Seattle's Minimum Wage Hike Hurts Workers
Increasing the cost of labor decreases the quantity of labor demanded.

Seattle's minimum wage increased to $20.76 per hour on Wednesday, and at least one business has already closed because of it.
Seattle adopted the Minimum Wage Ordinance in June 2014, amending the city's municipal code to implement yearly increases from January 1, 2016, through January 1, 2025. The law distinguished "Schedule 1" employers, which have more than 500 employees, from "Schedule 2" employers, which have 500 or fewer. Until last Wednesday, the ordinance allowed the second group, but not the first, to meet its compensation requirement through tax-preferred contributions to employee medical plans rather than direct wage increases. This created an incentive for firms not to hire more than 500 employees.
Counting medical benefits toward the compensation requirement also encouraged employers to pay employees in-kind (to the extent that that's feasible). That is less efficient for everyone: If workers just got cash instead, they could spend it on whatever they value most highly—maybe a health care plan, or maybe something else.
The ordinance was pitched as a way to reduce income inequality, but a 2021 study by the Evans School of Public Policy & Governance at the University of Washington found that that's not what happened. The study found "no evidence to suggest…that Seattle's minimum wage lowered the overall level of earnings inequality across all workers in the city." In fact, earnings inequality "substantially widened" from 2014 to 2017.
The latest hike will further exacerbate both income inequality and unemployment. As the cost to small businesses of hiring minimum-wage employees increases by anywhere from 4 to 20 percent, many will respond by either firing employees or closing entirely. Already, Corina Lukenbach's Bebop Waffle Shop has responded to the new rules by shutting down. Don't be surprised if more follow.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That one business that folded, would that be the one run by the supporter of the bill, who claims she still supports it?
Why, yes it would be!
https://notthebee.com/article/seattle-breakfast-stop-shuts-door-after-minimum-wage-increase
Corina Luckenbach still supports the minimum wage law, despite being put out of business by it.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DCO9Ziqv9kU/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=85035d0c-380c-4417-8041-1591d9fd1fbb
I hate to close a safe space for queer people at this time but the money just isn’t there after the minimum wage increase (which I fully support).
My hope as a boss has been that every employee leaves better than when they started and breaking the news to them split my heart. MANY people are asking how to support me during this transition and all I ask is come TIP my staff, pay in CASH, tip in CASH buy all our merch, lobby for tax breaks for small businesses AND BOOK the space when we open. Tell everyone you know, send money via Venmo @bebopwaffleshop I’ll need to raise money, so stay tuned for that. Make all your spaces inclusive, your lgbtq and trans neighbors need you. AND thank you for supporting my art, my vision, my heart and my family.
Some people deserve whatever they get. Good and hard.
Yep that cunt was solely responsible for the safety of the faggots in seattle
If she was a conservative or god help her a Republican this would be spun as 'local business owner wants queer people to be unable to find jobs'.
Residents of Seattle are increasingly unlikely to tip, given the new minimum wage laws.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/12/29/why-residents-in-seattle-refuse-to-tip-n2649720
According to a Daily Mail report, residents in the Democrat-run city feel it is unnecessary to tip service workers. The minimum wage will increase from $19.97 to $20.76 an hour on January 1, 2025. Seattle’s Minimum Wage Ordinance requires the wage rate to reflect the city's inflation rise.
One Reddit user said they are “done tipping 10-20 percent come January 1st,” while another person claimed that with the minimum wage hike, food industry workers have “finally reach[ed] a level playing field.”
“With Seattle’s new minimum wage going into effect really soon, most food industry workers are finally reaching a level playing field. As a result, I’ll no longer be tipping more than 5-10%. And I’m ONLY doing that if service is EXCEPTIONAL,” another person said.
“Any instance where I am ordering busing my own table, getting my own utensils, etc warrants $0. I also am not tipping at coffee shops anymore,” another user wrote.
Seattle’s minimum wage ordinance was designed to ensure a “living wage” for all workers, including service workers. However, the city’s push for higher minimum wages has had unintended consequences. Consumers are voicing frustration over "tipping fatigue," which is made worse by "tipflation," as suggested gratuities climb alongside wage increases.
I have reduced my tipping significantly. Counter-service restaurants automatically suggest a 20% tip as the minimum-- for counter service food. I always select 'custom' and do $1. I'll still tip the usual 15% for sit-down restaurants, but I visit those much less frequently.
I don't tip at McDonalds, and now that restaurant workers there are making the same wage as everyone else the idea anyone should tip them is absurd.
