Regulations Keep Millions of Bedrooms Empty During a Housing Crisis
Zoning laws, occupancy limits, and short-term rental restrictions are keeping housing off the market and driving up costs.

The U.S. is facing a housing affordability crisis, and new data from Realtor.com highlight an often missed contributing factor: millions of empty bedrooms. Census data reveal 31.8 million "excess" bedrooms in American homes—compared to just 4 million in 1970. Overregulation, particularly in zoning and local occupancy laws, is among the culprits.
Realtor.com tries to put a positive spin on the bad news. We have, as they put it, a record number of potential "guest bedrooms." However, there are local barriers across the country that make that option difficult and sometimes illegal—as well as regulations that actually encourage the empty bedroom phenomenon.
To some extent, the "excess" is the result of broad social trends. Household size has been in a long-term decline, from 3.1 persons per household in 1970 to 2.5 in 2023. As Americans have become wealthier, they can afford bigger houses—and stay put even when their children move out.
But even if homeowners would like to make use of those "guest" rooms, they can run afoul of local laws. Research I conducted for the American Enterprise Institute found that in 23 of the 30 largest U.S. cities, there are laws that limit occupants deemed "unrelated," defining a "family" only as a group whose members are related by blood, marriage, or adoption. In St. Louis, no more than three unrelated persons may live together. In Sugar Land, Texas, the limit is four. Private homeowner associations may be even more strict. In the Chase Oaks Homeowners Association in Plano, Texas, a "household" can comprise no more than two unrelated persons, though there is an exception for live-in employees.
Those who would like to form a household of five single adults or multiple unmarried couples in order to share costs are not permitted to do so—no matter how many bedrooms are available. These relics stand in the way of allowing the widowed, divorced, and never-married to build households.
Short-term rental restrictions further exacerbate the problem. In New York, the nation's largest city, such restrictions require host owners to be present when rooms are rented—and for the renters to have access to the whole house. Airbnb has called this a "de facto" ban. San Francisco requires a $975 short-term rental registration fee and imposes a hotel-level room tax of 14 percent for "transient occupancy." These cities are taking steps to limit short-term rentals rather than encouraging them. This disadvantages homeowners struggling to make their mortgage payments who could otherwise avail themselves of an additional source of income.
According to Census data the number of "roomers and boarders" declined by at least 400,000 between 1970 and 2005. Restrictions on the "unrelated" are not the only culprits. Rent control laws—as in New York, where 960,000 apartments are price-regulated—have a similar effect. As a Brookings Institution report puts it, "Once a tenant has secured a rent-controlled apartment, he may not choose to move in the future and give up his rent control, even if his housing needs change." This "misallocation," is not without major consequences, Brookings continued, most notably "empty-nest households living in family-sized apartments and young families crammed into small studios."
The same is true of the over 3 million units of public and subsidized housing in the U.S., whose tenants are prohibited from taking in unrelated persons not on the lease—or are subject to a higher rent if formally adding another tenant. Data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development show that 17 percent of public and voucher housing tenants are "overhoused"—they have more bedrooms than tenants. In New York City, that number is estimated to be 30 percent of the 177,000 subsidized units.
The time when extended families lived under one roof may be in the past. However, there's no reason for local laws to stand in the way of living arrangements that allow the most efficient use of the housing we already have. It's time to rethink outdated housing laws and policies that force millions of bedrooms to remain empty. Reforming these regulations is a practical step toward easing the housing crisis without building a single new home.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What methodology was used to distinguish guest bedrooms from home offices and craft rooms and 'exercise rooms'?
If it has a door and a closet, it’s a bedroom.
Now move that crap out of there, as we have assigned a migrant to that room.
"?YOU? didn't build that! [WE] did!" - Obama. /s
"Regulations Keep Millions of Bedrooms Empty During a Housing Crisis."
Don't worry, folks.
Those same people who made those rules will still live comfortable in their million-dollar mansions.
Kulaks (the wreckers that they are) are a threat to civilization and enemies of the revolution!
Why would you want to? Those are all potential rooms available to be converted back (at the right price point) to guest rooms to help solve the housing "crisis".
That day FDR and the [D]-trifecta sold the criminalistic-mindset that their almighty Gov-'Guns' could make housing.
Turns out the only thing the 'Guns' could do was keep people out of housing and make it completely 'unaffordable' due to excessive STEALING.
America didn't spend 100+ years getting rid of boarding houses in order to bring back boarding houses
Think of the progress!
May 10, 2023 — New York City's vacant office space could fill 26.6 Empire State Buildings
and THE FOOL wants --- get this --- National Rent control.
Biden is an utterly monstrously incompetent lazy worthless sluggard.
Let me clarify this for the big brains at 'reason' -- a house is neither a hotel nor a homeless encampment. And did anybody bother to ask the neighbors what they think about bringing in god knows who? I mean, what could possibly go wrong? And no bedroom anywhere should be opened for business until 'reason' staffers put their money where their mouths are and start taking in illegal aliens (cough Fiona cough).
While I would support deregulation that allows people to rent out their spare bedrooms to think doing so would do anything more than a negligible to zero effect on housing is idiocy as most people don't want strangers living in their home. Most people when they get home from work don't want strangers in their living spaces. They want peace and quiet.
Btw eviction laws would need to be changed as well to make it easier to evict people in those spare rooms because nobody wants a tenant who has been evicted in their home for 24 hours let alone 30 days.
They start as strangers; doesn't everybody?
I get the distinct impression that the author is being very cagey in his word use here.
As Americans have become wealthier, they can afford bigger houses—and stay put even when their children move out.
The only people I've ever seen complain about this are Marxists.
If I want to live in a 30-room mansion, alone, and sleep in a different bedroom every night each month, is that some kind of issue for you?
If so, why?
I admit it : I didn't read a word of this.
I am tired by those who argue a major point with minor examples
NY has a housing shortage and a migrant problem and tons of folks leaving. BUT, says NY Times :
26 Empire State Buildings Could Fit Into New York’s Empty Office Space. That’s a Sign.