The Brutalist Is Great American Cinema
Architecture and ambition collide in Brady Corbet's post-war epic.

For the last decade or so, it has sometimes seemed as if Hollywood has lost its grandest ambition—not merely to entertain, provoke, or create art, but to pursue and portray America's national myths, to reflect the nation back on itself in new and revelatory ways. In 2024, however, we got two such attempts.
The first was aging legend Francis Ford Coppola's ill-conceived spectacle, Megalopolis, a movie that recast New York City as a modern vestige of the Roman Empire. Megalopolis was weird and wooden and flat-out bizarre in almost every aspect, but even in its failure, there was something vital about it, an urgency about taking life and society and the idea of the future seriously.
The second is The Brutalist, from the up-and-coming filmmaker Brady Corbet. Corbet is still in his 30s, and if The Brutalist is any indication, he has the sort of cinematic vitality that Coppola's self-financed flub demanded. Yes, unlike Coppola's sci-fi scenario, Corbet's film is a look back at America's post-war period, the story of a Hungarian Jewish immigrant who comes to America after losing much to the war. But it is also a movie with a relentless forward drive, about the power to transcend history and horrors, to forge one's own path and identity, even and perhaps especially in the shadow of trauma. It's a movie about artistic ambition and the will to create, and it's almost certainly the best movie of 2024.
The Brutalist draws its name from the school of mid-century architecture associated with sleek, imposing concrete block buildings. But it's also designed with a double meaning in mind, a reference to the succession of horrors and indignities faced by its title character, the fictional architect László Tóth (Adrien Brody). Tóth is a survivor of the Holocaust, and while he has made it to American soil, his wife remains in Europe, blocked by the labyrinth of immigration bureaucracy.
One way to look at the film is as a tale of immigrant grit and greatness. The movie opens with Tóth arriving in New York. Before he goes through customs, he stares up at the Statue of Liberty—only in Corbet's shaky, warped view, he sees it upside down.
The movie's question, then, is what one makes of life once arriving on U.S. soil. Using transportation funds provided by the government, Tóth makes his way to Philadelphia, where he has a cousin, Attila (Alessandro Nivola). Attila has opened a small furniture business, Miller and Sons, despite having no children, because, he says, the locals prefer a family business. He's changed his name, married an American woman, and he says he's Catholic—shedding his Jewish identity and replacing it with a sort of costume of Americana.
Tóth, in contrast, finds an opportunity to recreate America in his own image rather than the other way around. He's hired to install a library in the home of a local wealthy man, Harrison Lee Van Buren (Guy Pearce), who initially rejects the work. But after Look magazine gives the library space a glowing review, Van Buren returns to Tóth, engaging him for a much larger work: a community center in Doylestown, Pennsylvania.
The catch, it turns out, is that Tóth is expected to make the center reflect Christian identity, with a chapel and religious symbols, affirming their identity rather than his. And so he begins a long quest to build a structure that will reshape their world—but is, we discover, entirely intended as a monument to his own past, his own brokenness, his own grief, his own pain. He infuses his work with his own, deeply personal, almost cryptographic symbology.
Tóth's pain, however, is not merely a memory. Eventually, Tóth's wife and niece make it to the U.S., and it turns out that they, too, have been damaged by the war and its atrocities. His wife, Erzsébet (Felicity Jones), is wheelchair-bound thanks to osteoporosis induced by famine, and his niece Zsófia refuses to speak. Van Buren, meanwhile, continues to be a temperamental figure at best. He is eventually revealed to be something far worse, another brutality to be endured in a life that sometimes seems like nothing else.
Corbet and cinematographer Lol Crawley photographed The Brutalist in VistaVision, a process dating to the 1950s in which 35mm film stock is shot vertically to create a more imposing frame. In select markets, the film is being screened in 70mm, a larger film format designed to show off those enhanced images. The canisters for the 70mm print reportedly weigh upwards of 300 pounds, in part because the film is also more than three and a half hours long, including a 15-minute scheduled intermission with a countdown clock.
Even that intermission adds background detail to the story, for the clock counts down over a wedding photo from Tóth's pre-war days, showing the cosmopolitan life that was taken from him. The intermission is not just a break; it's a time to reflect on his loss, built into the structure of the filmgoing experience.
The literal weightiness, the length, the unusual cinematic process—they all add up to a demand to be taken seriously, and it might seem pompous or ridiculous, like Megalopolis, if it weren't so magnificent. In every shot, every line, every tiny interaction, every subtle detail, and grandiose image, The Brutalist is great American cinema.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sounds boring.
Suderman has shown he has shitty taste. Not a surprise.
I don't even know how the concept could have been greenlit considering how boring and empty the story sounds.
Bet you voted for Biden,
One of the Great Unifier's very first things in office, to annoy as many as he could , was this
President Biden Overturns Trump’s “Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture” Executive Order
A stupid, childish, venal fool is Biden
Let me get this straight
The hero of our story is commissioned to build something for a lot of money, and instead of following his commission, he subtly undermines and sabotages it.
The villain is the guy handsomely paying him, and probably rightly objects to the subterfuge?
I guess if a Christian contractor were hired to build a mosque or a Chabbad house and secretly put a bunch of crucifixes and illusions to his favorite football team in his work, he should be applauded
The villain also turns out to be a villain for real, if I read between the lines correctly, and has so little self-esteem that he lets others opinions on the architect's work overrule his own.
This sounds like a downer of a movie with no good guys at all. And at more than three and a half hours longs, it sounds like the director was more interested in wallowing in pessimism than telling a story anyone would want to see.
I am very shallow when it comes to watching movies. I want a story that grabs me instantly and carries me away from the here-and-now reality. That doesn't mean it should be empty of principle or meaning, but I don't like to be proselytized with a big hammer while being "entertained." My predilection has meant that I tend to avoid "heavy" movies, preferring fantasy and sci-fi as long as the quality of the story allows me to suspend my disbelief and doesn't go against the grain of the books that they're usually based upon. I prefer reading books to watching movies because of those factors and rarely find a movie that equals or improves upon my favorite books. Film has, therefore, been mostly a big disappointment to me.
Same here. Movies, books, stories in general, are either for entertainment or education. 3.5+ hours of self-pity is neither.
Watch SISU.
Brutalist architecture is anything but sleek.
Another boring, over long film that YOU HAVE TO LIKE because ITS IMPORTANT.
I will not see it but I will applaud it.
The movie is short compared to the lifetime I have had looking at ugly, heartless, soul-destroying public architecture.
President Biden Overturns Trump’s “Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture” Executive Order
If I didn't already loathe the man, this sealed it. only days in office and he has to do this ---with no reason given and nothing to offer in its stead. A sorry trivial soulless creep is Biden.
And I was not surprised to see what his wife considers aesthetically appropriate to Christmas. IF you don't find this ugly maybel you are too comfortable with ugliness in general
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/12/05/fashion/30JILL-BIDEN-XMAS-entrance/merlin_198531891_7047e8fa-d406-4a63-9e28-ce87d8273616-superJumbo.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp
This was an article on it from BRITAIN
Jill Biden's Christmas decor at White House dubbed as ugly, and fans beg for Melania to return soon