We no longer go to Seattle for any reason. Even the traffic through Seattle is so dangerous that we avoid trips south now. Stage one of the deterioration of high-population urban centers was the stranglehold of public employee unions on the despotic and corrupt governments needed to maintain the bare minimum of infrastructure required for people to survive. Stage 2 was the increasing failure of even that concentration of power to successfully maintain the infrastructure, followed by decay, conservative flight, murderous law enforcement crackdowns and psychotic homeless violence and an accelerating downward spiral.
And then there are the negatives.
We used to go over for opening day of the Mariners, but we generally stay in North Bend and take the train to Safeco.
And when I was stationed at Ft Lewis we cut through Puyallup and come out of the pass when we head back to Idaho on a pass or leave.
Which minimum wage hike? The one that went to $15? Or the one that went to $17? Or wait, no the one that went to $18... or no... you're talking about the one that went to $19... or oh, you're talking about the one that went over $20.
Seattle's Minimum Wage Hike Hurts Workers
This is exactly what should happen.
The ordinance was pitched as a way to reduce income inequality
Why is income inequality a bad thing?
In an ideal world, everyone from a dishwasher to the most successful brain surgeon, will make the same income.
Sweet. I will never aspire to anything beyond washing dishes. Why bother.
Aspirations are racist.
I'm told there's a pod for me, and I'll love it.
I would gladly be a dishwasher for a surgeon's salary. Sadly, the real effect would be to have surgeon's end up paid a dish-washer's salary.
This is something Star Trek (especially TNG) never addressed in the supposed post capitalist, post monetary compensation world. Why would I risk my life exploring space if I'm not paid for it? Why would I do the back breaking work of farming or cooking or janitorial work, if I'm not compensated for it? Etc. Yeah, you can replicate food, but that still takes energy someone has to create (and we know from the different series that people still farm, run vineyards, clean, run restaurants etc). And well it's not well addressed (except for Chief O'Brien) there are enlisted in Star Fleet, so if you really wanted to explore, why go to four years of Star Fleet Academy when you can just enlist?
Unless it's everyone has a career chip ala Futurama that is never mentioned in the books, shows or movies. Yeah it sucks but you're career is to be a sewage maintenance tech but you don't get paid for it.
They do address it, but it involves a fundamental shift in ethos for basically all of humanity after World War 3. It's not realistic or plausible, but that's never been a problem for Star Trek. I don't even know how many time lines there are now, nor do I care.
I was never all that taken with their explanation, it seemed pretty thin. They don't mention how people choose their careers etc. just that money doesn't matter anymore and people work for the betterment of mankind, but that doesn't explain a lot. Are their vast population of unemployed in the federation, who aren't smart enough for glamorous work and don't want to do the drudge work that keeps society functioning? And we know some humans do still value money, they work for alien species that still have money, etc. And there's criminals, etc. So, the explanation is not well thought out.
That's a good question and one I have never heard a good answer to. Every human society, down to a tribal village of 100 people has inequality. High inequality can be a symptom of a corrupt or badly run system. Or it can be a symptom of a highly productive society generating lots of wealth. In the latter case, poor people are generally better off than ever in human history.
I know, right? It's like there's a thing called "value" and it has a definition.
...and Gov-Gun forcing Seattle product to cost everyone else outside of Seattle more $.
These are the 'Gun' end-games of Socialism ... "Who gets the last twinkie" battles.
Put in place by the 'Guns' make sh*t mentality (socialist criminals).
Every historical account of genocide, every poverty stricken community, every crime-infestation *ALL* started with the BS belief that 'Guns' (Gov-Guns) could made sh*t for them.
The only humanitarian tool a political 'Gun' can provide is to ensure Individual Liberty and Justice for all. 'Guns' don't make sh*t!
The ordinance was pitched as a way to reduce income inequality, but a 2021 study by the Evans School of Public Policy & Governance at the University of Washington found that that's not what happened. The study found "no evidence to suggest…that Seattle's minimum wage lowered the overall level of earnings inequality across all workers in the city." In fact, earnings equality "substantially widened" from 2014 to 2017.
No shit.
The bottom of the workforce, you know the most 'unequal', is going to get laid off as they aren't worth the new wage (or the business just can't afford to pay morons for moron work) thus formerly employed morons are now unemployed morons.
Furthermore, as the minimum wage rises to encompass what was skilled labor before, the wages for those skilled workers must also go up because those workers are more valuable thus must be paid more than the burger flipper at the local McDonalds. For example, an EMT that puts up with a heinous amount of shit at their job might not continue being an EMT if they are now paid the same as a cashier at a Lowes. They could just go be a cashier at Lowes and have a much lower stress level and still have the same income.
