst of a group of criminally wanted illegals has been held past that point, I haven't heard arrested, just detained, and certainly haven't heard of any being deported.
[A] deportation policy that focuses on generating impressive numbers to achieve a "mission accomplished" moment cannot also prioritize removing dangerous criminals.
Well, I suppose that depends on how many dangerous criminals are in the country illegally, now doesn't it?
NO, it doesn't. They don't register under the "I am in US illegally and I am a dangerous criminal too" ACT So you are both wrong.
Your priority is dangerous criminals however hard in practice it is to be 100% sure. AND many are here illegally because Biden-Harris couln't be bothered to put anyone on a Naturalization path.
Many I am sure would crave a path to citizenship. We failed them, that is Biden adn Harris failed the people that came here with good records and intentions.
I really don't think you want to take a "it's about the numbers" approach to this subject.
Trump's got a LONG way to go to dealing with the sheer numbers that Team Biden/Kamala wrongfully ignored crossing our border.
That would represent a pace of 379,600 removals in a year.
If anything, you should be lauding his restraint. Folks on the ground are clamoring for even more than that. Threefold, at least. The United States of America has had ENOUGH of illegal alienage. They want them ALL gone. And at this point, they don't really care how anymore.
That is unrealistically theoretical No one is going to wait 3-4 years in limbo. They will get on the path to citizenship or voluntarily leave. If you go any faster you encourage not compliance but hiding.
It is the difference between the movies' "I'll give you 15 minutes ot get out of town " or "You have a week and I want you gone"
One is an invitation to a quick draw to slay the Marshall and the other is for most people "It's not worth the trouble, I'm leaving "
To be fair, the plan to replace the US population with migrants is all about numbers, not safety.
Sounds like a lot but that's still not even keeping pace with the number of entries.
False. He was briefly stopped and asked to show ID (which he could have refused to do)
Then why is the US forced to take in illegal immigrants?
We can just unceremoniously drop them off. For Cuba, that's super easy, just push them out of the gate at Guantanamo.
Trump's Deportation Plan Is About Numbers, Not Safety
I'm confused... Isn't there safety in numbers?
"Trump's Deportation Plan Is About Numbers, Not Safety"
Not True! Intent matters!
To find the violent one's you sort through a lot of illegal immigrants who are not violent, but while you're there it makes sense to deport those you find along the way. It's just more efficient this way!
One of the comments from those at the border, that is U.S. Border Patrol is that the numbers are way down from when dementia Joe was in office. Way down.
People have noticed the lack of illegal immigrants hustling stolen goods from the sidewalks in N.Y. City. In many places the sidewalks are clean now.
The folks in Aurora, Colorado feel safer now that the gangs have been removed.
The family of Laken Riley are still dealing with their own loss as are the families of other victims of rape and murder.
Venezuelans especially, seem to have the propensity for rape and murder.