The old adage of 'the real minimum wage is zero' still applies, although I'm sure transfer payments are their solution to this self-inflicted problem.
This is why we need more immigrants. Who's going to work under the table for no benefits?
Only immigrants can work under the table?
And porn stars.
I know the answer. Universal basic income. Let's just pay people to exist, regardless of their social/economic/cultural value.
And make it inversely proportional to their income tax! The more valuable they are, they more we tax them! The less valuable they are, the less!
That's the way to prosperity and cultural growth!
I think I read a book about this one. Maybe it was just a bunch of maps. *shrug*
I know this is sarcasm and snark, which is totally appropriate for these morons, but you aren't wrong that they think doubling down on transfer payments is some kind of 'solution' even though it's literally part of the problem.
Setting a wage floor for everyone, working or not, is not going to solve their 'inflation' problem that's driving demand for higher wages from workers, it will make it much worse and no one serious thinks otherwise.
All they are effectively doing is moving the window, which in no conceivable universe will have any positive effect on 'inequality' but it will crash their economy for everyone. The bigger the increase on their minimum wage, the more workers will be displaced from the workforce entirely. That can have no other effect but to increase the supposed income equality gap which is, of course, a pointless measure in the first place.
Those few who benefit from the minimum wage increase will be happy in the short term, but the people who aren't able to get any wage will not be. In the long term, neither of them will be happy since prices will rise and even the beneficiaries will be back right where they started in terms of actual purchasing power.
To say nothing of the fact that when a Mars Bar costs $0.50, and suddenly Mars Inc. knows you were just gifted $20.00 - well, they know you can pay a little bit more for that Mars Bar, can't you. You want it, they know you want it, and they know you can pay for it at a "slightly higher" price. Value hasn't changed, just your amount of discretionary income.
And boy do those folks gifted with free money want a Mars Bar.
That's irrelevant for the most part since Mars is now paying more in labor costs, a lot more, so the cost increase on that candy bar is inevitable and it won't mean increased profit for Mars.
This is a simplistic analysis since the minimum wage is not the same across the whole United States and interstate commerce is a thing, but I'm honestly not going to bother doing that analysis without being paid for it.
ISWYDT.
Did this story involve the crew of a hijacked Martian gunship by any chance?
The writers did go into the dangers of a UBI pretty in depth in the latter books of the series (although Amazon didn't so much in their adaptation).
They do show that Earth is basically a junk heap and most citizens are basically homeless welfare recipients but it was at best a few throwaway lines and maybe hand full of scenes in the show.
Of course, the main protagonist was not from that group of Earthers.
This is simply not true because you left out half of the people who want minimum wage jobs. Although it's true that many people doing menial jobs don't have the ability to do anything else to earn a living, many if not most are young people who want flexible hours or some spending money for part-time work while they are studying to enter a better career. So not only is the minimum wage tactic itself flawed, it's not even based on an unflawed premise of mandating a "living wage."
Yeah, not everyone needs a "living wage". Not every job supports a family of 4. Young people get especially screwed by shit like this. And retirees who just want something to do. Who wants to hire some unskilled 16 year old if you have to pay them that much? And then they can't have any income and never learn how to work and end up crying on ticktock when they realize that work is actually hard sometimes and if you want to make money you sometimes have to do things that aren't fun.
It's hard to suss out what you're trying to say here.
If a 'young person' with zero work experience can do the job, the job isn't worth $20 an hour AKA $41,600 before taxes per year assuming 40 hour work weeks. In fact, that's pretty close to the minimum to be considered a salaried exempt employee in 2025 ($58,656) which was just raised from a cap of $43,888 which is really damn close.
“Increasing the cost of labor decreases the quantity of labor demanded.”
I wonder if the inverse of this is also true…
Isn't that one of the arguments against immigration?
Starting with the prejudice that only/all immigrants work.
Which is complete BS.
Yes, Increasing the quantity of labor (especially in regards to low skilled workers) decreasing the cost of labor is indeed an argument against mass immigration (or at least mass illegal immigration).
It’s totally understandable from a business perspective to try and reduce labor costs, but it doesn’t work out so great for the people competing for those jobs. Much like the increases of the minimum wage.
On the pluse side humans don't live in Seattle
'Increasing the cost of labor decreases the quantity of labor demanded.'
What about the quantity of labor mandated by the next generation of compassionate progressive officials? Minimum wage plus minimum work time yields worker paradise 2.0.
ps. And don't even think about reducing staff.
Slaves didn't know how great they had it with permanent mandatory employment.
-Progressives, probably.
Worth $20 an hour minimum wage...